In the dynamic landscape of scientific research, imaging core facilities are vital hubs propelling collaboration and innovation at the technology development and dissemination frontier. Here, we present a collaborative effort led by Global BioImaging (GBI), introducing international recommendations geared towards elevating the careers of Imaging Scientists in core facilities. Despite the critical role of Imaging Scientists in modern research ecosystems, challenges persist in recognising their value, aligning performance metrics and providing avenues for career progression and job security. The challenges encompass a mismatch between classic academic career paths and service-oriented roles, resulting in a lack of understanding regarding the value and impact of Imaging Scientists and core facilities and how to evaluate them properly. They further include challenges around sustainability, dedicated training opportunities and the recruitment and retention of talent. Structured across these interrelated sections, the recommendations within this publication aim to propose globally applicable solutions to navigate these challenges. These recommendations apply equally to colleagues working in other core facilities and research institutions through which access to technologies is facilitated and supported. This publication emphasises the pivotal role of Imaging Scientists in advancing research programs and presents a blueprint for fostering their career progression within institutions all around the world.

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), depressive disorders are currently considered as one of the most disabling medical conditions in the world with one of the highest disability-adjusted life years [1] and this situation has apparently been further worsened during the COVID-19 pandemic [2]. Up to two thirds of patients with major depressive disorders (MDD) do not achieve full remission following an adequate first line standard of care and/or experience residual symptoms such as anxiety, impaired cognition, fatigue, sleep disturbance, or anhedonia [3]. Several attempts are often needed to find the most suitable treatment [4]. Thus, there is a need for medicinal products with better efficacy (e.g., faster onset of action, higher rates of response and remission), improved safety and/or more personalised profiles [5].

UNASSIGNED: An initial investigation of US medical device guidelines is presented, with the aid of those of medicines as qualitative comparator. Since the first recorded FDA medical device guideline (February 1975) until the mid-2010s, the number of medical device guidelines has been basically stable, then rapidly rose.
UNASSIGNED: The rise of the COVID-19 pandemic and digital health technologies explains 50% of the upward momentum in guidelines since the mid-2010s. Concomitantly, medical device and medicinal guidelines became moderately correlated. This perspective posits that this trend will continue irrespective of the ebbing pandemic as it is embedded in the concept of \'innovation saltus\' - i.e. discrete periods of elevated innovation. A key aspiration of this work is to inspire additional research into this interesting area of regulatory science; namely, examination of guidelines (as proxy measures of regulations) and their influence on innovation.

暂无摘要。

To measure by consensus the level of innovation and its potential within the physical medicine and rehabilitation (PM&R) medical specialists.
Three consecutive techniques are applied using digital tools for consensus among professionals, first synchronously to a group of 17 professionals; posteriorly extended to a group of 169 professionals who participate asynchronously and the third technique is done synchronously with 25 physiatrists.
The analysis of the consensus done by the PM&R physicians on the innovation potential of the group during October and November 2020 shows: starting situation, strengths and weaknesses, as well as their innovation priorities.
PM&R physicians believe that innovation could improve the cost-effectiveness of their departments, and could increase their clinical efficiency, also that to innovate they need a close relationship with the industry.

New discoveries and technologies are driving major advances in our understanding of cancer and underpinning a new era of precision medicine and immunotherapy. However, advances in treatment have been uneven: whereas survival rates for some common cancers are improving rapidly, for others there has been much less progress. In addition, healthcare systems are finding it difficult to provide access to expensive new treatments. There is an urgent need for imaginative policy solutions to incentivise the creation of novel therapies that address the full range of cancer-causing mechanisms. We have worked with organisations across the medical research community to develop consensus statements on how to enhance access to innovative cancer drugs. Here, we present our reflections on these statements.

A fixed-dose combination (FDC) is a drug product in which two or more separate drug components (active pharmaceutical ingredients) are combined in a single-dosage form. Interest in developing FDCs is increasing in a range of diseases. This project investigated the regulatory environment for FDCs in the EU and US. A review of the FDC guidelines set forth by the EMA, FDA, and ICH, followed by interviews of key informants in industry, identified 5 main industry concerns related to development of FDCs. These concerns were presented to key informants from both the EU and US regulatory authorities. It was clear from the results that the current regulatory environment for FDCs lacks consistency. This may create a barrier to innovation moving from the laboratory to the clinic, as companies cannot clearly see the development path requirements. This project also highlighted certain challenges that currently face the regulatory world: how to improve the role of regulatory science and provide clear quantification in assessment decisions; the role of guidelines and their impact on innovation; and, most important, the question of globalization and how to move toward a more harmonized regulatory system.

Adults make inferences about the conventionality of others\' behaviors based on their prevalence across individuals. Here, we look at whether children use behavioral consensus as a cue to conventionality, and whether this informs which cultural models children choose to learn from. We find that 2- to 5-year old children exhibit increasing sensitivity to behavioral consensus with age, suggesting that like adults, young humans use behavioral consensus to identify social conventions. However, unlike previous studies showing children\'s tendencies to prefer and to learn from members of a consensus, the present study suggests that there are contexts in which children prefer and learn from unconventional individuals. The implications of these different preferences are discussed.

The open-endedness of a system is often defined as a continual production of novelty. Here we pin down this concept more fully by defining several types of novelty that a system may exhibit, classified as variation, innovation, and emergence. We then provide a meta-model for including levels of structure in a system\'s model. From there, we define an architecture suitable for building simulations of open-ended novelty-generating systems and discuss how previously proposed systems fit into this framework. We discuss the design principles applicable to those systems and close with some challenges for the community.

Changing long-held beliefs is never easy. As a consequence of the accumulating clinical data and knowledge about the epidemiology and pathological mechanisms of the most frequent causes of morbidity and mortality, we are currently reconsidering our view of the origins and progression of cardiovascular, oncologic and neurodegenerative diseases. Optimistic versus pessimistic prognosis for healthcare sector depends much on diagnostic, preventive and treatment approaches, which healthcare systems will preferably adopt in the near future. PPPM offers great promise for the future practice of medicine. We are pleased to announce this first open access volume of The EPMA Journal following its transfer to BioMed Central two years after publication of the first article in the journal.