Lassa virus

拉沙病毒
  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    本系统综述,遵循PRISMA指南,仔细检查拉沙热研究中使用的数学模型。分析揭示了模型和数据中固有的异质性,对参数估计提出了重大挑战。虽然健康和行为干预在减轻疾病传播方面表现出希望,它们的功效取决于上下文因素。通过这次审查发现了关键的差距,局限性,以及未来研究的途径,需要增加建模方法的协调和标准化。对季节和空间变化的考虑是需要进行针对性调查的关键因素。新出现的疾病的永久威胁,再加上拉沙热对公众健康的持久影响,强调了对数学建模进行持续研究和投资的必要性。结论强调,尽管数学建模仍然是抗击拉沙热的宝贵工具,它的最佳利用要求多学科合作,完善的数据收集方法,以及对复杂疾病动态的丰富理解。这种全面的方法对于有效减轻拉沙热的负担和保护弱势群体的健康至关重要。
    This systematic review, conducted following the PRISMA guidelines, scrutinizes mathematical models employed in the study of Lassa fever. The analysis revealed the inherent heterogeneity in both models and data, posing significant challenges to parameter estimation. While health and behavioral interventions exhibit promise in mitigating the disease\'s spread, their efficacy is contingent upon contextual factors. Identified through this review are critical gaps, limitations, and avenues for future research, necessitating increased harmonization and standardization in modeling approaches. The considerations of seasonal and spatial variations emerge as crucial elements demanding targeted investigation. The perpetual threat of emerging diseases, coupled with the enduring public health impact of Lassa fever, underscores the imperative for sustained research endeavors and investments in mathematical modeling. The conclusion underscored that while mathematical modeling remains an invaluable tool in the combat against Lassa fever, its optimal utilization mandates multidisciplinary collaboration, refined data collection methodologies, and an enriched understanding of the intricate disease dynamics. This comprehensive approach is essential for effectively reducing the burden of Lassa fever and safeguarding the health of vulnerable populations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目的:拉沙热(LF)是由具有大流行潜力的病毒病原体引起的。LF疫苗有可能预防有感染风险的个体的重大疾病,但是到目前为止,还没有此类疫苗获得许可或授权使用。我们进行了范围审查,以确定和比较已注册的1、2或3期LF疫苗候选临床试验,并评估了LF疫苗的当前发展轨迹。
    方法:我们系统地搜索了24个试验注册中心,PubMed,相关会议摘要和额外的灰色文献来源,截至2022年10月27日。在提取了每个候选疫苗和每个合格试验的关键细节之后,我们定性地综合了证据.
    结果:我们发现了四种LF疫苗候选物(INO-4500,MV-LASV,rVSV÷G-LASV-GPC,和EBS-LASV)已进入临床评估阶段。迄今为止,已经注册了五项1期试验(全部针对健康成年人)和一项2期试验(涉及18个月至70岁的更广泛的年龄组)评估其中一种疫苗。这里,我们描述了每种候选疫苗和试验的特征,并将它们与WHO的拉萨疫苗目标产品概况进行了比较。
    结论:尽管LF疫苗开发仍处于早期阶段,目前在安全有效疫苗方面取得的进展令人鼓舞。
    Lassa fever (LF) is caused by a viral pathogen with pandemic potential. LF vaccines have the potential to prevent significant disease in individuals at risk of infection, but no such vaccine has been licensed or authorised for use thus far. We conducted a scoping review to identify and compare registered phase 1, 2 or 3 clinical trials of LF vaccine candidates, and appraise the current trajectory of LF vaccine development.
    We systematically searched 24 trial registries, PubMed, relevant conference abstracts and additional grey literature sources up to 27 October 2022. After extracting key details about each vaccine candidate and each eligible trial, we qualitatively synthesised the evidence.
    We found that four LF vaccine candidates (INO-4500, MV-LASV, rVSV∆G-LASV-GPC, and EBS-LASV) have entered the clinical stage of assessment. Five phase 1 trials (all focused on healthy adults) and one phase 2 trial (involving a broader age group from 18 months to 70 years) evaluating one of these vaccines have been registered to date. Here, we describe the characteristics of each vaccine candidate and trial and compare them to WHO\'s target product profile for Lassa vaccines.
    Though LF vaccine development is still in early stages, current progress towards a safe and effective vaccine is encouraging.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    自1980年代以来,利巴韦林已广泛用于治疗西非的拉沙热。然而,很少有研究系统地评估其使用的证据。我们对从电子数据库和灰色文献中检索到的已发表和未发表的文献进行了系统评价,从开始到2022年3月8日。我们确定了13项关于利巴韦林与不利巴韦林治疗对死亡率结局的比较有效性的研究。包括通过美国信息自由法要求提供的塞拉利昂研究中未发表的数据。尽管利巴韦林与死亡率下降有关,当使用ROBINS-I工具评估时,这些研究的结果存在严重或严重的偏倚风险。与缺乏对混杂因素的控制有关的偏见的重要风险,不朽的时间偏见,缺少结果数据。缺乏支持在拉萨热中使用利巴韦林的有力证据。需要进行良好的临床试验来阐明利巴韦林对拉沙热的有效性。
    Ribavirin has been used widely to treat Lassa fever in West Africa since the 1980s. However, few studies have systematically appraised the evidence for its use. We conducted a systematic review of published and unpublished literature retrieved from electronic databases and gray literature from inception to March 8, 2022. We identified 13 studies of the comparative effectiveness of ribavirin versus no ribavirin treatment on mortality outcomes, including unpublished data from a study in Sierra Leone provided through a US Freedom of Information Act request. Although ribavirin was associated with decreased mortality rates, results of these studies were at critical or serious risk for bias when appraised using the ROBINS-I tool. Important risks for bias related to lack of control for confounders, immortal time bias, and missing outcome data. Robust evidence supporting the use of ribavirin in Lassa fever is lacking. Well-conducted clinical trials to elucidate the effectiveness of ribavirin for Lassa fever are needed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    利巴韦林目前是治疗拉沙热的标准护理。然而,支持其使用的人体临床试验数据存在几个严重缺陷,使结果和结论不可靠。我们对拉沙利巴韦林的可用临床前数据和人体药代动力学数据进行了系统评价。在体外研究中,利巴韦林的EC50为0.6μg/ml~21.72μg/ml,EC90为1.5μg/ml~29μg/ml.平均EC50为7μg/ml,平均EC90为15μg/ml。拉沙热患者的人类PK数据很少,无法估算浓度曲线或药代动力学参数。基于健康人体数据的药代动力学模型表明,当前利巴韦林方案的浓度分布仅在少于20%的时间内超过平均EC50,而在少于10%的时间内超过平均EC90。目前临床使用的利巴韦林方案不太可能可靠地达到抑制拉沙病毒复制所需的血清浓度。这次审查的结果突出了证据的严重问题,which,按照今天的标准,不太可能支持利巴韦林从临床前研究向人体临床试验的过渡。在进行拉沙热中利巴韦林的昂贵且具有挑战性的临床试验之前,还需要进行其他临床前研究。
    Ribavirin is currently the standard of care for treating Lassa fever. However, the human clinical trial data supporting its use suffer from several serious flaws that render the results and conclusions unreliable. We performed a systematic review of available pre-clinical data and human pharmacokinetic data on ribavirin in Lassa. In in-vitro studies, the EC50 of ribavirin ranged from 0.6 μg/ml to 21.72 μg/ml and the EC90 ranged from 1.5 μg/ml to 29 μg/ml. The mean EC50 was 7 μg/ml and the mean EC90 was 15 μg/ml. Human PK data in patients with Lassa fever was sparse and did not allow for estimation of concentration profiles or pharmacokinetic parameters. Pharmacokinetic modelling based on healthy human data suggests that the concentration profiles of current ribavirin regimes only exceed the mean EC50 for less than 20% of the time and the mean EC90 for less than 10% of the time, raising the possibility that the current ribavirin regimens in clinical use are unlikely to reliably achieve serum concentrations required to inhibit Lassa virus replication. The results of this review highlight serious issues with the evidence, which, by today standards, would be unlikely to support the transition of ribavirin from pre-clinical studies to human clinical trials. Additional pre-clinical studies are needed before embarking on expensive and challenging clinical trials of ribavirin in Lassa fever.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    拉沙病毒(LASV)一种西非特有的沙粒病毒,引起拉沙热——一种致命的出血热。LASV进入宿主细胞是由糖蛋白复合物(GPC)介导的,它是唯一位于病毒表面的蛋白质,包含三个亚基:糖蛋白1(GP1),糖蛋白2(GP2),和稳定的信号肽(SSP)。LASVGPC是一类病毒融合蛋白,类似于在人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)等病毒中发现的病毒,流感,埃博拉病毒(EBOV)和严重急性呼吸道综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)。这些病毒被包膜并利用膜融合将其遗传物质递送至宿主细胞。像其他一类融合蛋白一样,LASV介导的膜融合通过其GPC中构象变化的协调序列发生。受体结合亚基,GP1首先与宿主细胞受体接合,然后在递送至晚期核内体时经历独特的受体转换。酸性pH和受体的变化导致GP1的解离,暴露融合亚基,GP2,这样可以发生融合。这些事件最终导致融合孔的形成,使得LASV遗传物质被释放到宿主细胞中。有趣的是,成熟的GPC保留了其SSP作为第三个亚基-这是沙粒病毒独有的特征。此外,融合域包含两个独立的融合肽,而不是标准的单一融合肽。这里,我们全面回顾了LASVGPC组件及其不寻常的特征。
    Lassa virus (LASV), an arenavirus endemic to West Africa, causes Lassa fever-a lethal hemorrhagic fever. Entry of LASV into the host cell is mediated by the glycoprotein complex (GPC), which is the only protein located on the viral surface and comprises three subunits: glycoprotein 1 (GP1), glycoprotein 2 (GP2), and a stable signal peptide (SSP). The LASV GPC is a class one viral fusion protein, akin to those found in viruses such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), influenza, Ebola virus (EBOV), and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). These viruses are enveloped and utilize membrane fusion to deliver their genetic material to the host cell. Like other class one fusion proteins, LASV-mediated membrane fusion occurs through an orchestrated sequence of conformational changes in its GPC. The receptor-binding subunit, GP1, first engages with a host cell receptor then undergoes a unique receptor switch upon delivery to the late endosome. The acidic pH and change in receptor result in the dissociation of GP1, exposing the fusion subunit, GP2, such that fusion can occur. These events ultimately lead to the formation of a fusion pore so that the LASV genetic material is released into the host cell. Interestingly, the mature GPC retains its SSP as a third subunit-a feature that is unique to arenaviruses. Additionally, the fusion domain contains two separate fusion peptides, instead of a standard singular fusion peptide. Here, we give a comprehensive review of the LASV GPC components and their unusual features.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    迫切需要研究以降低拉沙热(LF)的发病率和死亡率,包括临床试验,以测试新疗法,并验证目前唯一的治疗建议的疗效和安全性,利巴韦林,临床证据基础薄弱。为了帮助建立适应发展的基础,标准化临床试验方法,我们进行了系统评价,以确定LF的临床特征和结局,并描述了LF在科学文献中的定义和评估.
    纳入2021年4月15日前发表在同行评审文献中的疑似和确诊LF患者的主要临床研究和报告。出版物是在对摘要进行两阶段筛选后选出的,然后全文,在每个阶段由两名独立审稿人。数据被提取,已验证,并使用描述性统计数据进行总结。
    包括147种出版物,主要是病例报告(36%),案例系列(28%),和队列研究(20%);仅发现2项准随机研究(1%)。数据主要来自尼日利亚(52%的个人,41%的出版物)和塞拉利昂(42%的个人,31%的出版物)。结果证实了世界卫生组织对LF表现的表征。然而,更广泛的症状表现是显而易见的,如胃肠道疾病和其他神经系统和肌肉骨骼疾病,通常不包括作为LF的指标。实验室确诊病例的总病死率为30%(在109份出版物中报告了1896/6373)。
    系统评价是在出版物有限的疾病的临床表征中的重要工具。本文的结果提供了对与临床试验设计相关的疾病谱的更完整的理解。这篇综述表明,需要在LF研究界进行协调,以产生协调的研究方法,这有助于为新疗法建立强有力的证据基础,并培养将其纳入临床护理的信心。
    Research is urgently needed to reduce the morbidity and mortality of Lassa fever (LF), including clinical trials to test new therapies and to verify the efficacy and safety of the only current treatment recommendation, ribavirin, which has a weak clinical evidence base. To help establish a basis for the development of an adaptable, standardised clinical trial methodology, we conducted a systematic review to identify the clinical characteristics and outcomes of LF and describe how LF has historically been defined and assessed in the scientific literature.
    Primary clinical studies and reports of patients with suspected and confirmed diagnosis of LF published in the peer-reviewed literature before 15 April 2021 were included. Publications were selected following a two-stage screening of abstracts, then full-texts, by two independent reviewers at each stage. Data were extracted, verified, and summarised using descriptive statistics.
    147 publications were included, primarily case reports (36%), case series (28%), and cohort studies (20%); only 2 quasi-randomised studies (1%) were found. Data are mostly from Nigeria (52% of individuals, 41% of publications) and Sierra Leone (42% of individuals, 31% of publications). The results corroborate the World Health Organisation characterisation of LF presentation. However, a broader spectrum of presenting symptoms is evident, such as gastrointestinal illness and other nervous system and musculoskeletal disorders that are not commonly included as indicators of LF. The overall case fatality ratio was 30% in laboratory-confirmed cases (1896/6373 reported in 109 publications).
    Systematic review is an important tool in the clinical characterisation of diseases with limited publications. The results herein provide a more complete understanding of the spectrum of disease which is relevant to clinical trial design. This review demonstrates the need for coordination across the LF research community to generate harmonised research methods that can contribute to building a strong evidence base for new treatments and foster confidence in their integration into clinical care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们对尼日利亚南部拉沙热住院患者的精神病咨询进行了回顾性审查。113例患者中有10例(8.8%)进行了精神病咨询。谵妄是拉沙热最常见的精神病表现。研究结果表明,精神干预可以改善拉沙热的总体结局。
    We conducted a retrospective review of psychiatric consultations for hospitalized patients with Lassa fever in southern Nigeria. Ten (8.8%) of 113 patients had psychiatric consultations. Delirium was the most common psychiatric manifestation complicating Lassa fever. Findings suggest that psychiatric intervention could improve overall outcomes of Lassa fever.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    拉沙病毒(LASV)人类病死率(CFR)和LASV在人类中的流行率的准确数据,需要啮齿动物和其他哺乳动物更好地规划行动,最终减轻撒哈拉以南非洲地区LASV感染的负担。在这篇带有荟萃分析的系统综述中,我们搜索了PubMed,Scopus,非洲在线杂志,和非洲指数药物从1969年到2020年获得的研究报告了足够的数据来计算LASV感染CFR或患病率。研究选择,数据提取,并独立进行偏倚风险评估。我们提取了电流的所有度量,最近,以及过去的LASV感染。使用随机效应荟萃分析汇总患病率和CFR估计值。与CFR相关的因素,患病率,并使用亚组和回归分析确定研究间异质性的来源。这篇评论在PROSPERO注册,CRD42020166465。我们最初确定了1,399条记录,最终保留了来自25个国家的291条流行记录的109份报告。人类的总体CFR为29.7%(22.3-37.5)。人类LASV感染的合并患病率为8.7%(95%置信区间:6.8-10.8),啮齿动物占3.2%(1.9-4.6),其他哺乳动物为0.7%(0.0-2.3)。亚组和回归分析显示,组织器官患病率较高解释了实质性的统计异质性。在病例控制中,在医院爆发时,和调查,在回顾性研究中,在城市和医院环境中,在住院患者中,在西非国家。这项研究表明,LASV感染是人类死亡的重要原因,并且LASV在人类中很常见,撒哈拉以南非洲的啮齿动物和其他哺乳动物。这些估计突出了次区域之间的差异,和人口风险概况。西非,特定的关键人群被确定为具有较高的LASVCFR和患病率,因此,值得更多关注具有成本效益的预防性干预措施。
    Accurate data on the Lassa virus (LASV) human case fatality rate (CFR) and the prevalence of LASV in humans, rodents and other mammals are needed for better planning of actions that will ultimately reduce the burden of LASV infection in sub-Saharan Africa. In this systematic review with meta-analysis, we searched PubMed, Scopus, Africa Journal Online, and African Index Medicus from 1969 to 2020 to obtain studies that reported enough data to calculate LASV infection CFR or prevalence. Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were conducted independently. We extracted all measures of current, recent, and past infections with LASV. Prevalence and CFR estimates were pooled using a random-effect meta-analysis. Factors associated with CFR, prevalence, and sources of between-study heterogeneity were determined using subgroup and metaregression analyses. This review was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42020166465. We initially identified 1,399 records and finally retained 109 reports that contributed to 291 prevalence records from 25 countries. The overall CFR was 29.7% (22.3-37.5) in humans. Pooled prevalence of LASV infection was 8.7% (95% confidence interval: 6.8-10.8) in humans, 3.2% (1.9-4.6) in rodents, and 0.7% (0.0-2.3) in other mammals. Subgroup and metaregression analyses revealed a substantial statistical heterogeneity explained by higher prevalence in tissue organs, in case-control, in hospital outbreak, and surveys, in retrospective studies, in urban and hospital setting, in hospitalized patients, and in West African countries. This study suggests that LASV infections is an important cause of death in humans and that LASV are common in humans, rodents and other mammals in sub-Saharan Africa. These estimates highlight disparities between sub-regions, and population risk profiles. Western Africa, and specific key populations were identified as having higher LASV CFR and prevalence, hence, deserving more attention for cost-effective preventive interventions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Lassa fever is a zoonotic disease caused by the Lassa virus, a rodent-borne arenavirus endemic to West Africa. Recent steady increase in reported cases of the disease in Nigeria, where 123 deaths occurred in 546 confirmed cases in 2019 has further underlined the need to accelerate the development of vaccines for preventing the disease. Intensified research and development of Lassa fever medical countermeasures have yielded some vaccine candidates with preclinical scientific plausibility using predominantly novel technology. The more advanced candidates are based on recombinant measles, Vesicular Stomatitis Virus or Mopiea and Lassa virus reassortants expressing Lassa virus antigens, and the deoxyribonucleic acid platform. However, the Lassa fever portfolio still lags behind other neglected tropical diseases\', and further investments are needed for continued development and additional research, such as the safety and efficacy of these vaccine candidates in special populations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号