Fulminant idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is a rapid vision-degrading presentation of IIH with limited published studies. This study composed a narrative review of fulminant IIH with the aim of better characterising fulminant IIH presentation and visual outcomes. SCOPUS and PubMed were searched for papers referencing IIH, benign intracranial hypertension, or pseudotumour cerebri. Abstracts were screened for rapid degradation in vision. All studies were required to meet both the modified Dandy and fulminant IIH criteria. Thirty-six studies met the inclusion criteria. Demographics, treatments, and visual outcome data were collected. Case studies made up 69% of the studies and 31% were case series. In total, 72 patients with fulminant IIH were reported, of which 23.6% were paediatric and 96% were female. Surgical intervention occurred in 85% of patients. Anaemia was present in 11% of patients and 85.7% of paediatric patients had a sixth cranial nerve palsy. In conclusion, we propose the following practice guidelines to assist in diagnosing and treating fulminant IIH patients: 1) patients who present with optic disc oedema require urgent visual field testing to evaluate for vision loss; 2) a paediatric patient presenting with a sixth cranial nerve palsy should have a comprehensive eye examination; 3) fulminant IIH can occur in patients with a normal body mass index; and 4) anaemia should be tested for in the setting of fulminant IIH. As little is known about the optimal treatment mechanisms for this presentation, multi-institutional and international collaborations will be a critical step for future research.

Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is increased intracranial pressure without a known cause. Dural venous sinus stenting (DVSS) is a relatively new intervention for treatment of IIH refractory to medical therapy and lifestyle modifications. In this review, we outline various hypotheses of IIH pathogenesis and describe the role of venous sinus stenosis and the technical details of DVSS. We also present a summary and critique of the available evidence describing the outcomes of DVSS in IIH and review the evidence-based guidelines for this procedure. We conclude that, although many studies have shown generally favorable outcomes of DVSS in patients with IIH, most have serious limitations, the most common one being paucity of pre- and postprocedure ophthalmological data. Thus, there is not enough available evidence to conclude whether DVSS is an effective procedure for treatment of IIH. We also present the most commonly used indications for DVSS as described in the literature and stress the importance of neuro-ophthalmological assessment before and after the procedure to monitor response and potential complications.

Background: Iodine-induced hyperthyroidism (IIH) was a common issue in the early twentieth century after introduction of iodine supplementation in dietary salt. Currently, IIH is mostly encountered in Western countries as a consequence of radiographic procedures involving the administration of iodinated contrast media (ICM). However, little is known about the magnitude and clinical relevance of this issue. To assess the incidence of hyperthyroidism after ICM exposure, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for studies published between 1946 and May 2018. Studies were considered eligible if they investigated the association between hyperthyroidism and iodinated contrast. Data on study design, baseline characteristics, and outcomes were extracted independently by two reviewers. Results: Thirty out of 1493 retrieved studies were included in the analysis. The time endpoint to assess thyroid hormone levels after ICM exposure varied between 1 and 541 days among studies, with most studies having a time endpoint between 7 and 56 days. The overall estimated prevalence of overt hyperthyroidism after ICM exposure was extremely low (0.1% [confidence interval, CI 0-0.6%]), and did not change after adjustments for baseline thyroid function status (0.3% in euthyroid patients at baseline [CI 0-1.7%]). There were no cases with overt hyperthyroidism at 7 days after ICM exposure, and the incidence was very low at 30 days (0.2% [CI 0-0.8%]). Conclusion: The incidence of IIH after ICM administration during radiographic procedures is extremely low.

We present an 8-month old male status post simple tethered cord release with idiopathic intracranial hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is a chronic neurologic disease that may result in persistent and debilitating symptoms that are refractory to conventional treatments.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to systematically review the effect of bariatric weight reduction surgery as a treatment for IIH.
METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Sciences, and the Cochrane Library. No restrictions were placed on these searches, including the date of publication.
RESULTS: A total of 85 publications were identified, and after initial appraisal, 17 were included in the final review. Overall improvement in symptoms of IIH after bariatric surgery was observed in 60 of the 65 patients observed (92%). Postoperative lumbar puncture opening pressure was shown to decrease by an average of 18.9 cmH2O in the 12 patients who had this recorded.
CONCLUSIONS: Bariatric surgery for weight loss is associated with alleviation of IIH symptoms and a reduction in intracranial pressure. Furthermore, an improvement was observed in patients where conventional treatments, including neurosurgery, were ineffective. Further prospective randomized studies with control groups and a larger number of participants are lacking within the published studies to date. There is, therefore, a strong rationale for the use of bariatric surgery in individuals with IIH for the effective treatment of this condition, as well as the efficacy of weight loss for various other obesity co-morbidities.