The prevalence of impacted maxillary canines is 1 to 3%, with approximately 50% of impacted canines causing root resorption of adjacent teeth. If the permanent canine has not acquired its correct position, evaluation by an orthodontist is necessary to determine the most adequate treatment. Surgery and orthodontic treatment are used for the treatment of impacted canines in the maxilla affecting permanent dentition. Selection of the most adequate treatment to achieve the correct position of the canine tooth depends on the position of the canine. This article summarizes the different techniques available and describes their advantages, and cost-benefit considerations. The objective of this literature review is to describe the etiology of impacted maxillary canines and provide an update of the information on orthodontic treatments available for these patients.
La prevalencia de caninos maxilares impactados es del 1 al 3%. Aproximadamente, el 50% de los caninos impactados provocan la reabsorción radicular de los dientes adyacentes. Por otro lado, si el canino permanente no ha comenzado a encontrar su posición correcta, se debe considerar como primera opción la evaluación de un ortodoncista, quien brindará diversos tratamientos. La cirugía y el tratamiento de ortodoncia se utilizan para tratar los caninos impactados en el maxilar afectado en la dentición permanente. Según la posición del canino, se puede seleccionar el mejor tratamiento para lograr la ubicación correcta del canino. Este artículo resume todas estas técnicas diferenciales, conociendo sus ventajas y consideraciones de costo-beneficio.El objetivo de esta revisión de literatura es actualizar la información sobre tratamientos de ortodoncia en caninos maxilares impactados, describir la etiología de caninos maxilares impactados, así como describir la tracción y los tratamientos de ortodoncia para caninos maxilares impactados.

UNASSIGNED: Ectopic teeth arise from developmental abnormalities, pathological conditions or iatrogenic factors. They can be supernumerary, deciduous or permanent and cause dental and facial pain, swelling and infection. Limited cases reveal limited knowledge about causes, symptoms, treatment options and surgical procedures. A thorough evaluation, including radiographic imaging and clinical examination, aids diagnosis and treatment planning.
UNASSIGNED: A 54-year-old female patient complains of tooth mobility in the upper right back tooth region for one month and occasional pain in the right pre-auricular region.
UNASSIGNED: Chronic generalised periodontitis with an impacted tooth in the right condylar region.
UNASSIGNED: Extraction of Grade III mobile 17 and conservative treatment for ectopic molar in the condylar region.
UNASSIGNED: The patient is on regular follow-up with no similar complaints.
UNASSIGNED: A personalised approach is crucial in managing ectopic mandibular third molars and should take into account the patient\'s symptoms, preferences and potential complications. Successful treatment requires informed decision-making and thorough evaluation.

Germectomy is a surgical method most typically performed in young adults. The indications for treatment are controversial. The purpose of this review was to determine the correct indications for germectomy and to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the procedure. We reviewed the surgical techniques (anesthetic methods, patient preparation, and flap designs) and complications. Germectomy for orthodontic purposes is a common indication for surgical removal of tooth germ among young patients. Several studies have supported removal at an earlier age to produce fewer surgical complications. Several surgical techniques have been described in the literature.

OBJECTIVE: This paper aims to better define hypercementosis, investigate its described potential aetiologies, and determine whether there are different patterns of cementum apposition and if they are a function of their supposed aetiology.
METHODS: A literature review was undertaken using the Medline, DOSS, Scopus and Cochrane Library electronic databases. Two co-authors selected the published works independently, extracted the data in accordance with the PRISMA statement.
RESULTS: Among 546 articles, 75 articles were finally selected. Eight different supposed aetiologies were identified: (1) intensive masticatory effort, (2) systemic disease, (3) carious lesion and apical periodontitis, (4) impaction, (5) periodontal disease, (6) concrescence, (7) super-eruption, and (8) drugs. Some of these aetiologies can be combined in the same tooth. Hypercementosis manifestations are various in nature and extent with different patterns that may be aetiology-specific. To improve the description and associated consistency in the characterisation of hypercementosis, in this review but also in future studies, we propose a new qualitative scoring system to quickly characterise hypercementosis and determine its most relevant aetiology.
CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review demonstrates that hypercementosis is a complex and not yet well-defined condition. Some forms of apposition are specific to a given aetiology. The hypercementosis characterisation may contribute to document the oral condition and/or the individuals masticatory activity.

UNASSIGNED: This systematic review aimed to evaluate periodontal parameters in orthodontically tractioned teeth compared with the respective non-tractioned contralateral teeth.
UNASSIGNED: Search strategies were developed for six electronic databases and gray literature. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed for the outcomes of interest. Furthermore, the certainty of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) tool.
UNASSIGNED: Overall, 2,082 articles were identified, of which 24 were selected for the qualitative synthesis. A significant difference was observed between the impacted and contralateral teeth (mean difference [MD] = 0.25; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.10-0.40; I2 = 0%) when the gingival index was evaluated. Additionally, impacted teeth showed a greater probing depth, with a significant mean difference between the groups (MD = 0.14; 95% CI = 0.07-0.20; I2 = 6%). Most studies had a low risk of bias; however, the certainty of the evidence was very low owing to the design of existing studies.
UNASSIGNED: The evidence in the literature indicated that tractioned teeth might show worsening of periodontal parameters related to the gingival index and probing depth; however, the evidence remains uncertain about this outcome. Furthermore, probing depth should be considered regarding its clinical significance because of the small effect size observed.

This scoping review aimed at reporting the outcomes of the bone lid technique in oral surgery in terms of bone healing, ridge preservation, and incidence of complications. Bone-cutting instruments and stabilization methods were also considered. PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials were searched using a combination of terms, including bone lid, bony window, piezosurgery, microsaw, cysts, endodontic surgery, impacted teeth, and maxillary sinus. A hand search was also performed. The last search was conducted on 30 November 2021. No date limitation was set. Searches were restricted to human clinical studies published in English. All types of study design were considered except reviews and case reports. After a two-step evaluation, 20 (2 randomized studies, 2 case-control studies, 3 cohort studies, 13 case series) out of 647 screened studies were included, reporting on 752 bone lid procedures. The bone lid technique was associated with favorable bone healing when compared to other methods, and with a very low incidence of major complications. Clinical indications, surgical procedures, study design, follow-up duration, and outcomes varied among the studies. Overall, favorable outcomes were reported using the bone lid approach, though evidence-based studies were scarce.

This work systematically reviews dental implant placement through impacted teeth or residual roots, as an alternative to invasive extraction surgeries, evaluated in terms of survival rates, marginal bone loss, surgical, and prosthetic complications. The authors conducted an electronic search of four databases up to September 2020; also a complementary handsearch was carried out. The quality of the included studies was assessed using a protocol for assessment of risk of bias in exposure studies. Ten studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were analysed. A total of 44 patients received 62 dental implants and were monitored for a minimum of 12-months follow-up. An overall mean implant survival rate was 90.32%, reporting 97.56 % for dental implants through impacted teeth and 76.19% through residual roots. No surgical or prosthetic complications were reported. Placing dental implants through impacted teeth may offer a valid therapeutic option for implant-supported restorations in patients for whom surgery and orthodontic traction are not possible, and/or patients who refuse to undergo more invasive extraction surgery. Moreover, additional caution is recommended when placing implants through retained root fragments, as this may involve long-term risk. Further research generating long-term data are needed to confirm these findings.

BACKGROUND: The authors\' aim in this systematic review was to evaluate to what extent impacted canines are associated with root resorption (RR) of the adjacent tooth by using cone-beam computed tomography.
METHODS: The authors performed an open-ended electronic search of the Cochrane Library, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature, PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus, and Web of Science and a partial gray literature search by using Google Scholar, Open Grey, and ProQuest. The authors included studies in people (adolescents, adults, and older adult) with impacted maxillary permanent canines in which the investigators assessed the incidence of RR in adjacent teeth. The investigators detected RR by using cone-beam computed tomography. Two reviewers independently performed the study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment with no language restrictions. The selection criteria included observational studies.
RESULTS: From the 953 studies recorded in databases, the authors included 18 studies. The meta-analysis results revealed that the most frequent position of impacted canines was 56.99% palatal (95% confidence interval [CI], 47.032% to 66.673%); the apical one-third was the most prevalent one-third for RR (56.87%; 95% CI, 38.880% to 73.628%). The intensity of RR was slight (43.2%; 95% CI, 35.229% to 51.352%), although 30.9% (95% CI, 19.007% to 44.261%) of RR was severe. Although the studies had different sample sizes, the main methodological problem was the absence of a control group and follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: RR in maxillary incisors was correlated with their contact with maxillary canines during eruption. Delayed eruption or treatment of impacted canines may lead to resorption of the adjacent lateral and central incisors. All root levels and surfaces of teeth associated with impacted maxillary canines can be resorbed to different levels of severity, but the apical one-third with slight resorption is the most common.
CONCLUSIONS: Knowing to what extent impacted canines are associated with root resorption of the adjacent tooth before starting any intervention, and being able to share this information with the patient, caregivers, or caregivers and patient, allows the choice of the most appropriate treatment.

The extraction of an impacted third molar violates the surrounding soft and bony tissues. The surgeon\'s access to the tooth, for which there are various surgical approaches, has an important impact on the periodontium of the adjacent second molar. The aim of this review was to analyze the relationships between the different flap techniques and postoperative periodontal outcomes for the mandibular second molars (LM2) adjacent to the impacted mandibular third molars (LM3). An electronic search of MEDLINE and other databases was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials fulfilling the eligibility criteria. To assess the impact of flap design on the periodontal condition, the weighted mean difference of the probing depth reduction (WDPDR) and the weighted mean difference of the clinical attachment level gain (WDCAG) at the distal surface of LM2 were used as the primary outcomes. The results showed that, overall, the different flap techniques had no significant impact on the probing depth reduction (WDPDR -0.14mm, 95% confidence interval -0.44 to 0.17), or on the clinical attachment level gain (WDCAG 0.05mm, 95% confidence interval -0.84 to 0.94). However, a subgroup analysis revealed that the Szmyd and paramarginal flap designs may be the most effective in reducing the probing depth in impacted LM3 extraction, and the envelope flap may be the least effective.

Tooth impaction is a pathological situation where a tooth fails to attain its normal functional position. Impacted third molars are commonly encountered in routine dental practice. The impaction rate is higher for third molars when compared with other teeth. The mandibular third molar impaction is said to be due to the inadequate space between the distal of the second mandibular molar and the anterior border of the ascending ramus of the mandible. Impacted teeth may remain asymptomatic or may be associated with various pathologies such as caries, pericoronitis, cysts, tumors, and also root resorption of the adjacent tooth. Even though various classifications exist in the literature, none of those address the combined clinical and radiologic assessment of the impacted third molar. Literature search using the advanced features of various databases such as PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Google Scholar, Directory of Open Access Journals and Cochrane electronic databases was carried out. Keywords like impaction, mandibular third molar, impacted mandibular third molar, complications, anatomy, inferior alveolar nerve injury, lingual nerve injury were used to search the databases. A total of 826 articles were screened, and 50 articles were included in the review which was obtained from 1980 to February 2015. In the present paper, the authors have proposed a classification based on clinical and radiological assessment of the impacted mandibular third molar.