Background and Objectives: Scrotal swelling or hydrocele is a rare complication of acute pancreatitis described in the literature. We present a case of penoscrotal swelling caused by the first attack of acute interstitial edematous alcohol-induced pancreatitis in a young male patient. Case report: A 22-year-old man was admitted to the emergency unit due to diarrhea and vomiting since morning which was followed by severe abdominal pain. Urgent abdominal multislice CT scan showed steatosis, pancreatic swelling and acute peripancreatic fluid collection (interstitial edematous pancreatitis). Also, scan showed fluid between small bowel loops and along the anterior renal fascia, while there was minimal amount of fluid in the Douglas space. There was no sign of penoscrotal swelling. On the second day of admission, the patient developed left scrotal swelling and mild pain without erythema. On the fourth day, a control CT scan showed progression to moderately severe pancreatitis (CT severity index 4). Dilated scrotal veins of the pampiniform venous plexus with an increased caliber of the testicular veins were present on both sides, from the scrotum to the level of the inguinal canal. Penoscrotal swelling was significantly reduced on discharge. Conclusions: Penoscrotal swelling is a rare complication or manifestation of acute inflammation of the pancreas. It is important to identify scrotal swelling caused by pancreatitis because in severe cases it can be related to possible infertility in the future.

UNASSIGNED: Encysted spermatic cord hydrocele is a rare anomaly characterized by obstruction of processus vaginalis closure. Clinically, it presents as a swelling in the inguinal region extending to the upper scrotum and does not communicate with the peritoneal cavity. It is often mistaken for indirect inguinal hernias, inguinal lymphadenopathy, undescended testis, and primary tumors of the cord in infants and children, making the diagnosis challenging.
METHODS: We report the cases of five male patients aged nine months to 12 years who presented with painless swelling on the right side of the scrotal region. Physical examination revealed firm masses in the right inguinal region with positive transillumination, negative cough impulse tests, and irreducibility. Inguinal and scrotal ultrasonography showed an anechoic cystic lesion with thin walls, without any signs suggestive of a hernia. Patients were diagnosed with encysted spermatic cord hydrocele and advised to undergo cyst excision. The postoperative periods were uneventful, and expected recovery was observed at one-week and one-month follow-ups.
UNASSIGNED: Encysted spermatic cord hydroceles are rare causes of painless inguinal swelling. The medical history and clinical findings can be used to establish a diagnosis, which can be confirmed using ultrasonography. Management depends on differentiating between spermatic cord hydrocele and scrotal hydrocele and involves considering the type. Treatment options range from conservative measures to surgery, particularly for non-communicating hydroceles that persist beyond 12-18 months or enlarge in size.
CONCLUSIONS: Encysted hydrocele of the cord is rare and is often mistaken for indirect inguinal hernias in infants and children. This similarity makes the diagnosis challenging and necessitates vigilance from clinicians. Surgical intervention results in optimal outcomes, especially in cases where the hydrocele persists beyond 12-18 months or with size progression.

UNASSIGNED: A hydrocele is typically a non-cancerous condition that arises from the accumulation of fluid between the layers of the vaginal process. Diagnosis primarily involves a physical examination. In instances where the condition is mistaken for other pathological conditions, additional investigations may be undertaken. Surgical intervention is typically deferred until after the age of one year, unless the hydrocele is significantly large.
METHODS: A case was presented of a 4-year-old boy who was referred to the hospital with a suspected deep inguinal hernia. Upon examination, it was determined that the mass was actually an encysted hydrocele of spermatic cord. The patient underwent a minimally invasive surgery to remove the spermatocele, and the procedure was successful.
UNASSIGNED: This emphasizes the importance of obtaining a detailed patient history and conducting a comprehensive physical examination, which often provide sufficient information to make a diagnosis. In many instances, these initial steps can spare patients from undergoing additional tests that may be invasive or pose unnecessary risks.
CONCLUSIONS: It is important to note that in cases of hydroceles, conservative treatment, such as observation, is the primary approach before the age of one year. Surgery is typically reserved for older children or those with large hydroceles.

UNASSIGNED: Fluid collection in a femoral hernia sac designated as a femorocele is an extremely uncommon surgical condition. Till date 9 cases of unilateral femorocele and one case of bilateral femorocele have been reported in English literature.
UNASSIGNED: Thus making the case presented the second case of bilateral femorocele in English literature.
UNASSIGNED: A case of bilateral femorocele in a patient suffering from rheumatic heat disease who had undergone dual valvular replacement with ascites due to cardiac cirrhosis is presented to highlight the surgical challenges in management of such a rare case.
UNASSIGNED: Pathophysiology, clinical features, investigations and managemeny of femorocele are discussed.
UNASSIGNED: Contrast enhanced CT scan of the abdomen and scrotum is diagnostic. Open surgery in the form of dissection of sac with high ligation followed by obliteration of femoral ring is therapeutic. There is no scope of laparoscopy in such a case.

BACKGROUND: Hydroceles of the canal of Nuck are rare, and have not been described in relation to pregnancy.
METHODS: A 34-year-old Caucasian female patient had bilateral groin swelling debuted during her pregnancy. A preoperative magnetic resonance imaging scan found bilateral hydroceles of the canal of Nuck. Operative findings and histological examinations revealed a left-sided inguinal hernia and a right-sided hydrocele. The patient was discharged well and without signs of postoperative complications or hernia recurrence.
CONCLUSIONS: In this case, a hydrocele and a hernia sac were morphologically identical in terms of preoperative appearance and development. Given the morphological correlation, it was surprising to find different operative findings confirmed by the histopathological examination.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first ever report of the synchronic development of two morphologically identical cystic processes, with one being a hydrocele and the other a hernia sac. In addition, the hydrocele developed during pregnancy, making this case even more unique.

BACKGROUND: Hydrocele, an abnormal fluid collection between parietal and visceral layers of the tunica vaginalis, is the commonest cause of scrotal swelling, and it affects all age groups. Calcification of hydrocele sac/wall is a rare clinical entity. The etiology of calcification of hydrocele sac is not clear, but most literature proposes that calcification is secondary to chronic irritation. Trauma and infectious diseases including Schistosoma haematobium, filariasis, and tuberculosis can also cause calcification of the hydrocele sac.
METHODS: A 74-year-old Ethiopian male patient presented with left side scrotal swelling of 3 years duration, which was initially small but progressively increased. He had no history of trauma, and he had no history of swelling on the contralateral side. Scrotal ultrasound (US) showed a large echodebrinous left-side scrotal collection with calcifications, bilateral testis appear normal in size, echogenicity, and color Doppler flow with the index of likely chronic hematocele. Therefore, with a diagnosis of left-sided calcified hydrocele, the patient was operated on and the calcified sac was excised and sent for histopathology. Finally, the patient was discharged improved after 2 days of hospital stay.
CONCLUSIONS: Calcification of the tunica vaginalis is very rare and is probably due to chronic irritation of the wall from the coexisting hydrocele. Surgical excision of calcified hydrocele sac is the treatment of choice.

BACKGROUND: The hydrocele of the canal of Nuck is a rare cause of bilateral inguino-labial swelling. Due to its rarity, lack of clinician knowledge regarding this entity, and paucity of relevant literature, it can be misdiagnosed and often mistreated.
METHODS: We present a case of a two-year-old female with bilateral inguino-labial swelling who was diagnosed with a hydrocele of the canal of Nuck based on history and clinical examination. The patient underwent bilateral hydrocele excision with high pouch ligation, and she experienced an uneventful recovery.
CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral hydrocele of the canal of Nuck is rare in females. Diagnosis can be made based on history and clinical findings. In cases of diagnostic uncertainty, preoperative ultrasonography may aid in diagnosis. Management of hydrocele of the canal of Nuck involves surgical intervention, which is necessary for both definitive diagnosis and treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Although rare, hydrocele of the canal of Nuck must be suspected in cases with inguino-labial swelling, properly diagnosed, and surgically excised. It can be misdiagnosed; therefore, clinicians need to have a high index of suspicion to reach a provisional diagnosis and prevent morbidity and further complications.

BACKGROUND: Funiculus hydrocele is an uncommon anomaly characterized by obstruction in the closure of the processus vaginalis. The two variations of funiculus hydrocele are the encysted variety that is not related to the peritoneal cavity and the funicular variety that is associated with the peritoneal cavity. We report the clinical investigation and management of a very rare case of encysted spermatic cord hydrocele in a 2-year-old boy.
METHODS: A 2-year-old boy came to the hospital with the complaint of a lump in the scrotum for 1 year. The lump had exhibited growth and was not recurrent. The lump was painless, and the parent denied a history of testicular trauma. The vital signs were within normal limits. The left hemiscrotal was observed to be larger than the right. Palpation indicated an oval, soft, well-defined, and fluctuating impression, without tenderness, measuring 4 × 4 cm. The scrotal ultrasound showed a hypoechoic lesion measuring 2.8 × 2.4 × 4.5 cm. The patient underwent a scrotal-approach hydrocelectomy. The 1-month follow-up reported no recurrence.
UNASSIGNED: An encysted hydrocele is a non-communicating inguinal hydrocele, with a collection of fluid throughout the spermatic cord, which is separate and lies above the testes and epididymis. Diagnosis is clinically important, and if any uncertainty exists, scrotal ultrasound can be used to distinguish it from other scrotal lesions. The treatment for non-communicating inguinal hydrocele in this patient was surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Hydrocele is usually painless and rarely dangerous so it does not require immediate treatment. The treatment for hydrocele in this patient was surgery because it becomes larger.

UNASSIGNED: Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescent lymphography is reportedly a safe and effective method to diagnosis of lymphatic leakage. We report a case of a patient who underwent ICG fluorescent lymphography during laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.
METHODS: A 59-year-old man was referred to our department for the treatment of both inguinal hernias, during which laparoscopic ICG lymphography was performed. The patient had a history of open left inguinal indirect hernia repair at the age of 3 years. Following the induction of general anesthesia, 0.25 mg ICG was injected into both testicles, and the scrotum was gently massaged, after which laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair was performed. During the operation, ICG fluorescence was observed in two lymphatic vessels in the spermatic cord. The ICG fluorescent vessels were injured only on the left side due to strong adhesion between lymphatic vessels and the hernia sac, possibly due to a previous operation. ICG leakage was observed on the gauze. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (transabdominal preperitoneal approach [TAPP]) was performed. The patient was discharged 1 day postoperatively. He had a slight postoperative ultrasonic hydrocele only in the left groin that was detected at the follow-up clinic 9 days postoperatively during ultrasonic examination (ultrasonic hydrocele).
UNASSIGNED: We report the use of ICG fluorescent lymphography during laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in a patient who developed a postoperative ultrasonic hydrocele.
CONCLUSIONS: This case may indicate a relationship between lymphatic vessel injury and hydroceles.

BACKGROUND: Hydrocele is an abnormal collection of serous fluid in the tunica vaginalis. The most common form of hydrocele in adults is primary or idiopathic, affecting approximately 1% of adult men. Most patients receive surgical treatment. We report a case cured by intracapsular injection of polidocanol.
METHODS: A 32-year-old man found a lump in his left scrotum while taking a bath. He conducted a transillumination test himself, and the result was positive. Hydrocele of the testis was then diagnosed by ultrasound examination. The patient underwent several rounds of hydrops aspiration, intracapsular drug injection, and oral antibiotic treatment, but all failed. Finally, the hydrocele was cured by injection of polidocanol into the capsule.
CONCLUSIONS: Simple hydrocele aspiration and intracapsular injection of anti-inflammatory drugs had no obvious therapeutic effect. Intracapsular injection of polidocanol has a reliable and lasting therapeutic effect on hydroceles with the advantages of procedure simplicity, low cost, rapid recovery, and few side effects.