MAP, mean arterial pressure

MAP,平均动脉压
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经证实:急性肾损伤(AKI)在围手术期移植期间很常见,并与不良预后相关。很少有研究报道特利加压素治疗通过抵消肝移植过程中发生的血液动力学改变而降低AKI发生率。然而,特利加压素对移植后结局的影响尚未得到系统评价.
    UNASSIGNED:对电子数据库进行了全面搜索。包括报告在活体肝移植围手术期使用特利加压素的研究。我们将二分法结果表示为风险比(RR,95%置信区间[CI])使用随机效应模型。主要目的是评估移植后AKI的风险。次要目的是评估肾脏替代疗法(RRT)的需求,血管升压药,对血液动力学的影响,手术过程中失血,住院和重症监护病房(ICU)和住院死亡率。
    UNASSIGNED:共纳入9项研究报告711例患者(特利加压素组309例患者和对照组402例患者)进行分析。术后给予特利加压素的平均持续时间为53.44±28.61h。特利加压素组发生AKI的风险较低(0.6[95%CI,0.44-0.8];P=0.001)。然而,敏感性分析仅包括4项随机对照试验(I2=0;P=0.54),两组的AKI风险相似(0.7[0.43-1.09];P=0.11).两组的RRT需求相似(0.75[0.35-1.56];P=0.44)。特利加压素治疗减少了对另一种血管加压药的需求(0.34[0.25-0.47];P<0.001),同时平均动脉压和全身血管阻力升高3.2mmHg(1.64-4.7;P<0.001)和77.64dynecm-1。秒-5(21.27-134;P=0.007),分别。失血,住院/ICU住院时间,两组的死亡率相似.
    未经批准:围手术期特利加压素治疗没有临床相关益处。
    UNASSIGNED: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is common in the perioperative transplant period and is associated with poor outcomes. Few studies reported a reduction in AKI incidence with terlipressin therapy by counteracting the hemodynamic alterations occurring during liver transplantation. However, the effect of terlipressin on posttransplant outcomes has not been systematically reviewed.
    UNASSIGNED: A comprehensive search of electronic databases was performed. Studies reporting the use of terlipressin in the perioperative period of living donor liver transplantation were included. We expressed the dichotomous outcomes as risk ratio (RR, 95% confidence interval [CI]) using the random effects model. The primary aim was to assess the posttransplant risk of AKI. The secondary aims were to assess the need for renal replacement therapy (RRT), vasopressors, effect on hemodynamics, blood loss during surgery, hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and in-hospital mortality.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of nine studies reporting 711 patients (309 patients in the terlipressin group and 402 in the control group) were included for analysis. Terlipressin was administered for a mean duration of 53.44 ± 28.61 h postsurgery. The risk of AKI was lower with terlipressin (0.6 [95% CI, 0.44-0.8]; P = 0.001). However, on sensitivity analysis including only four randomized controlled trials (I2 = 0; P = 0.54), the risk of AKI was similar in both the groups (0.7 [0.43-1.09]; P = 0.11). The need for RRT was similar in both the groups (0.75 [0.35-1.56]; P = 0.44). Terlipressin therapy reduced the need for another vasopressor (0.34 [0.25-0.47]; P < 0.001) with a concomitant rise in mean arterial pressure and systemic vascular resistance by 3.2 mm Hg (1.64-4.7; P < 0.001) and 77.64 dyne cm-1.sec-5 (21.27-134; P = 0.007), respectively. Blood loss, duration of hospital/ICU stay, and mortality were similar in both groups.
    UNASSIGNED: Perioperative terlipressin therapy has no clinically relevant benefit.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    妊娠高血压疾病(HDP)是全球孕产妇发病和死亡的主要原因。不幸的是,这些疾病的发展缺乏准确的早期临床筛查方法。动脉僵硬度(AS)是血管健康的重要血液动力学指标,已显示出预测HDP发作的有希望的结果。该领域过去的系统评价报告了发生HDP的妇女AS指数的增加,并强调了AS测量作为妊娠早期预测工具的潜力。最近的系统审查,包括截至2015年的论文,评估了有和没有妊娠并发症的女性之间AS参数的差异。从那以后,关于该主题的已发表研究大量涌入,并且对将AS测量纳入临床实践的兴趣日益浓厚。因此,我们提出了一项系统综述和荟萃分析,该综述和荟萃分析更涵盖所有HDP亚群和血管健康的各种血液动力学指标,以全面概述目前的证据状况.具体来说,我们的目标是评估与正常血压妊娠相比发生HDPs的女性的这些指标,以确定哪些指标与HDPs的发生最相关和/或可以预测HDPs的发生.主要数据库(Medline,Embase,科克伦图书馆,WebofScience,PubMed,和CINAHL),将搜索灰色文献(GoogleScholar)和临床试验(clinicaltrials.gov),以确定报告有和没有HDP的孕妇AS和血液动力学测量的研究。对研究类型或年份没有限制。文章将由三位作者独立评估,以根据纳入和排除标准确定资格。将评估纳入研究的方法学质量。将使用随机效应模型进行汇集分析。还将评估发表偏倚和研究之间的异质性。异质性的来源将通过敏感性来探索,子组,和/或荟萃回归分析。这项研究的结果将通过科学会议和科学期刊上的出版物分享。对HDP发病的潜在AS和血流动力学标志物的分析将有助于制定筛查指南和临床相关的AS和HDP风险的血流动力学标志物的临界值。指导未来的研究。编写本协议没有适用的道德考虑。
    Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDPs) are a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality worldwide. Unfortunately, accurate early clinical screening methods for the development of these disorders are lacking. Arterial stiffness (AS) is an important hemodynamic indicator of vascular health that has shown promising results for the prediction of HDP onset. Past systematic reviews in the field have reported an increase in AS indices in women who develop HDPs and have highlighted the potential of AS measurements as a predictive tool early in pregnancy. The most recent systematic review, including papers up to 2015, assessed the differences in AS parameters between women with and without pregnancy complications. Since then, there has been a substantial influx of published research on the topic and a growing interest in the incorporation of AS measurements into clinical practice. Thus, we propose a systematic review and meta-analysis that is more inclusive to all HDP subsets and various hemodynamic indices of vascular health to provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of evidence. Specifically, we aim to evaluate these measures in women who develop HDPs compared to normotensive pregnancies to determine which measures are most associated with and/or can predict the development of HDPs. Major databases (Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PubMed, and CINAHL), grey literature (Google Scholar) and clinical trials (clinicaltrials.gov) will be searched to identify studies that report AS and hemodynamic measurements in pregnant women with and without HDPs. No restrictions will be made on study type or year. Articles will be independently evaluated by three authors to determine eligibility based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Methodological quality of included studies will be assessed. Pooled analyses will be conducted using a random-effects model. Publication bias and between-study heterogeneity will also be assessed. Sources of heterogeneity will be explored by sensitivity, subgroup, and/or meta-regression analyses. Results from this study will be shared through scientific conferences and publications in scientific journals. The analysis of potential AS and hemodynamic markers for HDP onset will help inform the development of screening guidelines and clinically relevant cut-off values of AS and hemodynamic markers for HDP risk, guiding future research. There are no applicable ethical considerations to the writing of this protocol.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    Introduction Advances in systemic chemotherapy, molecular targeted therapy and immunotherapy have extended and improved the quality of life of patients with cancer. However, the central nervous system is very susceptible to complications of systemic cancer and its treatment. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) is a rare clinical and neuroradiologic entity which has garnered increasing recognition in the past two decades. Cancer patients are generally treated with cytotoxic agents, immunotherapy, molecular targeted therapies or glucosteroids which are more frequently associated with PRES. Case presentation A 59-year old female, known with a relapse of her lung adenocarcinoma, had been treated with 4 cycles of cisplatin (75 mg/m²) and pemetrexed (500 mg/m²). Six weeks after this combination chemotherapy and within 28 h after the administration of pemetrexed maintenance therapy, she developed a generalised epileptic insult. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain showed bilateral areas of increased signal intensity in the subcortical parietal and frontal white matter. She was treated with a broad spectrum antiseizure drug, levetiracetam 750 mg twice daily and strict control of blood pressure. Discussion Diagnosis of PRES should be considered in all patients with neurologic symptoms who are at risk to develop PRES. It is crucial to establish the diagnosis as soon as possible since there is no specific treatment of PRES other than correction of the underlying risk factors and preventing seizure recurrence. Administration of pemetrexed is a possible risk factor for the development of PRES.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号