Maternal morbidity

产妇发病率
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    为了克服纸张的缺点,加强分娩和分娩期间的护理,改善记录保存,帮助决策,一些国家已经专注于采用低成本的数字应用。此范围审查重点介绍了数字模式在产科护理中的可用性和现状。我们进行了彻底的搜索,涉及数据库ScienceDirect,PubMed,和谷歌学者通过使用关键词“partograph”,从开始到2023年9月进行相关研究\"电子\",和“产科”以及布尔运算符“AND”和“OR”。根据选择标准,该综述包括25项研究,这些研究探索了电子分娩图(e-partographs)在产科护理中的应用。大多数研究检查了效率,并报告了与纸质句图相比的电子句图的有效性。e-partograph还显示出明显的好处,因为医疗保健提供者填写了数据,并放置了一个提醒机制,这可能有助于确定分娩过程是否正常或需要更多护理。此外,对于产科护理人员来说,电子产图易于采用和使用,并且有可能节省时间.总而言之,数字Partograph产生优于纸质Partograph的结果。使用电子产图仪可以使分娩保持在正轨上,同时降低剖宫产和长期分娩的需求。e-partograph为其用户提供了基本的好处,并且还提供了具有听觉和视觉提示的警告系统,可用于检测交付过程中的困难。
    To overcome shortcomings of the paper partograph, enhance care during labor and delivery, improve record keeping, and help decision-making, several countries have focused on adopting low-cost digital applications. This scoping review highlights the usability and current status of the digital partogram in obstetric care. We conducted a thorough search involving the databases ScienceDirect, PubMed, and Google Scholar for relevant studies from inception till September 2023 by using the keywords \"partograph\", \"electronic\", and \"obstetric\" as well as the Boolean operators \"AND\" and \"OR\". Based on the selection criteria, 25 studies exploring the application of electronic partographs (e-partographs) in obstetric care were included in the review. The majority of the studies examined the efficiency and reported the effectiveness of e-partographs in comparison to paper partographs. The e-partograph has also demonstrated a clear benefit in that the healthcare providers filled out the data, and a reminder mechanism was placed, which might help determine whether the labor process was normal or needed more care. Moreover, an e-partograph was simple to adopt and use for obstetric caregivers and had the potential to save time. To sum up, digital partograph produces superior results to paper partograph. The use of an e-partograph can keep deliveries on track while lowering the need for cesarean sections and prolonged labor. The e-partograph provides essential benefits to its users and also provides a warning system with audible and visual cues that might be utilized to detect difficulties during delivery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:精神健康障碍是孕产妇死亡的头号原因,也是孕产妇发病率的重要原因。这项范围审查旨在了解怀孕和分娩期间社会背景与经历之间的关联,胁迫和风化的生物学指标,围产期情绪和焦虑症(PMAD)。方法:使用PRISMA-ScR指导和JBI范围审查方法进行范围审查。搜索在OVIDMedline和Embase中进行。结果:这篇综述确定了74篇合格的英语同行评审的原始研究文章。大多数研究报告了社会背景之间的显著关联,产前负面和紧张的经历,和更高的发病率的诊断和症状的PMAD。纳入的研究报告了产后抑郁和产前应激源之间的显著关联(n=17),社会经济劣势(n=14),负出生经历(n=9),产科暴力(n=3),和产妇护理提供者的虐待(n=3)。出生相关的创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)与负出生经历呈正相关(n=11),产科暴力(n=1),产妇护理团队的虐待(n=1),社会经济劣势(n=2),和产前压力(n=1);与产妇护理团队的支持(n=5)和分娩伴侣或导乐的存在(n=4)呈负相关。产后焦虑与阴性分娩经历(n=2)和产前压力(n=3)显着相关。与压力和风化的生物标志物之间的关联相关的发现,围产期暴露,和PMADs(n=14)具有混合意义。结论:产后心理健康结局与产前社会背景以及怀孕和分娩期间与产妇护理团队的互动有关。适当的产妇护理有可能减少不良的产后心理健康结果,特别是受系统压迫的人。
    Background: Mental health disorders are the number one cause of maternal mortality and a significant maternal morbidity. This scoping review sought to understand the associations between social context and experiences during pregnancy and birth, biological indicators of stress and weathering, and perinatal mood and anxiety disorders (PMADs). Methods: A scoping review was performed using PRISMA-ScR guidance and JBI scoping review methodology. The search was conducted in OVID Medline and Embase. Results: This review identified 74 eligible English-language peer-reviewed original research articles. A majority of studies reported significant associations between social context, negative and stressful experiences in the prenatal period, and a higher incidence of diagnosis and symptoms of PMADs. Included studies reported significant associations between postpartum depression and prenatal stressors (n = 17), socioeconomic disadvantage (n = 14), negative birth experiences (n = 9), obstetric violence (n = 3), and mistreatment by maternity care providers (n = 3). Birth-related post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) was positively associated with negative birth experiences (n = 11), obstetric violence (n = 1), mistreatment by the maternity care team (n = 1), socioeconomic disadvantage (n = 2), and prenatal stress (n = 1); and inverse association with supportiveness of the maternity care team (n = 5) and presence of a birth companion or doula (n = 4). Postpartum anxiety was significantly associated with negative birth experiences (n = 2) and prenatal stress (n = 3). Findings related to associations between biomarkers of stress and weathering, perinatal exposures, and PMADs (n = 14) had mixed significance. Conclusions: Postpartum mental health outcomes are linked with the prenatal social context and interactions with the maternity care team during pregnancy and birth. Respectful maternity care has the potential to reduce adverse postpartum mental health outcomes, especially for persons affected by systemic oppression.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    先兆子痫(PE)是孕产妇和围产期健康发病的主要原因之一,在全球范围内产生超过4.6%的妊娠并发症。这项系统评价旨在确定特定生物标志物在预测妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)和2型糖尿病(DM)中的PE中的意义。该综述测量并解释了脂质的显着异常,血糖,细胞因子,炎症标志物,胎盘蛋白,尿蛋白,和其他血清生物标志物有助于PE在GDM和2型DM人群中的发展。我们搜索了CINAHL,EMBASE,Medline,产妇和婴儿护理,Scopus,和WebofScience。如果他们在患有PE并患有GDM或先前存在的2型DM的女性的血清或尿液中具有可测量的成分,则包括研究。由于研究数据的高度异质性,进行了叙述性综合而不是荟萃分析。共筛选了2593项研究,8项相关研究从40至1,344名参与者的研究组中研究了27种不同的生物标志物。没有确定单一的生物标志物;然而,需要进一步研究PE的特定生物标志物,尤其是CRP,FABP4和GDM-PE组中的微量白蛋白尿和2型DM人群中的钙卫蛋白。当与其他生物标志物组合时,许多生物标志物被鉴定为在预测PE方面实用,并且需要更多数据来验证孕妇诊断标志物的可预测性。
    Pre-eclampsia (PE) is one of the leading causes of maternal and perinatal health morbidity, producing more than 4.6% of complications in pregnancy worldwide. This systematic review was conducted to determine the significance of specific biomarkers in predicting PE in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). The review measured and explained the significant abnormalities in lipids, blood glucose, cytokines, inflammatory markers, placental proteins, urinary proteins, and other serum biomarkers that contribute to the development of PE in GDM and type 2 DM populations. We searched CINAHL, EMBASE, Medline, Maternity and Infant care, Scopus, and Web of Science. Studies were included if they had a measurable component in the blood serum or urine of women who developed PE and suffered from GDM or pre-existing type 2 DM. A narrative synthesis was conducted instead of a meta-analysis due to the high heterogeneity of data from the studies. A total of 2,593 studies were screened, producing eight relevant studies. Twenty-seven different biomarkers were investigated from the study group of 40 to 1,344 participants. No single biomarker was identified; however, there is a need for further research on specific biomarkers of PE, especially in CRP, FABP4, and microalbuminuria in the GDM-PE group and calprotectin in the type 2 DM population. Many biomarkers were identified as practical in predicting PE when combined with other biomarkers and more data are required to verify the predictability of the diagnostic markers in pregnant women.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:集束化护理是降低产后出血相关发病率和死亡率的一种有前景的方法。我们评估了护理束预防和/或治疗产后出血的有效性和安全性。
    方法:我们搜索了MEDLINE,Embase,科克伦中部,妇幼保健数据库,以及全球指数Medicus(始于2023年6月9日)和ClinicalTrials.gov以及国际临床试验注册平台(过去5年),采用分阶段搜索策略,结合产后出血的术语和护理捆绑。
    方法:纳入评估产后出血相关护理服务的同行评审研究。护理捆绑被定义为包括集体实施的≥3个组件的干预措施,同时,或快速连续。随机和非随机对照试验,中断的时间序列,且前后研究(对照或未对照)均符合条件.
    方法:使用RoB2(随机试验)和ROBINS-I(非随机研究)评估偏倚风险。对于对照研究,我们报告了二分结局的风险比和连续结局的平均差异,确定使用等级确定的证据。对于不受控制的研究,我们使用效果方向表,并对结果进行了叙述总结。
    结果:纳入22项研究进行分析。对于仅预防的捆绑(2项研究),低确定性证据表明减少失血可能有好处,住院时间,和重症监护室停留,和母亲的幸福。对于仅治疗束(9项研究),高确定性证据表明,电子运动干预降低了复合严重发病率的风险(风险比,0.40;95%置信区间,0.32-0.50)和输血出血,产后出血,严重的产后出血,意味着失血。一项非随机试验和7项对照研究表明,其他产后出血治疗方案可能会减少失血和严重产后出血。但这是不确定的。对于联合预防/治疗束(11项研究),低确定性证据表明,加州产妇优质护理协作护理捆绑可能会降低严重的产妇发病率(风险比,0.64;95%置信区间,0.57-0.72)。十项不受控制的研究显示了可能的益处,没有影响,或其他捆绑类型的危害。几乎所有不受控制的研究都没有使用合适的统计方法进行单组前测-后测比较,因此应谨慎解释。
    结论:E-MOTIVE干预可改善阴道分娩妇女的产后出血相关结局,和加州产妇优质护理合作捆绑可能会降低严重的产妇发病率。在考虑实施之前,其他束设计需要进一步的有效性研究。
    Care bundles are a promising approach to reducing postpartum hemorrhage-related morbidity and mortality. We assessed the effectiveness and safety of care bundles for postpartum hemorrhage prevention and/or treatment.
    We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Maternity and Infant Care Database, and Global Index Medicus (inception to June 9, 2023) and ClinicalTrials.gov and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (last 5 years) using a phased search strategy, combining terms for postpartum hemorrhage and care bundles.
    Peer-reviewed studies evaluating postpartum hemorrhage-related care bundles were included. Care bundles were defined as interventions comprising ≥3 components implemented collectively, concurrently, or in rapid succession. Randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials, interrupted time series, and before-after studies (controlled or uncontrolled) were eligible.
    Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2 (randomized trials) and ROBINS-I (nonrandomized studies). For controlled studies, we reported risk ratios for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences for continuous outcomes, with certainty of evidence determined using GRADE. For uncontrolled studies, we used effect direction tables and summarized results narratively.
    Twenty-two studies were included for analysis. For prevention-only bundles (2 studies), low-certainty evidence suggests possible benefits in reducing blood loss, duration of hospitalization, and intensive care unit stay, and maternal well-being. For treatment-only bundles (9 studies), high-certainty evidence shows that the E-MOTIVE intervention reduced risks of composite severe morbidity (risk ratio, 0.40; 95% confidence interval, 0.32-0.50) and blood transfusion for bleeding, postpartum hemorrhage, severe postpartum hemorrhage, and mean blood loss. One nonrandomized trial and 7 uncontrolled studies suggest that other postpartum hemorrhage treatment bundles might reduce blood loss and severe postpartum hemorrhage, but this is uncertain. For combined prevention/treatment bundles (11 studies), low-certainty evidence shows that the California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative care bundle may reduce severe maternal morbidity (risk ratio, 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.57-0.72). Ten uncontrolled studies variably showed possible benefits, no effects, or harms for other bundle types. Nearly all uncontrolled studies did not use suitable statistical methods for single-group pretest-posttest comparisons and should thus be interpreted with caution.
    The E-MOTIVE intervention improves postpartum hemorrhage-related outcomes among women delivering vaginally, and the California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative bundle may reduce severe maternal morbidity. Other bundle designs warrant further effectiveness research before implementation is contemplated.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    淋巴管肌瘤病是一种罕见的囊性肺病,主要影响绝经前女性,可能因怀孕而加重。我们对妊娠期淋巴管肌瘤病进行了文献综述,重点关注相关的母体发病率和产科结局。我们还报告了一例淋巴管平滑肌瘤病,在妊娠晚期表现为急性自发性气胸。其次是显著的产妇发病率。一名37岁的初产妇在妊娠29周5天时出现胸痛,被诊断为自发性气胸。进一步成像显示囊性肺病变和肾血管平滑肌脂肪瘤。她因胎盘早剥而出现严重腹痛,导致妊娠30周2天时紧急剖宫产。她的病程因复发性气胸而变得复杂,叠加先兆子痫,严重肠梗阻和肠扩张并发肠穿孔。对于临床怀疑妊娠淋巴管平滑肌瘤病的患者,提示识别,诊断,转诊给适当的多学科亚专科医生对于减轻妊娠期间和妊娠后的并发症和优化结局至关重要.
    Lymphangioleiomyomatosis is a rare cystic lung disease primarily affecting premenopausal females and may be exacerbated by pregnancy. We conducted a literature review of lymphangioleiomyomatosis during pregnancy with a specific focus on related maternal morbidity and obstetrical outcomes. We also report a case of lymphangioleiomyomatosis that presented as an acute spontaneous pneumothorax in the third trimester of pregnancy, followed by significant maternal morbidity. A 37-year-old primigravid woman who presented at 29 weeks 5 days gestation with chest pain was diagnosed with spontaneous pneumothorax. Further imaging demonstrated cystic lung lesions and renal angiomyolipomas. She developed severe abdominal pain concerning for placental abruption that led to an urgent cesarean delivery at 30 weeks 2 days gestation. Her course was complicated by recurrent pneumothorax, superimposed preeclampsia, and significant ileus and bowel dilation complicated by bowel perforation. For patients with a clinical suspicion of lymphangioleiomyomatosis in pregnancy, prompt recognition, diagnosis, and referral to appropriate multidisciplinary subspecialists is critical to mitigate complications and optimize outcomes both during and after pregnancy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目的:女性可以发展创伤后应激障碍(PTSD),以应对经历或感知的创伤,通常是医学上复杂的,分娩;美国这些事件的患病率仍然很高。目前,在预防或减轻产妇分娩相关PTSD(CB-PTSD)的常规护理中,没有推荐的治疗方法.我们对任何预防或治疗CB-PTSD的疗法的临床试验进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。
    方法:PsycInfo,Psycarticles,PubMed(MEDLINE),ClinicalTrials.gov,CINAHL,ProQuest,社会学文摘,谷歌学者,Embase,WebofScience,ScienceDirect,Scopus,和CENTRAL被搜索到2023年9月之前发表的符合条件的试验.
    方法:如果是介入试验,评估了CB-PTSD的任何治疗方法,症状的指示或PTSD发作之前,用英语写的.
    方法:独立编码人员提取了符合条件的研究的样本特征和干预信息,并使用Downs和Black的质量检查表和Cochrane的偏倚风险方法评估了试验。
    结果:41项研究(32项随机对照试验,9项非随机试验)进行了综述。他们测试了简短的心理治疗,包括汇报,以创伤为中心(包括认知行为疗法和表达性写作),记忆巩固/再巩固阻塞,以母婴为中心,和教育干预。试验针对二级预防缓冲CB-PTSD通常在创伤性分娩后(n=24),可能患有CB-PTSD的妇女的三级预防措施(n=14),和怀孕期间的一级预防(n=3)。联合随机二级预防的荟萃分析显示,与常规治疗相比,降低CB-PTSD症状的效果中等(标准化平均差异,SMD=-0.67;95%CI-0.92,-0.42)。产后96小时内的单次治疗是有帮助的(SMD=-0.55)。简短的结构化创伤聚焦疗法和半结构化助产士主导的基于对话的心理咨询显示出最大的效果(SMD=-0.95和SMD=-0.91)。其他治疗方法(例如,俄罗斯方块游戏,正念,以母婴为中心)需要更多的研究。三级预防代表较小的影响与次要,但具有潜在的临床意义(SMD=-0.37(-0.60;-0.14))。产前教育方法可能会有所帮助,但经验证据不足。
    结论:在创伤分娩后的早期实施的以创伤为中心和非创伤为中心的短期心理治疗为缓解与分娩相关的创伤后应激障碍的症状提供了关键和可行的机会。整合诊断和生物学措施的未来研究可以为治疗效用和工作机制提供信息。
    Women can develop posttraumatic stress disorder in response to experienced or perceived traumatic, often medically complicated, childbirth; the prevalence of these events remains high in the United States. Currently, no recommended treatment exists in routine care to prevent or mitigate maternal childbirth-related posttraumatic stress disorder. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials that evaluated any therapy to prevent or treat childbirth-related posttraumatic stress disorder.
    PsycInfo, PsycArticles, PubMed (MEDLINE), ClinicalTrials.gov, CINAHL, ProQuest, Sociological Abstracts, Google Scholar, Embase, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched for eligible trials published through September 2023.
    Trials were included if they were interventional, if they evaluated any therapy for childbirth-related posttraumatic stress disorder for the indication of symptoms or before posttraumatic stress disorder onset, and if they were written in English.
    Independent coders extracted the sample characteristics and intervention information of the eligible studies and evaluated the trials using the Downs and Black\'s quality checklist and Cochrane\'s method for risk of bias evaluation. Meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate pooled effect sizes of secondary and tertiary prevention trials.
    A total of 41 studies (32 randomized controlled trials, 9 nonrandomized trials) were reviewed. They evaluated brief psychological therapies including debriefing, trauma-focused therapies (including cognitive behavioral therapy and expressive writing), memory consolidation and reconsolidation blockage, mother-infant-focused therapies, and educational interventions. The trials targeted secondary preventions aimed at buffering childbirth-related posttraumatic stress disorder usually after traumatic childbirth (n=24), tertiary preventions among women with probable childbirth-related posttraumatic stress disorder (n=14), and primary prevention during pregnancy (n=3). A meta-analysis of the combined randomized secondary preventions showed moderate effects in reducing childbirth-related posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms when compared with usual treatment (standardized mean difference, -0.67; 95% confidence interval, -0.92 to -0.42). Single-session therapy within 96 hours of birth was helpful (standardized mean difference, -0.55). Brief, structured, trauma-focused therapies and semi-structured, midwife-led, dialogue-based psychological counseling showed the largest effects (standardized mean difference, -0.95 and -0.91, respectively). Other treatment approaches (eg, the Tetris game, mindfulness, mother-infant-focused treatment) warrant more research. Tertiary preventions produced smaller effects than secondary prevention but are potentially clinically meaningful (standardized mean difference, -0.37; -0.60 to -0.14). Antepartum educational approaches may help, but insufficient empirical evidence exists.
    Brief trauma-focused and non-trauma-focused psychological therapies delivered early in the period following traumatic childbirth offer a critical and feasible opportunity to buffer the symptoms of childbirth-related posttraumatic stress disorder. Future research that integrates diagnostic and biological measures can inform treatment use and the mechanisms at work.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    背景:临床证据表明,孕妇更容易感染COVID-19,因为她们疾病进展和产科并发症的风险增加,比如早产,流产,先兆子痫,剖宫产,胎儿生长受限和围产期死亡。尽管有这些证据,孕妇经常被排除在临床试验之外,导致对COVID-19管理的了解有限。这项系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是提供更好的证据,证明现有的COVID-19治疗对孕妇的疗效和安全性。
    方法:四位作者从开始到2022年11月1日搜索了主要的电子数据库,以进行对照试验/观察性研究,调查受COVID-19影响的孕妇服用抗SARS-CoV-2治疗后的结果。分析调查了孕妇分娩和产妇结局的累积发生率,比较那些服用活性药物和标准治疗的人。计算具有95%置信区间的风险比(RR)。使用随机效应模型和逆方差方法评估统计显著性。本系统评价和荟萃分析是根据更新的2020年系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行的。该协议已在Prospero注册(编号注册:CRD42023397445)。
    结果:从最初的937条非重复记录中,我们评估了40篇文章的全文,最后包括十项研究。在六项研究中,包括1627名患者,使用casirivimab/imdevimab(CAS/IMD),remdesivir,和IFN-α2b显着降低了剖宫产的需要((RR=0.665;95CI:0.491-0.899;p=0.008;I2=19.5%;)(表1,(图。1).治疗并没有降低早产的风险,入院新生儿ICU,或死产/围产期损失(所有这些结局的p值>0.50),并不能阻止疾病向严重程度的进展(k=8;2,374名孕妇;RR=0.778;95CI:0.550-1.099;p=0.15;I2=0%).此外,在两项研究中,孕期使用药物并未改变孕产妇死亡的发生率(表2).
    结论:对于我们的分析,CAS/IMD,remdesivir,和IFNα2b减少了剖宫产次数,但对疾病进展和其他产科和COVID-19相关结局无影响.无法评估病毒载量对孕妇疾病发展的影响归因于缺乏数据。在我们的系统审查中,没有重大副作用的报道。不过,医学界必须更多地关注临床试验,而不是偶发性病例报告和病例系列,胎儿和产妇结局的标准化。
    BACKGROUND: Clinical evidence suggests that pregnant women are more vulnerable to COVID-19, since they are at increased risk for disease progression and for obstetric complications, such as premature labor, miscarriage, preeclampsia, cesarean delivery, fetal growth restriction and perinatal death. Despite this evidence, pregnant women are often excluded from clinical trials, resulting in limited knowledge on COVID-19 management. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to provide better evidence on the efficacy and safety of available COVID-19 treatment in pregnant women.
    METHODS: Four authors searched major electronic databases from inception until 1 st November-2022 for controlled trials/observational studies, investigating outcomes after the administration of anti-SARS-CoV-2 treatments in pregnant women affected by COVID-19. The analyses investigated the cumulative incidence of delivery and maternal outcomes in pregnant women, comparing those taking active medication vs standard care. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Statistical significance was assessed using the random effects model and inverse-variance method. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the updated 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The protocol has been registered in Prospero (number registration: CRD42023397445).
    RESULTS: From initially 937 non duplicate records, we assessed the full texts of 40 articles, finally including ten studies. In six studies, including 1627 patients, the use of casirivimab/imdevimab (CAS/IMD), remdesivir, and IFN-alpha 2b significantly decreased the need of cesarean section ((RR = 0.665; 95%CI: 0.491-0.899; p = 0.008; I 2 = 19.5%;) (Table 1, (Fig. 1). Treatments did not decrease the risk of preterm delivery, admission to neonatal ICU, or stillbirth/perinatal loss (p-values > 0.50 for all these outcomes) and did not prevent the progression of disease towards severe degrees (k = 8; 2,374 pregnant women; RR = 0.778; 95%CI: 0.550-1.099; p = 0.15; I 2 = 0%). Moreover, the use of medications during pregnancy did not modify the incidence of maternal death in two studies (Table 2).
    CONCLUSIONS: To our analysis, CAS/IMD, remdesivir, and IFN alpha 2b reduced the number of cesarean sections but demonstrated no effect on disease progression and other obstetric and COVID-19 related outcomes. The inability to evaluate the influence of viral load on illness development in pregnant women was attributed to lack of data. In our systematic review, no major side effects were reported. Though, it is essential for the medical community to focus more on clinical trials and less on episodic case reports and case series, with standardization of fetal and maternal outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    目标:全世界有超过1.45亿新生儿,每年剖腹产(CD)超过3000万。比较计划CD和计划阴道分娩(VD)的围产期和产妇结局的数据有限。目的是通过随机对照试验(RCT)的荟萃分析评估围产期和孕产妇的发病率和死亡率,该试验将患者随机分为计划CD和计划VD。
    方法:Scopus,PubMed,CINAHL,科克伦图书馆,从开始到2022年8月检索WHO临床试验数据库.
    方法:包括将计划CD与计划VD进行比较的RCT。包括任何胎龄或分娩指征。
    方法:两位作者独立提取数据。PRISMA指南用于数据提取和质量评估。主要结局是围产期死亡率。汇总措施报告为相对风险(RR)或平均差(MD),置信区间为95%(CI)。使用Mantel-Haenszel随机效应模型对结果进行汇总赔率比和95%置信度。
    结果:在15个主要随机对照试验中,3,265名患者被随机分配到计划的CD,和3,353计划的VD。围产期死亡的发生率没有差异(1.3%vs1.3%;RR0.71,95%CI0.33-1.52)。CD与低pH的新生儿发病率较低相关(0.3%vs2.4%;RR0.18,RR0.05-0.67),产伤(0.3%对0.7%,RR0.46,95%CI0.22-0.96),管进料要求(2.5%对7.1%,RR0.36,95%CI0.19-0.66),和低张力(0.4%对3.5%,RR0.11,95%CI0.03-0.47)。CD组绒毛膜羊膜炎的发生率较低(0.3%vs1.0%;RR0.27,95%CI0.08-0.98)。伤口感染在CD组中更为常见(1.9%vs1.1%;RR1.61,95%CI1.04-2.52)。在两个≤3个月时,CD组尿失禁较少见(8.7%vs12.2%;RR0.71,95%CI0.59-0.85),和1-2年(16.9%对22%,RR0.77,95%CI0.67-0.88),在CD组中,2年的会阴疼痛较少见(4%vs6.2%,RR0.64,95%CI0.47-0.87)。
    结论:在RCT的荟萃分析中,计划CD和计划VD与围产期和孕产妇死亡率相似。计划的CD与新生儿不良结局的显着减少有关,例如低pH值,出生创伤,管饲料需求和低张力,绒毛膜羊膜炎显著减少,尿失禁和会阴疼痛;而计划的VD与全身麻醉和伤口感染的需求显着减少有关。需要进一步的随机试验来评估低风险患者和普通人群中计划CD与计划VD的风险和益处。
    There are over 145 million births worldwide, with over 30 million cesarean deliveries yearly. There are limited data comparing the perinatal and maternal outcomes between planned cesarean delivery and planned vaginal delivery. This study aimed to evaluate perinatal and maternal morbidity and mortality by meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that randomly assigned patients to either planned cesarean delivery or planned vaginal delivery.
    Scopus, PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and the World Health Organization clinical trial databases were searched from inception through August 2022.
    Randomized controlled trials that compared planned cesarean delivery with planned vaginal delivery at any gestational age and for any delivery indication were included.
    Two authors independently extracted data. PRISMA guidelines were used for data extraction and quality assessment. The primary outcome was perinatal mortality. The summary measures were reported as relative risks or as mean differences with 95% confidence intervals. Pooled odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using Mantel-Haenszel random-effects models for outcomes.
    In 15 primary randomized controlled trials, 3265 patients were randomized to planned cesarean delivery and 3353 to planned vaginal delivery. The incidence of perinatal deaths was not different (1.3% vs 1.3%; relative risk, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.33-1.52). Planned cesarean delivery was associated with lower neonatal incidences of low umbilical artery pH (0.3% vs 2.4%; relative risk, 0.18; 95% confidence interval, 0.05-0.67), birth trauma (0.3% vs 0.7%; relative risk, 0.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.22-0.96), tube feeding requirement (2.5% vs 7.1%; relative risk, 0.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.19-0.66), and hypotonia (0.4% vs 3.5%; relative risk, 0.11; 95% confidence interval, 0.03-0.47), compared to planned vaginal delivery. Chorioamnionitis was less frequent in the planned cesarean delivery group (0.3% vs 1.0%; relative risk, 0.27; 95% confidence interval, 0.08-0.98). Wound infection was more common in the planned cesarean delivery group (1.9% vs 1.1%; relative risk, 1.61; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-2.52). Lower rates were observed in the planned cesarean delivery group for urinary incontinence at both ≤3 months (8.7% vs 12.2%; relative risk, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.59-0.85) and 1 to 2 years (16.9% vs 22%; relative risk, 0.77; 95% confidence interval, 0.67-0.88) and for a painful perineum at 2 years (4% vs 6.2%; relative risk, 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.47-0.87) compared to planned vaginal delivery. Among singleton pregnancies, planned cesarean delivery was associated with a lower rate of perinatal death (0.69% vs 1.81%; relative risk, 0.45; 95% confident interval, 0.21-0.93).
    Planned cesarean delivery and planned vaginal delivery were associated with similar rates of perinatal and maternal mortality in this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Planned cesarean delivery was associated with significant decreases in adverse neonatal outcomes such as low umbilical artery pH, birth trauma, tube feeding requirement, and hypotonia, and significant decreases in chorioamnionitis, urinary incontinence, and painful perineum. Planned vaginal delivery was associated with significant decreases in need for general anesthesia and wound infection. Further randomized trials are needed to assess the risks and benefits of planned cesarean delivery vs planned vaginal delivery in lower-risk patients and in the general population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Review
    子宫破裂的主要风险是由于先前的剖宫产或其他子宫手术导致的子宫疤痕的存在。然而,无疤痕子宫破裂极为罕见,危险因素包括多胎妊娠,创伤,先天性异常,使用子宫收缩和胎盘植入谱。
    胎盘植入谱,也被称为病态粘附胎盘,正变得越来越普遍,并与显著的孕产妇和新生儿发病率和死亡率相关。
    我们报告了一例因胎盘穿孔导致子宫破裂的案例,该案例是在一名需要紧急围产期子宫切除术的多胎妇女中。
    The main risk for uterine rupture is the presence of a uterine scar due to prior cesarean delivery or other uterine surgery. However, rupture in an unscarred uterus is extremely rare, and risk factors include multiple gestations, trauma, congenital anomalies, use of uterotonics and placenta accreta spectrum.
    Placenta accreta spectrum, also known as morbidly adherent placenta, is becoming increasingly common and is associated with significant maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality.
    We report a case of unscarred uterine rupture due to placenta percreta in a multiparous woman that required emergency peripartum hysterectomy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Preprint
    产后妇女可以发展创伤后应激障碍(PTSD),以应对复杂的,创伤性分娩;这些事件的患病率在美国目前仍然很高,在常规围产期护理中,没有推荐的治疗方法来预防产妇分娩相关的PTSD(CB-PTSD)并减轻其严重程度。这里,我们对现有的临床试验进行了系统评价,这些临床试验测试了CB-PTSD的预防和适应症的干预措施.
    我们对PsycInfo进行了系统评价,Psycarticles,PubMed(MEDLINE),ClinicalTrials.gov,CINAHL,ProQuest,社会学文摘,谷歌学者,Embase,WebofScience,ScienceDirect,和Scopus到2022年12月确定涉及CB-PTSD预防和治疗的临床试验。
    如果是介入性的,则包括试验,评估CB-PTSD预防策略或治疗,并报告评估CB-PTSD症状的结果。重复研究,病例报告,协议,积极的临床试验,死产后CB-PTSD的研究被排除。
    两名独立的编码人员使用修改后的Downs和Black方法学质量评估清单对试验进行了评估。通过基于Excel的表格提取样本特征和相关干预信息。
    共33项研究,包括25项随机对照试验(RCT)和8项非RCT,包括在内。试验质量从差到优不等。试验测试了心理治疗,最常作为CB-PTSD发作的二级预防(n=21);一些检查了初级(n=3)和三级(n=9)疗法。采用常规创伤聚焦疗法的早期干预措施具有积极的治疗效果,心理咨询,和母婴二重聚焦策略。治疗对有严重急性创伤应激症状或减少CB-PTSD诊断的女性的效用尚不清楚。作为三级干预是否有效。怀孕期间以教育生育计划为重点的干预措施可以改善孕产妇健康结果,但是研究仍然很少。
    一系列针对创伤性分娩的早期心理治疗,而不是普遍的,在产后头几天和几周,可能潜在地缓冲CB-PTSD的发展。而不是一种治疗适合所有人,有效的治疗应考虑个体特异性因素.AsadditionalRCTsgeneratecriticalinformationandguiderecommendationsforfirst-linepreventivetreatmentsforCB-PTSD,与创伤性分娩相关的精神后果可以减轻。
    UNASSIGNED: Postpartum women can develop post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in response to complicated, traumatic childbirth; prevalence of these events remains high in the U.S. Currently, there is no recommended treatment approach in routine peripartum care for preventing maternal childbirth-related PTSD (CB-PTSD) and lessening its severity. Here, we provide a systematic review of available clinical trials testing interventions for the prevention and indication of CB-PTSD.
    UNASSIGNED: We conducted a systematic review of PsycInfo, PsycArticles, PubMed (MEDLINE), ClinicalTrials.gov, CINAHL, ProQuest, Sociological Abstracts, Google Scholar, Embase, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and Scopus through December 2022 to identify clinical trials involving CB-PTSD prevention and treatment.
    UNASSIGNED: Trials were included if they were interventional, evaluated CB-PTSD preventive strategies or treatments, and reported outcomes assessing CB-PTSD symptoms. Duplicate studies, case reports, protocols, active clinical trials, and studies of CB-PTSD following stillbirth were excluded.
    UNASSIGNED: Two independent coders evaluated trials using a modified Downs and Black methodological quality assessment checklist. Sample characteristics and related intervention information were extracted via an Excel-based form.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 33 studies, including 25 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 8 non-RCTs, were included. Trial quality ranged from Poor to Excellent. Trials tested psychological therapies most often delivered as secondary prevention against CB-PTSD onset (n=21); some examined primary (n=3) and tertiary (n=9) therapies. Positive treatment effects were found for early interventions employing conventional trauma-focused therapies, psychological counseling, and mother-infant dyadic focused strategies. Therapies\' utility to aid women with severe acute traumatic stress symptoms or reduce incidence of CB-PTSD diagnosis is unclear, as is whether they are effective as tertiary intervention. Educational birth plan-focused interventions during pregnancy may improve maternal health outcomes, but studies remain scarce.
    UNASSIGNED: An array of early psychological therapies delivered in response to traumatic childbirth, rather than universally, in the first postpartum days and weeks, may potentially buffer CB-PTSD development. Rather than one treatment being suitable for all, effective therapy should consider individual-specific factors. As additional RCTs generate critical information and guide recommendations for first-line preventive treatments for CB-PTSD, the psychiatric consequences associated with traumatic childbirth could be lessened.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号