Lipectomy

嘴唇切除术
  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Although widely accepted as an optimal procedure in thigh contouring, liposuction can result in complications, such as skin irregularity or aspiration inadequacy. A main cause might be insufficient knowledge of the superficial fascial system (SFS). The authors aimed to explore the characteristics of the SFS in the thigh and propose anatomical guidelines and new zoning for liposuction-assisted thigh contouring.
    A total of 20 fresh female thighs were dissected from the skin to deep fascia to observe and compare changes in the SFS from the medial to the lateral side and from the proximal to the distal end.
    The thigh was divided into four units, namely, the medial (three subunits: upper, middle, and lower), anterior, posterior (three subunits: upper medial, upper lateral, and middle lower parts), and lateral thigh. The authors found that the form of the SFS has regional variations. Therefore, based on these varied features, four anatomical scenarios (degrees I to IV) and one functional section (hip-contour support) were devised from the eight subunits. Five different liposuction methods were formulated to manage these subunits: all-layer mass liposuction, normal aspiration, border feather-out, restricted lipoplasty, and anchor.
    The SFS of the thigh showed a regional variation pattern, based on which the authors proposed a series of new anatomy-based liposuction approaches. A well-sculpted thigh with its different sections presented in harmony can be safely obtained using these approaches.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:由于大量浸润性肿胀,周向吸脂术可能会导致稀释性贫血。目前缺乏分析吸收的肿胀百分比以及肿胀浸润的安全极限的研究。
    目的:目的是计算动力辅助吸脂术中给药液体的平均体积摄取。此外,我们试图计算一个实用的公式来确定可以安全给药的液体量,而不会引起症状性稀释性贫血或血容量过高.
    方法:接受动力辅助肿胀浸润的圆周吸脂术的患者被纳入一项前瞻性临床研究。收集手术期间和手术后的所有相关给药和排泄量。比较术前与术后血象结果,并随访24小时的血流动力学参数。基于测量的体积计算平均体积吸收,以及给药体积和患者血容量之间的比率。
    结果:在2021年9月期间纳入了30例患者。对于计算的1.11比1的浸润与抽吸比率,平均体积摄取为58%。术后Hb和Hct平均下降1.9g/dl和4.6%,分别,红细胞水平稳定.所有患者均保持血流动力学稳定,无需输血或长期需氧。肿胀与血液体积的平均比率为85.0%。
    结论:在动力辅助浸润的圆周吸脂术中,浸润的肿胀体积应保持低于患者血体积的85%,以最大限度地降低有症状的稀释性贫血或血容量过高的风险.
    Circumferential liposuction may cause dilution anemia due to a high volume of infiltrated tumescent. Studies analyzing the percentage of absorbed tumescent and the safe limit of tumescent infiltration are currently lacking.
    The aim of this study was to calculate the average volume uptake of administered fluids in power-assisted liposuction, and to calculate a practical formula to determine the amount of fluid that can safely be administered without inducing symptomatic dilution anemia or hypervolemia.
    Patients undergoing circumferential liposuction with power-assisted tumescent infiltration were included in a prospective clinical study. All relevant administered and excreted volumes during and after the operation were collected. Preoperative vs postoperative hemogram results were compared and the hemodynamic parameters were followed for 24 hours. The average volume uptake was calculated based on the measured volumes, and on the ratio between administered volumes and the patient\'s blood volume.
    Thirty patients were included during September 2021. The average volume uptake was 58% for a calculated 1.11:1 infiltration to aspiration ratio. There was a mean drop of 1.9 g/dL and 4.6% for the postoperative hemoglobin and hematocrit, respectively, with a stable red blood cell level. All patients remained hemodynamically stable without the need for blood transfusion or prolonged oxygen administration. The average tumescent vs blood volume ratio was 85.0%.
    In circumferential liposuction with power-assisted infiltration, the infiltrated tumescent volume should remain below 85% of the patient\'s blood volume to minimize the risk of symptomatic dilution anemia or hypervolemia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:背部轮廓畸形在背部的每个部位表现不同,如后卷,髂嵴存款,还有水牛驼峰.然而,目前很少有文献在背侧轮廓畸形的解剖学基础上存在。这项研究的目的是更好地了解背部的解剖特征,为了提出基于证据的分区原则抽脂辅助背部轮廓。
    方法:共解剖了12具新鲜尸体,以垂直顺序(皮肤到深筋膜)观察每个层次,并横向比较肩胛骨下腰椎三角区域的浅筋膜系统(SFS)。全背矢量切片用于研究肩胛骨上脂肪沉积。
    结果:SFS充当连接背部皮下组织所有水平的桥梁。宏观上,它在肩胛骨和腰椎三角形区域更密集,在肩胛骨下区域更松散,在微观上,蒂支持带的超微结构由疏松的小叶间筋膜和僵硬的功能性筋膜组成。
    结论:背部SFS的区域变异模式与亚洲女性观察到的背部轮廓畸形一致。更好地了解应用于证据分区的背部地形解剖是提高手术精度和避免背部轮廓畸形的基础。
    Dorsal contour deformity presents with different manifestations in each part of the back, such as back rolls, iliac crest deposit, and buffalo hump. However, scant current literature exists on the anatomical basis of dorsal contour deformity. The aim of this study was to better understand the anatomical characteristics of the back, and to propose evidence-based zoning principles for liposuction-assisted back contouring.
    A total of 12 fresh cadavers were dissected for observation of each hierarchy in the vertical order (skin to deep fascia) and transverse comparison of the superficial fascial system (SFS) in the scapular-infrascapular-lumbar triangle region. Full-dorsum vectorial sections were used for the study of suprascapular fat deposits.
    The SFS acts as a bridge connecting all levels of the dorsal subcutaneous tissue. Macroscopically, it is denser in the scapular and lumbar triangle regions and looser in the infrascapular region; microscopically, the ultrastructure of the retinaculum cutis consists of loose interlobular fascia and stiff functional fascia.
    The regional variation pattern of the SFS in the back was consistent with observed back contour deformities in Asian female patients. A better understanding of the topographic anatomy of the back applied to evidenced zoning is the basis for improving surgical precision and avoiding dorsal contour deformity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    As power-assisted liposuction (PAL) gains in popularity, plastic surgeons operating these devices experience occupational exposure to hand-transmitted vibration, which can result in hand-arm vibration syndrome, a debilitating neurovasculopathy.
    The objective of the study was to determine vibration exposure from the utilization of a PAL device during surgery to generate recommendations for safe use.
    Vibration emission of a commonly utilized PAL system (MicroAire-650, Surgical Instruments, Charlottesville, VA) was examined employing a vibration data logger under both controlled laboratory conditions and during 13 typical liposuction cases. Data were analyzed and compared with established safety limits of vibration exposure.
    The experiments demonstrated a mean vibration magnitude of typical liposuction surgeries to be 5.69 ± 0.77 m/s2 (range, 4.59-6.27 m/s2), which is significantly higher than the manufacturer declared value of 3.77 m/s2. Cannula size was shown to be the most significant contributor to vibration magnitude, with larger cannulas causing more vibration transmission.
    These results indicate that recommendations must be made to prevent undue occupational exposure to vibration from PAL. The MicroAire-650 can generally be safely utilized for less than 1.5 h/d. At exposure levels >1.5 h/d, there is increased risk of developing vibration-related injuries, and vibration-reducing strategies should be implemented. At exposure levels >6 h/d, the safety limit is exceeded and there is significantly increased risk of developing hand-arm vibration syndrome and vibration exposure should be halted.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Lipedema is a chronic, progressive disorder of subcutaneous adipose tissue that usually affects the lower extremities of women. Also known as \"two-body syndrome,\" the fat accumulations in lipedema are unsightly and painful. The disorder is well-known in Europe but is largely unrecognized and underdiagnosed in the United States.
    To hold the First International Consensus Conference on Lipedema with the purpose of reviewing current European guidelines and the literature regarding the long-term benefits that have been reported to occur after lymph-sparing liposuction for lipedema using tumescent local anesthesia.
    International experts on liposuction for lipedema were convened as part of the First International Congress on Lipedema in Vienna, Austria, June 9 to 10, 2017.
    Multiple studies from Germany have reported long-term benefits for as long as 8 years after liposuction for lipedema using tumescent local anesthesia.
    Lymph-sparing liposuction using tumescent local anesthesia is currently the only effective treatment for lipedema.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    This International Society of Lymphology (ISL) Consensus Document is the latest revision of the 1995 Document for the evaluation and management of peripheral lymphedema (1). It is based upon modifications: [A] suggested and published following the 1997 XVI International Congress of Lymphology (ICL) in Madrid, Spain (2), discussed at the 1999 XVII ICL in Chennai, India (3), and considered/ confirmed at the 2000 (ISL) Executive Committee meeting in Hinterzarten, Germany (4); [B] derived from integration of discussions and written comments obtained during and following the 2001 XVIII ICL in Genoa, Italy as modified at the 2003 ISL Executive Committee meeting in Cordoba, Argentina (5); [C] suggested from comments, criticisms, and rebuttals as published in the December 2004 issue of Lymphology (6); [D] discussed in both the 2005 XX ICL in Salvador, Brazil and the 2007 XXI ICL in Shanghai, China and modified at the 2008 Executive Committee meeting in Naples, Italy (7,8);[E] modified from discussions and written comments from the 2009 XXII ICL in Sydney, Australia, the 2011 XXIII ICL in Malmö, Sweden, the 2012 Executive Committee Meetings (9),and [F] from discussions at the 2013 XXIV ICL in Rome, Italy, and the 2015 XXV ICL in San Francisco, USA, as well as multiple written comments and feedback from Executive Committee and other ISL members during the 2016 drafting. The document attempts to amalgamate the broad spectrum of protocols and practices advocated worldwide for the diagnosis and treatment of peripheral lymphedema into a coordinated proclamation representing a “Consensus” of the international community based on various levels of evidence. The document is not meant to override individual clinical considerations for complex patients nor to stifle progress. It is also not meant to be a legal formulation from which variations define medical malpractice. The Society understands that in some clinics the method of treatment derives from national standards while in others access to medical equipment and supplies is limited; therefore the suggested treatments might be impractical. Adaptability and inclusiveness does come at the price that members can rightly be critical of what they see as vagueness or imprecision in definitions, qualifiers in the choice of words (e.g., the use of “may... perhaps... unclear”, etc.) and mentions (albeit without endorsement) of treatment options supported by limited hard data. Most members are frustrated by the reality that NO treatment method has really undergone a satisfactory meta-analysis (let alone rigorous, randomized, stratified, long-term, controlled study). With this understanding, the absence of definitive answers and optimally conducted clinical trials, and with emerging technologies and new approaches and discoveries on the horizon, some degree of uncertainty, ambiguity, and flexibility along with dissatisfaction with current lymphedema evaluation and management is appropriate and to be expected. We continue to struggle to keep the document concise while balancing the need for depth and details. With these considerations in mind, we believe that this 2016 version presents a Consensus that embraces the entire ISL membership, rises above national standards, identifies and stimulates promising areas for future research, and represents the best judgment of the ISL membership on how to approach patients with peripheral lymphedema in the light of currently available evidence. Therefore, the document has been, and should continue to be, challenged and debated in the pages of Lymphology (e.g., as Letters to the Editor) and ideally will remain a continued focal point for robust discussion at local, national and international conferences in lymphology and related disciplines. We further anticipate as experience evolves and new ideas and technologies emerge that this “living document” will undergo further periodic revision and refinement as the practice and conceptual foundations of medicine and specifically lymphology change and advance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    The present, revised guidelines on lipedema were developed under the auspices of and funded by the German Society of Phlebology (DGP). The recommendations are based on a systematic literature search and the consensus of eight medical societies and working groups. The guidelines contain recommendations with respect to diagnosis and management of lipedema. The diagnosis is established on the basis of medical history and clinical findings. Characteristically, there is a localized, symmetrical increase in subcutaneous adipose tissue in arms and legs that is in marked disproportion to the trunk. Other findings include edema, easy bruising, and increased tenderness. Further diagnostic tests are usually reserved for special cases that require additional workup. Lipedema is a chronic, progressive disorder marked by the individual variability and unpredictability of its clinical course. Treatment consists of four therapeutic mainstays that should be combined as necessary and address current clinical symptoms: complex physical therapy (manual lymphatic drainage, compression therapy, exercise therapy, and skin care), liposuction and plastic surgery, diet, and physical activity, as well as psychotherapy if necessary. Surgical procedures are indicated if - despite thorough conservative treatment - symptoms persist, or if there is progression of clinical findings and/or symptoms. If present, morbid obesity should be therapeutically addressed prior to liposuction.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号