Objectives The study sought to evaluate and compare the maternal and fetal outcomes of pregnancy in women with sickle cell disease (SCD) versus healthy pregnant women in Bahrain. The objective was to update the available data in order to come up with a strategy to implement a multidisciplinary management program, which will enhance pregnancy outcomes for the SCD patient population. Materials and methods This retrospective case-control study was conducted in the Obstetrics and Gynecology Department at Salmaniya Medical Complex (SMC) in Bahrain. The study group consisted of all pregnant women with homozygous SCD (HbSS) who delivered at SMC between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2021. The control group comprised pregnant women who delivered at SMC during the same period but did not have SCD or trait. Data for the study were collected from the healthcare system records at SMC, specifically the I-Seha electronic medical record system and the labor room registry book. A thorough review and analysis of the data were conducted, encompassing 217 cases of SCD and 200 controls. The variables examined included nationality, age, gravidity, parity, gestational age, reason for admission, antenatal/postnatal complications (such as urinary tract infection, pneumonia, acute chest syndrome, thromboembolism, premature rupture of membranes, hypertension, pre-eclampsia, and intrauterine growth restriction), type of delivery, birth weight, newborn outcome, and postnatal complications. Results Pregnant women with SCD experienced significantly higher rates of antenatal hospitalization compared to controls - 69.6% were admitted at least twice versus only 16.5%. Vaso-occlusive crises were the primary reason for admission in over half of SCD patients, with 22.6% having one episode, 11.1% having two, and 20.3% having more than two during pregnancy. Low hemoglobin levels also necessitated admission in 11.1% of SCD women, while no controls required hospitalization for this. The burden of maternal morbidity was substantially greater in the SCD group, with only 20.3% free of complications versus 94% in controls. SCD women had elevated rates of blood transfusions, acute chest syndrome, and urinary tract infections. Adverse pregnancy outcomes were also more common, including higher risks of preterm birth, low birth weight, and intrauterine growth restriction. Despite these increased maternal and fetal risks, there was no significant difference in the incidence of hypertensive disorders between groups. Interestingly, our data showed a significantly lower incidence of gestational diabetes in the SCD group compared to controls (8.3% vs. 18%). Tragically, one maternal death occurred in the SCD group, although the overall maternal mortality did not differ significantly. Conclusion SCD poses substantial risks for mother and fetus. Careful monitoring with a multidisciplinary team and patient education are crucial. Early detection can reduce morbidity and mortality. Further research is needed on interventions to improve outcomes.

BACKGROUND: There is an emerging need to systematically investigate the causes for the increased cesarean section rates in Greece and undertake interventions so as to substantially reduce its rates. To this end, the ability of the participating Greek obstetricians to follow evidence-based guidelines and respond to other educational and behavioral interventions while managing labor will be explored, along with barriers and enablers. Herein discussed is the protocol of a stepped-wedge designed intervention trial in Greek maternity units with the aforementioned goals in mind, named ENGAGE (ENhancinG vAGinal dElivery in Greece).
METHODS: Twenty-two selected maternity units in Greece will participate in a multicenter stepped-wedge randomized prospective trial involving 20,000 to 25,000 births, with two of them entering the intervention period of the study each month (stepped randomization). The maternity care units entering the study will apply the suggested interventions for a period of 8-18 months depending on the time they enter the intervention stage of the study. There will also be an initial phase of the study lasting from 8 to 18 months including observation and recording of the routine practice (cesarean section, vaginal birth, and maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality) in the participating units. The second phase, the intervention period, will include such interventions as the application of the HSOG (the Hellenic Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology) Guidelines on labor management, training on the correct interpretation of cardiotocography, and dealing with emergencies in vaginal deliveries, while the steering committee members will be available to discuss and implement organizational and behavioral changes, answer questions, clarify relevant issues, and provide practical instructions to the participating healthcare professionals during regular visits or video conferences. Furthermore, during the study, the results will be available for the participating units in order for them to monitor their own performance while also receiving feedback regarding their rates. Τhe final 2-month phase of the study will be devoted to completing follow-up questionnaires with data concerning maternal and neonatal morbidities that occurred after the completion of the intervention period. The total duration of the study is estimated at 28 months. The primary outcome assessed will be the cesarean section rate change and the secondary outcomes will be maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: The study is expected to yield new information on the effects, advantages, possibilities, and challenges of consistent clinical engagement and implementation of behavioral, educational, and organizational interventions described in detail in the protocol on cesarean section practice in Greece. The results may lead to new insights into means of improving the quality of maternal and neonatal care, particularly since this represents a shared effort to reduce the high cesarean section rates in Greece and, moreover, points the way to their reduction in other countries.
BACKGROUND: NCT04504500 (ClinicalTrials.gov). The trial was prospectively registered. Ethics Reference No: 320/23.6.2020, Bioethics and Conduct Committee, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.

BACKGROUND: As utilization of individual antenatal care (I-ANC) has increased throughout sub-Saharan Africa, questions have arisen about whether individual versus group-based care might yield better outcomes. We implemented a trial of group-based antenatal care (G-ANC) to determine its impact on birth preparedness and complication readiness (BPCR) among pregnant women in Ghana.
METHODS: We conducted a cluster randomized controlled trial comparing G-ANC to routine antenatal care in 14 health facilities in the Eastern Region of Ghana. We recruited women in their first trimester to participate in eight two-hour interactive group sessions throughout their pregnancies. Meetings were facilitated by midwives trained in G-ANC methods, and clinical assessments were conducted in addition to group discussions and activities. Data were collected at five timepoints, and results are presented comparing baseline (T0) to 34 weeks\' gestation to 3 weeks post-delivery (T1) for danger sign recognition, an 11-point additive scale of BPCR, as well as individual items comprising the scale.
RESULTS: 1285 participants completed T0 and T1 assessments (N = 668 I-ANC, N = 617, G-ANC). At T1, G-ANC participants were able to identify significantly more pregnancy danger signs than I-ANC participants (mean increase from 1.8 to 3.4 in G-ANC vs. 1.7 to 2.2 in I-ANC, p < 0.0001). Overall BPCR scores were significantly greater in the G-ANC group than the I-ANC group. The elements of BPCR that showed the greatest increases included arranging for emergency transport (I-ANC increased from 1.5 to 11.5% vs. G-ANC increasing from 2 to 41% (p < 0.0001)) and saving money for transportation (19-32% in the I-ANC group vs. 19-73% in the G-ANC group (p < 0.0001)). Identifying someone to accompany the woman to the facility rose from 1 to 3% in the I-ANC group vs. 2-20% in the G-ANC group (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: G-ANC significantly increased BPCR among women in rural Eastern Region of Ghana when compared to routine antenatal care. Given the success of this intervention, future efforts that prioritize the implementation of G-ANC are warranted.
BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04033003 (25/07/2019).
UNASSIGNED: Protocol Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9508671/ .

OBJECTIVE: To study neonatal and maternal outcomes associated with routine maneuvers in breech vaginal delivery at term.
METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of the multicenter PREMODA observational prospective study in France and Belgium. We included women with vaginal breech delivery, excluding those who underwent maneuvers to resolve a dystocic delivery. Maternal data and characteristics of labor, in addition to neonatal and maternal outcomes, were recorded. We defined two groups according to mode of delivery; breech vaginal delivery with or without routine maneuvers, and we compared the variables between the groups. To assess the factors associated with adverse perinatal outcomes, a multivariate logistic regression with adjustment for confounders was performed.
RESULTS: Of the 2502 women with planned vaginal deliveries, 1794 were delivered vaginally, 606 of whom were excluded from the study due to maneuvers performed for dystocia. A total of 25 other patients were excluded as a result of missing data. A total of 537 women were included in the routine maneuvers group and 626 women in the no maneuvers group. Adverse perinatal outcome was similar for the two groups (4.5% vs 5.0%, P = 0.65) and no neonatal deaths were reported. Third degree perineal tear and postpartum hemorrhage >1 L rates were comparable for the two groups. After adjustment, the factors associated with adverse perinatal outcomes were primiparity and birth weight <2500 g.
CONCLUSIONS: Routine maneuvers were not associated with an increase in neonatal morbidity in our population.

UNASSIGNED: Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is defined by the World Health Organization as blood loss of ≥500 mL within 24 h of delivery. Globally, hemorrhage accounts for 27.1% of maternal deaths, making it the leading direct cause of maternal death. PPH has been identified in more than two-thirds of reported hemorrhage-related deaths, causing 38% of maternal deaths in India. Tranexamic acid, an antifibrinolytic, has been used to control bleeding after PPH is identified.
UNASSIGNED: Antenatal women admitted for elective cesarean section were randomized into two arms: the case group (received one gram of tranexamic acid 20 min prior to skin incision) and the control group (received a placebo), each group consisting of 36 participants. Clinical Trials Registry - India (CTRI) registration number - CTRI/2021/02/031579.
UNASSIGNED: The mean (±standard deviation [SD]) intraoperative blood loss in the case group was 241.25 (±67.83) mL, and in the control group, it was 344.92 (±146.67) mL (P = 0.001), while postoperative blood loss did not differ significantly between the groups (P = 0.1470). In terms of the difference in hemoglobin, there was a significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.001). No significant maternal or neonatal side effects were found.
UNASSIGNED: Preoperative tranexamic acid, when given in elective cesarean section, significantly reduces intraoperative blood loss.

We used National Birth Defects Prevention Study data to investigate associations between working patterns shortly before and during pregnancy and gestational diabetes and pregnancy-related hypertension. We analyzed working patterns (multiple-job holders, job changers, single-job holders) during the three months before and during pregnancy for 8140 participants who delivered a live-born child without a birth defect. \"Multiple-job holders\" worked more than one job simultaneously, \"job changers\" worked more than one job with no overlap, and \"single-job holders\" (referent) worked one job. We used multivariable logistic regression to estimate associations between working pattern and each outcome, adjusting for maternal age and educational attainment at delivery. We explored effect measure modification by household income, peak weekly working hours, and maternal race/ethnicity. Multiple-job holders had higher odds of gestational diabetes (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.5; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1-2.1) and pregnancy-related hypertension (aOR: 1.5; 95% CI: 1.0-2.2) compared with single-job holders. Multiple-job holders with a household income of more than 30,000 USD per year, 32-44 peak weekly working hours, and from racial/ethnic minority groups had higher odds of gestational diabetes compared with single-job holders in respective categories. Detailed occupational information is important for studies of occupation and maternal health.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the frequency of uterine ruptures, clinical characteristics, and maternal and neonatal outcomes in a tertiary referral center.
METHODS: Information on complete uterine rupture between July 2010 and June 2022 was investigated retrospectively at a tertiary center.
RESULTS: There were 42 cases of complete uterine rupture in 144 474 deliveries, with an incidence rate of 0.029%. Twenty-seven cases had a scarred uterus and 15 had an unscarred uterus; Rupture of the lower uterine segment was predominant in the scarred uterus, whereas rupture of the body of the uterus was predominant in the non-scarred uterus (P ≤ 0.001). Newborns with Apgar score of 7 or less at 1 min in the non-scarred uterus group was more than that in the scarred uterus group (P = 0.001). There were no significant differences in the history of gynecologic surgery, induction of labor, mode of delivery, clinical features, maternal outcomes, neonatal weight, preterm birth rate, 5-min Apgar score, or neonatal mortality between the two groups (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The clinical manifestations of uterine rupture are mainly abdominal pain, abnormal fetal heartbeat, or vaginal bleeding. Attention should also be paid to the history of previous uterine surgery. Strict prenatal management, early identification, and aggressive management can help improve maternal and child outcomes. Hysterectomy is not imperative.

BACKGROUND: Birthing people with de novo postpartum hypertensive disorders continue to be among the populations at highest risk for severe maternal morbidity. Randomized controlled trials demonstrate a benefit of oral loop diuretics in decreasing postpartum hypertensive morbidity in patients with an antenatal diagnosis of preeclampsia. It is not known whether this same therapy benefits patients at risk for new-onset postpartum hypertension.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate whether oral furosemide can reduce the risk for de novo postpartum hypertension among high-risk birthing people by reducing postdelivery blood pressure.
METHODS: From October 2021 to April 2022, we conducted a randomized triple-masked placebo-controlled clinical trial of individuals at high risk for de novo postpartum hypertension at a single university-based tertiary care medical center. A total of 82 postpartum patients with no antenatal diagnosis of chronic hypertension or a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy who were at high risk for the development of de novo postpartum hypertension based on a prespecified risk factor algorithm were enrolled after childbirth. The participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to a 5-day course of 20-mg oral furosemide daily or identical-appearing placebo starting within 8 hours of delivery. Participants were followed for 6 weeks postpartum using Bluetooth-enabled remote blood pressure monitoring and electronic surveys. The primary outcome was mean arterial pressure averaged over the 24 hours before discharge or the 24 hours before antihypertensive therapy initiation. The study was powered to detect a 5 mm Hg difference in average mean arterial pressure (standard deviation, 6.4 mm Hg) with 90% power at an alpha of 0.05, requiring a sample size of 41 per group. Secondary outcomes included the rate of de novo postpartum hypertension, readmission data, other measures of hypertensive and maternal morbidity, breastfeeding data, and drug-related neonatal outcomes.
RESULTS: The primary outcome was assessed in 80 of the 82 participants. Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. There was no significant difference in average mean arterial pressure in the 24 hours before discharge (or antihypertensive initiation) in the furosemide group (88.9±7.4 mm Hg) compared with the placebo group (86.8±7.1 mm Hg; absolute difference, 2.1 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval, -1.2 to 5.3). Of the 79 participants for whom secondary outcomes were assessed, 10% (n=8) developed de novo postpartum hypertension and 9% (n=7) were initiated on antihypertensive therapy. Rates were not significantly different between the groups (P=.71 and P>.99, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: De novo postpartum hypertension is a common phenomenon among at-risk patients, warranting close monitoring for severe hypertension and other maternal morbidity. There is insufficient evidence to suggest that furosemide reduces average mean arterial pressure in the 24 hours before discharge from the delivery hospitalization (or antihypertensive medication initiation) compared with placebo.

BACKGROUND: Relaparotomy following a cesarean delivery (CD) is an infrequent complication, with inconsistency regarding risk factors and indications for its occurrence. We therefore aimed to determine risk factors and indications for a relaparotomy following a CD at a single large tertiary center.
METHODS: A retrospective case-control single-center study (2013-2023). We identified all women who had a relaparotomy up to six weeks following a CD (study group). Maternal characteristics, obstetrical and surgical data were compared to a control group in a 1:2 ratio. Controls were women with a CD before and immediately after each case in the study group, who did not undergo a relaparotomy. Included were CDs occurring after 24 gestational weeks. CD performed at different centers and indications for repeat surgery unrelated to the primary surgery (e.g., appendicitis) were excluded. Logistic regression was used to adjust for potential confounders.
RESULTS: During the study period, 131,268 women delivered at our institution. Of them, 28,280 (21.5%) had a CD, and 130 patients (0.46%) underwent a relaparotomy. Relaparotomies following a CD occurred during the first 24 h, the first week, and beyond the first week, in 59.2%, 33.1%, and 7.7% of cases, respectively. In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, relaparotomy was significantly associated with Mullerian anomalies (aOR 3.33, 95%CI 1.08-10.24, p = 0.036); uterine fibroids (aOR 3.17, 95%CI 1.11-9.05,p = 0.031); multiple pregnancy (aOR 4.1, 95%CI 1.43-11.79,p = 0.009); hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (aOR 3.46, 95%CI 1.29-9.3,p = 0.014); CD during the second stage of labor (aOR 2.54, 95%CI 1.15-5.88, p = 0.029); complications during CD (aOR 1.62, 95%CI 1.09-3.21,p = 0.045); and excessive bleeding during CD or implementation of bleeding control measures (use of tranexamic acid, a hemostatic agent, or a surgical drain) (aOR 2.23, 95%CI 1.29-4.12,p = 0.012). Indications for relaparotomy differed depending on the time elapsed from the CD, with suspected intra-abdominal bleeding (36.1%) emerging as the primary indication within the initial 24 h.
CONCLUSIONS: We detected several pregnancy, intrapartum, and intra-operative risk factors for the need for relaparotomy following a CD. Practitioners may utilize these findings to proactively identify women at risk, thereby potentially reducing their associated morbidity.

Trial of labor after cesarean after 2 cesarean deliveries is linked to a lower success rate of vaginal delivery and higher rates of adverse obstetrical outcomes than trial of labor after cesarean after 1 previous cesarean delivery.
This study aimed to investigate the factors associated with failed trial of labor after cesarean among women with 2 previous cesarean deliveries.
This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study, which included all women with singleton pregnancies attempting trial of labor after cesarean after 2 previous cesarean deliveries between 2003 and 2021. This study compared labor, maternal, and neonatal characteristics between women with failed trial of labor after cesarean and those with successful trial of labor after cesarean. Univariate analysis was initially performed, followed by multivariable analysis (adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals).
The study included a total of 1181 women attempting trial of labor after cesarean after 2 previous cesarean deliveries. Among these cases, vaginal birth after cesarean was achieved in 973 women (82.4%). Women with failed trial of labor after cesarean had higher rates of maternal and neonatal morbidities. Several factors were found to be associated with failed trial of labor after cesarean, including longer interpregnancy and interdelivery intervals, lower gravidity and parity, lower rates of previous successful vaginal delivery, smoking, earlier gestational age at delivery (38.3±2.1 vs 39.5±1.3 weeks), late preterm delivery (34-37 weeks of gestation), lower cervical dilation on admission, no use of epidural, and smaller neonatal birthweight. Our multivariable model revealed that late preterm delivery (adjusted odds ratio, 3.79; 95% confidence interval, 1.37-10.47) and cervical dilation on admission for labor <3 cm (adjusted odds ratio, 2.58; 95% confidence interval, 1.47-4.54) were associated with higher odds of failed trial of labor after cesarean.
In the investigated population of women with 2 previous cesarean deliveries undergoing trial of labor after cesarean, admission at the late preterm period with a cervical dilation of <3 cm, which reflects the latent phase, may elevate the risk of failed trial of labor after cesarean and a repeated intrapartum cesarean delivery.