Liver metastases

肝转移
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:利用原发灶第一引流静脉(FDV)的循环肿瘤细胞(CTC)和其他临床相关参数,构建预测结直肠癌(CRC)患者肝转移的列线图,为临床诊断和治疗提供理论依据。
    方法:收集了343例CRC患者的信息并建立了数据库。多因素分析用于确定结直肠癌肝转移(mCRC)的独立因素,并构建列线图。接收机工作特性曲线(ROC),校准图,和决策曲线分析(DCA)用于评估歧视,与实际风险达成协议,和预测模型的临床实用性,分别。
    结果:有肝转移患者的FDV中CTC水平明显高于无肝转移患者。Logistic多因素分析显示,血管侵犯,T级,癌胚抗原(CEA),CA19-9和CTC可以用作构建列线图的预测因子。列线图在预测mCRC方面表现出良好的判别能力,训练集和验证集的曲线下面积(AUC)值为0.871[95%CI:0.817-0.924)和0.891(95%CI:0.817-0.964),分别。]ThecalibrationcurvesofboththetrainingandvalidationsetshowsthatthemodelwaseffectiveinpredictingtheprobabilityofmCRC.DCA用于评估该预测模型,并显示出良好的净临床效益。
    结论:我们开发并验证了基于FDV中CTC与其他临床参数相结合的列线图模型,以更好地预测mCRC的发生。
    OBJECTIVE: To use circulating tumor cells (CTC) from the first drainage vein (FDV) of the primary lesion and other clinically relevant parameters to construct a nomogram for predicting liver metastasis in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients, and to provide a theoretical basis for clinical diagnosis and treatment.
    METHODS: Information from 343 CRC patients was collected and a database was established. Multivariate logistic analysis was used to identify independent factors for colorectal cancer liver metastasis(mCRC) and nomograms were constructed. Receiver operating characteristic curves(ROC), calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to assess discrimination, agreement with actual risk, and the clinical utility of the prediction model, respectively.
    RESULTS: CTC levels in FDV were significantly higher in patients with liver metastasis than in those without liver metastasis. Logistic multivariate analysis showed that vascular invasion, T stage, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), CA19-9, and CTC could be used as predictors to construct nomograms. The nomograms showed good discriminatory ability in predicting mCRC, with area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.871 [95 % CI: 0.817-0.924) and 0.891 (95 % CI: 0.817-0.964) for the training and validation sets, respectively.] The calibration curves of both the training and validation sets showed that the model was effective in predicting the probability of mCRC. DCA was used to evaluate this predictive model and showed good net clinical benefit.
    CONCLUSIONS: We developed and validated a nomogram model based on the combination of CTC in the FDV with other clinical parameters to better predict the occurrence of mCRC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    传统上,转移性乳腺癌的手术被认为是姑息性手术。然而,一些回顾性文献表明,在存在转移性疾病的情况下,手术可能会带来生存获益.最近的随机试验将针对从头乳腺癌中完整的原发性肿瘤和全身性继发性转移的管理进行审查。
    Surgery for the management metastatic breast cancer has traditionally been considered a palliative procedure. However, some retrospective publications indicated that there may be a survival benefit to surgery in the presence of metastatic disease. Recent randomized trials will be reviewed for both management of the intact primary tumor in de novo breast cancer and systemic secondary metastases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究调查了ramucirumab(RAM)作为晚期CRC患者的二线或挽救治疗在治疗肝转移(LMs)中的作用。在36名患者中,21人(58%)接受了RAM+亚叶酸,氟尿嘧啶和伊立替康(FOLFIRI)作为二线治疗,而15人(42%)是在打捞环境中收到的。中位总生存时间为23个月[95%可信区间(CI),二线治疗组12-34个月],抢救治疗组8个月(95%CI,5-19个月)。在36名患者中,14例(39%)在化疗期间接受了LMs的手术切除。在二线RAM加FOLFIRI(RAM-LM)期间,共有6例患者首次接受了LMs手术切除;其余8例患者中,6例患者在基于贝伐单抗(BEV)的一线化疗(BEV-LM)期间接受了LM切除术。免疫组织化学分析CD42b显示血小板聚集评分(CD42b评分),范围从0(不存在沉积)到3(存在线性沉积),随着RAM和BEV治疗持续时间的增加,有降低的趋势。尽管BEV-LM组和RAM-LM组之间抗VEGF抗体治疗的平均持续时间没有显着差异,RAM-LM组CD42b评分中位数较高(CD42b评分中位数,3;范围,0-3)与BEV-LM组(中位CD42b评分,1;范围,0-3;P=0.01),提示与BEV相比,RAM在肝窦中诱导不同程度的血小板聚集。
    The present study investigated the role of ramucirumab (RAM) in treating liver metastases (LMs) as a second-line or salvage treatment in patients with advanced CRC. Of the 36 patients, 21 (58%) received RAM plus folinic acid, fluorouracil and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) as second-line treatment, whereas 15 (42%) received it in a salvage setting. The median overall survival time was 23 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 12-34 months] for those in the second-line treatment group and 8 months (95% CI, 5-19 months) for those in the salvage treatment group. Of the 36 patients, 14 (39%) underwent surgical resection of LMs during chemotherapy. A total of 6 patients underwent surgical resection for LMs for the first time during second-line RAM plus FOLFIRI (RAM-LM); of the remaining 8 patients, 6 underwent resection of LMs during first-line bevacizumab (BEV)-based chemotherapy (BEV-LM). Immunohistochemical analysis of CD42b showed that the platelet aggregation score (CD42b score), which ranges from 0 (absence of deposition) to 3 (presence of linear deposition), tended to decrease with the increasing duration of treatment with both RAM and BEV. Although there was no significant difference in the mean duration of anti-VEGF antibody treatment between the BEV-LM and RAM-LM groups, the median CD42b score was higher in the RAM-LM group (median CD42b score, 3; range, 0-3) compared with that in the BEV-LM group (median CD42b score, 1; range, 0-3; P=0.01), suggesting that RAM induces a different degree of platelet aggregation in liver sinusoids compared to BEV.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:大约40%的结直肠癌患者会发生肝转移。肝动脉灌注化疗(HAIC)是一种有价值的治疗选择,有疗效,姑息治疗,或佐剂意图。我们研究的目的是描述技术考虑因素,安全,和接受HAIC的患者的肿瘤学结果。
    方法:本回顾性分析包括2004年至2021年在我们机构接受经皮肝动脉端口放置的所有患者。人口统计,收集解剖学和技术数据。使用RECIST1.1评估肿瘤反应。Kaplan-Meier估计用于总生存期(OS)和肝无进展生存期(PFS)。不良事件(AE)使用Clavien-Dindo分类进行分级。
    结果:总共360名患者(中位年龄,包括58.6年[四分位数范围(IQR):49.5-65.4];208名男性[57.8%])。在87.9%的病例中,经皮肝动脉端口置入成功,导致379个端口放置(431次尝试)。总的来说,提供了394个HAIC课程,主要是奥沙利铂(94.7%),每个疗程的中位数为6个周期(IQR:3-8)。在42.0%的端口(IIIb-V级:1.1%)中观察到AE(所有等级)。大多数港口功能障碍都可以解决,导致HAIC恢复率达到73.1%,不影响操作系统。中位OS为22个月(IQR:18-24),中位肝PFS为11个月(IQR:9.5-13)。肿瘤降级允许35.6%的患者进行手术,中位OS明显长于非手术患者(39个月[IQR:33-79]与14个月[IQR:12-16],p<0.001)。
    结论:这项回顾性队列研究证明了其可行性,安全,以及经皮肝动脉端口放置对选定患者生存率的影响。
    结论:经皮肝动脉端口放置是可行的,安全有效,对选定患者的生存有影响。
    结论:肝动脉灌注化疗提供了有希望的肿瘤反应和总生存期,特别是在切除/消融的情况下。肝动脉灌注化疗端口使用总并发症发生率高,但严重的并发症很少见.端口修正通常是必要的,但可以恢复肝动脉灌注化疗,而不会影响总体生存率。
    OBJECTIVE: Approximately 40% of patients with colorectal cancer will develop liver metastases. Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) represents a valuable treatment option, with curative, palliative, or adjuvant intent. The aim of our study was to describe technical considerations, safety, and oncological outcomes of patients receiving HAIC.
    METHODS: All patients who underwent percutaneous hepatic arterial port placement in our institution between 2004 and 2021 were included in this retrospective analysis. Demographic, anatomical and technical data were collected. Tumor response was assessed using RECIST 1.1. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used for overall survival (OS) and hepatic progression-free survival (PFS). Adverse events (AEs) were graded using the Clavien-Dindo classification.
    RESULTS: A total of 360 patients (median age, 58.6 years [interquartile range (IQR): 49.5-65.4]; 208 men [57.8%]) were included. Percutaneous hepatic arterial port placement was successful in 87.9% of cases, resulting in 379 port placements (431 attempts). Overall, 394 HAIC courses were delivered, mostly oxaliplatin-based (94.7%), with a median of 6 cycles per course (IQR: 3-8). AEs (all grades) were observed in 42.0% of ports (grade IIIb-V: 1.1%). Most port dysfunctions could be resolved, resulting in a 73.1% rate of HAIC resumption, without impact on OS. Median OS was 22 months (IQR: 18-24), and median hepatic PFS was 11 months (IQR: 9.5-13). Tumor downstaging allowed surgery in 35.6% of patients, with significantly longer median OS than non-operated patients (39 months [IQR: 33-79] versus 14 months [IQR: 12-16], p < 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective cohort study demonstrates the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of percutaneous hepatic arterial port placement with an impact on survival for selected patients.
    CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous hepatic arterial port placement is feasible, safe and effective with an impact on the survival of selected patients.
    CONCLUSIONS: Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy provides promising tumor response and overall survival, especially in cases of resection/ablation. Total complication rate of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy port use is high, but serious complications are rare. Port revision is often necessary but allows the resumption of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy without affecting overall survival.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    尽管有远处转移的疾病,甲状腺髓样癌(MTC)的病程通常会缓慢。此外,鉴于转移性MTC是无法治愈的,并且全身疗法具有不可忽视的毒性,在存在寡进行性疾病的情况下,局部治疗通常是有利的。钇90(Y90)经动脉放射栓塞(TARE)已成为不可切除的原发性和转移性肝肿瘤的安全有效治疗方法。然而,支持其用于转移性MTC的数据有限.我们介绍了一名遗传性MTC和大型双叶肝转移患者的病例,该患者在使用Y90微球TARE后表现出肿瘤反应和副肿瘤性腹泻的消退。
    Medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) can often have an indolent course despite distant metastatic disease. Additionally, given that metastatic MTC is incurable and systemic therapies have non-negligeable toxicities, localized treatments are often favored in presence of oligo-progressive disease. Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) with yttrium-90 (Y90) has emerged as a safe and efficacious treatment for nonresectable primary and metastatic liver tumors, yet data supporting its use in metastatic MTC are limited. We present the case of a patient with hereditary MTC and large bilobar liver metastases who demonstrated tumor response and resolution of their paraneoplastic diarrhea following TARE with Y90 microspheres.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    诊断肿瘤性发热需要排除可识别的原因,让它成为诊断挑战。发热作为胰腺腺癌的主要表现并不常见,文献报道的病例很少。在这里,我们介绍了一个不寻常的转移性胰腺腺癌,主要表现为不明原因的发热。一位63岁的斯里兰卡男性,一个被诊断患有糖尿病的非吸烟者,有发热史的高血压和血脂异常,厌食症和体重减轻2个月。尽管副伤寒血清学阳性的治疗已经完成,他的症状和炎症标志物仍然升高,而其余的感染筛查均为阴性。在进一步评估中,患者在影像学检查中发现胰腺远端低密度伴环状增强的多发性肝脏病变.组织学证实胰腺癌伴肝转移。在计算机断层扫描成像中,非典型肝转移可能存在环增强的证据;因此,活检对于诊断和决策是强制性的.通常,胰尾肿瘤是可切除的,但如果它们与肝转移疾病相关,不建议手术切除,因为它不可能治愈。因此,在转移性胰腺腺癌的背景下,姑息性化疗和发热的药物管理是必需的。
    Diagnosing neoplastic fever requires excluding identifiable causes, making it a diagnostic challenge. Fever as a primary manifestation of pancreatic adenocarcinoma is uncommon with few cases reported in the literature. Here we present an unusual case of metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma primarily manifesting as pyrexia of unknown origin. A 63-year-old Sri Lankan male, a non-smoker who was diagnosed with diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidaemia presented with a history of fever, anorexia and weight loss for 2 months. Despite the completion of treatment for positive serology for paratyphi, his symptoms and inflammatory markers remained elevated while the rest of the infectious screening was negative. On further evaluation, the patient was found to have a hypodense distal pancreas with ring-enhancing multiple liver lesions on imaging. Histology confirmed pancreatic adenocarcinoma with liver metastasis. Atypical liver metastases may present with evidence of ring enhancement in computed tomography imaging; thus, the biopsy is mandatory for diagnosis and decision-making. Usually, tumours of the pancreatic tail are resectable but if they are associated with liver metastatic disease, surgical resection is not recommended because it is not potentially curative. Therefore, in the context of metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma, palliative chemotherapy and pharmacological management of fever are required.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们研究的目的是比较三种放射消融方式的剂量学方面-直接高剂量率近距离放射治疗(HDR-BT)和在Cyberknife(SBRTck)和ElektaVersaHDLINAC(SBRTTe)上进行的几乎计划的立体定向放射治疗。
    我们选择了30例肝转移患者,他们接受了肝脏间质HDR-BT,并为SBRTck和SBRTe准备了计划。在所有情况下,处方剂量为25Gy的单次剂量。治疗交付时间,传递给PTV和危险器官的剂量,以及合格指数,进行了计算和比较。
    在SBRTck中观察到最长的中位治疗递送时间,与显著较短且相当的HDR-BT和SBRTe形成对比。与SBRT模式相比,HDR-BT计划实现了更好的PTV覆盖率(D98%除外)。在两种SBRT模式之间,SBRTck计划导致Dmean更好的剂量覆盖率,D50%,和D90%值与SBRTe相比,D98%无差异。考虑到PCI和R100%,SBRTe是最有利的。SBRTck计划实现了最好的HI,而SBRTe和SBRTck之间的R50%值相当。递送至未受累肝脏体积的最低中位剂量(V5Gy,V9.1Gy)通过HDR-BT实现,而SBRT模式之间的差异不显著。关于十二指肠和右肾中更有利的剂量分布,SBRT计划更好,而HDR-BT在胃中达到较低的剂量,心,伟大的船只,肋骨,皮肤和脊髓。在所有选择的方式之间,肠和胆道剂量分布没有显着差异。
    HDR-BT在PTV内导致更有利的剂量分布,在危险器官中导致更低的剂量。这表明,这种治疗方式可以被视为在精心选择的肝脏恶性肿瘤患者中替代其他局部消融疗法。未来的研究应进一步解决比较不同肝脏位置和临床情况下的治疗方式的问题。
    UNASSIGNED: The aim of our study was to compare dosimetric aspects of three radioablation modalities - direct high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) and virtually planned stereotactic body radiation therapy performed on CyberKnife (SBRTck) and Elekta Versa HD LINAC (SBRTe) applied in patients with liver metastases.
    UNASSIGNED: We selected 30 patients with liver metastases, who received liver interstitial HDR-BT and virtually prepared plans for SBRTck and SBRTe. In all the cases, the prescribed dose was a single fraction of 25 Gy. Treatment delivery time, doses delivered to PTV and organs at risk, as well as conformity indices, were calculated and compared.
    UNASSIGNED: The longest median treatment delivery time was observed in SBRTck in contrast to HDR-BT and SBRTe which were significantly shorter and comparable. HDR-BT plans achieved better coverage of PTV (except for D98%) in contrast to SBRT modalities. Between both SBRT modalities, SBRTck plans resulted in better dose coverage in Dmean, D50%, and D90% values compared to SBRTe without difference in D98%. The SBRTe was the most advantageous considering the PCI and R100%. SBRTck plans achieved the best HI, while R50% value was comparable between SBRTe and SBRTck. The lowest median doses delivered to uninvolved liver volume (V5Gy, V9.1Gy) were achieved with HDR-BT, while the difference between SBRT modalities was insignificant. SBRT plans were better regarding more favourable dose distribution in the duodenum and right kidney, while HDR-BT achieved lower doses in the stomach, heart, great vessels, ribs, skin and spinal cord. There were no significant differences in bowel and biliary tract dose distribution between all selected modalities.
    UNASSIGNED: HDR-BT resulted in more favourable dose distribution within PTVs and lower doses in organs at risk, which suggests that this treatment modality could be regarded as an alternative to other local ablative therapies in carefully selected patients\' with liver malignancies. Future studies should further address the issue of comparing treatment modalities in different liver locations and clinical scenarios.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    大多数转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者在标准治疗后的治疗选择有限。VEGFR-酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)与免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)联合使用已证明在mCRC中具有临床活性。特别是在没有肝转移的患者中。TKIzanzalintinib(XL092)靶向VEGFR,MET和TAM激酶,参与肿瘤生长的蛋白质,血管生成,转移和免疫抑制。Zanzalintinib具有免疫调节特性,可以增强对ICIs的反应。介绍了STELLAR-303的设计,第三阶段,开放标签,随机研究评估了在非MSI-HmCRC期间/之后进展或难以治疗/不耐受的非MSI-HmCRC患者中,扎扎林替尼联合阿特珠单抗与瑞戈非尼的比较.主要终点是无肝转移患者的总生存期。临床试验注册:NCT05425940(ClinicalTrials.gov)。
    转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)是已经扩散到身体其他部位的结肠癌或直肠癌,最常见的是肝脏,肺和腹部。初始治疗后mCRC恶化的患者选择有限。Zanzalintinib是一种新型的口服研究药物,可以减缓或阻止癌症的生长。它通过阻断在发育中起重要作用的某些蛋白质起作用,癌症的生长和扩散。Zanzalintinib还可能有助于提高另一类称为免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)的癌症药物的有效性。它通过激活患者的免疫系统来对抗癌症。这里,我们描述了STELLAR-303的设计,这是一项正在进行的研究,该研究比较了联合使用扎扎林替尼和一种名为阿特珠单抗的ICI药物与一种名为瑞戈非尼的mCRC批准治疗的效果.全球约有900名mCRC参与者将被纳入该研究。要纳入研究,参与者的mCRC必须在以前的治疗后恶化,并且必须没有高水平的微卫星不稳定性,这是一些mCRCs的特定特征。参与者将被随机给予两种治疗方法之一。该研究的主要目标是通过测量参与者在开始治疗后存活的时间长度来评估zanzalintinib联合阿特珠单抗与regorafenib的比较,特别是在没有扩散到肝脏的mCRC患者中。此外,这项研究将研究每种治疗的副作用。该研究目前正在寻找参与者。
    Most patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) have limited treatment options following standard-of-care therapy. VEGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have demonstrated clinical activity in mCRC in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), particularly in patients without liver metastases. The TKI zanzalintinib (XL092) targets VEGFR, MET and TAM kinases, proteins that are involved in tumor growth, angiogenesis, metastasis and immunosuppression. Zanzalintinib has immunomodulatory properties that may enhance response to ICIs. Presented is the design of STELLAR-303, a global, phase III, open-label, randomized study evaluating zanzalintinib plus atezolizumab versus regorafenib in patients with non-MSI-H mCRC who progressed during/after or are refractory/intolerant to standard-of-care therapy. The primary end point is overall survival in patients without liver metastases.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT05425940 (ClinicalTrials.gov).
    Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is cancer of the colon or rectum that has spread to other parts of the body, most often to the liver, lungs and abdomen. People with mCRC that has worsened after initial treatment have limited options. Zanzalintinib is a novel oral investigational drug that can slow or stop cancer growth. It works by blocking certain proteins that play important roles in the development, growth and spread of cancer. Zanzalintinib may also help improve the effectiveness of another class of cancer drugs called immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), which work by activating the patient\'s immune system to fight cancer. Here, we describe the design of STELLAR-303, an ongoing study that is comparing the effects of combining zanzalintinib and an ICI drug called atezolizumab with an approved treatment for mCRC called regorafenib. About 900 participants with mCRC will be enrolled in the study worldwide. To be included in the study, participants must have mCRC that worsened after previous therapies and must not have a high level of microsatellite instability, which is a specific feature of some mCRCs. Participants will be randomly given one of the two treatments. The main goal of the study is to evaluate zanzalintinib plus atezolizumab compared with regorafenib by measuring the length of time participants are alive after starting treatment, specifically in patients with mCRC that has not spread to the liver. Additionally, the study will look at the side effects with each treatment. The study is currently seeking participants.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肝转移通常发生在许多实体恶性肿瘤中。随着系统疗法的进步和预期寿命的延长,在寡转移中使用局部疗法的作用正在迅速增加.立体定向放射治疗(SBRT)是一种新兴的精确疗法,在不可切除的肝转移的治疗中越来越频繁地使用。本文就SBRT在肝转移中的作用作一综述。治疗原则,临床结果,毒性,和最佳的患者选择。
    Liver metastases occur commonly in many solid malignancies. With advances in systemic therapies and increased life expectancy, the role of using local therapies in oligo-metastases is rapidly increasing. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an emerging precision therapy that is being used more frequently in the treatment for unresectable liver metastases. This review focuses on the role of SBRT for liver metastases, principles of treatment, clinical outcomes, toxicity, and optimal patient selection.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号