Inappropriate Prescribing

不适当的处方
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    与初级保健中抗生素处方的适当性相关的因素研究甚少。特别是,计算机决策支持系统(CDSS)的影响仍然未知。
    我们旨在研究CDSS的摄取及其与医师特征和专业活动的关联。
    自2022年5月以来,已邀请法国初级保健中使用CDSS进行抗生素处方的用户,注册时,完成三个病例小插曲,评估一般实践中经常遇到的临床情况,并被确定为有滥用抗生素的风险。抗生素处方的适当性被定义为符合当前指南的回答率,由个人和具体问题计算。与个体适当抗生素处方相关的医师特征(<50%,50-75%和>75%适当性)通过多变量有序逻辑回归确定。
    2023年6月,6067名医生在CDSS上注册。在回答所有病例小插曲的13851名医生中,抗生素处方的个体适当性水平中位数为77.8%[四分位数范围,66.7%-88.9%],1,353名医生(10%)<50%。在多变量分析中,与适当性相关的医生特征是以前使用过CDSS(OR=1.71,95%CI1.56-1.87),作为一名全科医生与其他专家(OR=1.34,95%CI1.20-1.49),在初级保健工作(OR=1.14,95%CI1.02-1.27),指导学生(OR=1.12,95%CI1.04-1.21)年龄(OR=0.69每10年增加,95%CI0.67-0.71)。
    在CDSS用户中,抗生素处方的个人适用性很高,年轻全科医生的比率更高,以前使用的系统。CDSS可以改善初级保健中的抗生素处方。
    CDSS使用者对抗生素处方的个人适用性很高。CDSS的使用可以被动地改善初级保健中的抗生素处方。与初级保健疾病抗生素处方适当性相关的因素是:以前使用过CDSS,全科专业与其他特色菜,年轻的年龄和学生的指导。
    UNASSIGNED: Factors associated with the appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing in primary care have been poorly explored. In particular, the impact of computerised decision-support systems (CDSS) remains unknown.
    UNASSIGNED: We aim at investigating the uptake of CDSS and its association with physician characteristics and professional activity.
    UNASSIGNED: Since May 2022, users of a CDSS for antibiotic prescribing in primary care in France have been invited, when registering, to complete three case vignettes assessing clinical situations frequently encountered in general practice and identified as at risk of antibiotic misuse. Appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing was defined as the rate of answers in line with the current guidelines, computed by individuals and by specific questions. Physician\'s characteristics associated with individual appropriate antibiotic prescribing (< 50%, 50-75% and > 75% appropriateness) were identified by multivariate ordinal logistic regression.
    UNASSIGNED: In June 2023, 60,067 physicians had registered on the CDSS. Among the 13,851 physicians who answered all case vignettes, the median individual appropriateness level of antibiotic prescribing was 77.8% [Interquartile range, 66.7%-88.9%], and was < 50% for 1,353 physicians (10%). In the multivariate analysis, physicians\' characteristics associated with appropriateness were prior use of the CDSS (OR = 1.71, 95% CI 1.56-1.87), being a general practitioner vs. other specialist (OR = 1.34, 95% CI 1.20-1.49), working in primary care (OR = 1.14, 95% CI 1.02-1.27), mentoring students (OR = 1.12, 95% CI 1.04-1.21) age (OR = 0.69 per 10 years increase, 95% CI 0.67-0.71).
    UNASSIGNED: Individual appropriateness for antibiotic prescribing was high among CDSS users, with a higher rate in young general practitioners, previously using the system. CDSS could improve antibiotic prescribing in primary care.
    Individual appropriateness for antibiotic prescribing is high among CDSS users.CDSS use could passively improve antibiotic prescribing in primary care.Factors associated with appropriateness for antibiotic prescribing for primary care diseases are: prior use of CDSS, general practice speciality vs. other specialities, younger age and mentoring of students.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在Covid-19大流行期间,由于无法获得医疗保健服务,使用抗生素或其他药物的自我药物治疗显着增加。这种自我治疗,在不了解病情及其相关风险的情况下,会导致误诊,过量服用和延迟获得专业医疗护理,甚至可能引起抗菌素耐药性。此外,有报道表明,医生给新冠肺炎患者开了不适当的药物处方。为了进一步调查,本研究比较了Covid-19患者住院前使用的药物,无论是否有医学建议.
    方法:数据来自马什哈德Covid-19患者的大规模调查,患者分为两大类:在医学专业人员指导下接受药物治疗的患者(治疗组)和在没有专业监督的情况下自行用药的患者(自我治疗组).然后使用SPSS版本26进行统计分析,卡方,和多元Logistic回归检验。
    结果:这项研究检查了3266名患者,分析中包括1466。结果显示,男性(9.5%),生活在农村地区的人(21%),没有学历的人(37.5%)自我用药的可能性更高。抗生素是住院前最常用的药物(9.5%)。比较两组,发现三种药物类别——抗生素,抗病毒药物和其他药物(不在其他4个主要类别的药物)-在治疗组比在自我治疗组使用更频繁,p值<0.05。两组之间唯一有显着差异的医疗状况是糖尿病,自我治疗组为34.1%,治疗组为24.5%(P<0.05)。
    结论:新冠肺炎大流行通过自我用药导致某些药物的不当使用激增。这对患者的健康构成了严重的风险,强调不仅需要调整指导方针,而且需要提高认识和强制遵守,以防止不必要的药物使用。
    BACKGROUND: During the Covid-19 pandemic, there has been a notable increase in self-medication with antibiotics or other medications due to impaired access to healthcare services. This kind of self-treatment, without comprehending the condition and its related risks, can result in misdiagnosis, overdosing and delaying in acquiring professional medical attention, or may even cause antimicrobial resistance. Additionally, reports have suggested that medical practitioners have prescribed medications inappropriately to patients with Covid-19. To investigate this further, this study compared the medications used by patients with Covid-19 prior to hospitalization with or without a medical recommendation.
    METHODS: Data was extracted a mass survey of patients with of Covid-19 in Mashhad, and the patients were divided into two main groups: those who received medication with guidance from a medical professional (treatment group) and those who self-administered medications without professional oversight (self-treatment group). Statistical analysis was then conducted using SPSS version 26, the Chi-square, and multiple logistic regression test.
    RESULTS: This study examined 3266 patients, with 1466 included in the analysis. Results showed that men (9.5 %), those living in rural areas (21 %), and those with no academic degree (37.5%) had a higher likelihood to self-medicating. Antibiotics were the most frequently used medications prior to hospitalization (9.5%). Comparing the two groups revealed that three drug categories- antibiotics, antivirals and other medications (medicines that are not in the other 4 main categories)- were utilized more often in the treatment group than in the self-treatment group, with a p-value of < 0.05. The only medical condition that had a significant difference between the two groups was diabetes, with 34.1 % in the self-treatment group versus 24.5 % in the treatment group (P < 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: The Covid-19 pandemic has caused a surge in the inappropriate use of certain medications through self-medicating. This poses a serious risk to the health of patients, highlighting the need for not only adjusting guidelines but also raising awareness and enforcing compliance to prevent unnecessary use of drugs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:全面的药物管理审查是确定药物相关问题的既定干预措施,比如开潜在不适当的药物,开处方不足和过度。然而,全面药物管理审查书面报告中包含的信息类型,除了与药物相关的问题,是未知的。
    目的:本研究旨在探讨澳大利亚药剂师在综合用药管理审查后的书面报告中所包含的信息类型。
    方法:澳大利亚顾问药剂师被邀请上传其10份最新书面报告,其基于家庭的综合用药管理综述。随机选择报告,由每个药剂师分层,包括在内进行定性内容分析。
    结果:纳入了来自澳大利亚八个州和地区中五个州的八名顾问药剂师的72份去识别报告进行分析。从评估报告中,确定了四个主要类别的信息:(1)患者详细信息,例如访谈日期(n=72,100%)和病史(n=70,97%);(2)药剂师评估,包括对患者的评估(n=70,97%),药物管理(n=68,94%)和药物相关问题(n=60,83%);(3)药剂师建议,特别是药理学建议(n=67,93%);(4)以患者为中心的经验,如对药物的看法(n=56,78%).以患者为中心的经历的报告在纳入的报告中出现得最多,包括患者担忧(n=38,53%),变革意愿(n=27,38%),患者偏好(n=13,18%),和患者目标(n=7,10%)。
    结论:在我们的研究中,药剂师在其全面的药物管理审查报告中纳入了各种各样的信息。除了药物相关的问题,药剂师通常会对他们所护理的患者进行整体评估.然而,报告之间的可变性有可能影响一致的服务交付。
    BACKGROUND: Comprehensive medication management reviews are an established intervention to identify medication-related problems, such as the prescribing of potentially inappropriate medications, and under- and over-prescribing. However, the types of information included in written reports of comprehensive medication management reviews, beyond types of medication-related problems, are unknown.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the types of information Australian pharmacists include in their written reports following comprehensive medication management reviews.
    METHODS: Australian consultant pharmacists were invited to upload their 10 most recent written reports of their domiciliary-based comprehensive medication management reviews. A random selection of the reports, stratified by each pharmacist, were included for qualitative content analysis.
    RESULTS: Seventy-two de-identified reports from eight consultant pharmacists located in five of the eight Australian States and Territories were included for analysis. From the evaluated reports, four major categories of information were identified: (1) patient details such as date of interview (n = 72, 100%) and medicine history (n = 70, 97%); (2) pharmacist assessment including assessment of the patient (n = 70, 97%), medicines management (n = 68, 94%) and medicine-related issues (n = 60, 83%); (3) pharmacist recommendations, specifically pharmacological recommendations (n = 67, 93%); and (4) patient-centred experiences such as perspectives on medicines (n = 56, 78%). Reporting of patient-centred experiences appeared most variably in the included reports, including patient concerns (n = 38, 53%), willingness for change (n = 27, 38%), patient preferences (n = 13, 18%), and patient goals (n = 7, 10%).
    CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacists within our study included a wide variety of information in their comprehensive medication management review reports. Aside from medication-related problems, pharmacists commonly provided a holistic assessment of the patients they care for. However, variability across reports has the potential to impact consistent service delivery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:抗生素可用于治疗感染和改善健康结果,并且已经有效和可靠地使用了数十年。对抗生素的这种信任导致了过度处方和抗生素耐药性的出现。大量的抗生素仍被广泛处方和服用,尤其是在年幼的孩子。然而,关于母亲如何,他们是幼儿的主要照顾者,可能会受到他们对抗生素信任的影响。
    目的:探讨哪些因素影响母亲为年幼的孩子寻求抗生素的决定。
    方法:使用邮政编码边界的定性案例研究。
    方法:对5岁以下儿童母亲的定性数据进行主题分析,通过社区游戏小组在案例中招募。数据收集于2018年10月至2019年5月,来自六个焦点小组(n=19)和一对一访谈(n=14)。对数据的专题分析包括六个阶段:数据熟悉;生成初始代码;搜索主题;审查主题;定义和命名主题;以及编写报告。
    结果:母亲受到对抗生素的信念和信任的影响。抗生素被认为是复苏的象征,治疗和提供保护和安全。
    结论:通过了解抗生素对产妇决策的象征性作用,所有抗生素处方者都可以为母亲提供和提供令人放心的替代和可接受的治疗选择,而不是使用抗生素。
    结论:本文介绍了抗生素的概念,它是影响抗生素寻求行为的有力符号。这反过来可能导致抗生素的不适当使用,这导致了抗微生物耐药性发展的风险。尽管大多数抗生素仍由医生开处方,护士开处方的人数一直在增加。因此,对抗生素象征意义的认识提高,在所有开处方的临床医生中,对于制定未来的地方和国家战略非常重要,支持孕产妇决策并减少寻求抗生素的行为。
    BACKGROUND: Antibiotics savelives and have been effectively and reliably used for decades to treat infections and improve health outcomes. This trust in antibiotics has contributed to over prescribing and the emergence of antimicrobial resistance. Significant amounts of antibiotics are still widely prescribed and taken, especially in young children. However, there is a paucity of existing literature relating to how mothers, who are the main carers of young children, may be influenced by their trust in antibiotics.
    OBJECTIVE: To explore what factors influence mothers\' decisions to seek antibiotics for their young children.
    METHODS: Qualitative case study using postcode boundaries.
    METHODS: Thematic analysis of qualitative data from mothers of children under 5, recruited via community playgroups within the case. Data were collected between October 2018 and May 2019, from six focus groups (n = 19) and one-to-one interviews (n = 14). Thematic analysis of the data consisted of six phases: data familiarization; generating initial codes; searching for themes; reviewing themes; defining and naming themes; and producing the report.
    RESULTS: Mothers were influenced by their belief and trust in antibiotics. Antibiotics were identified as symbolic of recovery, healing and of providing protection and safety.
    CONCLUSIONS: By understanding the symbolic power of antibiotics on maternal decision making, all antibiotic prescribers may be able to offer and provide reassuring alternative and acceptable treatment options to mothers, rather than using antibiotics.
    CONCLUSIONS: This paper introduces the concept of antibiotics as powerful symbols which influence antibiotic seeking behaviour. This in turn may result in inappropriate use of antibiotics which contributes to the risk of antimicrobial resistance developing. Although the majority of antibiotics are still prescribed by doctors, the number of nurse prescribers has been increasing. Therefore, an increased awareness of antibiotic symbolism, in all prescribing clinicians, is important to enable future local and national strategies to be developed, to support maternal decision making and reduce antibiotic seeking behaviour.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    虽然文献中已经注意到在各种护理环境中检查老年人的潜在不适当处方(PIP),对中间护理的程度知之甚少。此外,很少有研究检查了临床药师在这种护理背景下的效用。
    确定北爱尔兰(NI)的中间护理(IC)设置中PIP的患病率,探索新的药剂师病例管理模式在降低PIP方面的效用,并检查与后续医疗保健利用的关联。
    在NI的三个中间护理点的药物优化药剂师病例管理模式期间收集的前瞻性数据的二次分析(N=532)。独立处方药剂师提供了干预措施。使用多元线性回归分析检查从入院到出院的用药适当性指数评分变化(ΔMAI)的变异性。多变量逻辑和泊松回归用于检查ΔMAI与IC出院后30和90天内计划外再入院的可能性和数量之间的关联。
    PIP在基线时非常普遍(89.5%),从入院(中位数=14)到出院(中位数=0)的MAI评分显着降低(Z=-18.28,p<.001)。出院时PIP的患病率为7.8%。在ΔMAI评分与计划外再入院之间没有观察到关系。那些接受过至少一次教育干预的患者在IC出院后30天内再入院的可能性较小(OR=0.15,95%CI0.03,0.71,p<.001)。基线医疗保健利用率始终预测IC出院后的医疗保健利用率。
    许多老年人在急性护理出院后仍然存在与药物相关的问题,中间护理可能为药物优化干预提供理想的位置。
    Whilst attention has been paid within the literature to examining potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) for older adults in a variety of care settings, less is known about the extent within intermediate care. Furthermore, few studies have examined the utility of clinical pharmacist involvement in this care context.
    Determine the prevalence of PIP in intermediate care (IC) settings in Northern Ireland (NI), explore the utility of a novel pharmacist case management model at reducing PIP and to examine the association with subsequent healthcare utilisation.
    Secondary analysis of prospective data (N = 532) collected during a medicines optimisation pharmacist case management model in three intermediate care sites in NI. Independent prescriber pharmacists delivered the intervention. Variability in Medication Appropriateness Index score change (ΔMAI) from admission to discharge was examined using multivariate linear regression analysis. Multivariate logistic and Poisson regressions were used to examine the association between ΔMAI and likelihood and numbers of unplanned hospital readmissions within 30 and 90 days of IC discharge.
    PIP was highly prevalent (89.5%) at baseline with significant reductions in MAI score achieved from admission (Median = 14) to discharge (Median = 0) (Z = -18.28, p < .001). The prevalence of PIP at discharge was 7.8%. No relationship was observed between ΔMAI score and unplanned hospital readmission. Those who received at least one educational intervention were less likely to be readmitted within 30 days of IC discharge (OR = 0.15, 95% CI 0.03, 0.71, p < .001). Baseline healthcare utilisation consistently predicted healthcare utilisation post-IC discharge.
    Drug-related problems persist for many older adults following acute care discharge and intermediate care may provide an ideal location for medicines optimisation interventions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:心血管疾病(CVD)的全球负担预计将增加,抗凝剂仍将是其管理的重要药物。验尸官“预防未来死亡报告”(PFD)提供了有价值的见解,可以更安全,更有效地使用这些药物。
    目的:鉴定涉及抗凝血剂的CVD相关PFDs。
    方法:对2013年至2019年英格兰和威尔士的冠状病例报告进行回顾性观察研究。
    方法:我们筛选了3037个PFD的合格性,并纳入了CVD和抗凝剂引起或促成死亡的PFD。我们对纳入的病例进行了描述性分析,并使用内容分析来评估验尸官提出的问题以及对这些问题的回应。
    结果:我们确定了113种涉及抗凝剂的心血管疾病相关PFD。华法林(36%),依诺肝素(11%),利伐沙班(11%)是最常见的抗凝剂.验尸官最常提出的担忧包括系统不佳(31%),沟通不良(25%),和未能保持准确的医疗记录(25%)。这些担忧最常见的是针对NHS信托(29%),医院(10%),和一般做法(8%)。近三分之二(60%)的PFD没有收到此类组织的答复,根据验尸官第28条(调查),这是强制性的。我们创建了一个公开可用的工具,https://preventabledeathstracker.net/,它显示了英格兰和威尔士的验尸官报告,以简化访问并确定重要的教训,以防止未来的死亡。
    结论:国家组织,医疗保健专业人员,处方医师应采取行动解决PFD中验尸官的担忧,以提高心血管疾病患者抗凝药的安全使用.
    BACKGROUND: The global burden of cardiovascular disease (CVD) is forecast to increase, and anticoagulants will remain important medicines for its management. Coroners\' Prevention of Future Death reports (PFDs) provide valuable insights that may enable safer and more effective use of these agents.
    OBJECTIVE: To identify CVD-related PFDs involving anticoagulants.
    METHODS: Retrospective observational study of coronial case reports in England and Wales between 2013 and 2019.
    METHODS: We screened 3037 PFDs for eligibility and included PFDs where CVD and an anticoagulant caused or contributed to the death. We descriptively analysed included cases and used content analysis to assess concerns raised by coroners and who responded to them.
    RESULTS: We identified 113 cardiovascular disease-related PFDs involving anticoagulants. Warfarin (36%), enoxaparin (11%), and rivaroxaban (11%) were the most common anticoagulants reported. Concerns most frequently raised by coroners included poor systems (31%), poor communication (25%), and failures to keep accurate medical records (25%). These concerns were most often directed to NHS trusts (29%), hospitals (10%), and general practices (8%). Nearly two-thirds (60%) of PFDs had not received responses from such organisations, which are mandatory under regulation 28 of the Coroners\' (Investigations). We created a publicly available tool, https://preventabledeathstracker.net/, which displays coroners\' reports in England and Wales to streamline access and identify important lessons to prevent future deaths.
    CONCLUSIONS: National organisations, healthcare professionals, and prescribers should take actions to address the concerns of coroners\' in PFDs to improve the safe use of anticoagulants in patients with cardiovascular disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号