Drug repurposing involves the investigation of existing drugs for new indications. It offers a great opportunity to quickly identify a new drug candidate at a lower cost than novel discovery and development. Despite the importance and potential role of drug repurposing, there is no specific definition that healthcare providers and the World Health Organization credit. Unfortunately, many similar and interchangeable concepts are being used in the literature, making it difficult to collect and analyze uniform data on repurposed drugs. This research was conducted based on understanding general criteria for drug repurposing, concentrating on liver diseases. Many drugs have been investigated for their effect on liver diseases even though they were originally approved (or on their way to being approved) for other diseases. Some of the hypotheses for drug repurposing were first captured from the literature and then processed further to test the hypothesis. Recently, with the revolution in bioinformatics techniques, scientists have started to use drug libraries and computer systems that can analyze hundreds of drugs to give a short list of candidates to be analyzed pharmacologically. However, this study revealed that drug repurposing is a potential aid that may help deal with liver diseases. It provides available or under-investigated drugs that could help treat hepatitis, liver cirrhosis, Wilson disease, liver cancer, and fatty liver. However, many further studies are needed to ensure the efficacy of these drugs on a large scale.

Liver blood test anomalies are common after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), but their cause often remains difficult to identify. Our objective was to evaluate the safety and utility of liver biopsies in patients who underwent allo-HSCT. In a retrospective single-center cohort study, we reviewed all cases of patients who underwent liver biopsy between June 2005 and July 2017. During this period, 54 biopsies were performed in 45 patients, in which 38 patients underwent allo-HSCT for malignant and 7 for nonmalignant hematological disorders. Median time between allo-HSCT and liver biopsy was 213 days. Seven biopsies were percutaneous, and 47 were transjugular. No adverse event related to the biopsy procedure occurred; 94.5% biopsies (51 of 54) led to a histological diagnosis. Cholestatic graft-versus-host disease was histologically demonstrated in 16 biopsies (30%); hepatitis-like graft-versus-host disease in 9 biopsies (17%); nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in 6 biopsies (9%); regenerative nodular hyperplasia in 4 biopsies (5%); and drug-induced liver injury, sinusoidal obstruction syndrome, and viral hepatitis each in 3 biopsies (5%). Association between clinical, laboratory, imaging and pathological features was poor. Only 34% of physicians\' prebiopsy hypotheses were confirmed by pathological findings. Patient management was influenced by liver biopsy results in 65% of cases, allowing us to identify a new diagnosis (n = 13), rule out a differential diagnosis (n = 14), or confirm the main hypothesis (n = 6). In conclusion, liver biopsy is a safe and useful technique to investigate liver blood test anomalies following allo-HSCT.

暂无摘要。