OBJECTIVE: Limited information is available about the relationship between colorectal cancer (CRC) and serum concentration of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) and insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 3 (IGFBP3). This study aims to compare the serum levels of IGF1and IGFBP3 in colorectal cancer cases and controls and to assess the relationship between their level and the demographic and histopathological characteristics.
METHODS: A case-control study in which 50 patients with colorectal cancer and 50 controls matched by gender and age were compared regarding the demographic characteristics and the level of both IGF1 and IGFBP3. The correlation with different clinicopathological features was assessed.
RESULTS: Levels of IGF1 were significantly higher while levels of IGFBP3 were significantly lower among cases compared to control. IGF1 was significantly higher among patients with liver metastasis, lymph node (LN) spread, and lymphovenous invasions and did not show significant association with gender, smoking status, family history, or primary site of colorectal cancer. Lower IGFBP3 was significantly high among patients with liver and lymph node metastasis, lymphovenous invasion, and patients with positive family history. This significant negative correlation was also detected between IGFBP3 levels and the size of the tumor.
CONCLUSIONS: High IGF1 levels and low concentrations of IGFBP3 are related to colorectal cancer and were significantly associated with liver metastasis, lymph node spread, and lymphovenous invasions. Further research is recommended to investigate if circulating IGF1 and IGFBP3 levels can be used to identify people at high risk of colorectal cancer and to investigate potential lifestyle or pharmaceutical ways to lower IGF1 bioactivity as a risk reduction strategy.

Adrenal incidentalomas (AI) are very common and mostly they are non-functioning adenomas (NFA). NFAs are often associated with insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome. Several biomarkers, including certain growth factors, may participatein the pathogenesis ofmetabolic changes in patients with adrenal adenomas.Patients with NFA and age-matched control subjects were enrolled in the study. Data on age, gender, presence of metabolic syndrome or its components were obtained for each subject. Blood samples were obtained and glycemia, insulinemia, lipid profile, and selected growth factor levels were measured. Forty-three patients with NFA and 40 controls were included in the study. Differences were not found in the metabolic syndrome and its components prevalence or in the biochemical profile between patients and the control group. Significant differences were noticed in the levels of IGF1, IGF2, and IGFBP3 (p=0.016, p=0.005, p=0.004, respectively), but there were no differences in VEGF or EGF concentrations. In NFA patients, an association between glycemia and EGF levels was present (p=0.026). No significant correlations between tumor size and insulin or growth factor concentrations were present in AI patients. Significantly higher serum IGF1, IGF2, and IGFBP3 concentrations in NFA patients may support the role of the IGF axis in the pathogenesis of adrenocortical lesions.No correlation between IGFs or IGFBP3 and parameters of glucose or lipid metabolism was found. Present results may support the role of the growth hormone axis rather than hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance in the pathogenesis of adrenocortical adenomas.

Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) and binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3) are associated with breast cancer in women at average risk of cancer. Less is known whether these biomarkers also predict risk in women with breast cancer family history.
We conducted a nested case-control study within the New York site of the Breast Cancer Family Registry (BCFR, n = 80 cases, 156 controls), a cohort enriched for breast cancer family history. Using conditional logistic regression, we estimated the association between IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 levels and breast cancer risk and examined whether this risk differed by predicted absolute breast cancer risk based on pedigree models.
The overall association between IGF-1 or IGFBP-3 elevation (≥ median in controls) and breast cancer risk was elevated, but not statistically significant (IGF-1 OR = 1.37, 95% CI = 0.66-2.85; IGFBP-3 OR = 1.62, 95% CI = 0.81-3.24). Women with elevated predicted absolute 10-year risk ≥ 3.4% and elevated IGFBP-3 (≥ median) had more than a 3-fold increased risk compared to women with lower predicted absolute 10-year risk (< 3.4%) and low IGFBP-3 (OR = 3.47 95% CI = 1.04-11.6).
These data offer some support that the overall magnitude of the associations between IGF-1 and IGFBP3 seen in average risk cohorts may be similar in women enriched with a strong breast cancer family history.

Recently, insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), forkhead box transcription factor (Fox) O1, and mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) signaling have been introduced as key elements in acne pathogenesis. The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between serum levels of IGF-1, insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3), FoxO1 and mTORC1, and the components of metabolic syndrome (MS) and AV. This prospective case-control study was carried out on 89 participants, including 49 AV patients and 40 controls. The serum levels of IGF-1, IGFBP-3, insulin, FoxO1, and mTORC1 were measured along with the components of MS. The blood pressure (BP) measures were significantly higher in the AV patients than in the controls (P = .001). The mean high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels were significantly lower in the AV patients than in the controls (P = .040). The numbers of accompanying MS components were significantly higher in the AV patients than in the controls (P = .001). The IGFBP-3 levels were significantly higher in the AV patients than in the controls (P = .02). The IGF-1, mTORC1, and FoxO1 levels were higher in the AV patients than in the controls; neither were statistically significant (P = .093, P = .741, and P = .564, respectively). The higher BP and IGFBP-3 levels, the lower HDL-C levels and the common presence of MS components demand caution in terms of new therapeutic strategies and possible associated comorbidities.

Insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1 is a potent mitogen, but IGF binding protein (IGFBP)-3 inhibits IGF1. To elucidate the relationship between both IGF1 and IGFBP and the risk of tumorigenesis, the association between IGF1 and IGFBP3 serum levels and of malignant tumor incidence was investigated in a prospective case-control study nested in the Japan Collaborative Cohort Study. A baseline survey was started in 1988-1990, 110,585 subjects were enrolled, and 35% of participants donated blood samples. Those who had been diagnosed with malignant tumors by 1997 were considered cases. The analysis involved 1,349 cases and 4,012 controls. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate ORs for cancer incidence associated with IGF-related molecules. After controlling for alcohol intake, body mass index (BMI), and smoking, participants with high total-IGFBP3 and free-IGFBP3, which is estimated by the molar difference of (IGFBP3 - IGF1), had a risk of future neoplasms (P trend = 0.014 and 0.009, respectively), but those with IGF1 did not. People in the second to fifth quintiles had a lower risk than those in the first quintile (ORs 0.676-0.736 and 0.657-0.870, respectively). Limiting subjects to those followed for 3 years weakened the negative associations of total- and free-IGFBP3, whereas a positive relationship of free-IGF1, which was estimated by the molar ratio of IGF1/IGFBP3, was seen (P trend = 0.004, 0.002, and 0.013, respectively). After controlling for alcohol intake, smoking, BMI, and diabetes mellitus, the results were confirmed. These findings suggest that serum IGF1 and IGFBP3 are related to future risk of malignant neoplasms.

According to the growth hormone - insulin-like growth factor 1 axis (GH/IGF1 axis) theory, the actions of GH on promoting growth are mediated by IGF1. In the blood, IGF1, insulin-like growth factor 1 binding protein 3 (IGFBP3) and acid-labile subunit (ALS) form ternary complexes, hence the accumulation of IGF1. We report a case of 10-year-old male with short stature due to GH deficiency diagnosed with hypopituitarism. Therapy with recombinant human GH (rhGH) was initiated at 11 years and 4 months. After twenty three months on treatment clinical effects were as follows: increase in the patient\'s height by 19.2 cm (initial height 12.4 cm vs. 140.6 cm; hSDS -4.35 vs. -2.7; predicted adult height 176 cm vs. 182 cm, respectively). Despite good clinical response to the therapy, serum levels of IGF1 and IGFBP3 remained diminished: IGF1 - 28 ng/ml initially, vs. 23 ng/ml 19 months on therapy and IGFBP3 - 1116 ng/ml initially, vs. 1888 ng/ml after 11 months on therapy. We attempt to justify this phenomenon by reconsidering the IGF1-independent GH actions, assessing the endocrine role of hepatic IGF1 in comparison to the autocrine/paracrine role of its bone tissue fraction, and evaluating the functions of ALS. The exact explanation for the positive response to rhGH treatment without the expected increase in IGF1 in our patient remains unknown. Serum levels of IGF1 and IGFBP3 seem not always to be reliable markers of the response to rhGH treatment in GH-deficient patients.
Zgodnie z teorią osi hormon wzrostu (GH) – insulinopodobny czynnik wzrostu 1 (IGF1) w działaniu GH na promowanie wzrostu komórek pośredniczy IGF1. W surowicy krwi IGF1 trzecie białko wiążące insulinopodobny czynnik wzrostu 1 (IGFBP3) oraz kwasolabilna podjednostka (ALS) tworzą potrójne kompleksy, które umożliwiają akumulację IGF1. Przedstawiamy przypadek 10-letniego chłopca z niskorosłością zależną od niedoboru GH, u którego zdiagnozowano niedoczynność przysadki. U pacjenta rozpoczęto terapię rekombinowanym ludzkim hormonem wzrostu (rhGH) w wieku 11 lat i 4 miesięcy. Odpowiedź po dwudziestu trzech miesiącach leczenia była następująca: zwiększenie wzrostu o 19.2 cm (wzrost początkowy: 121,4 cm, vs. 140,6 cm; hSDS początkowo -4,35 vs. -2,7, przewidywany wzrost ostateczny 176 cm vs. 182 cm). Pomimo dobrej odpowiedzi klinicznej stężenia IGF1 i IGFBP3 w surowicy pozostawały obniżone: IGF1 – 28 ng/ml początkowo vs. 23 ng/ml po 19 miesiącach leczenia, IGFBP3 – 1116 ng/ml początkowo vs. 1888 ng/ml po 11 miesiącach leczenia. Podejmując próbę wyjaśnienia tego zjawiska uwzględnić należy działanie GH niezależne od IGF1, endokrynną rolę frakcji IGF1 pochodzenia wątrobowego w porównaniu z frakcją IGF1 pochodzenia kostnego, działającą auto- i parakrynnie, ocenę funkcji ALS. Dokładne wyjaśnienie pozytywnej odpowiedzi na leczenie rhGH bez spodziewanego wzrostu IGF1 u naszego pacjenta pozostaje nieznane. Stężenia IGF1 oraz IGFBP3 w surowicy krwi nie zawsze są wiarygodnymi markerami działania rhGH stosowanego w somatotropinowej niedoczynności przysadki.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationship between serum levels of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF1)/IGF-binding protein-3 (IGFBP3) and the risk of esophageal carcinoma.
METHODS: We assessed the relationship between the serum levels of these molecules and the risk of esophageal cancer in a prospective, nested case-control study of participants from the Japan Collaborative Cohort Study. A baseline survey was conducted from 1988 to 1990. Of the 110585 enrolled participants, 35% donated blood samples. Those who had been diagnosed with esophageal cancer were considered cases for nested case-control studies. A conditional logistic model was used to estimate odds ratios for the incidence of esophageal cancer associated with serum IGF1 and IGFBP3 levels.
RESULTS: Thirty-one cases and 86 controls were eligible for the present assessment. The molar ratio of IGF1/IGFBP3, which represents the free and active form of IGF1, was not correlated with the risk of esophageal carcinoma. A higher molar difference between IGFBP3 and IGF1, which estimates the free form of IGFBP3, was associated with a decreased risk of esophageal carcinoma (P = 0.0146), and people in the highest tertile had the lowest risk (OR = 0.107, 95%CI: 0.017-0.669). After adjustment for body mass index, tobacco use, and alcohol intake, the molar difference of IGFBP3-IGF1 was inversely correlated with the risk of esophageal carcinoma (P = 0.0150).
CONCLUSIONS: The free form of IGFBP3, which is estimated by this molar difference, may be inversely associated with esophageal cancer incidence.

Insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF1) is a potent mitogen. IGF-binding protein-3 (IGFBP3) binds and inhibits IGF1. High circulating IGF1 levels and low IGFBP3 levels are associated with increased risk of several cancers. We examined relationships between serum levels of these factors and hepatoma risk in a case-control study nested in a prospective cohort study (the Japan Collaborative Cohort Study (JACC Study)). A baseline survey was conducted from 1988 to 1990, and 39,242 subjects donated blood samples. Participants diagnosed with hepatoma by 1997 were considered cases for nested case-control studies. Ninety-one cases and 263 sex- and age-matched controls were analyzed. A conditional logistic model was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) for the incidence of hepatoma associated with serum IGF1 and IGFBP3 levels. Neither IGF1 nor the molar ratio of IGF1/IGFBP3 was correlated with hepatoma risk. After adjustment for hepatitis viral infection, body mass index, smoking, and alcohol intake, a higher molar difference of (IGFBP3 - IGF1) was associated with a decreased hepatoma risk more than IGFBP3 alone (p for trend <0.001 and = 0.003, respectively). People in the highest quartile had a lower risk (OR = 0.098; 95 % confidence interval = 0.026-0.368). In subgroup analyses of males and females, the molar difference was associated with a decreased hepatoma risk (p for trend <0.05). In non-elderly individuals, the difference was inversely correlated with the incidence of hepatoma (p for trend <0.01). The molar difference of (IGFBP3 - IGF1) may be inversely associated with the incidence of hepatoma.

BACKGROUND: Insulin-like growth factor peptides play important roles in regulating cell growth, cell differentiation, and apoptosis, and have been demonstrated to promote the development of colorectal cancer (CRC).
OBJECTIVE: To examine the association of insulin-related biomarkers including insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) and C-peptide with CRC risk and assess their relevance in predictive models.
METHODS: The odds ratios of colorectal cancer for serum levels of IGF-1, IGFBP-3 and C-peptide were estimated using unconditional logistic regression models in 100 colorectal cancer cases and 100 control subjects. Areas under the receiving curve (AUC) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) statistics were used to assess the discriminatory potential of the models.
RESULTS: Serum levels of IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 were negatively associated with colorectal cancer risk (OR=0.07, 95%CI: 0.03-0.16, P for trend <.01, OR=0.06, 95%CI: 0.03-0.15, P for trend <.01 respectively) and serum C-peptide was positively associated with risk of colorectal cancer (OR=4.38, 95%CI: 2.13-9.06, P for trend <.01). Compared to the risk model, prediction for the risk of colorectal cancer had substantially improved when all selected biomarkers IGF-1, IGFBP-3 and inverse value of C-peptide were simultaneously included inthe reference model [P for AUC improvement was 0.02 and the combined IDI reached 0.166% (95 % CI; 0.114-0.219)].
CONCLUSIONS: The results provide evidence for an association of insulin-related biomarkers with colorectal cancer risk and point to consideration as candidate predictor markers.

Recent evidence suggests that genetic variations in the IGFBP-3 gene may impact susceptibility to colorectal cancer, but individually published results are inconclusive. Our meta-analysis was aimed at providing a more precise estimation of these associations. An extensive literature search was conducted for appropriate articles published before May 1, 2013. This meta-analysis was performed using the STATA 12.0 software. The crude odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. Eleven case-control studies were included with a total of 11,895 colorectal cancer patients and 17,147 healthy controls. Our meta-analysis indicated that the G variant of IGFBP-3 C2133G polymorphism may be associated with increased colorectal cancer risk. However, no statistically significant association was noted between IGFBP-3 A-202C polymorphism and colorectal cancer risk. No publication bias was detected in this meta-analysis. The current meta-analysis suggests that the IGFBP-3 C2133G polymorphism may confer susceptibility to colorectal cancer. The G variant of the IGFBP-3 C2133G polymorphism may serve as a useful biomarker for predicting the risk of colorectal cancer.