Hypoglycemic Agents

降血糖药
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白-2抑制剂(SGLT2i)已经使用了近十年,并且已被证明不仅在治疗2型糖尿病(T2D)方面有效,但是它们的心脏和肾脏保护功能使它们在管理具有多种合并症风险的患者方面非常有用。作者进行了这项系统评价,因为印度目前尚无证据研究SGLT2i作为印度新诊断为T2D患者的一线药物的适用性。
    方法:首先,检索文献以确定在决定管理T2D的一线药物时被认为重要的特征。总共确定了5个主要主题-血糖控制,额外的血糖影响,抗高血糖联合治疗,安全,和成本效益。这些领域有更多的副标题,共鉴定出16个结构域。在这种情况下,二甲双胍是首选的一线药物,被认为是评估SGLT2i在这些领域的作用的黄金标准。对每个领域进行了系统的文献综述,以比较SGLT2i与新诊断为T2D的印度患者的金标准。证据被分级(证据水平(LoE)-A,B,andC),和推荐(推荐类别(CoR)-I,II,和III)由专家组按照方法中的定义进行分类。
    结果:根据进行的系统评价,11个领域有A级证据,2个结构域(对脂质和肠道微生物组的影响)具有B级,和3个结构域具有C级(β细胞功能,肾脏保护,和血糖变异性)证据。根据证据和专家意见,作者推荐SGLT2i作为治疗新诊断的T2D患者的一线药物,其中13个领域为I类推荐,其余3个领域为II类(对脂质的影响,肠道微生物组,和β细胞功能)。尽管血糖变异性领域的证据水平较差(C级),根据他们的专家意见和共识,作者仍将此报告为I类建议.
    结论:本文主张采用SGLT2抑制剂作为印度新诊断的T2D患者的主要治疗选择。
    BACKGROUND: Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have been used for almost a decade and have proven to be effective not only in managing Type 2 diabetes (T2D), but their cardio and renal protective features make them very useful in managing patients with risk of multiple comorbidities. This systematic review was undertaken by the authors because there is no evidence currently available in India that has studied the suitability of SGLT2i as a first-line agent in patients newly diagnosed with T2D in India.
    METHODS: First, literature was searched to identify features that are considered important when deciding on a first-line agent for managing T2D. A total of 5 broad topics were identified-glycemic control, extra glycemic effects, antihyperglycemic combination therapy, safety, and cost-effectiveness. These domains had further subheadings, and a total of 16 domains were identified. Metformin is the drug of choice as a first-line agent in such situations and has been considered the gold standard for evaluating the effects of SGLT2i across these domains. A systematic literature review on each domain was conducted to compare SGLT2i with the gold standard in Indian patients newly diagnosed with T2D. Evidence was graded (levels of evidence (LoE)-A, B, and C), and recommendations (class of recommendation (CoR)-I, II, and III) were classified by the expert group as defined in the methodology.
    RESULTS: According to the systematic reviews conducted, 11 domains had Level A evidence, 2 domains (impact on lipids and gut microbiome) had Level B, and 3 domains had Level C (β-cell function, renal protection, and glycemic variability) evidence. Based on evidence and expert opinion, the authors recommend SGLT2i as a first-line agent for managing newly diagnosed patients with T2D with a Class I recommendation for 13 domains and Class II for the remaining 3 (impact on lipids, gut microbiome, and β-cell function). Although a poorer level of evidence (Level C) was available for the glycemic variability domain, the authors still reported this as Class I recommendations according to their expert opinion and consensus.
    CONCLUSIONS: This article advocates adopting SGLT2 inhibitors as the primary treatment choice for treating patients with newly diagnosed T2D in India.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:关于不同糖尿病药物组合对心力衰竭合并糖尿病患者(HFwDM)的影响的科学证据仍然有限。
    目的:我们旨在研究在三联指导药物治疗(GDMT)下,糖尿病单药治疗和联合治疗对HFwDM全因死亡率的影响。
    方法:这项全国性的回顾性队列研究包括2016年1月1日至2022年12月31日之间的三重GDMT下的成人HFwDM。我们从土耳其卫生部的国家电子数据库收集数据。我们根据目前的DM指南创建了各种组合,包括不同的糖尿病药物。主要终点是全因死亡率。
    结果:三重GDMT下共有321,525例HFwDM(女性:49%,中位年龄:68[61-75]岁)。处方联合治疗的比例最高的是二甲双胍和磺脲类药物(n=55,266)。在Cox回归分析中,insülin单药治疗的全因死亡率风险最高(HR:2.25,95CI%:2.06-2.45),而包括二甲双胍在内的联合治疗,SGLT2i,与未接受糖尿病药物治疗的患者相比,磺酰脲类对生存率的影响最大(HR:0.29,95CI%:0.22-0.39).在服用糖尿病药物的患者中,纳入SGLT2i显示了生存益处(p<0.05),尽管同时使用胰岛素和噻唑烷二酮类等保量药物。相反,与未服用糖尿病药物的患者相比,无SGLT2i的糖尿病药物组合未显示任何生存获益(p>0.05).
    结论:本研究强调使用SGLT2i作为单一疗法或作为联合糖尿病药物的一部分,以改善HFwDM患者的生存率。同时也强调缺乏SGLT2i的组合不能带来任何生存益处。
    BACKGROUND: Scientific evidence regarding the impact of different combinations of diabetes medications in heart failure patients with diabetes mellitus (HFwDM) remains limited.
    OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the effect of monotherapy and combination therapy for DM on all-cause mortality in HFwDM under triple guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT).
    METHODS: This nationwide retrospective cohort study included adult HFwDM under triple GDMT between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2022.We collected the data from the National Electronic Database of the Turkish Ministry of Health.We created various combination including different diabetes medications based on the current guidelines for DM.The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality.
    RESULTS: A total of 321,525 HFwDM under triple GDMT (female:49%, median age:68[61-75] years) were included. The highest rate of prescribed combination therapy was metformin and sulfonylureas (n = 55,266). In Cox regression analysis, insülin monotherapy had the highest risk for all-cause mortality (HR:2.25, 95CI%:2.06 - 2.45), whereas combination therapy including metformin, SGLT2i, and sulfonylureas provided the most beneficial effect on survival (HR:0.29, 95CI%:0.22-0.39) when compared to patients not receiving diabetes medication. Among patients taking diabetes medications, the inclusion of SGLT2i demonstrated a survival benefit (p < 0.05), despite concurrent use of volume-retaining medications such as insulin and thiazolidinediones. Conversely, combinations of diabetes medications without SGLT2i did not demonstrate any survival benefit compared to patients not taking diabetes medication (p > 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: This study underscored the use of SGLT2i as monotherapy or as a part of combination diabetes medications to improve survival among HFwDM, while also highlighting that combinations lacking SGLT2i did not confer any survival benefit.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    美国医师学会(ACP)制定了该临床指南,以更新有关2型糖尿病新药物治疗的建议。本临床指南基于有效的最佳证据,比较利益和危害,考虑患者的价值观和偏好,和成本。
    本临床指南基于对2型糖尿病新型药物治疗的有效性和危害的系统评价。包括胰高血糖素样肽-1(GLP-1)激动剂,GLP-1激动剂和葡萄糖依赖性促胰岛素多肽激动剂,钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白-2(SGLT-2)抑制剂,二肽基肽酶-4(DPP-4)抑制剂,和长效胰岛素,用作单一疗法或与其他药物联合使用。临床指南委员会优先考虑以下结果,使用等级(建议评估等级,开发和评估)方法:全因死亡率,主要不良心血管事件,心肌梗塞,中风,充血性心力衰竭住院治疗,慢性肾病进展,严重不良事件,和严重的低血糖。减肥,以总体体重减轻至少10%的参与者的百分比来衡量,是一个优先的结果,但数据不足以进行网络meta分析,且未按GRADE进行评级.
    本临床指南的受众是医生和其他临床医生。该人群是患有2型糖尿病的非妊娠成年人。
    ACP建议在2型糖尿病和血糖控制不足的成人中,在二甲双胍和生活方式改变中添加钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白-2(SGLT-2)抑制剂或胰高血糖素样肽-1(GLP-1)激动剂(强烈推荐;高确定性证据)。
    •使用SGLT-2抑制剂可降低全因死亡风险,主要不良心血管事件,慢性肾病进展,以及充血性心力衰竭导致的住院治疗.
    •使用GLP-1激动剂降低全因死亡风险,主要不良心血管事件,和中风。
    ACP建议不要在2型糖尿病和血糖控制不足的成人中添加二甲双胍和生活方式改变二肽基肽酶-4(DPP-4)抑制剂,以降低发病率和全因死亡率(强烈推荐;高确定性证据)。
    UNASSIGNED: The American College of Physicians (ACP) developed this clinical guideline to update recommendations on newer pharmacologic treatments of type 2 diabetes. This clinical guideline is based on the best available evidence for effectiveness, comparative benefits and harms, consideration of patients\' values and preferences, and costs.
    UNASSIGNED: This clinical guideline is based on a systematic review of the effectiveness and harms of newer pharmacologic treatments of type 2 diabetes, including glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists, a GLP-1 agonist and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide agonist, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, and long-acting insulins, used either as monotherapy or in combination with other medications. The Clinical Guidelines Committee prioritized the following outcomes, which were evaluated using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach: all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events, myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalization for congestive heart failure, progression of chronic kidney disease, serious adverse events, and severe hypoglycemia. Weight loss, as measured by percentage of participants who achieved at least 10% total body weight loss, was a prioritized outcome, but data were insufficient for network meta-analysis and were not rated with GRADE.
    UNASSIGNED: The audience for this clinical guideline is physicians and other clinicians. The population is nonpregnant adults with type 2 diabetes.
    UNASSIGNED: ACP recommends adding a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitor or glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonist to metformin and lifestyle modifications in adults with type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycemic control (strong recommendation; high-certainty evidence). • Use an SGLT-2 inhibitor to reduce the risk for all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events, progression of chronic kidney disease, and hospitalization due to congestive heart failure. • Use a GLP-1 agonist to reduce the risk for all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events, and stroke.
    UNASSIGNED: ACP recommends against adding a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor to metformin and lifestyle modifications in adults with type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycemic control to reduce morbidity and all-cause mortality (strong recommendation; high-certainty evidence).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本视觉临床指南的目的是提供ACP临床指南的视觉总结,“成人2型糖尿病的较新药物治疗。\"此外,本可视化临床指南以交互式数据可视化的方式显示与ACP对本主题的临床建议相关的结果.
    The purpose of this visual clinical guideline is to provide a visual summary of ACP\'s clinical guideline, \"Newer Pharmacologic Treatments in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes.\" In addition, this visual clinical guideline features an interactive data visualization of findings associated with ACP\'s clinical recommendations for this topic.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:几种钠-葡萄糖转运蛋白2抑制剂(SGLT2i)和胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1RA)可降低2型糖尿病(T2D)患者的心血管事件(CV)并改善肾脏预后;尽管有指南建议,利用率仍然很低。
    方法:随机,MassGeneralBrigham网络的远程实施试验纳入了高CV和/或肾脏风险的T2D患者.符合资格的患者,但没有规定,SGLT2i或GLP-1RA被随机分配到同时进行的虚拟患者教育,同时进行SGLT2i或GLP-1RA的处方(“同时”)或两个月的虚拟教育,然后进行药物处方(“教育优先”)。由无执照的导航员和临床药剂师驱动的多学科团队使用标准化的治疗算法开具SGLTi或GLP-1的处方。主要结果是6个月前服用SGLT2i或GLP-1RA处方的患者比例。
    结果:在2021年3月至2022年12月之间,200例患者被随机分配。平均年龄为66.5岁,36.5%是女性,22.0%为非白人。总的来说,30.0%患有心血管CV疾病,5.0%有脑血管疾病,1.5%的人两者都有。平均估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)77.9mL/min/1.73m2和平均尿/白蛋白肌酐比(UACR)88.6mg/g。两个月后,69/200(34.5%)患者接受SGLT2i或GLP-1RA的新处方:53.4%的患者与8.3%的患者处于教育第一臂(p<0.001)。六个月后,128/200(64.0%)接受了新处方:同时臂中69.8%的患者与56.0%的患者接受教育优先(p<0.001)。在进入试验的六个月内服用SGLT2i或GLP-1RA的患者自我报告在同时组与教育第一组相似(69/116;59.5%vs37/84;44.0%;p<0.001)首次处方的中位时间为24(IQR13,50)vs85天(IQR65,106),分别(p<0.001)。
    结论:在这项随机试验中,一个远程的基于团队的项目,识别患有T2D和高CV或肾脏风险的患者,提供虚拟教育,并开具SGLT2i或GLP-1RA可改善GDMT。这些发现支持更多地利用基于虚拟团队的方法来优化慢性病管理。
    UNASSIGNED: Several SGLT2i (sodium-glucose transport protein 2 inhibitors) and GLP1-RA (glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists) reduce cardiovascular events and improve kidney outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes; however, utilization remains low despite guideline recommendations.
    UNASSIGNED: A randomized, remote implementation trial in the Mass General Brigham network enrolled patients with type 2 diabetes with increased cardiovascular or kidney risk. Patients eligible for, but not prescribed, SGLT2i or GLP1-RA were randomly assigned to simultaneous virtual patient education with concurrent prescription of SGLT2i or GLP1-RA (ie, Simultaneous) or 2 months of virtual education followed by medication prescription (ie, Education-First) delivered by a multidisciplinary team driven by nonlicensed navigators and clinical pharmacists who prescribed SGLT2i or GLP1-RA using a standardized treatment algorithm. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with prescriptions for either SGLT2i or GLP1-RA by 6 months.
    UNASSIGNED: Between March 2021 and December 2022, 200 patients were randomized. The mean age was 66.5 years; 36.5% were female, and 22.0% were non-White. Overall, 30.0% had cardiovascular disease, 5.0% had cerebrovascular disease, and 1.5% had both. Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate was 77.9 mL/(min‧1.73 m2), and mean urine/albumin creatinine ratio was 88.6 mg/g. After 2 months, 69 of 200 (34.5%) patients received a new prescription for either SGLT2i or GLP1-RA: 53.4% of patients in the Simultaneous arm and 8.3% of patients in the Education-First arm (P<0.001). After 6 months, 128 of 200 (64.0%) received a new prescription: 69.8% of patients in the Simultaneous arm and 56.0% of patients in Education-First (P<0.001). Patient self-report of taking SGLT2i or GLP1-RA within 6 months of trial entry was similarly greater in the Simultaneous versus Education-First arm (69 of 116 [59.5%] versus 37 of 84 [44.0%]; P<0.001) Median time to first prescription was 24 (interquartile range [IQR], 13-50) versus 85 days (IQR, 65-106), respectively (P<0.001).
    UNASSIGNED: In this randomized trial, a remote, team-based program identifies patients with type 2 diabetes and high cardiovascular or kidney risk, provides virtual education, prescribes SGLT2i or GLP1-RA, and improves guideline-directed medical therapy. These findings support greater utilization of virtual team-based approaches to optimize chronic disease management.
    UNASSIGNED: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT06046560.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:Empagliflozin在心血管并发症高风险的2型糖尿病患者中起着有益的作用。这项研究旨在根据2022年至2023年的临床指南评估需要依帕列净的2型糖尿病患者的患病率。
    方法:本研究是对2型糖尿病患者目标人群进行的描述性分析性横断面研究。患者数据,包括人口特征,吸烟状况,高血压,高脂血症,肾功能不全,视网膜病变,和蛋白尿,被收集。根据心血管并发症的风险确定处方依帕列净的适应症。
    结果:共检查了398名平均年龄为58.4岁的2型糖尿病患者。总的来说,87.4%的患者有依帕列净处方的适应症。在男性中,依帕列净的适应症明显较高,患有高脂血症的个体,55岁以上的人,肥胖个体,和吸烟者。平均年龄,身体质量指数,依帕列净处方候选人的甘油三酯水平较高。与女性相比,empagliflozin的男性候选人的吸烟率和收缩压明显更高。
    结论:这项研究的结果表明,根据临床和实验室标准,相当比例的2型糖尿病患者有依帕列净处方的适应症。
    BACKGROUND: Empagliflozin plays a beneficial role in individuals with type 2 diabetes at high risk of cardiovascular complications. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of individuals with type 2 diabetes who required empagliflozin based on clinical guidelines between the years 2022 and 2023.
    METHODS: This study was a descriptive-analytical cross-sectional study conducted on a target population of patients with type 2 diabetes. Patient data, including demographic characteristics, smoking status, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, renal insufficiency, retinopathy, and proteinuria, were collected. The indication for prescribing empagliflozin was determined based on the risk of cardiovascular complications.
    RESULTS: A total of 398 individuals with type 2 diabetes with a mean age of 58.4 years were examined. Overall, 87.4% of the patients had an indication for empagliflozin prescription. The indication for empagliflozin prescription was significantly higher in men, individuals with hyperlipidemia, those over 55 years of age, obese individuals, and smokers. The mean age, body mass index, and triglyceride levels were higher in candidates for empagliflozin prescription. Male candidates for empagliflozin had significantly higher rates of smoking and systolic blood pressure compared to females.
    CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study demonstrated that a significant percentage of individuals with type 2 diabetes had an indication for empagliflozin prescription based on clinical and laboratory criteria.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    这项系统评价和荟萃分析评估了抗肥胖药物对激素,生殖,新陈代谢,和多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)的心理结局,以告知2023年国际PCOS循证指南的更新。我们搜查了Medline,EMBASE,PsycInfo,和CINAHL,直到2022年7月,10年限制专注于新的代理商。11项试验(干预和控制组分别有545名和451名参与者,包括12个比较)。在描述性分析中,大多数药物改善人体测量结果;利拉鲁肽,塞马鲁肽和奥利司他的人体测量结果优于安慰剂.Meta分析可能用于两种比较(艾塞那肽与二甲双胍和奥利司他+联合口服避孕药[COCP]与单独使用COCP)。在荟萃分析中,艾塞那肽与二甲双胍的人体测量没有差异,生化高雄激素血症,和代谢结果,二甲双胍组的空腹血糖低于艾塞那肽组(MD:0.10mmol/L,CI0.02-0.17,I2=18%,2试验)。与单独使用COCP相比,奥利司他+COCP并不能改善代谢结果(空腹胰岛素MD:-8.65pmol/L,-33.55至16.26,I2=67%,2试验)。研究抗肥胖药物在PCOS女性中的作用的公开数据非常有限。这些药物在PCOS中的作用应该是未来研究的重点。
    This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of anti-obesity agents for hormonal, reproductive, metabolic, and psychological outcomes in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) to inform the 2023 update of the International Evidence-based Guideline on PCOS. We searched Medline, EMBASE, PsycInfo, and CINAHL until July 2022 with a 10-year limit to focus on newer agents. Eleven trials (545 and 451 participants in intervention and control arms respectively, 12 comparisons) were included. On descriptive analyses, most agents improved anthropometric outcomes; liraglutide, semaglutide and orlistat appeared superior to placebo for anthropometric outcomes. Meta-analyses were possible for two comparisons (exenatide vs. metformin and orlistat + combined oral contraceptive pill [COCP] vs. COCP alone). On meta-analysis, no differences were identified between exenatide versus metformin for anthropometric, biochemical hyperandrogenism, and metabolic outcomes, other than lower fasting blood glucose more with metformin than exenatide (MD: 0.10 mmol/L, CI 0.02-0.17, I2 = 18%, 2 trials). Orlistat + COCP did not improve metabolic outcomes compared with COCP alone (fasting insulin MD: -8.65 pmol/L, -33.55 to 16.26, I2 = 67%, 2 trials). Published data examining the effects of anti-obesity agents in women with PCOS are very limited. The role of these agents in PCOS should be a high priority for future research.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Observational Study
    最近的糖尿病管理指南建议,对于2型糖尿病(T2DM)和已确定的心血管疾病(CVD)患者,应优先考虑具有心血管益处的钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂(SGLT2is)或胰高血糖素样肽1受体激动剂(GLP-1RAs)的联合治疗。这项研究旨在评估T2DM和已建立的CVD患者的SGLT2i或GLP-1RA使用率和各种相关因素。
    在这项回顾性观察性研究中,我们招募了2019年1月至2020年5月在韩国13家二级和三级医院因心血管疾病住院的年龄≥30岁的T2DM成年人。
    总的来说,在2,107名入选患者中,有2,050名患者符合分析条件。病人的平均年龄,糖尿病持续时间,糖化血红蛋白水平为70.0岁,12.0年,和7.5%,分别。在9.7个月的平均随访期间,25.7%的患者在CVD事件后服用SGLT2is。然而,只有1.8%的患者服用了GLP-1RAs.与SGLT2i非用户相比,SGLT2i使用者更常见的是男性和肥胖。此外,他们的糖尿病病程较短,但在事件发生时血糖控制较差,肾功能较好.与GLP-1RA非使用者相比,GLP-1RA使用者在事件发生时的糖尿病持续时间更长,血糖控制更差。
    在T2DM和已确诊的CVD患者中,SGLT2i或GLP-1RA处方率并不理想。性,身体质量指数,糖尿病持续时间,血糖控制,肾功能与这些药物的使用有关。
    BACKGROUND: Recent diabetes management guidelines recommend that sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) or glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) with proven cardiovascular benefits should be prioritized for combination therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and established cardiovascular disease (CVD). This study was aimed at evaluating SGLT2i or GLP-1RA usage rates and various related factors in patients with T2DM and established CVD.
    METHODS: We enrolled adults with T2DM aged ≥30 years who were hospitalized due to established CVD from January 2019 to May 2020 at 13 secondary and tertiary hospitals in Korea in this retrospective observational study.
    RESULTS: Overall, 2,050 patients were eligible for analysis among 2,107 enrolled patients. The mean patient age, diabetes duration, and glycosylated hemoglobin level were 70.0 years, 12.0 years, and 7.5%, respectively. During the mean follow-up duration of 9.7 months, 25.7% of the patients were prescribed SGLT2is after CVD events. However, only 1.8% were prescribed GLP-1RAs. Compared with SGLT2i non-users, SGLT2i users were more frequently male and obese. Furthermore, they had a shorter diabetes duration but showed worse glycemic control and better renal function at the time of the event. GLP-1RA users had a longer duration of diabetes and worse glycemic control at the time of the event than GLP-1RA non-users.
    CONCLUSIONS: The SGLT2i or GLP-1RA prescription rates were suboptimal in patients with T2DM and established CVD. Sex, body mass index, diabetes duration, glycemic control, and renal function were associated with the use of these agents.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    According to the \"Federal Law on the Fundamentals of Protection of the Public Health\", medical care for patients should be provided in accordance with National Russian guidelines for the relevant nosology, which are based on the principles of evidence-based medicine. The article presents an analysis of the compliance with the completeness of implementation of National Russian guidelines in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM 2) in real clinical practice. The analysis of the actual state of management of DM 2 patients was carried out from the Federal Register of diabetes as of 01.01.2023. Incomplete compliance with the guidelines on the frequency of measuring glycated hemoglobin, the rate of intensification of hypoglycemic therapy, and the appointment of new classes of hypoglycemic drugs was established. Possible reasons for the identified discrepancies between real practice and guidelines requirements are discussed, as well as possible measures to overcome these discrepancies.
    Согласно Федеральному закону №323-ФЗ «Об основах охраны здоровья граждан в Российской Федерации» медицинская помощь пациентам должна быть оказана в соответствии с клиническими рекомендациями (КР) по соответствующей нозологии, которые основываются на принципах доказательной медицины. В данной статье представлен анализ соответствия полноты выполнения КР по лечению больных сахарным диабетом (СД) 2-го типа, утвержденных Минздравом России, в реальной клинической практике. Анализ фактического состояния ведения пациентов с СД 2-го типа проведен на основе данных Федерального регистра больных СД на 01.01.2023. Установлено неполное соответствие выполнения КР в частоте измерений гликированного гемоглобина, скорости интенсификации терапии, доли назначений современных классов сахароснижающих препаратов. Обсуждаются возможные причины выявленных расхождений реальной практики с требованиями КР, а также возможные меры по преодолению этих расхождений.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号