Jejunostomy

空肠造口术
  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy / jejunostomy (PEG/J) is a relatively safe and effective minimally invasive surgical approach to establish long-term enteral nutrition (EN) channels. Due to the good compliance and the reduced incidence of reflux and aspiration pneumonia, PEG/J is the preferred way for long-term EN and has been widely used in clinical applications. However, few technical guidelines or expert consensus guiding the clinical practice of PEG/J have been published. The formation of \"Chinese expert consensus on clinical application of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy / jejunostomy (2024 edition)\" is led by the Committee of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, Chinese Research Hospital Association. This consensus is based on the latest clinical evidence as well as the clinical experience of Chinese experts. This consensus is divided into PEG/J indications and contraindication, perioperative management, operational techniques, prevention, and treatment of related complications and other issues. All recommendations and their strengths were carried out by expert-voting method and presented as the basic framework of \"Recommended Opinions (level of evidence and strength of recommendation) and Summary of Evidence\". This consensus is registered on the International Practice Guide Registration Platform (IPGRP-2022CN329).
    为建立长期的肠内营养支持治疗(EN)通道,经皮内镜下胃(空肠)造口术(PEG/J)提供了一种较为安全、有效的微创手术途径。PEG/J依从性好,且可降低反流和吸入性肺炎的发生率,是长期EN的首选方式,目前已得到了广泛的临床应用。但至今尚无相关的操作技术指南或专家共识,来指导临床规范开展这项技术。由中国研究型医院学会肠外肠内营养学专业委员会牵头,组织我国相关领域的专家学者,在国内外相关文献基础上,总结最新临床证据,结合中国专家临床经验,围绕PEG/J的适应证和禁忌证、围手术期管理、操作技术以及相关并发症防治等问题,按照“推荐意见(证据级别和推荐强度)和证据简述”的基本框架分别进行阐述,所有推荐意见及其推荐强度采用国际通用的专家投票方式进行,形成《中国经皮内镜下胃(空肠)造口术临床应用专家共识(2024版)》。本共识在国际实践指南注册平台完成注册申请(IPGRP-2022CN329)。.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:喂养问题在有复杂医疗问题或急危重症的儿童中很常见,可能需要肠内营养。在某些情况下,胃管喂养耐受性差或可能不可行.尽管对口服和胃肠内治疗方案进行了适当调整,但当饲料不耐受持续存在时,空肠管喂养可以被认为是营养支持的一种选择。
    方法:召开了澳大利亚肠外和肠内营养学会多学科专家工作组会议。他们确定了儿童空肠管喂养的主题问题和五个关键领域。在Pubmed上进行了文献检索,Embase,和所有相关研究的Medline,2000年1月至2022年9月(n=103)。研究使用国家卫生和医学研究委员会指南进行评估,以生成声明,作为一个小组讨论,然后使用修改后的Delphi程序对声明进行投票,以确定共识。
    结果:针对五个关键领域共创建了24个共识声明:患者选择,进料管的类型和选择,并发症,临床使用空肠管,后续行动,和重新评估。
    结论:在有复杂医疗需求的儿科患者中,空肠管喂养是一种安全有效的营养方式,不能用胃管喂养的人。适当的患者选择很重要,因为与空肠管喂养相关的并发症并不少见,虽然大多是未成年人,可能是重要的或需要重新插入管。所有接受空肠管喂养的儿童都应进行多学科小组评估和随访。
    BACKGROUND: Feeding problems are common in children with complex medical problems or acute critical illness and enteral nutrition may be required. In certain situations, gastric tube feeding is poorly tolerated or may not be feasible. When feed intolerance persists despite appropriate adjustments to oral and gastric enteral regimens, jejunal tube feeding can be considered as an option for nutrition support.
    METHODS: A multidisciplinary expert working group of the Australasian Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition was convened. They identified topic questions and five key areas of jejunal tube feeding in children. Literatures searches were undertaken on Pubmed, Embase, and Medline for all relevant studies, between January 2000 and September 2022 (n = 103). Studies were assessed using National Health and Medical Research Council guidelines to generate statements, which were discussed as a group, followed by voting on statements using a modified Delphi process to determine consensus.
    RESULTS: A total of 24 consensus statements were created for five key areas: patient selection, type and selection of feeding tube, complications, clinical use of jejunal tubes, follow-up, and reassessment.
    CONCLUSIONS: Jejunal tube feeding is a safe and effective means of providing nutrition in a select group of pediatric patients with complex medical needs, who are unable to be fed by gastric tube feeding. Appropriate patient selection is important as complications associated with jejunal tube feeding are not uncommon, and although mostly minor, can be significant or require tube reinsertion. All children receiving jejunal tube feeding should have multidisciplinary team assessment and follow-up.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尽管具有共同的性质,没有公开的腹腔镜空肠造口术培训视频的教育质量数据.腹腔镜手术视频教育指南(LAP-VEGAS)视频评估工具,于2020年发布,已开发以确保教学视频具有适当的质量。本研究将LAP-VEGAS工具应用于当前可用的腹腔镜空肠造口术视频。
    方法:对“腹腔镜空肠造口术”的YouTube®视频进行回顾性回顾。“纳入的视频由三名独立调查人员使用LAP-VEGAS视频评估工具(0-18)进行评级。Wilcoxon秩和检验用于评估视频类别和发布日期与2020年之间的LAP-VEGaS得分差异。进行Spearman相关性检验以测量分数与长度之间的关联,数量的意见和喜欢。
    结果:27个独特的视频符合选择标准。学术和医生视频演练并未显示中位数得分的显着差异(9.33IQR6.33,14.33与7.67IQR4,12.67,p=0.3951)。2020年之后发布的视频显示,中位数得分高于2020年之前发布的视频(13IQR7.5,14.67与5IQR3,9.67,p=0.0081)。大多数视频未能提供患者位置(52%),术中发现(56%),手术时间(63%),图形辅助工具(74%),和音频/书面评论(52%)。得分与喜欢数量(rs=0.59,p=0.0011)和视频长度(rs=0.39,p=0.0421)之间呈正相关。但不是视图数(rs=0.17,p=0.3991)。
    结论:大多数可用的关于腹腔镜空肠造口术的YouTube®视频未能满足外科学员的基本教育需求,学术中心或独立医生之间没有区别。然而,评分工具发布后,视频质量有所改善。使用LAP-VEGaS评分对腹腔镜空肠造口培训视频进行标准化,可以确保视频具有逻辑结构的适当教育价值。
    Despite its common nature, there is no data on the educational quality of publicly available laparoscopic jejunostomy training videos. The LAParoscopic surgery Video Educational GuidelineS (LAP-VEGaS) video assessment tool, released in 2020, has been developed to ensure that teaching videos are of appropriate quality. This study applies the LAP-VEGaS tool to currently available laparoscopic jejunostomy videos.
    A retrospective review of YouTube® videos was conducted for \"laparoscopic jejunostomy.\" Included videos were rated by three independent investigators using LAP-VEGaS video assessment tool (0-18). Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to evaluate differences in LAP-VEGaS scores between video categories and date of publication relative to 2020. Spearman\'s correlation test was performed to measure association between scores and length, number of views and likes.
    27 unique videos met selection criteria. Academic and physician video walkthroughs did not demonstrate a significant difference in median scores (9.33 IQR 6.33, 14.33 vs. 7.67 IQR 4, 12.67, p = 0.3951). Videos published after 2020 demonstrated higher median scores than those published before 2020 (13 IQR 7.5, 14.67 vs. 5 IQR 3, 9.67, p = 0.0081). A majority of videos failed to provide patient position (52%), intraoperative findings (56%), operative time (63%), graphic aids (74%), and audio/written commentary (52%). A positive association was demonstrated between scores and number of likes (rs = 0.59, p = 0.0011) and video length (rs = 0.39, p = 0.0421), but not number of views (rs = 0.17, p = 0.3991).
    The majority of available YouTube® videos on laparoscopic jejunostomy fail to meet the basic educational needs of surgical trainees, and there is no difference between those produced by academic centers or independent physicians. However, there has been improvement in video quality following the release of the scoring tool. Standardization of laparoscopic jejunostomy training videos with the LAP-VEGaS score can ensure that videos are of appropriate educational value with logical structure.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Enteral nutrition (EN) is the introduction of nutrients into the gastrointestinal tract through a tube placed in a natural or artificial stoma. Tubes may be passed into the stomach (gastrostomy) or the jejunum (jejunostomy) in patients who cannot obtain adequate nourishing via oral feeding. Following placement, nurses are typically responsible for management of gastrostomy or other enteral tube devices in both the acute and home care settings. This article summarizes guidelines developed for nursing management of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy or jejunostomy (PEG/PEJ) and gastrojejunostomy (PEGJ) tubes, developed by the Italian Association of Stoma care Nurses (AIOSS-Associazione Italiana Operatori Sanitari di Stomaterapia) in collaboration with the Italian Association of Endoscopic Operators (ANOTE-Associazione Nazionale Operatori Tecniche Endoscopiche) and the Italian Association of Gastroenterology Nurses and Associates (ANIGEA-Associazione Nazionale Infermieri di Gastroenterologia e Associati). The guidelines do not contain recommendations about EN through nasogastric tubes, indications for PEG/PEJ/PEGJ positioning, composition of EN, selection of patients, type of tube, modality of administration of the EN, and gastrointestinal complications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Practice Guideline
    临床程序的标准化已成为当代医学实践中的理想目标。为此,西班牙肠外和肠内营养学会(SENPE)致力于创建人工营养的临床实践指南和/或共识文件以及质量标准.因此,SENPE的标准化小组汇集了由西班牙儿科胃肠病学会支持的“儿科营养支持肠内获取共识文件”,肝病学和营养学(SEGHNP),全国儿科和新生儿重症监护托儿所协会(ANECIPN),和西班牙小儿外科学会(SECP)。本出版物是我们工作的精简版;完整的文件将作为专刊出版。它分析儿科患者的肠内进入选择,审查证据的水平,并提供团队成员的经验。同样,它详细介绍了儿科肠内支持的一般和具体适应症,当前的技术,护理指南,每个肠内通路的给药方法和并发症。美国肠外和肠内营养学会(ASPEN)和几个欧洲学会发布的数据也已被纳入。
    Standardization of clinical procedures has become a desirable objective in contemporary medical practice. To this effect, the Spanish Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (SENPE) has endeavoured to create clinical practice guidelines and/or documents of consensus as well as quality standards in artificial nutrition. As a result, the SENPE´s Standardization Team has put together the \"Document of Consensus in Enteral Access for Paediatric Nutritional Support\" supported by the Spanish Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (SEGHNP), the National Association of Pediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care Nursery (ANECIPN), and the Spanish Society of Pediatric Surgery (SECP). The present publication is a reduced version of our work; the complete document will be published as a monographic issue. It analyzes enteral access options in the pediatric patient, reviews the levels of evidence and provides the team-members\' experience. Similarly, it details general and specific indications for pediatric enteral support, current techniques, care guidelines, methods of administration and complications of each enteral access. The data published by the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) and several European Societies has also been incorporated.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号