Large-scale multicenter studies demonstrating the safety and effectiveness of transradial iliac artery stenting are lacking. We evaluated the data from a multicenter database in Japan. Transradial iliac artery stenting was performed on 115 lesions in 105 patients. The approach site was determined at the discretion of the operator. Patients with scheduled multiple sheath insertions for the bidirectional approach were excluded. Clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. The average age of this cohort was 71.1 ± 8.3 years. Eighty-six patients (81.9%) were male. Diabetes mellitus, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and smoking habit were present in 39 (37.1%), 84 (80.0%), 69 (65.7%), and 78 patients (74.3%), respectively. Rutherford classifications 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 comprised 40 (34.8%), 42 (36.5%), 28 (24.3%), 3 (2.6%), and 2 (1.7%) lesions, respectively, while Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus II classifications A, B, C, and D comprised 74 (64.3%), 21 (18.3%), 15 (13.0%), and 5 (4.3%), respectively. Twenty-seven lesions (23.5%) had chronic total occlusion. All lesions were successfully treated with 141 stents. Four patients (3.8%) required additional puncture of the common femoral artery for successful stent implantation. The ankle-brachial index significantly improved from 0.65 ± 0.17 to 0.95 ± 0.15 (P < 0.0001). None of the patients experienced any procedural or access site-related complications. Asymptomatic radial artery occlusion was observed in three cases (2.9%) after the procedure. There were no target lesion revascularizations or complications at 1 month. Compared to the traditional transfemoral approach, transradial iliac artery stenting is safe and feasible without any specific complications in carefully selected patients.

Iliac artery angioplasty with stenting is an effective alternative treatment modality for aortoiliac occlusive diseases. Few randomized controlled trials have compared the efficacy and safety between self-expandable stent (SES) and balloon-expandable stent (BES) in atherosclerotic iliac artery disease. In this randomized, multicenter study, patients with common or external iliac artery occlusive disease were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either BES or SES. The primary end point was the 1-year clinical patency, defined as freedom from any surgical or percutaneous intervention due to restenosis of the target lesion after the index procedure. The secondary end point was a composite event from major adverse clinical events at 1 year. A total of 201 patients were enrolled from 17 major cardiovascular intervention centers in South Korea. The mean age of the enrolled patients was 66.8 ± 8.5 years and 86.2% of the participants were male. The frequency of critical limb ischemia was 15.4%, and the most common target lesion was in the common iliac artery (75.1%). As the primary end point, the 1-year clinical patency as primary end point was 99% in the BES group and 99% in the SES group (p > 0.99). The rate of repeat revascularization at 1 year was 7.8% in the BES group and 7.0% in the SES group (p = 0.985; confidence interval, 1.011 [0.341-2.995]). In our randomized study, the treatment of iliac artery occlusive disease with self-expandable versus balloon-expandable stent was comparable in 12-month clinical outcomes without differences in the procedural success or geographic miss rate regardless of the deployment method in the distal aortoiliac occlusive lesion (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01834495).

OBJECTIVE: To explore the relationship between the retroperitoneal vasculature and anterior surface of the lower spine, and to establish values for aiding in prediction of the pertinence of anterior approach at the L4-L5 and L5-S1 intervertebral discs.
METHODS: The study included 13 fresh human cadavers. After exploration of the abdominal cavity and removal of the visceral organs, the vasculature, and anterior spinal surface were revealed beneath the lower extension of the perirenal fascia. Morphometric measurements of the great vessels and the intervertebral discs were obtained. All measurements were analyzed and presented as mean and standard deviation. Differences in the values between sexes were assessed.
RESULTS: The anterior height of the L4-L5 and L5-S1 intervertebral disc was 6.8 ± 0.81 mm and 6.7 ± 0.99 mm, respectively. The widths of the aorta, inferior vena cava, right and left common iliac arteries, and right, and left common iliac veins were 16.4 ± 3.58, 20.6 ± 3.36, 11.5 ± 2.32, 11.5 ± 2.43, 14.7 ± 3.13, and 15.5 ± 3.27 mm, respectively. The mean aortic bifurcation angle was 45.5°. The aortic bifurcation was located above the lower endplate of the L4 vertebrae in 53.8% of the cadavers. The area of the interarterial and interiliac trigones was 14.6 ± 5.33 cm < sup > 2 < /sup > and 7.1 ± 4.35 cm2, respectively. No statistically significant differences were noted between the sexes.
CONCLUSIONS: An elaborate radiological examination of the vasculature should be performed prior to surgery to avoid unwanted vascular complications during the anterior approach. Knowing the area of the interarterial and interiliac triangles and the aortic bifurcation location could be aid in assessing the safe working zone.

OBJECTIVE: The deep circumflex iliac artery flap (DCIA) and vascularized fibular free flap (FFF) are mainstay flaps for maxillary defect reconstruction. This study compared the functional outcomes and success rates of these flaps to provide midface reconstruction strategies.
METHODS: Maxillary defects reconstructed with DCIA or FFF at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology between May 2016 and May 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. The length, width, and height of the grafted bone segments; intermaxillary distance; buttress reconstruction rate (BRR); dental arch reconstruction rate (DAR); success rate; and dental implantation rate were compared.
RESULTS: The DCIA and FFF groups had 33 and 27 patients, respectively. Success rate in the DCIA group was 93.94 % and 100 % in the FFF group. The DCIA length was less than that of FFF; however, the width and height were significantly larger. 87.10 % of cases in the DCIA group were classified as Brown class b and c, 51.85 % of cases in the FFF group were classified as Brown class d. The average BRR in the DCIA group was 69.89 % ± 16.05 %, which was significantly higher than that in the FFF group. A total of 38.7 % and 11.1 % patients in the DCIA and FFF groups, respectively, had completed implantation.
CONCLUSIONS: DCIA has a greater width and height, and is more suitable for repairing Brown class b and c defects, providing sufficient bone for implantation, while the FFF is longer and more suitable for Brown class d defect reconstruction.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to determine the flexion point\'s location of the ilio-femoral arterial axis and its angulation.
METHODS: Thirty-seven dynamic digital subtraction angiographies were analyzed and were included in the current study. Different lengths were measured, based on specific anatomical landmarks: the origin of the external iliac artery, the inguinal ligament and the bifurcation of the femoral artery. These lengths were measured in extension and during flexion of the hip in order to determine the flexion point of the artery.
RESULTS: In extension, some physiological angulations of the external iliac artery were measured. During flexion of the hip joint, the distance from the kink point to the bifurcation of the common iliac artery was respectively 82 ± 21 mm (range 48-116) on the right side and 95 ± 20 mm (range 59-132) on the left side. The distance from the kink point to the inguinal ligament was respectively 38 ± 40 mm (range 12-138) on the right side and 26 ± 23 mm (range 8-136) on the left side. The distance from the kink point to the bifurcation of the femoral artery was respectively 45 ± 29 mm (range 15-107) on the right side and 27 ± 12 mm (range 10-66) on the left side. During flexion, the angulation of the flexion point of the ilio-femoral axis was 114 ± 18° (range 81-136°).
CONCLUSIONS: The flexion point was located cranially to the inguinal ligament and below the departure of the external iliac artery.

OBJECTIVE: Endovascular repair is the preferred treatment for aortoiliac aneurysm, with preservation of at least one internal iliac artery recommended. This study aimed to assess pre-endovascular repair anatomical characteristics of aortoiliac aneurysm in patients from the Global Iliac Branch Study (GIBS, NCT05607277) to enhance selection criteria for iliac branch devices (IBD) and improve long-term outcomes.
METHODS: Pre-treatment CT scans of 297 GIBS patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair were analyzed. Measurements included total iliac artery length, common iliac artery length, tortuosity index, common iliac artery splay angle, internal iliac artery stenosis, calcification score, and diameters in the device\'s landing zone. Statistical tests assessed differences in anatomical measurements and IBD-mediated internal iliac artery preservation.
RESULTS: Left total iliac artery length was shorter than right (6.7 mm, P = .0019); right common iliac artery less tortuous (P = .0145). Males exhibited greater tortuosity in the left total iliac artery (P = .0475) and larger diameter in left internal iliac artery\'s landing zone (P = .0453). Preservation was more common on right (158 unilateral, 34 bilateral) than left (105 unilateral, 34 bilateral). There were 192 right-sided and 139 left-sided IBDs, with 318 IBDs in males and 13 in females.
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides comprehensive pre-treatment iliac anatomy analysis in patients undergoing endovascular repair with IBDs, highlighting differences between sides and sexes. These findings could refine patient selection for IBD placement, potentially enhancing outcomes in aortoiliac aneurysm treatment. However, the limited number of females in the study underscores the need for further research to generalize findings across genders.

BACKGROUND: Steroids and anti-IL6 biotherapy are highly effective in obtaining remission in patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA) but the risk of relapses remains high. We aimed to identify predictors of relapse in GCA.
METHODS: All consecutive patients admitted with a new diagnosis of GCA - according to the 2022 American College of Rheumatology/EULAR (ACR/EULAR) classification criteria - between May 2011 and May 2022 were eligible for this study. The primary outcome was the GCA relapse rate over the 36-months follow up. Factors associated with the primary outcome and time to first relapse were analyzed.
RESULTS: One hundred and eight patients (74 [69-81] years, 64.8% women) with a new diagnosis of GCA were studied. GCA was biopsy-proven in 65 (60.2%) cases. Ninety-eight (90.7%) FDG/PET CT scans performed at diagnosis were available for review. All patients received steroids given for 21.0 [18.0-28.5] months, associated with methotrexate (n=1, 0.9%) or tocilizumab (n=2, 1.9%). During a median follow-up of 27.5 [11.4-35.0] months, relapse occurred in 40 (37%) patients. Multivariable Cox regression model, including general signs, gender, aortic wall thickness, FDG uptake in arterial wall and IV steroid pulse as covariates, showed that both general signs (HR 2.0 [1.0-4.0, P<0.05) and FDG uptake in limb arteries (HR 2.7 [1.3-5.5], P<0.01) at diagnosis were associated with GCA relapse.
CONCLUSIONS: FDG uptake in limb arteries at diagnosis is a predictor of relapse in newly diagnosed GCA.

暂无摘要。

暂无摘要。

UNASSIGNED: To compare the hemodynamic performance of three (Bottom Up non-ballet, Top-Down non-ballet, Top Down ballet) idealized stent graft configurations used during endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms, under the influence of various rheological models.
UNASSIGNED: Ten rheological models are assumed and a commercial finite volume solver is employed for the simulation of blood flow under realistic boundary conditions. An appropriate mesh convergence study is performed and five hemodynamic variables are computed: the time average wall shear stress (TAWSS), oscillatory shear index (OSI), relative residence time (RRT), endothelial cell activation potential (ECAP) and displacement force (DF) for all three configurations.
UNASSIGNED: The choice of blood flow model may affect results, but does not constitute a significant determinant on the overall performance of the assumed stent grafts. On the contrary, stent graft geometry has a major effect. Specifically, the Bottom Up non-ballet type is characterized by the least favorable performance presenting the lowest TAWSS and the highest OSI, RRT and ECAP values. On the other hand, the Top Down ballet type presents hemodynamic advantages yielding the highest TAWSS and lowest OSI, RRT and ECAP average values. Furthermore, the ballet type is characterized by the lowest DF, although differences observed are small and their clinical relevance uncertain.
UNASSIGNED: The effect of the assumed rheological model on the overall performance of the grafts is not significant. It is thus relatively safe to claim that it is the type of stent graft that determines its overall performance rather than the adopted blood flow model.