Insurance

保险
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Objectives.COVID-19大流行导致失业和相关的医疗保险损失,促使采取前所未有的紧急政策,包括经济救济工作和扩大医疗保险覆盖面。我们试图了解哮喘患者与大流行相关的挑战,以及紧急政策如何为面临慢性病管理和健康保险损失的家庭提供服务。研究设计。定性访谈研究。方法。2021年,我们对21名在COVID-19大流行期间患有哮喘和失业的成年人以及雇主赞助的医疗保险进行了半结构化电话采访。我们使用主题分析来评估健康和经济政策如何影响参与者获得护理和控制哮喘的能力。结果。参与者报告说,由于哮喘,他们获得护理的机会减少,并担心对COVID-19的易感性增加。虽然保险损失加剧了这些挑战,与会者表示,经济救济努力,包括直接刺激支付,帮助他们负担得起所需的哮喘治疗。由于难以理解,参与者对现有覆盖政策的增强更为关键,例如《平价医疗法案》(ACA)市场和《综合预算对账法案》(COBRA)。访问,并提供这样的覆盖范围。Conclusions.我们的研究结果强调,受哮喘和健康保险损失影响的人受益于提供灵活和易于使用的援助的政策,例如直接付款,以应对慢性病带来的各种挑战。尽管扩大医疗保险覆盖面的政策至关重要,需要更多的关注,以帮助患有医学脆弱疾病的人及时获得这些计划。
    UNASSIGNED: The COVID-19 pandemic led to unemployment and associated health insurance loss, prompting an unprecedented adoption of emergency policies, including economic relief efforts and health insurance coverage expansion. We sought to understand pandemic-related challenges for people with asthma and how emergency policies served families facing both chronic disease management and health insurance loss.
    UNASSIGNED: Qualitative interview study.
    UNASSIGNED: In 2021, we conducted semi-structured telephone interviews with 21 adults who had asthma and lost employment and employer-sponsored health insurance coverage during the COVID-19 pandemic. We used thematic analysis to assess how health and economic policies affected participants\' ability to access care and manage their asthma.
    UNASSIGNED: Participants reported reduced access to care, as well as worry about heightened susceptibility to COVID-19 due to their asthma. While insurance loss exacerbated these challenges, participants indicated that economic relief efforts, including direct stimulus payments, helped them afford needed asthma care. Participants were more critical of enhancements to existing coverage policies such as the Affordable Care Act (ACA) Marketplace and Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA) due to difficulty understanding, accessing, and affording such coverage.
    UNASSIGNED: Our findings underscore that people affected by asthma and health insurance loss benefit from policies that provide flexible and easy-to-use assistance, such as direct payments, for meeting the diverse challenges posed by living with a chronic disease. Although policies that expand health insurance coverage are critical, more attention is needed to help people with chronic conditions access these programs in a timely way.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    加拿大全民医疗系统内的治疗需要成本效益分析,导致相对于美国医疗保健的延误。霍奇金淋巴瘤(HL)患者通常预后良好,但是那些在移植后复发或没有资格接受移植的人受益于新疗法,包括Brentuximabvedotin(BV)。BV于2011年获得FDA批准,但直到2014年才获得加拿大资助。为了评估访问延迟的影响,我们比较了美国批准前/后美国患者(保险公司)和加拿大患者生存率的变化.患者16-64岁,在2007-2010年(第1期)和2011-2014年(第2期)从美国SEER和加拿大癌症登记处诊断为HL。使用批准日期(替代),因为注册中心无法获得治疗。Kaplan-Meier存活曲线和调整后的Cox回归模型按保险类别比较了不同时期之间的生存率。在12,003名美国和4210名加拿大患者中,美国患者的生存率较好(校正后风险比(aHR)0.87(95CI0.77-0.98));加拿大患者的生存率改善(aHR0.84(95CI0.69-1.03)相似,但无显著性.保险公司之间的比较显示,美国无保险和医疗补助的生存率明显低于美国私人保险和加拿大患者。鉴于肿瘤资助日益复杂的性质,这值得进一步调查,以确保公平获得治疗发展。
    Cost-effectiveness analyses are required for therapies within Canada\'s universal healthcare system, leading to delays relative to U.S. healthcare. Patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) generally have an excellent prognosis, but those who relapse after or are ineligible for transplant benefit from novel therapies, including brentuximab vedotin (BV). BV was FDA-approved in 2011 but not Canadian-funded until 2014. To assess the impact of access delays, we compared changes in survival for U.S. (by insurer) and Canadian patients in periods pre/post-U.S. approval. Patients were 16-64 years, diagnosed with HL in 2007-2010 (Period 1) and 2011-2014 (Period 2) from the U.S. SEER and Canadian Cancer Registries. Approval date (surrogate) was utilized as therapy was unavailable in registries. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and adjusted Cox regression models compared survival between periods by insurance category. Among 12,003 U.S. and 4210 Canadian patients, survival was better in U.S. patients (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.87 (95%CI 0.77-0.98)) between periods; improvement in Canadian patients (aHR 0.84 (95%CI 0.69-1.03) was similar but non-significant. Comparisons between insurers showed survival was significantly worse for U.S. uninsured and Medicaid vs. U.S. privately insured and Canadian patients. Given the increasingly complex nature of oncologic funding, this merits further investigation to ensure equity in access to therapy developments.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:心力衰竭(HF)患者是德国最常再入院的成年患者。大多数HF患者因非心血管原因再次入院。了解医院以外的HF管理的相关性对于了解HF和导致再入院的因素至关重要。机器学习(ML)对来自法定健康保险(SHI)的数据的应用允许评估代表一般人群的大型纵向数据集,以支持临床决策。
    目的:本研究旨在评估ML方法在门诊SHI数据中预测HF患者初次入院后1年全因和特定HF再入院的能力,并确定重要的预测因素。
    方法:我们使用2012年至2018年德国AOKBaden-WürttembergSHI的门诊数据确定了HF患者。然后,我们对回归和ML算法进行了训练和应用,以预测HF首次入院后一年内的首次全因和特定于HF的再入院。我们拟合了一个随机森林,一个弹性网,逐步回归,以及使用诊断代码预测再入院的逻辑回归,药物暴露,人口统计(年龄,性别,国籍,和SHI内的覆盖类型),居住的乡村程度,并参与常见慢性病(1型和2型糖尿病,乳腺癌,慢性阻塞性肺疾病,和冠心病)。然后,我们根据其重要性和预测再入院的方向评估了HF再入院的预测因子。
    结果:我们的最终数据集包括97,529名HF患者,和78,044(80%)在观察期内再次入院。在经过测试的建模方法中,随机森林方法最好地预测了1年全因和HF特异性再入院,C统计量分别为0.68和0.69。1年全因再入院的重要预测因素包括泮托拉唑的处方,慢性阻塞性肺疾病,动脉粥样硬化,性别,rurality,并参与2型糖尿病和冠心病的疾病管理计划。HF特异性再入院的相关特征包括大量典型的HF合并症。
    结论:虽然我们确定的许多预测因子已知与HF的合并症有关,我们还发现了几个新颖的联想。疾病管理计划已被广泛证明是有效的管理慢性疾病;然而,我们的结果表明,在短期内,它们可能有助于针对再次入院风险增加的合并有并发症的HF患者.我们的结果还表明,生活在更农村的地方会增加再次入院的风险。总的来说,共病以外的因素与HF再入院风险相关.这一发现可能会影响门诊医生如何识别和监测有HF再入院风险的患者。
    BACKGROUND: Patients with heart failure (HF) are the most commonly readmitted group of adult patients in Germany. Most patients with HF are readmitted for noncardiovascular reasons. Understanding the relevance of HF management outside the hospital setting is critical to understanding HF and factors that lead to readmission. Application of machine learning (ML) on data from statutory health insurance (SHI) allows the evaluation of large longitudinal data sets representative of the general population to support clinical decision-making.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the ability of ML methods to predict 1-year all-cause and HF-specific readmission after initial HF-related admission of patients with HF in outpatient SHI data and identify important predictors.
    METHODS: We identified individuals with HF using outpatient data from 2012 to 2018 from the AOK Baden-Württemberg SHI in Germany. We then trained and applied regression and ML algorithms to predict the first all-cause and HF-specific readmission in the year after the first admission for HF. We fitted a random forest, an elastic net, a stepwise regression, and a logistic regression to predict readmission by using diagnosis codes, drug exposures, demographics (age, sex, nationality, and type of coverage within SHI), degree of rurality for residence, and participation in disease management programs for common chronic conditions (diabetes mellitus type 1 and 2, breast cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and coronary heart disease). We then evaluated the predictors of HF readmission according to their importance and direction to predict readmission.
    RESULTS: Our final data set consisted of 97,529 individuals with HF, and 78,044 (80%) were readmitted within the observation period. Of the tested modeling approaches, the random forest approach best predicted 1-year all-cause and HF-specific readmission with a C-statistic of 0.68 and 0.69, respectively. Important predictors for 1-year all-cause readmission included prescription of pantoprazole, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, atherosclerosis, sex, rurality, and participation in disease management programs for type 2 diabetes mellitus and coronary heart disease. Relevant features for HF-specific readmission included a large number of canonical HF comorbidities.
    CONCLUSIONS: While many of the predictors we identified were known to be relevant comorbidities for HF, we also uncovered several novel associations. Disease management programs have widely been shown to be effective at managing chronic disease; however, our results indicate that in the short term they may be useful for targeting patients with HF with comorbidity at increased risk of readmission. Our results also show that living in a more rural location increases the risk of readmission. Overall, factors beyond comorbid disease were relevant for risk of HF readmission. This finding may impact how outpatient physicians identify and monitor patients at risk of HF readmission.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究的主要目的是提出一种称为模糊网络数据包络分析(FNDEA)的创新方法,以评估具有两阶段结构的网络决策单元(DMU)的性能,同时考虑到数据的不确定性。为了实现这一目标,我们利用各种方法,包括非合作博弈(领导者-追随者)NDEA方法,Z数的概念,可信性理论,和机会约束规划(CCP)来建立模糊NDEA方法的模型。FNDEA方法提供了几个优点,例如所提出的FNDEA模型的线性,在模糊的情况下对两级DMU进行排名的能力,在不确定环境中提供独特的效率分解方法,以及处理Z信息的能力。为了证明所提出方法的适用性和有效性,在评估伊朗私人保险公司的绩效时,我们采用了Z-number网络数据包络分析(ZNDEA)方法。该实施的结果表明,所提出的ZNDEA方法适用于在存在数据歧义的情况下对保险公司进行测量和排名是有效的。
    The main aim of this research is to present an innovative method known as fuzzy network data envelopment analysis (FNDEA) in order to assess the performance of network decision-making units (DMUs) that possess a two-stage structure while taking into account the uncertainty of data. To attain this goal, we utilize various methodologies including the non-cooperative game (leader-follower) NDEA method, the concept of Z-number, credibility theory, and chance-constrained programming (CCP) to develop a model for the fuzzy NDEA approach. The FNDEA approach offers several advantages, such as the linearity of the presented FNDEA models, the ability to rank two-stage DMUs in situations of ambiguity, the provision of a unique efficiency decomposition method in an uncertain environment, and the capability to handle Z-information. To demonstrate the applicability and effectiveness of the proposed approach, we implement the Z-number network data envelopment analysis (ZNDEA) approach in assessing the performance of Iranian private insurance companies. The results of this implementation reveal that the proposed ZNDEA method is suitable and effective for measuring and ranking insurance companies in situations where data ambiguity is present.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:许多国家的职业病漏报严重阻碍了干预计划的制定,构成重大公共卫生问题。我们的研究旨在通过检查授权在整个土耳其发布报告的医院的数据,为职业病监测做出贡献。
    方法:本横断面研究使用2018年1月1日至2022年12月31日期间向土耳其81个省公共卫生总局报告的职业病医学诊断进行。该研究评估了对职业病进行医学诊断的医院,并比较了年龄组,性别,职业病诊断小组和法律和医学诊断工作省份。
    结果:就医学诊断而言,前三名疾病组是肌肉骨骼疾病,占38.8%,呼吸系统疾病占14.4%,听力缺陷占10.9%。关于法律诊断,呼吸系统疾病以26.4%排名第一,其次是8.2%的肌肉骨骼疾病和5.5%的听力缺陷。虽然大多数医疗职业病病例被诊断的省份有相似之处,Karabük和Batman的大多数受影响个人尚未获得对职业病的法律承认。土耳其三分之二的医疗职业病诊断是在两家医院进行的。
    结论:这项研究反映了土耳其的国家数据,是该国的第一个全国性研究。土耳其的职业病数量低于预期。以包括医疗诊断的方式表达数据而不是使用与法律诊断相对应的补偿文件的数量会更准确。
    OBJECTIVE: The underreporting of occupational diseases in many countries significantly hampers the development of intervention programs, posing a significant public health problem. Our study aimed to contribute to the occupational diseases surveillance by examining the data of hospitals authorized to issue reports throughout Turkey.
    METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted using medical diagnoses of occupational diseases reported to the General Directorate of Public Health from 81 provinces in Turkey between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2022. The study evaluated hospitals that made medical diagnoses of occupational diseases and compared age groups, genders, occupational disease diagnosis groups and provinces of work regarding legal and medical diagnoses.
    RESULTS: The top three disease groups in terms of medical diagnosis are musculoskeletal disorders with 38.8%, respiratory diseases with 14.4% and hearing defects with 10.9%. Regarding legal diagnoses, respiratory system diseases ranked first with 26.4%, followed by musculoskeletal disorders with 8.2% and hearing defects with 5.5%. While the provinces where most cases of medical occupational diseases are diagnosed share similarities, the majority of affected individuals in Karabük and Batman have not received a legal recognition of the occupational disease. Two-thirds of Turkey\'s medical occupational disease diagnoses were made in two hospitals.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study is reflecting national data in Turkey and is the country\'s first nationwide study. The number of occupational diseases in Turkey is lower than expected. It would be more accurate to express the data in a way that includes medical diagnoses instead of using the number of compensated files corresponding to legal diagnoses.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:患有高血压的老年人的目标收缩压(SBP)水平因国家而异,导致在确定适当的SBP水平方面面临挑战。
    目的:本研究旨在确定最佳SBP水平,以最大程度降低韩国老年高血压患者的全因和心血管疾病(CVD)死亡率。
    方法:这项回顾性队列研究使用了来自国家健康保险服务数据库的数据。我们纳入了65岁或以上的老年人,他们新诊断出患有高血压,并在2003-2004年接受了国家健康保险服务的健康检查。我们排除了有高血压或CVD病史的患者,没有开高血压药,失去血压或任何其他协变量值,在2020年之前的随访期间,进行了不到2次的健康检查。我们将平均SBP水平分为6类,以10mmHg为增量,从<120mmHg到≥160mmHg;130-139mmHg为参考范围。Cox比例风险模型用于检查SBP与全因死亡率和CVD死亡率之间的关系。亚组分析按年龄组(65~74岁和75岁或以上)进行.
    结果:本研究纳入了68,901名新诊断为高血压的老年人。在后续期间,32,588(47.3%)参与者有全因死亡率,4273(6.2%)有CVD死亡率。与SBP在130-139mmHg范围内的老年人相比,属于其他SBP类别的个人,不包括SBP120-129mmHg,显示全因死亡率和CVD死亡率显著较高。亚组分析显示,根据SBP类别,65-74岁的老年人的全因死亡率和CVD死亡率高于75岁或以上的老年人。
    结论:120-139mmHg范围内的SBP水平与韩国老年高血压患者的全因死亡率和CVD死亡率最低相关。建议将SBP降低到<140mmHg,以120mmHg作为SBP的最小值,适用于患有高血压的韩国老年人。此外,对于65-74岁的成年人,需要更严格的SBP管理。
    BACKGROUND: Target systolic blood pressure (SBP) levels for older adults with hypertension vary across countries, leading to challenges in determining the appropriate SBP level.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to identify the optimal SBP level for minimizing all-cause and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality in older Korean adults with hypertension.
    METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used data from the National Health Insurance Service database. We included older adults aged 65 years or older who were newly diagnosed with hypertension and underwent a National Health Insurance Service health checkup in 2003-2004. We excluded patients who had a history of hypertension or CVD, were not prescribed medication for hypertension, had missing blood pressure or any other covariate values, and had fewer than 2 health checkups during the follow-up period until 2020. We categorized the average SBP levels into 6 categories in 10 mm Hg increments, from <120 mm Hg to ≥160 mm Hg; 130-139 mm Hg was the reference range. Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine the relationship between SBP and all-cause and CVD mortalities, and subgroup analysis was conducted by age group (65-74 years and 75 years or older).
    RESULTS: A total of 68,901 older adults newly diagnosed with hypertension were included in this study. During the follow-up period, 32,588 (47.3%) participants had all-cause mortality and 4273 (6.2%) had CVD mortality. Compared to older adults with SBP within the range of 130-139 mm Hg, individuals who fell into the other SBP categories, excluding those with SBP 120-129 mm Hg, showed significantly higher all-cause and CVD mortality. Subgroup analysis showed that older adults aged 65-74 years had higher all-cause and CVD mortality rates according to SBP categories than those aged 75 years or older.
    CONCLUSIONS: The SBP levels within the range of 120-139 mm Hg were associated with the lowest all-cause and CVD mortality rates among older Korean adults with hypertension. It is recommended to reduce SBP to <140 mm Hg, with 120 mm Hg as the minimum value for SBP, for older Korean adults with hypertension. Additionally, stricter SBP management is required for adults aged 65-74 years.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    解决健康的社会决定因素(SDOH)对于改善健康结果至关重要。在学生经营的免费诊所,我们开发了一个筛选过程,以了解密尔沃基无保险人群的SDOH需求和资源利用情况。
    在这项横断面研究中,我们在2021年10月至2022年10月期间,对没有健康保险的成年患者(N=238)进行了9种传统SDOH需求的筛查,以及他们获得牙科和精神卫生保健的机会.以大于或等于30天的间隔对患者进行调查。我们评估了SDOH需求与患者报告的资源有用性趋势之间的相关性。
    获得牙科护理(64.7%)和健康保险(51.3%)是最常被认可的需求。我们发现各种SDOH需求之间存在显着相关性(P≤0.05)。值得注意的是,心理健康获取需求与牙科显着相关(r=0.41;95%CI=0.19,0.63),药物治疗(r=0.51;95%CI=0.30,0.72),公用事业(r=0.39;95%CI=0.17,0.61),和粮食不安全(r=0.42;95%CI=0.19,0.64)。食品住房(r=0.55;95%CI=0.32,0.78),住房药物(r=0.58;95%CI=0.35,0.81),药物和食物(r=0.53;95%CI=0.32,0.74)之间存在显着相关性。对患者报告的有用性的纵向评估告知了所提供资源的变化。
    了解突出的SDOH需求可以为资源提供和干预提供信息,解决资源不足患者负担的根本原因。在这项研究中,患者报告的有关资源有用性的数据促使了对新资源和志愿者角色的管理.这项概念验证研究表明,纵向跟踪低资源诊所的SDOH需求如何为社会心理资源提供信息。
    UNASSIGNED: Addressing social determinants of health (SDOH) is fundamental to improving health outcomes. At a student-run free clinic, we developed a screening process to understand the SDOH needs and resource utilization of Milwaukee\'s uninsured population.
    UNASSIGNED: In this cross-sectional study, we screened adult patients without health insurance (N = 238) for nine traditional SDOH needs as well as their access to dental and mental health care between October 2021 and October 2022. Patients were surveyed at intervals greater than or equal to 30 days. We assessed correlations between SDOH needs and trends in patient-reported resource usefulness.
    UNASSIGNED: Access to dental care (64.7%) and health insurance (51.3%) were the most frequently endorsed needs. We found significant correlations (P ≤ 0.05) between various SDOH needs. Notably, mental health access needs significantly correlated with dental (r = 0.41; 95% CI = 0.19, 0.63), medications (r = 0.51; 95% CI = 0.30, 0.72), utilities (r = 0.39; 95% CI = 0.17, 0.61), and food insecurity (r = 0.42; 95% CI = 0.19, 0.64). Food-housing (r = 0.55; 95% CI = 0.32, 0.78), housing-medications (r = 0.58; 95% CI = 0.35, 0.81), and medications-food (r = 0.53; 95% CI = 0.32, 0.74) were significantly correlated with each other. Longitudinal assessment of patient-reported usefulness informed changes in the resources offered.
    UNASSIGNED: Understanding prominent SDOH needs can inform resource offerings and interventions, addressing root causes that burden under-resourced patients. In this study, patient-reported data about resource usefulness prompted the curation of new resources and volunteer roles. This proof-of-concept study shows how longitudinally tracking SDOH needs at low-resource clinics can inform psychosocial resources.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:调查基于保险类型的耳鼻喉科护理新患者预约等待时间的潜在差异,并探讨影响这些等待时间的因素。
    方法:横断面审计研究,使用“神秘来电者”的方法,用线性混合泊松模型进行分析,以调整混杂因素。
    方法:共有来自49个州和哥伦比亚特区的612名医生,代表6个耳鼻喉科亚专科,包括在内。
    方法:神秘来电者通过电话联系了耳鼻喉科医生,他们有医疗补助或蓝十字/蓝盾(BCBS)保险的患者。来电者要求下一个可用的约会。使用广义线性混合泊松模型在R中记录并分析新患者预约的等待时间。
    结果:共有1224个电话中的1183个到达代表。与BCBS患者相比,医疗补助患者的等待时间延长了5.73%(P<.001)(IRR:1.06;置信区间[CI]:1.03-1.09;P<.001),平均等待时间分别为36.8天(SE±1.6)和32.4天(SE±1.6)。等待时间较长也与附属于大学(P=.001)和某些亚专科的医生有关,如小儿耳鼻喉科(P<.001)和神经科(P=.008)。还观察到区域差异,特定的AAO-HNS区域显示较短的等待时间。该模型实现了0.947的条件R平方值。
    结论:这项研究揭示了基于保险类型的耳鼻喉科护理等待时间的差异,延长医疗补助受益人的等待时间。这些发现强调了潜在的护理差距,这就需要确保公平获得耳鼻喉科护理的策略,并进一步研究以了解这些潜在差异的根本原因。
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate potential differences in new patient appointment wait times for otolaryngology care based on insurance types and explore factors influencing these wait times.
    METHODS: A cross-sectional audit study, using a \"mystery caller\" approach, analyzed with a linear mixed Poisson model to adjust for confounding factors.
    METHODS: A total of 612 physicians across 49 states and the District of Columbia, representing 6 otolaryngology subspecialties, were included.
    METHODS: Otolaryngology physicians were contacted by mystery callers via telephone with scripted clinical vignettes as patients with either Medicaid or Blue Cross/Blue Shield (BCBS) insurance. Callers requested next available appointment. Wait times for new patient appointments were recorded and analyzed in R using a generalized linear mixed Poisson model.
    RESULTS: A total of 1183 of 1224 calls reached a representative. Medicaid patients waited 5.73% longer (P < .001) compared to BCBS patients (IRR: 1.06; confidence interval [CI]: 1.03-1.09; P < .001), with respective mean wait times of 36.8 days (SE ± 1.6) and 32.4 days (SE ± 1.6). Longer waiting times were also associated with physicians affiliated with universities (P = .001) and certain subspecialties, such as pediatric otolaryngology (P < .001) and neurotology (P = .008). Regional differences were also observed, with specific AAO-HNS regions showing shorter wait times. The model achieved a conditional R-squared value of 0.947.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals disparities in wait times for otolaryngology care based on insurance type, with extended wait times for Medicaid beneficiaries. The findings highlight a potential access to care disparity, which begets the need for strategies that ensure equitable access to otolaryngology care and further research to understand the underlying reasons for these potential disparities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:雄激素剥夺疗法(ADT)广泛用于前列腺癌的治疗。ADT与骨密度降低相关,导致骨质疏松性骨折风险增加。这项回顾性队列研究的目的是在日本的现实实践中量化接受ADT治疗前列腺癌的男性的骨折风险。
    方法:从日本医学数据视觉(MDV)数据库中提取数据。在2010年4月至2021年3月之间开始ADT治疗前列腺癌的男性被确定,并使用倾向评分与未服用ADT的前列腺癌患者队列进行匹配。通过累积发生率函数估计骨折率,并使用Cox原因特异性风险模型在队列之间进行比较。信息是根据人口统计学提取的,合并症和骨密度测定。
    结果:30,561名开始ADT的PC男性与30,561名未经ADT治疗的前列腺癌男性相匹配。ADT启动后,<5%的男性接受骨密度测定。与不服用ADT相比,ADT处方与骨折风险增加相关(调整后的风险比:1.63[95%CI1.52-1.75])。
    结论:ADT与前列腺癌男性骨质疏松性骨折风险增加1.6倍相关。该人群中的密度测定很少见,迫切需要改善监测以实施有效的骨折预防。
    BACKGROUND: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is widely used for the treatment of prostate cancer. ADT is associated with reduced bone density leading to an increased risk of osteoporotic fracture. The objective of this retrospective cohort study was to quantify fracture risk in men treated with ADT for prostate cancer in real-world practice in Japan.
    METHODS: Data were extracted from the Japanese Medical Data Vision (MDV) database. Men initiating ADT for treatment of prostate cancer between April 2010 and March 2021 were identified and matched to a cohort of prostate cancer patients not taking ADT using a propensity score. Fracture rates were estimated by a cumulative incidence function and compared between cohorts using a Cox cause-specific hazard model. Information was extracted on demographics, comorbidities and bone densitometry.
    RESULTS: 30,561 men with PC starting ADT were matched to 30,561 men with prostate cancer not treated with ADT. Following ADT initiation, <5% of men underwent bone densitometry. Prescription of ADT was associated with an increased fracture risk compared to not taking ADT (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.63 [95% CI 1.52-1.75]).
    CONCLUSIONS: ADT is associated with a 1.6-fold increase in the risk of osteoporotic fracture in men with prostate cancer. Densitometry in this population is infrequent and monitoring urgently needs to be improved in order to implement effective fracture prevention.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号