背景:2019年美国阴道镜和宫颈病理学学会(ASCCP)基于风险的管理共识指南是针对异常宫颈癌筛查测试管理的最新国家指南。这些指南通过将测试和治疗集中在宫颈癌风险最高的患者中而使患者受益。准则的采纳往往进展缓慢,很少有研究检查与指南坚持异常结果管理相关的因素。
方法:为了阐明在进行宫颈癌筛查的临床医生中使用2019ASCCP指南的相关因素,进行宫颈癌筛查的医师和高级执业专业人员进行了横断面调查.在2019年和之前的管理指南之间,临床医生对筛查小插曲做出了不同的管理建议。筛选插图1涉及减少对低风险患者的侵入性测试;筛选插图2涉及对高风险患者的增加监测测试。二项逻辑回归模型确定了与2019年指南使用相关的因素。
结果:共有来自美国各地的1251名临床医生参加。对于筛选小插曲1和2,28%和36%的参与者给出了遵循指南的回答,分别。管理建议因专业而异,并且在不同情况下是不正确的:妇产科医生进行了不适当的侵入性测试(插图1),而家庭和内科医生则不适当地中止了筛查(插图2)。不管他们选择的回应,超过一半的人错误地认为他们是指导方针的坚持者。
结论:许多认为自己遵循适当指南的临床医生可能没有意识到他们的管理策略与2019年指南不一致。针对临床医生专业量身定制的教育计划可以解决对当前指南的理解,鼓励使用更新的指导方针,最大限度地提高患者的利益,尽量减少危害。
结论:2019年美国阴道镜和宫颈病理学学会基于风险的管理共识指南是最新的异常宫颈癌筛查测试管理国家指南。我们调查了1200多个妇产科(OB/GYN),家庭医学,以及内科医师和高级实践提供者关于他们的筛查和异常结果随访实践的指南。很少有临床医生遵循2019年指南。管理建议因临床医师专业而异,并且在不同情况下是不正确的:OB/GYN医师进行了不适当的侵入性测试,而家庭和内科医师进行了不适当的筛查中止。由临床医师专业量身定制的教育可以解决对当前指南的理解,鼓励使用更新的指导方针,最大限度地提高患者的利益,尽量减少危害。
The 2019 American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology (ASCCP) risk-based management
consensus guidelines are the most recent national guidelines for the management of abnormal cervical cancer screening tests. These guidelines benefit patients by concentrating testing and treatment in those at highest cervical cancer risk. Adoption of
guidelines often occurs slowly, with few studies examining the factors associated with
guideline-adherent management of abnormal results.
To elucidate the factors associated with the use of the 2019 ASCCP guidelines among clinicians who perform cervical cancer screening, physicians and advanced practice professionals who perform cervical cancer screening were cross-sectionally surveyed. Clinicians responded to screening vignettes with differing recommendations for management between the 2019 and prior management guidelines. Screening vignette 1 involved reduction of invasive testing on a low-risk patient; screening vignette 2 involved increased surveillance testing on a high-risk patient. Binomial logistic regression models determined the factors associated with the use of the 2019 guidelines.
A total of 1251 clinicians participated from across the United States. For screening vignettes 1 and 2,
guideline-adherent responses were given by 28% and 36% of participants, respectively. Management recommendations differed by specialty and were incorrect in different situations: there was inappropriate invasive testing by obstetrics and gynecology physicians (vignette 1) and inappropriate discontinuation of screening by family and internal medicine physicians (vignette 2). Regardless of their chosen response, over half erroneously believed they were
guideline adherent.
Many clinicians who believe they are following appropriate guidelines may not realize their management strategy is inconsistent with the 2019 guidelines. Education initiatives tailored to clinician specialty could address the understanding of current guidelines, encourage the use of updated guidelines, maximize patient benefits, and minimize harms.
The 2019 American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology risk-based management
consensus guidelines are the most recent national guidelines for abnormal cervical cancer screening test management. We surveyed over 1200 obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN), family medicine, and internal medicine physicians and advanced practice providers about their screening and abnormal results follow-up practices in relation to guidelines. Few clinicians are following the 2019 guidelines. Management recommendations differed by clinician specialty and were incorrect in different situations: there was inappropriate invasive testing by OB/GYN physicians and inappropriate screening discontinuation by family and internal medicine physicians. Education tailored by clinician specialty could address the understanding of current guidelines, encourage the use of updated guidelines, maximize patient benefits, and minimize harms.