Language Development

语言发展
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    科学文献中的共识是,每个孩子都经历着独特的语言发展道路,尽管有共同的发展阶段。有些孩子在语言技能方面表现出色或落后于同龄人。因此,语言习得研究的一个关键挑战是确定影响语言发展中个体差异的因素。
    我们纵向观察了3至24个月生命的儿童,以探索词汇量的早期预测因素。根据24个月儿童的有效词汇量,30名儿童符合我们的样本选择标准:10名晚期说话者和10名早期说话者,我们将它们与10个典型的健谈者进行了比较。我们评估了3、6、9和12个月的互动行为,考虑到声乐制作,凝视母亲的脸,以及母子互动过程中的手势产生,我们考虑了母亲在15个月和18个月时儿童的动作和手势以及接受词汇量的报告。
    结果表明,在声乐作品中,在24个月时可以识别出语言结果的早期前兆,凝视母亲的脸6个月,手势制作12个月。
    我们的研究突出了理论和实践意义。理论上,确定属于晚期或早期说话者组的早期指标强调了这一发育期对未来研究的重要作用。实际上,我们的研究结果强调,在确定词汇延迟的典型年龄之前,必须进行早期调查,以确定词汇发展的预测因子。
    UNASSIGNED: The consensus in scientific literature is that each child undergoes a unique linguistic development path, albeit with shared developmental stages. Some children excel or lag behind their peers in language skills. Consequently, a key challenge in language acquisition research is pinpointing factors influencing individual differences in language development.
    UNASSIGNED: We observed children longitudinally from 3 to 24 months of life to explore early predictors of vocabulary size. Based on the productive vocabulary size of children at 24 months, 30 children met our sample selection criteria: 10 late talkers and 10 early talkers, and we compared them with 10 typical talkers. We evaluated interactive behaviors at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months, considering vocal production, gaze at mother\'s face, and gestural production during mother-child interactions, and we considered mothers\' report of children\'s actions and gestures and receptive-vocabulary size at 15 and 18 months.
    UNASSIGNED: Results indicated early precursors of language outcome at 24 months identifiable as early as 3 months in vocal productions, 6 months for gaze at mother\'s face and 12 months for gestural productions.
    UNASSIGNED: Our research highlights both theoretical and practical implications. Theoretically, identifying the early indicators of belonging to the group of late or early talkers underscores the significant role of this developmental period for future studies. On a practical note, our findings emphasize the crucial need for early investigations to identify predictors of vocabulary development before the typical age at which lexical delay is identified.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    Objective: The aim of this study is to analyze the development of speech ability in Mandarin-speaking infants and children with normal hearing using MUSS and to provide a normal value control for the evaluation of speech ability in children with hearing loss. Methods: From September 2012 to January 2023, a total of 256 infants and children aged 1-60 months in Mandarin language environment participated in this study. 200 infants and children aged from 1 to 60 months were finally included, whose hearing was considered normal according to the history collection, high-risk registers for hearing loss and hearing screening. All infants and children were divided into 10 groups with 20 infants or children in each group. They were: 1 month, 2-3 months, 4-6 months, 7-9 months, 10-12 months, 13-18 months, 19-24 months, 25-36 months, 37-48 months, and 49-60 months. Using SPSS 19.0 software for data analysis, we calculated regression equations based on fitting curves. Results: The language ability of infants and children with normal hearing increased with age and reached ceiling at 56.5months.The regression equation was: score=-0.009 3×(age) 2+2.179×(age)+6.718 6, r2=0.85; age=0.003 9×(score) 2+0.148 4×(score)+2.708, r2=0.85. Conclusions: The speech ability of infants and children with normal hearing shows an increasing trend with age. Scores of different speech skills can be predicted according to their age. Age can also be predicted according to their scores of different speech skills.
    目的: 采用有意义使用言语量表(Meaningful Use of Speech Scale,MUSS)测量使用普通话的听力正常婴幼儿和儿童的言语能力发育正常值,为听力损失患儿的言语能力评估提供正常值对照。 方法: 2012年9月至2023年1月共有256名月龄为1~60个月的北京地区普通话语言交流环境下的婴幼儿和学龄前儿童参与MUSS问卷调查,经过病史采集、耳聋高危因素排查和听力学检查,最终200名婴幼儿和儿童通过所有检查项,其问卷结果纳入统计分析,其中男105名,女95名。按照生理年龄将受试儿童分为10组(1月龄组、2~3月龄组、4~6月龄组、7~9月龄组、10~12月龄组、13~18月龄组、19~24月龄组、25~36月龄组、37~48月龄组和49~60月龄组),每组20人。采用SPSS19.0软件进行数据分析,根据拟合曲线计算回归方程。 结果: 听力正常婴幼儿和儿童的MUSS得分随月龄的增加而提高,在56.5月龄时达到满分。回归方程为:得分=-0.009 3×(月龄)2+2.179×(月龄)+6.718 6,r2=0.85;月龄=0.003 9×(得分)2+0.148 4×(得分)+2.708,r2=0.85。 结论: 普通话听力正常婴幼儿和学龄前儿童言语能力得分随月龄增加呈增长趋势,根据得分和月龄,分别可推断出言语能力发育年龄和与年龄相对应的言语能力得分,可为听力损失患儿言语发育情况的评估提供正常值对照。.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:越来越多的证据表明,COVID-19带来了立即影响早期语言发展的变化。鲜为人知的是,这些与COVID-19相关的变化影响了发展的时间。当前的研究系统和纵向地解决了这个问题,在最初的2.5年中跟踪儿童的语言发展。
    方法:本研究对Frota等人的样品进行了跟进。(2022),这表明,在大流行期间出生和抚养的7-9个月大的婴儿不会像大流行前的同龄人那样划分单词。进行了四项研究:(1)12个月大的分词任务(Npregiume=15);(2)20个月大的单词学习任务(Npregiume=20);(3)30个月大的语言和交流发展,通过CDI和CSBS父母报告(Npredima范围为25-74);(4)使用Griffiths发育量表(Npredima=16)在30月龄时的总体发育。
    结果:与大流行前的数据相比,在所有四项研究中,大流行样本的表现始终不佳。没有证据表明在12个月大时有发达的分词能力,在20个月大的时候没有成功的单词学习。12至24月龄之间的词汇发育低于大流行前样本,而社会交往似乎没有受到影响。在30个月大的时候,大流行样本在语言和交流格里菲斯子量表上显示较低的分数和较低的心理年龄,与大流行前的数据相比。
    结论:大流行期间出生和抚养的婴儿语言发育较差,这种情况至少持续到30个月大。
    BACKGROUND: There is growing evidence that COVID-19 brought changes that immediately affected early language development. Little is known for how long these COVID-19 related changes shaped development. The current study systematically and longitudinally addressed this issue, following up children\'s language development throughout the first 2.5 years.
    METHODS: The present study follows up on the sample from Frota et al. (2022), which demonstrated that 7-9-month-old infants born and raised during the pandemic do not segment words unlike pre-pandemic peers. Four studies were conducted: (1) word segmentation task at 12 months of age (Npandemic = 15); (2) word learning task at 20 months of age (Npandemic = 20); (3) language and communication development up to 30 months of age, via CDI and CSBS parental reports (Npandemic ranged 25-74); (4) overall development at 30 months of age using the Griffiths Developmental Scales (Npandemic = 16).
    RESULTS: The pandemic sample consistently underperformed in all four studies in comparison to pre-pandemic data. There was no evidence of developed word segmentation abilities at 12 months of age, and no successful word learning at 20 months of age. Lexical development between 12 and 24 months of age was lower than in the pre-pandemic sample, while social communication did not seem to be affected. At 30 months of age, the pandemic sample showed lower scores and lower mental age on the Language and Communication Griffiths\' subscale, in comparison to the pre-pandemic data.
    CONCLUSIONS: Infants born and raised during the pandemic have a poorer language development, that persists at least until 30 months of age.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    早期语言发展的特点是个体差异大。有人提出了几个因素来促进婴儿期和儿童期语言习得的个体途径。基于生物学的解释因素之一是气质,然而,确切的贡献和影响的时机值得进一步研究。期前状态,婴儿性,和环境因素,如母亲的教育和母亲的语言也涉及。我们的研究旨在探讨婴儿气质与早期语言发育之间的纵向关系,还考虑到婴儿的性别,胎龄,和出生体重。使用非常简短的婴儿行为问卷(IBQ-R)和非常简短的幼儿行为问卷(ECBQ)在6、9、18、24和30个月评估早期气质。早期的非语言沟通技巧,使用匈牙利版的麦克阿瑟交际发展清单(HCDI)评估了接受性和表达性词汇。我们的研究为婴儿气质对早期语言发育的贡献提供了进一步的证据。气质,婴儿性别,胎龄与婴儿期语言发育有关。具有较高摄制度的婴儿和幼儿可能更容易进入交流环境,并表现出与成年社交伙伴的更多参与,有利于通信发展。妊娠年龄以前被确定为早产儿语言的预测因子。我们的结果将这种关联扩展到足月分娩的更晚和更窄的胎龄时间窗口。怀孕时间较长的婴儿在幼儿时期会发展出更好的表达能力。妊娠年龄可能标志着产前发育过程,这些过程可能会影响后期的言语交流发展。
    Early language development is characterized by large individual variation. Several factors were proposed to contribute to individual pathways of language acquisition in infancy and childhood. One of the biologically based explaining factors is temperament, however, the exact contributions and the timing of the effects merits further research. Pre-term status, infant sex, and environmental factors such as maternal education and maternal language are also involved. Our study aimed to investigate the longitudinal relationship between infant temperament and early language development, also considering infant gender, gestational age, and birthweight. Early temperament was assessed at 6, 9, 18, 24, and 30 months with the Very Short Form of Infant Behavior Questionnaire (IBQ-R) and the Very Short Form of Early Childhood Behavior Questionnaire (ECBQ). Early nonverbal communication skills, receptive and expressive vocabulary were evaluated with the Hungarian version of The MacArthur Communicative Development Inventory (HCDI). Our study adds further evidence to the contribution of infant temperament to early language development. Temperament, infant gender, and gestational age were associated with language development in infancy. Infants and toddlers with higher Surgency might enter communicative situations more readily and show more engagement with adult social partners, which is favorable for communication development. Gestational age was previously identified as a predictor for language in preterm infants. Our results extend this association to the later and narrower gestational age time window of term deliveries. Infants born after longer gestation develop better expressive vocabulary in toddlerhood. Gestational age may mark prenatal developmental processes that may exert influence on the development of verbal communication at later ages.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:语言延迟会影响幼儿的近期和长期社交交流和学习,and,越来越多的专家关注它。韵律歧视的发展是语言发展的最早阶段之一,掌握了后期阶段的关键技能。因此,分析语言韵律的大脑辨别力与语言能力的关系,可以为语言延迟的诊断和干预提供客观依据。
    方法:在本研究中,所有病例(n=241)均来自三级妇女医院,从2021年到2022年。我们使用功能近红外光谱(fNIRS)来评估儿童的神经韵律辨别能力,并使用中文交际发展清单(CCDI)来评估他们的语言能力。
    结果:在I期和II期研究的最终分析中纳入了98名足月和108名早产幼儿,分别。足月CCDI筛查总异常率为9.2%,早产儿为34.3%。足月幼儿在除通道5外的所有通道中均显示出韵律辨别能力,而早产幼儿仅在通道6中显示出韵律辨别能力。多因素logistic回归分析表明,右角回(通道3)的韵律判别对足月幼儿的语言延迟有统计学意义(奇数比=0.301,P<0.05)。随机森林(RF)回归模型表明,基于fNIRS数据的通道和大脑区域反映的韵律判别是预测早产儿语言延迟的重要参数。其中由右角回(通道4)反映的韵律判别是最重要的参数。模型接收器工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积为0.687。
    结论:神经韵律辨别能力与语言发育呈正相关,通过fNIRS对脑韵律辨别能力的评估可作为未来临床应用中早期识别语言延迟儿童的客观指标.
    BACKGROUND: Language delay affects near- and long-term social communication and learning in toddlers, and, an increasing number of experts pay attention to it. The development of prosody discrimination is one of the earliest stages of language development in which key skills for later stages are mastered. Therefore, analyzing the relationship between brain discrimination of speech prosody and language abilities may provide an objective basis for the diagnosis and intervention of language delay.
    METHODS: In this study, all cases(n = 241) were enrolled from a tertiary women\'s hospital, from 2021 to 2022. We used functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) to assess children\'s neural prosody discrimination abilities, and a Chinese communicative development inventory (CCDI) were used to evaluate their language abilities.
    RESULTS: Ninety-eight full-term and 108 preterm toddlers were included in the final analysis in phase I and II studies, respectively. The total CCDI screening abnormality rate was 9.2% for full-term and 34.3% for preterm toddlers. Full-term toddlers showed prosody discrimination ability in all channels except channel 5, while preterm toddlers showed prosody discrimination ability in channel 6 only. Multifactorial logistic regression analyses showed that prosody discrimination of the right angular gyrus (channel 3) had a statistically significant effect on language delay (odd ratio = 0.301, P < 0.05) in full-term toddlers. Random forest (RF) regression model presented that prosody discrimination reflected by channels and brain regions based on fNIRS data was an important parameter for predicting language delay in preterm toddlers, among which the prosody discrimination reflected by the right angular gyrus (channel 4) was the most important parameter. The area under the model Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.687.
    CONCLUSIONS: Neural prosody discrimination ability is positively associated with language development, assessment of brain prosody discrimination abilities through fNIRS could be used as an objective indicator for early identification of children with language delay in the future clinical application.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    经常在严格控制的实验室环境中研究父母-幼儿dyads中的实时注意力协调。这些研究证明了共同注意力在支持注意力发展和支持早期语言学习的二元行为类型方面的重要性。人们对这些行为在幼儿日常生活中发生的频率知之甚少。我们将无线头戴式眼睛跟踪器带到家庭中,以研究幼儿和父母在日常生活中的视觉注意力和手动活动的即时模式。我们的样本包括说英语和西班牙语的家庭,他们都报告说是中产阶级或上层中产阶级。幼儿2至3岁。与以前的实验室研究结果一致,我们发现幼儿在两项日常活动-对象游戏和用餐时间中照顾命名对象的频率存在差异。然后,我们测试了在命名话语增加幼儿对命名对象的注意力之前的几秒钟内,父母与幼儿的共同注意力。我们发现,在命名过程中,伴随着被看管的物体的共同关注增加了孩子对标记物体的关注。我们认为在富人中,嘈杂的世界\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\体现注意力在协调二进行为和创造信息命名时刻中起着至关重要的作用。我们的发现强调了研究幼儿在现实世界中的自然行为的重要性。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2024APA,保留所有权利)。
    Real-time attention coordination in parent-toddler dyads is often studied in tightly controlled laboratory settings. These studies have demonstrated the importance of joint attention in scaffolding the development of attention and the types of dyadic behaviors that support early language learning. Little is known about how often these behaviors occur in toddlers\' everyday lives. We brought wireless head-mounted eye trackers to families\' homes to study the moment-to-moment patterns of toddlers\' and parents\' visual attention and manual activity in daily routines. Our sample consisted of English- and Spanish-speaking families who all reported being middle- or upper middle-class. Toddlers were 2 to 3 years old. Consistent with the findings from previous laboratory studies, we found variability in how frequently toddlers attended to named objects in two everyday activities-Object Play and Mealtime. We then tested whether parent-toddler joint attention in the seconds before a naming utterance increased toddler\'s attention on the named object. We found that joint attention accompanied by the attended object being held increased the child\'s attention to the labeled object during naming. We posit that in the rich, noisy world of toddlers\' everyday lives, embodied attention plays a critical role in coordinating dyadic behaviors and creating informative naming moments. Our findings highlight the importance of studying toddlers\' natural behavior in the real world. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    有大量证据表明,儿童在话语中明显遗漏了语法语素,例如“她打网球”和“妈咪吃”实际上是委托错误,其中在输入中遇到的上下文许可的未标记形式以上下文盲的方式再现。那么孩子们如何停止犯这样的错误呢?在这项研究中,我们测试了这样一个假设,即儿童从错误中恢复的能力与他们对更远距离依赖关系的敏感性有关。我们使用预先注册的语料库分析来探索不同线索对儿童动词标记错误的预测价值,并观察与此帐户一致的发展模式。我们查看上下文无关的线索(所使用的特定动词的身份)和上下文相关线索的相对值(所使用的特定主语+动词序列的身份)。我们发现,在一组2至3岁的孩子和一组3至4岁的孩子中,唯一一致的效果是使用未标记形式的特定主语动词序列的相对频率。仅在较年轻的年龄组中,动词的未标记形式的相对频率才可以预测。这与一个帐户一致,在该帐户中,儿童通过对上下文变得越来越敏感而从错误中恢复,首先是前面的词汇上下文(例如,动词前面的主语)和最终更遥远的语法标记(例如,在问题中位于主题前面的辅助)。研究重点:我们提供了一个语料库分析,调查输入对幼儿动词标记错误的影响(例如,木乃伊去)跨越发展(2至4岁之间)。我们发现有证据表明,这些明显的遗漏错误实际上是输入驱动的委托错误,持续到生命的第三年。我们比较了与上下文无关的错误率的相对影响(例如,动词)和上下文相关(例如,主语+动词序列)跨发展时间的线索。我们的发现支持以下建议:儿童通过对先前的上下文变得越来越敏感,从而从动词标记错误中恢复过来。
    There is substantial evidence that children\'s apparent omission of grammatical morphemes in utterances such as \"She play tennis\" and \"Mummy eating\" is in fact errors of commission in which contextually licensed unmarked forms encountered in the input are reproduced in a context-blind fashion. So how do children stop making such errors? In this study, we test the assumption that children\'s ability to recover from error is related to their developing sensitivity to longer-range dependencies. We use a pre-registered corpus analysis to explore the predictive value of different cues with regards to children\'s verb-marking errors and observe a developmental pattern consistent with this account. We look at context-independent cues (the identity of the specific verb being used) and at the relative value of context-dependent cues (the identity of the specific subject+verb sequence being used). We find that the only consistent effect across a group of 2- to 3-year-olds and a group of 3- to 4-year-olds is the relative frequency of unmarked forms of specific subject+verb sequences being used. The relative frequency of unmarked forms of the verb alone is predictive only in the younger age group. This is consistent with an account in which children recover from making errors by becoming progressively more sensitive to context, at first the immediately preceding lexical contexts (e.g., the subject that precedes the verb) and eventually more distant grammatical markers (e.g., the fronted auxiliary that precedes the subject in questions). RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS: We provide a corpus analysis investigating input effects on young children\'s verb-marking errors (e.g., Mummy go) across development (between 2 and 4 years of age). We find evidence that these apparent errors of omission are in fact input-driven errors of commission that persist into the third year of life. We compare the relative effect on error rates of context-independent (e.g., verb) and context-dependent (e.g., subject+verb sequence) cues across developmental time. Our findings support the proposal that children recover from making verb-marking errors by becoming progressively more sensitive to preceding context.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:腭裂患儿,有或没有唇裂(CP±L),与没有裂痕的儿童相比,平均表现出语言延迟。解决这些差距的干预措施很少。在这项多中心研究中,带切口的幼儿图书共享(BOOST),我们将测试一个遥控器,以父母为中心的干预促进CP±L儿童的语言发育
    目的:本研究将检验两个主要假设。首先,与接受标准护理(SOC)的儿童相比,随机接受BOOST的幼儿将表现出更好的语言结果。第二,我们假设BOOST程序对语言结果的影响是由亲子阅读互动的频率和质量介导的。
    方法:本研究是一项比较BOOST组与SOC比较组的随机对照试验。我们将招募N=320名年龄在24-32个月的英语和/或西班牙语儿童,其CP±L(每组n=160)。两组都将收到儿童读物,父母将使用为这项研究开发的智能手机应用程序记录并上传自己与孩子一起阅读书籍的视频。父母还将完成调查,询问他们是否在每周随机选择的五天给孩子读书。此外,BOOST组将通过Zoom参与3次远程对话书籍共享干预会话。我们将编写书籍共享视频,以评估父母的目标技能使用情况和孩子的表达语言。研究结束评估将包括儿童语言结果的衡量标准(例如,临床医生管理的措施,父报告,和自然主义儿童语言样本)。
    结果:报名于2024年4月开始,并将持续到2028年4月左右。
    结论:BOOST研究将解决文献中关于改善CP±L儿童语言的干预措施的关键空白。结果将为患有口腔裂痕的幼儿提供护理,并对其他人群具有潜在的应用价值。
    BACKGROUND: Children with cleft palate, with or without cleft lip (CP±L), exhibit language delays on average compared to children without clefts. Interventions to address these disparities are scarce. In this multi-center study, Book Sharing for Toddlers with Clefts (BOOST), we will test a remote, parent-focused intervention to promote language development in children with CP±L.
    OBJECTIVE: The study will test two primary hypotheses. First, toddlers randomized to BOOST will exhibit better language outcomes than children receiving standard-of-care (SOC). Second, we hypothesize that the BOOST program\'s effect on language outcomes is mediated by the frequency and quality of parent-child reading interactions.
    METHODS: The study is a randomized-controlled trial comparing the BOOST group to a SOC comparison group. We will enroll N = 320 English and/or Spanish-speaking children ages 24-32 months with isolated CP±L (n = 160 per group). Both groups will receive children\'s books, and parents will record and upload videos of themselves reading the books with their children using a smartphone app developed for the study. Parents will also complete surveys asking whether they read to their children on five randomly selected days each week. In addition, the BOOST group will participate in 3 remote dialogic book-sharing intervention sessions via Zoom. We will code book-sharing videos to assess parents\' target skill usage and children\'s expressive language. End-of-study assessments will include measures of child language outcomes (e.g., clinician-administered measures, parent reports, and naturalistic child language samples).
    RESULTS: Enrollment began in April 2024 and will continue through approximately April 2028.
    CONCLUSIONS: The BOOST study will address a critical gap in the literature on interventions to improve language in children with CP±L. The results will inform the care for toddlers with oral clefts and have potential applications for other populations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    连接语音过程(CSP)在母语人士的日常对话中随机发生;但是,这种语音变化会给非本地听众带来挑战。看看CSP文献,似乎很少有研究涉及年轻的外语学习者。因此,本研究旨在通过以201名9至12岁的中国EFL儿童为研究对象,探讨连接言语感知能力的发展。它还结合了系统误差分析,以进一步探讨特定的感知困难。结果表明:(1)尽管感知技能的整体增长呈显著上升趋势,11岁和12岁之间在消隐和收缩方面没有发现显着差异,这表明,发展趋势因不同的CSP类型而异;(2)尽管随机误差随年龄的增长而减少,词典和语法错误的数量逐渐增加,感知错误的分布从单词和音节的水平转移到音素的水平;(3)导致省略和收缩的感知困难的错误的主要类型是辅音错误,语法错误和形态学错误。因此,这项研究提高了EFL儿童对连接言语感知的理解,并为EFL/ESL听力指导提供了一些启示。
    Connected speech processes (CSPs) occur randomly in everyday conversations of native speakers; however, such phonological variations can bring about challenges for non-native listeners. Looking at CSP literature, there seems to be very few studies that involved young foreign language learners. Therefore, the present study aimed to explore the development of connected speech perception skills by focusing on 201 9- to 12-year-old Chinese EFL children. It also incorporated systematic error analysis to further probe into the specific perceptual difficulties. The results indicate that: (1) Despite a significantly ascending trend for the overall growth of perception skills, no significant differences were found between 11 and 12 year olds in elision and contraction, which suggests that the developmental trend varied depending on different CSP types; (2) Although random errors decreased with age, the number of lexicon and syntax errors gradually increased, and the distribution of perceptual errors shifted from the level of words and syllables to that of phonemes; (3) The primary types of errors resulting in the perception difficulties for elision and contraction were consonant errors, grammatical errors and morphology errors. Ergo, this study enhances the understanding of connected speech perception among EFL children and provides some implications for EFL/ESL listening instructions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    听觉处理和程序学习缺陷与语言学习困难有关。我们使用听觉事件相关电位(ERP)调查了有或没有晚期说话史的儿童的这些技能与学龄语言能力的关系。迟到(即,早期语言发展缓慢)增加了持续语言困难的风险,但其原因仍然未知。这项研究的参与者是具有不同语言能力的儿童(n=60)。一半的参与者(n=30)有迟到的历史。我们通过在被动听觉ERP范例中操纵正弦音调刺激的可预测性来测量程序学习。通过检查噪声的存在(感知需求的增加)如何影响ERP来测试听觉处理。与我们关于听觉处理和语言发展的假设相反,在有或没有晚说话史的儿童中,噪音对ERP的影响与学龄期语言能力无关.我们的范式未能揭示可预测性的可解释效果,使我们无法评估程序学习的效果。然而,更好的语言能力与75-175毫秒时间窗口中较弱的反应有关,和更强的响应在150-250毫秒的时间窗口。我们认为,语言能力较好的儿童的弱早期反应反映了对低水平听觉信息的有效处理,允许更深入的处理,高级听觉信息。我们假设这些差异反映了语言能力不同的个体之间大脑成熟度的变化。
    Auditory processing and procedural learning deficits have been associated with language learning difficulties. We investigated the relationship of these skills and school-age language abilities in children with and without a history of late talking using auditory event related potentials (ERPs). Late talking (i.e., slow early language development) increases the risk of persistent language difficulties, but its causes remain unknown. Participants in this study were children with varying language abilities (n = 60). Half of the participants (n = 30) had a history of late talking. We measured procedural learning by manipulating the predictability of sine tone stimuli in a passive auditory ERP paradigm. Auditory processing was tested by examining how the presence of noise (increasing perceptual demands) affected the ERPs. Contrary to our hypotheses on auditory processing and language development, the effect of noise on ERPs did not correlate with school-age language abilities in children with or without a history of late talking. Our paradigm failed to reveal interpretable effects of predictability leaving us unable to assess the effects of procedural learning. However, better language abilities were related to weaker responses in a 75-175 ms time window, and stronger responses in a 150-250 ms time window. We suggest that the weak early responses in children with better language ability reflect efficient processing of low-level auditory information, allowing deeper processing of later, high-level auditory information. We assume that these differences reflect variation in brain maturation between individuals with varying language abilities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号