Most of the studied MADS box members are linked to flowering and fruit traits. However, higher volumes of studies on type II of the two types so far suggest that the florigenic effect of the gene members could just be the tip of the iceberg. In the current study, we used a systematic approach to obtain a general overview of the MADS box members\' cross-trait and multifactor associations, and their pleiotropic potentials, based on a manually curated local reference database. While doing so, we screened for the co-occurrence of terms of interest within the title or abstract of each reference, with a threshold of three hits. The analysis results showed that our approach can retrieve multi-faceted information on the subject of study (MADS box gene members in the current case), which could otherwise have been skewed depending on the authors\' expertise and/or volume of the literature reference base. Overall, our study discusses the roles of MADS box members in association with plant organs and trait-linked factors among plant species. Our assessment showed that plants with most of the MADS box member studies included tomato, apple, and rice after Arabidopsis. Furthermore, based on the degree of their multi-trait associations, FLC, SVP, and SOC1 are suggested to have relatively higher pleiotropic potential among others in plant growth, development, and flowering processes. The approach devised in this study is expected to be applicable for a basic understanding of any study subject of interest, regardless of the depth of prior knowledge.

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the most common heart disease worldwide. Association of CAD with variants in the myocyte enhancer factor 2A (MEF2A) gene, the first identified CAD-causing gene, has attracted special attention but the results are controversial. We aimed to evaluate this genetic association via a case-control study and meta-analysis.
RESULTS: We performed a case-control association study to investigate the relationship between variations in exon 11 of MEF2A gene and CAD in 1045 sporadic patients and 1008 controls enrolled angiographically among southern Chinese population, and then the data from this study were compared and discussed in a systematic review and meta-analysis with all available published studies on MEF2A gene and CAD. In total, eight variants were identified (21-bp deletion, CAG repeats, CCG repeats, a CCA deletion and four SNPs). No significant link was observed between the common (CAG)(n) polymorphism and CAD, whereas the rare 21-bp deletion was detected only in five affected individuals. The meta-analysis of (CAG)(n) polymorphism and CAD risk, including nine studies with 3801 CAD patients and 4020 controls, also provided no convincing evidence for the genetic association, even upon stratification by race (mainly Whites and Chinese). However, the 21-bp deletion was regarded as a potentially logical, albeit undetermined, candidate for CAD in the following systematic review.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings failed to demonstrate a correlation between (CAG)(n) polymorphism with CAD, however, we concluded that the rare 21-bp deletion might have a more compelling effect on CAD than the common (CAG)(n) polymorphism, and MEF2A genetic variant might be a rare but specific cause of CAD/MI.

The photoperiodic induction of flowering is a systemic process requiring translocation of a floral stimulus from the leaves to the shoot apical meristem. In response to this stimulus, the apical meristem stops producing leaves to initiate floral development; this switch in morphogenesis involves a change in the identity of the primordia initiated and in phyllotaxis. The physiological study of the floral transition has led to the identification of several putative floral signals such as sucrose, cytokinins, gibberellins, and reduced N-compounds that are translocated in the phloem sap from leaves to the shoot apical meristem. On the other hand, the genetic approach developed more recently in Arabidopsis thaliana allowed the discovery of many genes that control flowering time. These genes function in \'cascades\' within four promotive pathways, the \'photoperiodic\', \'autonomous\', \'vernalization\', and \'gibberellin\' pathways, which all converge on the \'integrator\' genes SUPPRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF CO 1 (SOC1) and FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT). Recently, several studies have highlighted a role for a product of FT as a component of the floral stimulus or \'florigen\'. These recent advances and the proposed mode of action of FT are discussed here.