MORTALITY

死亡率
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:Fournier坏疽是一种严重的外科传染病,各种危险因素都会增加其死亡率。这项研究的目的是回顾性分析Fournier坏疽患者的临床特征和实验室资料,然后分析与死亡率相关的危险因素.这项研究没有次要目标。
    方法:本研究纳入2013年12月至2024年3月于苏州市中医医院确诊为Fournier坏疽的46例住院患者。从电子病历系统中提取所有患者的临床数据。收集的数据包括性别,年龄,疾病的持续时间,住院时间,感染部位,合并症,白细胞计数,血细胞比容,白蛋白,血糖,肌酐,血清钠,入院时血清钾,微生物培养结果,和患者预后(生存/死亡)。使用简化的Fournier坏疽严重指数(SFGSI)对所有患者进行评分。根据临床结果将患者分为存活和死亡组。使用χ²检验或Fisher精确检验比较分类变量之间的差异。使用学生t检验或曼-惠特尼U检验比较数值变量之间的差异。采用二元logistic回归分析Fournier坏疽死亡的危险因素。
    结果:在46例Fournier坏疽患者中,男性39人(84.8%),女性7人(15.2%)。年龄从17岁到86岁,平均年龄为61岁。14例(30.4%)局限于肛周区域,26例(56.5%)筋膜坏死累及肛周,会阴,和生殖器区域,6例(13.0%)延伸至腹壁。术后3个月随访,43例患者(93.5%)存活,而3例患者(6.5%)因严重疾病入院后不久死亡。根据结果,将患者分为存活组43例和死亡组3例,分别。两组患者年龄差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。延伸至腹壁(P<0.01),血细胞比容(P<0.01),白蛋白(P<0.01),SFGSI(P<0.01),SFGSI>2(P<0.01)。二元logistic回归分析显示红细胞压积降低是Fournier坏疽患者死亡的独立危险因素。
    结论:本研究详细分析了Fournier坏疽患者的临床特征和死亡危险因素。这项研究的主要结果是血细胞比容降低是预测FG患者死亡率的独立危险因素。这些发现为临床医生提供了有价值的预后见解,强调早期识别和纠正血细胞比容降低对改善患者预后和生存率的重要性。
    BACKGROUND: Fournier\'s Gangrene is a severe surgical infectious disease, and various risk factors can increase its mortality rate. The purpose of this study is to retrospectively analyze the clinical characteristics and laboratory data of Fournier\'s Gangrene patients, followed by an analysis of mortality-related risk factors. This study has no secondary objectives.
    METHODS: This study included 46 hospitalized patients diagnosed with Fournier\'s Gangrene at Suzhou Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital from December 2013 to March 2024. Clinical data for all patients were extracted from the electronic medical records system. The collected data included gender, age, duration of illness, length of hospital stay, sites of infection involvement, comorbidities, white blood cell count, hematocrit, albumin, blood glucose, creatinine, serum sodium, serum potassium upon admission, microbial culture results, and patient outcomes (survival/death). The Simplified Fournier Gangrene Severe Index (SFGSI) was used to score all patients. Patients were categorized into survival and death groups based on clinical outcomes. Differences between categorical variables were compared using the χ² test or Fisher\'s exact test. Differences between numerical variables were compared using Student\'s t-test or the Mann-Whitney U test. Binary logistic regression was employed to analyze the risk factors for mortality in Fournier\'s Gangrene.
    RESULTS: Among the 46 Fournier\'s Gangrene patients, 39 were male (84.8%) and 7 were female (15.2%). The age ranged from 17 to 86 years, with a median age of 61 years. Fourteen cases (30.4%) were confined to the perianal area, 26 cases (56.5%) had fascial necrosis involving the perianal, perineal, and genital regions, while 6 cases (13.0%) extended to the abdominal wall. At a 3-month postoperative follow-up, 43 patients (93.5%) survived, while 3 patients (6.5%) died shortly after admission due to severe illness. Based on the outcome, patients were divided into survival and death groups with 43 and 3 cases, respectively. Significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of age (P<0.05), extension to the abdominal wall (P<0.01), hematocrit (P<0.01), albumin (P<0.01), SFGSI (P<0.01), and SFGSI>2 (P<0.01). Binary logistic regression analysis indicated that decreased hematocrit was an independent risk factor for mortality in Fournier\'s Gangrene patients.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a detailed analysis of the clinical characteristics and risk factors for mortality in Fournier\'s Gangrene patients. The primary outcome of this study is that a decreased hematocrit is an independent risk factor for predicting mortality in FG patients. These findings offer valuable prognostic insights for clinicians, underscoring the importance of early identification and correction of reduced hematocrit to improve patient outcomes and survival rates.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    急性高血糖或应激性高血糖是急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者的常见表现。多项研究表明急性高血糖与ACS患者的短期和长期死亡率之间存在关联。但证据并不具体。我们从三个数据库收集了1056篇文章,即,PubMed,谷歌学者,和科学直接使用不同的搜索策略和过滤器。然后,我们删除了重复项,并使用标题摘要和全文筛选了919篇文章。经过169篇文章的全文筛选,我们删除了116篇文章。然后,我们应用了资格标准,并对文章进行了质量评估,最后,我们在研究中纳入了21篇文章。这21篇文章跨越了2014年至2024年。其中,16篇文章是观察性研究,两个是系统评价和荟萃分析,三篇是评论文章。六篇文章单独使用应激性高血糖率(SHR),七篇文章单独使用入院血糖(ABG),两个单独使用空腹血糖(FPG)和一个使用SHR,ABG,和FPG一起作为测量急性高血糖的参数。短期不良结果(住院,<30天)在12项研究中进行了研究,和长期不良结果(>30天-1年,>1年)在6项研究中进行了研究。在我们纳入的21项研究中发现急性高血糖与短期和长期死亡率之间存在正相关。在我们的研究中,用于量化急性或应激性高血糖的三个参数,即,SHR,ABG,和FPG可预测ACS患者的短期和长期死亡率。需要进一步的研究来确定高血糖的准确截止水平,称为糖尿病患者的急性高血糖。我们试图回顾有关该主题的最新文献,以加深我们对该主题的理解,并为将来的研究提供基础。
    Acute hyperglycemia or stress hyperglycemia is a frequent finding in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Several studies have demonstrated the association between acute hyperglycemia with short- and long-term mortality in ACS patients. But the evidence is not concrete. We gathered 1056 articles from three databases, i.e., PubMed, Google Scholar, and Science Direct using different search strategies and filters. We then removed duplicates and 919 articles were screened with title abstract and full text. After a full-text screening of 169 articles, we removed 116 articles. We then applied eligibility criteria and did a quality assessment of articles and finally, we included 21 articles in our study. The 21 articles spanned years 2014 to 2024. Of them, 16 articles were observational studies, two were systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and three were review articles. Six articles used stress hyperglycemia ratio (SHR) alone, seven articles used admission blood glucose (ABG) alone, two used fasting plasma glucose (FPG) alone and one used SHR, ABG, and FPG together as a parameter to measure acute hyperglycemia. Short-term poor outcomes (in-hospital, <30 days) were studied in 12 studies, and long-term poor outcomes (>30 days-1 year, >1 year) were studied in six studies. A positive correlation between acute hyperglycemia and short- and long-term mortality was found in our 21 included studies. The three parameters which are used to quantify acute or stress hyperglycemia in our study, i.e., SHR, ABG, and FPG predict both short- and long-term mortality in ACS patients. Further study is needed to determine the accurate cutoff level of hyperglycemia to be called acute hyperglycemia in diabetics. We tried to review the recent literature on this topic to deepen our understanding of this topic and to provide a base for future research.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:COVID-19大流行已在全球造成1483万人死亡。本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在提供重症COVID-19患者总死亡率和发病率的综合估计。
    方法:四个电子数据库,Medline/PubMed,Cochrane图书馆,WHOCOVID-19数据库,和WebofScience,用于确定相关研究。两位作者独立筛选了这些研究,通过与第三作者的讨论,评估了资格标准并解决了差异。使用STATA软件版本14计算合并效应大小。CochranQ检验和I2检验用于评估研究中的异质性。此外,亚组分析,敏感性分析,和发表偏倚进行了评估。它在Prospero注册了ProsperoIDCRD42020212146。
    结果:总共从各种数据库中筛选出1003篇已发表的文章,共纳入142,291名重症COVID-19参与者的24项研究纳入审查.在参与者中,67%是男性,平均年龄为63.43+SD3.33岁。个别研究报告的死亡率为4.5%至69.5%。分析结果显示,总体合并死亡率为34%(95%置信区间:31%-37%)。此外,研究结果表明,62%的重症COVID-19患者需要机械通气,而这些患者中68.7%有慢性病合并症。
    结论:重症COVID-19患者面临死亡的高风险,据估计,大约三分之一的患者死于这种病毒。值得注意的是,相当一部分重症COVID-19患者(62%)需要机械通气;令人惊讶的是,超过三分之二的COVID-19患者有慢性病合并症,强调在这一人群中管理合并症的重要性。
    BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has caused 14.83 million deaths globally. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to provide a pooled estimate of the overall mortality and morbidity of critically ill COVID-19 patients.
    METHODS: Four electronic databases, Medline/PubMed, the Cochrane Library, the WHO COVID-19 database, and the Web of Science, were used to identify relevant studies. Two authors independently screened the studies, evaluated the eligibility criteria and resolved discrepancies through discussion with the third author. The pooled effect size was computed using STATA software version 14. The Cochran Q test and I2 test were utilized to assess heterogeneity across the studies. Additionally, subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias were evaluated. It is registered in Prospero with Prospero ID CRD42020212146.
    RESULTS: A total of 1003 published articles were screened from various databases, and 24 studies involving a total of 142,291 critically ill COVID-19 participants were selected for inclusion in the review. Among the participants, 67 % were male, and the mean age was 63.43 + SD3.33 years. The mortality rate reported in the individual studies ranged from 4.5 % to 69.5 %. The findings from the analysis revealed that the overall pooled mortality rate was 34 % (95 % confidence interval: 31 %-37 %). Additionally, the findings showed that 62 % of critically ill COVID-19 patients required mechanical ventilation, while 68.7 % of these patients had chronic disease comorbidities.
    CONCLUSIONS: Critically ill COVID-19 patients face a high-risk risk of death, with an estimate of about one in three patients dying from the virus. Notably, a substantial portion of critically ill COVID-19 patients (62 %) require mechanical ventilation; surprisingly, more than two-thirds of patients with COVID-19 have chronic disease comorbidities, highlighting the importance of managing comorbidities in this population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肝硬化患者的自主神经病变(AN)与肝硬化相关并发症的风险较高和预后较差有关,在肝移植期间或之后(LT)。然而,只有少数研究存在不一致的结果。
    我们搜索了直到2023年9月发表的所有文章,这些文章描述了基于心血管自主神经反射测试(CART)的AN诊断,心率校正QT间期(QTc)的评估,心率变异性(HRV),和压力反射灵敏度(BRS)测试,为了评估AN在肝硬化和/或LT前后预后中的预测作用。
    包括25项研究:5、12、9和1项研究,分别,评估了CART的预测作用,QTc延长,HRV指数,和BRS在肝硬化或围/后LT预后。在基于CART的分析中,与无AN的肝硬化患者相比,有AN的肝硬化患者的LT前合并死亡率明显更高(20%vs.6%;P=0.01)。然而,在有和没有LT前QTc延长的患者之间,LT前合并死亡率没有差异(41%与18%;P=0.08),合并围移植的主要并发症风险(29%vs.17%;P=0.08)或LT后合并死亡率(15%与12%;P=0.36)。在基于HRV的分析中,在非幸存者中,正常到正常间隔的标准偏差显着降低,与肝硬化幸存者相比:标准化平均差-2.59,95%置信区间-4.75至-0.43;P=0.04。
    基于CARTS和HRV的AN的存在是LT前设置中死亡率的良好预测因子。术前延长QTc似乎与LT前后的结果无关。
    UNASSIGNED: Autonomic neuropathy (AN) in cirrhotic patients has been linked to a higher risk of cirrhosis-related complications and worse outcomes before, during or after liver transplantation (LT). However, only a few studies exist with inconsistent results.
    UNASSIGNED: We searched for all articles published until September 2023 that described a diagnosis of AN based on cardiovascular autonomic reflex tests (CARTs), assessment of the rate-corrected QT interval (QTc), heart rate variability (HRV), and baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) tests, in order to evaluate the predictive role of AN in cirrhosis and/or peri-/post-LT prognosis.
    UNASSIGNED: Twenty-five studies were included: 5, 12, 9, and 1 study, respectively, assessed the predictive role of CARTs, prolonged QTc, HRV indices, and BRS in cirrhosis or peri-/post-LT prognosis. In CARTs-based analysis, the pre-LT pooled mortality rate was significantly higher in cirrhotics with AN compared to those without AN (20% vs. 6%; P=0.01). However, no difference was found between patients with and without pre-LT prolonged QTc in the pre-LT pooled mortality rates (41% vs. 18%; P=0.08), pooled peri-transplant risk of major complications (29% vs. 17%; P=0.08) or post-LT pooled mortality rates (15% vs. 12%; P=0.36). In HRV-based analysis, the standard deviation of normal-to-normal intervals was significantly lower in non-survivors, compared to survivors with cirrhosis: standardized mean difference -2.59, 95% confidence interval -4.75 to -0.43; P=0.04.
    UNASSIGNED: The presence of CARTs- and HRV-based AN was a good predictor of mortality in the pre-LT setting. Preoperative prolonged QTc did not seem to be associated with the outcome before or after LT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Remdesivir是一种静脉内施用的抗病毒药物,可抑制RNA依赖性RNA聚合酶。体外研究表明,remesivir可以抑制COVID-19病毒在受感染的Vero细胞中的生长,并且可以抑制人细胞系中的感染。
    确定雷德西韦治疗COVID-19感染患者的疗效和安全性。
    从成立到2022年9月4日,对电子医学文献数据库进行了系统搜索。还进行了正在进行的研究和预印本的搜索。使用Cochrane偏差风险工具2.0版进行偏差风险评估。使用的效果指标是相对风险(RR)和95%置信区间(CI)。按疾病严重程度的亚组分析是预先计划的。使用ReviewManager5.4软件计算remdesivir疗效和安全性的估计值。
    确定了9项随机对照试验,有13,085名参与者。纳入研究的8项研究招募了需要住院治疗的确诊COVID-19患者,而一项研究仅限于非住院患者。就COVID19相关住院而言,雷德西韦对具有至少一个疾病进展危险因素的轻中度门诊患者显示出显著益处(RR0.1395%CI0.03至0.59),全因住院(RR0.28,95%CI0.10至0.75),和需要医疗就诊(RR0.19,95%CI0.07至0.56)。对于住院患者,瑞司韦在降低第28日全因死亡率方面有轻微获益(RR0.90,95%CI0.83~0.98).按疾病严重程度进行的亚组分析显示,重症患者的死亡率有降低的趋势(RR0.61,95%CI0.35至1.07),对危重症患者无影响(RR0.96,95%CI0.87至1.04),对于轻度-中度疾病的患者,效果不确定(RR0.74,95%CI0.49至1.11)。Remdesivir显示出减少临床恶化的益处(RR0.75,95%CI0.61至0.89),提高回收率(RR1.07,95%CI1.01至1.13),并减少机械通气的需要(RR0.68,95%CI0.51至0.90)。对ICU入住需求的影响尚无定论(RR0.98,95%CI0.43至2.22)。不良事件的风险没有增加(RR0.98,95%CI0.91至1.06),包括严重不良事件(RR0.77,95%CI0.57至1.03),被看见了。
    根据现有证据,remdesivir显示在治疗的好处为患者轻度,中度,和严重的COVID-19感染。然而,在需要机械通气的危重症患者中,死亡率没有获益.Remdesivir表现出良好的安全性,与对照组相比,不良事件的风险没有增加。这些结果与国际机构的建议一致,中度或重度COVID-19感染,但不适合那些严重感染的人。
    目前的证据支持使用雷德西韦治疗选定的COVID-19患者。
    UNASSIGNED: Remdesivir is an intravenously administered antiviral drug that inhibits RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. In vitro studies have shown that remdesivir can inhibit the growth of the COVID-19 virus in infected Vero cells and can inhibit infection in human cell lines.
    UNASSIGNED: To determine the efficacy and safety of remdesivir in treating patients with COVID-19 infection.
    UNASSIGNED: A systematic search of electronic medical literature databases was done from inception until September 4, 2022. Search for ongoing studies and preprints was also done. Risk of bias assessment was done using Cochrane risk of bias tool version 2.0. Measures of effect used were relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Subgroup analysis by disease severity was preplanned. The estimates for efficacy and safety of remdesivir was calculated using Review Manager 5.4 software.
    UNASSIGNED: Nine randomized controlled trials with 13,085 participants were identified. Eight of the included studies recruited confirmed COVID-19 patients needing hospitalization, while one study limited recruitment to non-hospitalized patients. Remdesivir showed significant benefit for outpatients with mild to moderate disease with at least one risk factor for disease progression in terms of COVID 19-related hospitalization (RR 0.13 95% CI 0.03 to 0.59), all-cause hospitalization (RR 0.28, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.75), and need for medically-attended visits (RR 0.19, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.56). For hospitalized patients, remdesivir had a slight benefit in reducing all-cause mortality at day 28 (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.83 to 0.98). Subgroup analysis by disease severity showed a trend towards reduction in mortality among those with severe disease (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.07), with no effect on those with critical disease (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.04), and inconclusive effect for those with mild-moderate disease (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.49 to 1.11). Remdesivir showed benefit in decreasing clinical deterioration (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.89), improving recovery rate (RR 1.07, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.13), and reducing the need for mechanical ventilation (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.90). There was inconclusive effect on the need for ICU admission (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.43 to 2.22). No increased risk of adverse events (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.06), including serious adverse events (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.03), was seen.
    UNASSIGNED: Based on the available evidence, remdesivir shows benefit in the treatment for patients with mild, moderate, and severe COVID-19 infection. However, there was no benefit in mortality noted among those with critical disease requiring mechanical ventilation. Remdesivir demonstrated a good safety profile, with no increased risk of adverse events compared to control. These results are consistent with the international agencies\' recommendations for the use of remdesivir among patients with mild, moderate or severe COVID-19 infection, but not for those with critical infection.
    UNASSIGNED: Current evidence supports the use of remdesivir as treatment for selected patients with COVID-19.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们提供了关于男性和女性冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)后短期术后死亡率差异的最新信息,并强调了术后卒中风险的差异。心肌梗塞,和新发心房颤动。我们纳入了23项研究,共有3,971,267名患者(70.7%为男性,29.3%女性),并为不平衡研究和倾向匹配研究提供了结果。短期死亡率,来自不平衡研究的合并比值比(OR)为1.71(95%CI1.69-1.74,I2=0%,p=0.7),和倾向匹配研究为1.32(95%CI1.14-1.52,I2=76%,p<0.01)。对于术后中风,合并效应为OR=1.50(95%CI1.35-1.66,I2=83%,p<0.01)和OR=1.31(95%CI1.02-1.67,I2=81%,p<0.01)。对于心肌梗塞,合并效应为OR=1.09(95%CI=0.78-1.53,I2=70%,p<0.01)和OR=1.03(95%CI=0.86-1.24,I2=43%,p=0.18)。对于术后房颤,不平衡研究的合并效应为OR=0.89(95%CI=0.82-0.96,I2=34%,p=0.18)。女性CABG术后短期死亡风险较高,与男人相比。女性术后中风的风险更高。与男性相比,女性术后心肌梗死的可能性没有显着差异。男性CABG术后房颤的风险较高。
    We provide an update regarding the differences between men and women in short-term postoperative mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and highlight the differences in postoperative risk of stroke, myocardial infarction, and new onset atrial fibrillation. We included 23 studies, with a total of 3,971,267 patients (70.7% men, 29.3% women), and provided results for groups of unbalanced studies and propensity matched studies. For short-term mortality, the pooled odds ratio (OR) from unbalanced studies was 1.71 (with 95% CI 1.69-1.74, I2 = 0%, p = 0.7), and from propensity matched studies was 1.32 (95% CI 1.14-1.52, I2 = 76%, p < 0.01). For postoperative stroke, the pooled effects were OR = 1.50 (95% CI 1.35-1.66, I2 = 83%, p < 0.01) and OR = 1.31 (95% CI 1.02-1.67, I2 = 81%, p < 0.01). For myocardial infarction, the pooled effects were OR = 1.09 (95% CI = 0.78-1.53, I2 = 70%, p < 0.01) and OR = 1.03 (95% CI = 0.86-1.24, I2 = 43%, p = 0.18). For postoperative atrial fibrillation, the pooled effect from unbalanced studies was OR = 0.89 (95% CI = 0.82-0.96, I2 = 34%, p = 0.18). The short-term mortality risk after CABG is higher in women, compared to men. Women are at higher risk of postoperative stroke. There is no significant difference in the likelihood of postoperative myocardial infarction in women compared to men. Men are at higher risk of postoperative atrial fibrillation after CABG.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:不良的社会关系与卒中后死亡率之间的关系仍不确定,关于不良社会关系与卒中风险之间关系的证据不一致。在这个荟萃分析中,我们的目的是阐明在社会关系不良的个体中有关卒中风险和卒中后死亡率的证据,包括社会隔离,有限的社交网络,缺乏社会支持,和孤独。
    方法:彻底搜索PubMed,Embase,和Cochrane图书馆数据库来系统地识别相关研究。数据提取由两名研究人员独立进行。使用随机效应或固定效应模型计算具有95%置信区间(CI)的集合比值比(OR)。进行了敏感性分析以评估结果的可靠性。进行随机效应荟萃回归以探索研究之间卒中风险估计的异质性来源。使用Egger和Begg测试对潜在发表偏倚进行评估。
    结果:纳入19项研究,原产于全球4大洲和12个国家。共有1,675,707名参与者参与了这项荟萃分析。随机效应模型下的汇总分析显示,不良社会关系与卒中风险之间存在显着关联(OR=1.30;95CI:1.17-1.44),以及卒中后死亡率的风险增加(OR=1.36;95CI:1.07-1.73)。亚组分析显示了有限社交网络之间的关联(OR=1.52;95CI=1.04-2.21),孤独感(OR=1.31;95CI=1.13-1.51),缺乏社会支持(OR=1.66;95CI=1.04-2.63)与卒中风险有关。荟萃回归解释了研究之间报告的卒中风险差异的75.21%。随机效应荟萃回归结果表明,估计卒中风险的异质性可能源于纳入研究的大陆和发表年份。
    结论:社会隔离,有限的社交网络,缺乏社会支持,孤独感已成为导致卒中后发病和随后死亡的独特危险因素。公共卫生政策必须优先考虑社会关系和孤独感在中风预防和中风后护理中的多方面影响。
    背景:该协议于2024年5月1日在ProsperoInternationalProspectiveSystem上注册,注册号为CRD42024531036。
    BACKGROUND: The association between poor social relationships and post-stroke mortality remains uncertain, and the evidence regarding the relationship between poor social relationships and the risk of stroke is inconsistent. In this meta-analysis, we aim to elucidate the evidence concerning the risk of stroke and post-stroke mortality among individuals experiencing a poor social relationships, including social isolation, limited social networks, lack of social support, and loneliness.
    METHODS: A thorough search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases to systematically identify pertinent studies. Data extraction was independently performed by two researchers. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using either a random-effects or fixed-effects model. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate the reliability of the results. Random-effects meta-regression was performed to explore the sources of heterogeneity in stroke risk estimates between studies. Assessment for potential publication bias was carried out using Egger\'s and Begg\'s tests.
    RESULTS: Nineteen studies were included, originating from 4 continents and 12 countries worldwide. A total of 1,675,707 participants contributed to this meta-analysis. Pooled analyses under the random effect model revealed a significant association between poor social relationships and the risk of stroke (OR = 1.30; 95%CI: 1.17-1.44), as well as increased risks for post-stroke mortality (OR = 1.36; 95%CI: 1.07-1.73). Subgroup analyses demonstrated associations between limited social network (OR = 1.52; 95%CI = 1.04-2.21), loneliness (OR = 1.31; 95%CI = 1.13-1.51), and lack of social support (OR = 1.66; 95%CI = 1.04-2.63) with stroke risk. The meta-regression explained 75.21% of the differences in reported stroke risk between studies. Random-effect meta-regression results indicate that the heterogeneity in the estimated risk of stroke may originate from the continent and publication year of the included studies.
    CONCLUSIONS: Social isolation, limited social networks, lack of social support, and feelings of loneliness have emerged as distinct risk factors contributing to both the onset and subsequent mortality following a stroke. It is imperative for public health policies to prioritize the multifaceted influence of social relationships and loneliness in stroke prevention and post-stroke care.
    BACKGROUND: The protocol was registered on May 1, 2024, on the Prospero International Prospective System with registration number CRD42024531036.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:心力衰竭(HF)因其对死亡率和反复住院的重大影响而成为全球关注的重要问题。在先前的研究中,被诊断为心力衰竭的个体中,反复住院与死亡率之间的关系一直是矛盾的发现。进行荟萃分析以研究复发性心力衰竭住院(HFHs)与死亡率之间的关系。
    方法:我们在各种在线数据库中进行了系统的搜索,比如PubMed,Embase,WebofScience,ProQuest,Scopus,科学直接,和谷歌学者,定位在2023年1月之前检查复发性HFHs与心血管(CV)死亡率以及全因死亡率之间联系的研究.为了评估研究之间的异质性,我们采用I2和Cochran的Q检验。
    结果:总计,来自7项研究的143,867名参与者被纳入分析。发现复发性HFHs与心血管(CV)死亡率和全因死亡率的升高风险密切相关。合并风险比(HR)表明与CV死亡率无显著关联(HR=4.28,95%CI:0.86-7.71),但与全因死亡率有显著关联(HR=2.76,95%CI:2.05-3.48)。亚组分析显示,当按质量评分、样本量,高血压合并症,复发性HFHs的数量,和后续时间。在HFH的频率和死亡风险之间观察到明显的相关性。各种子组,包括糖尿病患者,心房颤动,和慢性肾病,显示复发性HFHs与全因死亡率之间存在显著关联。此外,在射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)等亚组中,复发性HFHs与CV死亡率显着相关,心房颤动,和糖尿病。
    结论:这项荟萃分析提供了复发性HFH与CV死亡率和全因死亡率风险升高之间存在关联的证据。研究结果一致表明,更高的HFH频率与死亡率增加密切相关。
    BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) is a significant worldwide concern due to its substantial impact on mortality rates and recurrent hospitalizations. The relationship between recurrent hospitalizations and mortality in individuals diagnosed with heart failure has been the subject of conflicting findings in previous studies. A meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the association between recurrent heart failure hospitalizations (HFHs) and mortality.
    METHODS: We conducted a systematic search across various online databases, such as PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, ProQuest, Scopus, Science Direct, and Google Scholar, to locate studies that examined the connection between recurrent HFHs and cardiovascular (CV) mortality as well as all-cause mortality until January 2023. To evaluate the heterogeneity among the studies, we employed I2 and Cochran\'s Q test.
    RESULTS: In total, 143,867 participants from seven studies were included in the analysis. Recurrent HFHs were found to be strongly associated with elevated risks of both cardiovascular (CV) mortality and all-cause mortality. The pooled hazard ratios (HRs) indicated a non-significant association for CV mortality (HR = 4.28, 95% CI: 0.86-7.71) but a significant association for all-cause mortality (HR = 2.76, 95% CI: 2.05-3.48). Subgroup analyses revealed a reduction in heterogeneity when stratified by factors such as quality score, sample size, hypertension comorbidity, number of recurrent HFHs, and follow-up time. A clear correlation was observed between the frequency of HFH and the mortality risk. Various subgroups, including those with diabetes, atrial fibrillation, and chronic kidney disease, showed significant associations between recurrent HFHs and all-cause mortality. Additionally, recurrent HFHs were significantly associated with CV mortality in subgroups such as heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), atrial fibrillation, and diabetes.
    CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis provides evidence of an association between recurrent HFH and elevated risk of both CV mortality and all-cause mortality. The findings consistently indicate that a higher frequency of HFH is strongly associated with an increased likelihood of mortality.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    生长分化因子-15(GDF-15)是几种条件下的新兴生物标志物。这个单反,遵循PRISMA指南,研究了GDF-15浓度与心力衰竭(HF)患者不良结局范围之间的关联.出版物在2014年1月1日至2022年8月23日之间从Embase®和Medline®书目数据库中确定(大会摘要:2020年1月1日至2022年8月23日)。63篇出版物符合资格标准(55篇手稿和8篇摘要;45项观察性研究和18项随机对照试验[RCTs]的事后分析)。在确定的19个结果中,最常报告的纵向结局是死亡率(n=32;全因[n=27]或心血管相关[n=6]),复合结局(n=28;最常见的是死亡率±住院/再住院[n=19]),住院/再住院(n=11)。最常见的横断面结果是肾功能(n=22)。在使用多变量分析(MVA)评估与结果的独立关系的纵向研究中,在评估全因死亡率的22/24(92%)研究中发现与较高基线GDF-15浓度相关的风险显著增加,4/5(80%)评估心血管相关死亡率,13/19(68%)评估综合结果,和4/8(50%)评估住院/再住院。所有(7/7;100%)的横断面研究通过MVA评估与肾功能的关系,和3/4(75%)评估运动能力,发现较差的结果与较高的基线GDF-15浓度相关。该SLR表明GDF-15是HF患者死亡率和其他不良但非致死性结局的独立预测因子。更好地了解GDF-15在HF中的预后作用可以改善临床风险预测模型,并可能有助于优化治疗方案。
    Growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) is an emerging biomarker in several conditions. This SLR, conducted following PRISMA guidelines, examined the association between GDF-15 concentration and range of adverse outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF). Publications were identified from Embase® and Medline® bibliographic databases between January 1, 2014, and August 23, 2022 (congress abstracts: January 1, 2020, to August 23, 2022). Sixty-three publications met the eligibility criteria (55 manuscripts and 8 abstracts; 45 observational studies and 18 post hoc analyses of randomized controlled trials [RCTs]). Of the 19 outcomes identified, the most frequently reported longitudinal outcomes were mortality (n = 32 studies; all-cause [n = 27] or cardiovascular-related [n = 6]), composite outcomes (n = 28; most commonly mortality ± hospitalization/rehospitalization [n = 19]), and hospitalization/re-hospitalization (n = 11). The most common cross-sectional outcome was renal function (n = 22). Among longitudinal studies assessing independent relationships with outcomes using multivariate analyses (MVA), a significant increase in risk associated with higher baseline GDF-15 concentration was found in 22/24 (92 %) studies assessing all-cause mortality, 4/5 (80 %) assessing cardiovascular-related mortality, 13/19 (68 %) assessing composite outcomes, and 4/8 (50 %) assessing hospitalization/rehospitalization. All (7/7; 100 %) of the cross-sectional studies assessing the relationship with renal function by MVA, and 3/4 (75 %) assessing exercise capacity, found poorer outcomes associated with higher baseline GDF-15 concentrations. This SLR suggests GDF-15 is an independent predictor of mortality and other adverse but nonfatal outcomes in patients with HF. A better understanding of the prognostic role of GDF-15 in HF could improve clinical risk prediction models and potentially help optimize treatment regimens.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    为了全面审查患病率的系统评价,发病率,和雷诺的死亡率,Sjögren\'s和硬皮病,并找出任何研究空白。
    使用PubMed和Embase(OVID)对2000-2023年期间的英语系统评论进行了全面审查(PROSPEROCRD42023434865)。当从每个系统评价中获得时,报告了估计值及其相应的95%置信区间。使用苏格兰大学间指南网络(SIGN)工具评估系统评价的质量。进行了叙事综合。
    确定了17项系统评价,其中1用于RP,Sjögren's为5,硬皮病为11。有一些高质量的系统评价干燥症和硬皮病的死亡率。然而,只有关于RP和硬皮病的患病率和发病率的低质量系统评价.此外,没有关于RP死亡率的系统评价.对于RP,合并患病率为4850/100.000;合并年发病率为250/100.000.对于Sjögren\'s,患病率为60~70/100.000;年发病率为6.92/100.000,汇总的标准化死亡率为1.38~1.48.对于硬皮病,合并患病率为17.6~23/100.000;年发病率为1.4/100.000;合并标准化死亡率为2.72~3.53.
    与Sjögren's和硬皮病相比,RP的结果描述较少。对于RP和硬皮病的患病率和发病率缺乏高质量的系统评价。因此,具有严格案例定义的进一步研究和系统综述,评估不同的种族群体在这方面是有必要的。
    UNASSIGNED: To comprehensively review systematic reviews of prevalence, incidence, and mortality of Raynaud\'s, Sjögren\'s and Scleroderma, and to identify any research gaps.
    UNASSIGNED: An umbrella review of English language systematic reviews was undertaken using PubMed and Embase (OVID) covering the period 2000-2023 (PROSPERO CRD42023434865). The estimate and its corresponding 95% confidence interval were reported when available from each systematic review. The quality of systematic reviews was assessed using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) tool. A narrative synthesis was undertaken.
    UNASSIGNED: Seventeen systematic reviews were identified, of which 1 was for RP, 5 for Sjögren\'s and 11 for Scleroderma. There were some high-quality systematic reviews for Sjögren\'s and mortality of Scleroderma. However, there were only low-quality systematic reviews of prevalence and incidence of RP and Scleroderma. Furthermore, there were no systematic reviews for the mortality of RP. For RP, the pooled prevalence was 4850 per 100 000; pooled annual incidence was 250 per 100 000. For Sjögren\'s, prevalence was 60-70 per 100 000; annual incidence was 6.92 per 100 000 and the pooled standardized mortality ratio ranged from 1.38 to 1.48. For Scleroderma, pooled prevalence ranged from 17.6 to 23 per 100 000; annual incidence was 1.4 per 100 000; and the pooled standardized mortality ratio ranged from 2.72 to 3.53.
    UNASSIGNED: The outcomes of RP were less well described compared with Sjögren\'s and Scleroderma. There was a lack of high-quality systematic reviews for the prevalence and incidence of RP and Scleroderma. Therefore, further studies and systematic reviews with rigorous case definitions, assessing different ethnic groups are warranted in this area.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号