Spinal anesthesia is a common anesthetic technique for lower limb and abdominal surgery. Despite its efficacy, its use is limited because of its duration and potential severe side effects, especially in high-risk patients undergoing major surgery. Adjuvants such as dexamethasone offer the potential to prolong the anesthetic effect and reduce the need for local anesthetics while reducing the incidence of serious adverse events. The purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate the efficacy of dexamethasone as an intrathecal adjuvant in prolonging anesthetic duration, delaying pain onset, and minimizing adverse events (PROSPERO registration: CRD42022350218).
We included randomized controlled trials conducted in adult patients undergoing spinal anesthesia for lower limb or abdominal surgery and comparing the performance of dexamethasone with alternative spinal treatments. A comprehensive systematic search was conducted on PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and Cochrane Library from February to June 2023 without language restriction. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool (RoB2).
Ten studies, nine of which were at high risk of bias, were included (N.=685 patients). Overall, intrathecal dexamethasone was associated with a longer duration of sensory block, improvement in the duration or extent of postoperative analgesia, and significant shortening of block onset. The role of dexamethasone in prolonging motor block was not clear. The incidence of adverse events was low. Intrathecal dexamethasone has been shown to be a potentially valuable adjuvant to prolong the duration of sensory block and improve postoperative analgesia without increasing adverse events.
Given the wide heterogeneity of methodological approaches, further investigation is needed. Considering the limitations of the included studies and awaiting more conclusive evidence, the prudent use of dexamethasone could be recommended in those specific situations where general anesthesia or higher local anesthetics should be avoided.

Magnesium Sulfate (MgSO4) is a widely used adjuvant in anesthesia. Often administered with local anesthetics, it is known to reduce analgesic and opioid consumption while extending the duration of analgesia. MgSO4 applications extend to orthopedic surgeries, cardiovascular and urogenital procedures, offering extended postoperative pain relief. While commonly administered through various routes, there is a research gap concerning the comparative efficacy of intrathecal (IT) and intravenous (IV) MgSO4 administration. This narrative review aims to provide a comparison between IT and IV administration of MgSO4 particularly following orthopedic procedures, where pain management is paramount. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across several electronic databases, trial registries, and gray literature from inception to 2023. Inclusion criteria encompassed studies investigating the effects of perioperative IT administration of magnesium compared to perioperative IV administration of MgSO4 in patients undergoing surgery, with no language restrictions. Our search identified 4326 articles, of which 9 randomized controlled trials met our inclusion criteria. We summarized these selected articles. Four studies discussed IT magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) administration, 2 focused on IT administration in orthopedic surgeries, and 3 explored both IV and IT administration of MgSO4 in orthopedic surgery. IT MgSO4 shows promise in postoperative pain management, delaying block onset and extending duration. Personalized administration choice, considering patient factors and surgery type, is crucial. Further research is needed to refine strategies for better patient outcomes, particularly following orthopedic surgeries.

BACKGROUND: Infectious complications following regional anesthesia (RA) while rare, can be devastating. The objective of this review was to estimate the risk of infectious complications following central neuraxial blocks (CNB) such as epidural anesthesia (EA), spinal anesthesia (SA) and combined spinal epidural (CSE), and peripheral nerve blocks (PNB).
METHODS: A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases to identify reference studies reporting infectious complications in the context of RA subtypes. Both prospective and retrospective studies providing incidence of infectious complications were included for review to provide pooled estimates (with 95% CI). Additionally, we explored incidences specifically associated with spinal anesthesia, incidences of central nervous system (CNS) infections and, the incidences of overall and CNS infections following CNB in obstetric population.
RESULTS: The pooled estimate of overall infectious complications following all CNB was 9/100 000 (95% CI: 5, 13/100 000). CNS infections following all CNB was estimated to be 2/100 000 (95% CI: 1, 3/100 000) and even rarer following SA (1/100 000 (95% CI: 1, 2/100 000)). Obstetric population had a lower rate of overall (1/100 000 (95% CI: 1, 3/100 000)) and CNS infections (4 per million (95% CI: 0.3, 1/100 000)) following all CNB. For PNB catheters, the reported rate of infectious complications was 1.8% (95% CI: 1.2, 2.5/100).
CONCLUSIONS: Our review suggests that the risk of overall infectious complications following neuraxial anesthesia is very rare and the rate of CNS infections is even rarer. The infectious complications following PNB catheters seems significantly higher compared with CNB. Standardizing nomenclature and better reporting methodologies are needed for the better estimation of the infectious complications.

The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate empirical outcomes of studies in the literature that investigated effectiveness of intrathecal baclofen (ITB) in the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS)-related spasticity (MSRS) based on various metrics. Since the first description of this route of baclofen delivery for MS patients by Penn and Kroin in 1984, numerous studies have contributed to the medical community\'s knowledge of this treatment modality. The authors sought to add to the literature a systematic review of studies over the last 2 decades that elucidates the clinical impact of ITB in treating MSRS with the following endpoints: impact on patient-centered outcomes, such as spasticity reduction (primary), complications (secondary), and dosing (secondary).
The authors queried three databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library) using the following search terms: (intrathecal baclofen) AND (multiple sclerosis). The set inclusion criteria were as follows: 1) original, full-text article; 2) written in the English language; 3) published between and including the years 2000 and 2023; 4) discussion of pre- and post-ITB pump implantation outcomes (e.g., reduction in spasticity and improved comfort) in MSRS patients with long-term ITB treatment; and 5) contained a minimum of 5 MS patients. Data on study type, patient demographics, follow-up periods, primary outcomes, and secondary outcomes were extracted from the included studies.
The authors\' search yielded 465 studies, of which 17 met inclusion criteria. Overall, they found evidence for the effectiveness of ITB in treating MSRS patients whose condition was refractory to oral medications, with significant reported changes in spasm frequency from pre- to postimplantation. They also found evidence supporting the positive impact of ITB on MSRS patients\' quality of life. Moreover, the authors found that most complications were surgical rather than pharmacological. In addition, the average 1-year dose of ITB (reported in 7 of the included studies) was 191.93 μg/day, which is substantially lower than ITB doses reported in the literature for patients with central (non-MS) or spinal origins of spasticity at 1-year follow-up.
The evidence supports ITB as a clinically effective treatment for MSRS, particularly in patients in whom oral antispasmodics and physiotherapy have failed. This systematic review contributes a comprehensive synthesis of clinical benefits, complications, and dosing of ITB reported over the past 2 decades, which furthers an understanding of ITB\'s clinical utility in practice.

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: Based on previous in vivo studies and human trials, intrathecal cell delivery is a safe and relevant therapeutic tool for improving patient\'s quality of life with neurological conditions. We aimed to characterise the safety profile of intrathecally delivered Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs).
METHODS: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, KCI-Korean Journal Database, and Web of Science. Databases were searched from their inception until April 13, 2023. Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs) that compared intrathecal delivery of MSCs to controls in adult populations were included. Adverse events (AEs) were pooled and meta-analysed using DerSimonian-Laird random effects models with a correction factor 0.5 added to studies with zero count cells. Pooled AEs were described using Risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Then, a random-effects meta-regress model on study-level summary data was performed to explore the relationship between the occurrence of AEs and covariates thought to modify the overall effect estimate. Finally, publication bias was assessed.
RESULTS: 303 records were reviewed, and nine RCTs met the inclusion criteria and were included in the quantitative synthesis (n = 540 patients). MSCs delivered intrathecally, as compared to controls, were associated with an increased probability of AEs of musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders (categorised by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events-CTCAE version 5.0) (RR: 1.61, 95% CI 1.19-2.19, I2 = 0%). The random-effects meta-regress model suggested that fresh MSCs increased the probability of occurrence of AEs compared to cryopreserved MSCs (RR: 1.554; p-value = 0.048; 95% CI 1.004-2.404), and the multiple-dose, decreased the probability of AEs by 36% compared to single doses (RR: 0.644; p-value = 0.048; 95% CI 0.416-0.996); however, univariate random effects meta-regression models revealed a not significant association between the occurrence of AEs from MSCs intrathecal delivery and each covariate.
CONCLUSIONS: Intrathecal delivery of MSCs was associated with a slight increase in AEs associated with musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders, albeit without serious AEs. We conclude that intrathecal MSCs delivery is safe for patients with neurological conditions. However, further high-quality, large-scale RCTs are needed to confirm these findings.

In some infectious diseases, pathogenic microorganisms can directly or indirectly cause significant inflammatory reactions in the central nervous system, leading to severe neurological dysfunction, such as suppurative meningitis, tuberculous meningitis, and febrile infections. related epilepsy syndrome, etc. In these diseases, adjuvant administration of glucocorticoids is necessary to inhibit the release of proinflammatory cytokines, and intrathecal administration can deliver the drug more directly to the target. In this article, the authors studied intrathecal glucocorticoids for the treatment of infectious inflammatory reactions in terms of pharmacological effects and mechanisms, pharmacokinetics, clinical application, and safety. The authors concluded that the article could help provide new treatment strategies for infectious diseases.

UNASSIGNED: Cardiac surgeries often result in significant postoperative pain, leading to considerable use of opioids for pain management. However, excessive opioid use can lead to undesirable side effects and chronic opioid use. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate whether preoperative intrathecal morphine could reduce postoperative opioid consumption in patients undergoing cardiac surgery requiring sternotomy. We conducted a systematic search of Cochrane, EMBASE, and MEDLINE databases from inception to May 2022 for randomized controlled trials that evaluated the use of intrathecal morphine in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Studies that evaluated intrathecal administration of other opioids or combinations of medications were excluded. The primary outcome was postoperative morphine consumption at 24 h. Secondary outcomes included time to extubation and hospital length of stay. The final analysis included ten randomized controlled trials, with a total of 402 patients. The results showed that postoperative morphine consumption at 24 h was significantly lower in the intervention group (standardized mean difference -1.43 [-2.12, -0.74], 95% CI, P < 0.0001). There were no significant differences in time to extubation and hospital length of stay. Our meta-analysis concluded that preoperative intrathecal morphine is associated with lower postoperative morphine consumption at 24 h following cardiac surgeries, without prolonging the time to extubation. The use of preoperative intrathecal morphine can be considered part of a multimodal analgesic and opioid-sparing strategy in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND: Spasticity can significantly affect a patient\'s quality of life, caregiver satisfaction, and the financial burden on the healthcare system. Baclofen is one of only a few options for treating spasticity. The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of intrathecal baclofen (ITB) therapy on severe40.23 spasticity and motor function in patients with cerebral palsy.
METHODS: We conducted a systematic review in PubMed, Scopus, Ovid, and the Cochrane Library in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. We included studies based on eligibility criteria that included desired participants (cerebral palsy patients with spasticity), interventions (intrathecal baclofen), and outcomes (the Ashworth scales and the Gross Motor Function Measure [GMFM]). The within-group Cohen\'s d standardized mean differences (SMD) were analyzed using the random effect model.
RESULTS: We screened 768 papers and included 19 in the severity of spasticity section and 6 in the motor function section. The pre-intervention average spasticity score (SD) was 3.2 (0.78), and the post-intervention average score (SD) was 1.9 (0.72), showing a 40.25% reduction. The SMD for spasticity reduction was - 1.7000 (95% CI [-2.1546; -1.2454], p-value < 0.0001), involving 343 patients with a weighted average age of 15.78 years and a weighted average baclofen dose of 289 µg/day. The SMD for the MAS and Ashworth Scale subgroups were - 1.7845 (95% CI [-2.8704; -0.6986]) and - 1.4837 (95% CI [-1.8585; -1.1088]), respectively. We found no relationship between the participants\' mean age, baclofen dose, measurement time, and the results. The pre-intervention average GMFM (SD) was 40.03 (26.01), and the post-intervention average score (SD) was 43.88 (26.18), showing a 9.62% increase. The SMD for motor function using GMFM was 0.1503 (95% CI [0.0784; 0.2223], p-value = 0.0030), involving 117 patients with a weighted average age of 13.63 and a weighted average baclofen dose of 203 µg/day. In 501 ITB implantations, 203 medical complications were reported, including six new-onset seizures (2.96% of medical complications), seven increased seizure frequency (3.45%), 33 infections (16.26%), eight meningitis (3.94%), and 16 cerebrospinal fluid leaks (7.88%). Delivery system complications, including 75 catheter and pump complications, were also reported.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the risk of complications, ITB has a significant impact on the reduction of spasticity. A small but statistically significant improvement in motor function was also noted in a group of patients.

BACKGROUND: Mepivacaine is an intermediate-acting local anesthetic used for spinal anesthesia in adults. Currently, there are no published dosing guidelines for spinal mepivacaine in patients under age 18.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to describe the clinically used doses of mepivacaine by weight and age for orthopedic surgery in pediatrics.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients aged 0-18 who received mepivacaine for spinal anesthesia from 2016 to 2022. We performed a secondary analysis for patients aged 0-18 who received spinal anesthesia with bupivacaine or chloroprocaine.
RESULTS: The data extraction yielded 3627 single-shot mepivacaine spinals. Patient age ranged from 5 to 18 years. Median dosage in milligrams/kilograms (mg/kg) of mepivacaine was calculated for each age group. Our analysis revealed that dosage in mg/kg decreased by patient age and began to plateau at age 15. Bupivacaine was the most common single-shot spinal agent in patients under age 10. After age 10, mepivacaine was more common. Chloroprocaine began to be used in patients older than 8 years.
CONCLUSIONS: We describe mepivacaine dosage as a function of age and weight in patients younger than 18 years. As age and weight increased, a lower dose of mepivacaine per kg was administered for spinal anesthesia.