The \'2023 AAFP/IAAHPC Feline Hospice and Palliative Care Guidelines\' are authored by a Task Force of experts in feline hospice and palliative care convened by the American Association of Feline Practitioners and the International Association for Animal Hospice and Palliative Care. They emphasize the specialized communication skills and ethical considerations that are associated with feline hospice and palliative care, with references to other feline practice guidelines for a more complete discussion of specific diseases, feline pain management best practices and cat friendly interactions. A comprehensive, multi-step hospice consultation allows for tailoring the approach to both the cat and the family involved in the care. The consultation includes establishing \'budgets of care\', a concept that greatly influences what can be done for the individual cat. The Guidelines acknowledge that each cat and caregiver will be different in this regard; and establishing what is reasonable, practical and ethical for the individual cat and caregiver is important. A further concept of the \'care unit\' is introduced, which is extrapolated from human hospice and palliative care, and encourages and empowers the caregiver to become a part of the cat\'s care every step of the way. Ethical considerations include a decision-making framework. The importance of comfort care is emphasized, and the latest information available about how to assess the quality of a cat\'s life is reviewed. Emotional health is as equally important as physical health. Hence, it is fundamental to recognize that compromised physical health, with pain and/or illness, impairs emotional health. A limited discussion on euthanasia is included, referring to the AAFP\'s End of Life Educational Toolkit for recommendations to help the caregiver and the veterinary professional ensure a peaceful passing and transition - one that reflects the best interests of the individual cat and caregiver.

Spiritual care requires understanding the spiritual experiences of patients and recognizing their resources and needs. Therefore, educators and practitioners should develop their knowledge and understanding in this regard. Spiritual care helps people overcome their anxieties, worries, and suffering; reduces stress; promotes healing; and encourages patients to find inner peace. To provide comprehensive and appropriate care while upholding human/ethical virtues, the spiritual dimension must be a priority. We aim to develop spiritual care competence guidelines for Palliative Care (PC) education and practice in Portugal and Spain. The study detailed in this protocol paper will include three phases. In phase I, the phenomenon will be characterized and divided into two tasks: (1) a concept analysis of \"spiritual care competence\"; and (2) a systematic review of interventions or strategies used to integrate spiritual care in PC education and practice. Phase II will entail a sequential explanatory approach (online survey and qualitative interviews) to deepen understanding of the perceptions and experiences of educators, practitioners, and patients/family carers regarding spiritual care in PC education and practice and generate ideas for the next steps. Phase III will comprise a multi-phased, consensus-based approach to identify priority areas of need as decided by a group of experts. Results will be used to produce guidelines for integrating spirituality and spiritual care competence within PC education and practice and synthesized in a white book for PC professionals. The value of this improved examination of spiritual care competence will ultimately depend on whether it can inform the development and implementation of tailored educational and PC services. The project will promote the \'spiritual care\' imperative, helping practitioners and patients/family carers in their preparedness for End-of-Life care, as well as improving curricular practices in this domain.

Background: End-of-life dreams and visions (ELDVs) are a common phenomenon in which dying patients experience dreams/visions often of deceased loved ones before death. Past research has highlighted the need for education and awareness to improve clinical engagement at the bedside in response to ELDVs. Objectives: To explore the perspectives of multidisciplinary hospice care providers who are ELDV subject matter experts. Design/Methods: Semi-structured interviews with 13 multidisciplinary hospice providers were conducted and analyzed using thematic qualitative analysis. Results: Analysis revealed six themes: Normalization, Rapport Building, Active Listening, Individualized Meaning Making, Barriers, and Education. A secondary thematic analysis focused on defining/describing ELDVs and resulted in two themes: Natural Part of Dying and ELDV Properties. Conclusions: Findings identified facilitators and barriers encountered when caring for a patient with ELDVs. Based on this, an initial set of recommendations for meaningful clinical engagement regarding ELDVs and initial operationalized definition has been proposed.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate and analyze the methodological quality of the published clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for perinatal bereavement care and provide a reference for implementing best clinical practices.
METHODS: We performed a systematic and comprehensive search in five electronic databases (PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, Wan Fang Database), eight guideline databases, and six websites of professional organizations from March 2021 to June 2021. Four researchers used the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) instrument to appraise the selected CPGs independently. The inter-rater reliability of AGREE II domains was calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient with 95% CI.
RESULTS: We included a total of 8 CPGs. The mean scores of six domains ranged from the lowest score of 46.61% (editorial independence) to the highest score of 87.85% (clarity of presentation). Subgroup analysis showed no statistical difference. Each domain achieved \"good\" and \"very good\" intraclass reliability. Two CPGs were deemed as grade A (strongly recommended), five were rated as grade B (recommended with modifications), and one was evaluated as grade C (not recommended).
CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare professionals in obstetrics and neonatology play an important role in helping bereaved parents and families to cope with perinatal loss. High-quality CPGs for perinatal bereavement care can serve as useful resources to improve the quality and outcomes of clinical practice. More efforts should be made to disseminate the best practices for perinatal bereavement care. When implementing GCPs in countries or regions with different backgrounds, professional translations, strict validations, and cultural adaptations should be taken into account.

Background: National clinical guidelines have been developed internationally to reduce variations in clinical practices and promote the quality of palliative care. In The Netherlands, there is considerable variability in the organisation and care processes of inpatient palliative care, with three types of hospices - Volunteer-Driven Hospices (VDH), Stand-Alone Hospices (SAH), and nursing home Hospice Units (HU). Aim: This study aims to examine clinical practices in palliative care through different hospice types and identify variations in care. Methods: Retrospective cohort study utilising clinical documentation review, including patients who received inpatient palliative care at 51 different hospices and died in 2017 or 2018. Care provision for each patient for the management of pain, delirium and palliative sedation were analysed according to the Dutch national guidelines. Results: 412 patients were included: 112 patients who received treatment for pain, 53 for delirium, and 116 patients underwent palliative sedation therapy. Care was provided in accordance with guidelines for pain in 32%, 61% and 47% (P = .047), delirium in 29%, 78% and 79% (P = .0016), and palliative sedation in 35%, 63% and 42% (P = .067) of patients who received care in VDHs, SAHs and HUs respectively. When all clinical practices were considered, patient care was conducted according to the guidelines for 33% of patients in VDHs, 65% in SAHs, and 50% in HUs (P < .001). Conclusions: The data demonstrate that care practices are not standardised throughout Dutch hospices and exhibit significant variations between type of hospice.

BACKGROUND: Palliative and hospice care facilities face different challenges emerging from the COVID-19 pandemic. In particular, this results from the high age and pre-existing diseases of patients as well as the physically close contact between staff and patients.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify existing strategies, guidelines and recommendations in Germany and other countries with respect to addressing the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic in palliative and hospice care.
METHODS: The databases PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science and PsycInfo were searched as part of a scoping review. Additionally, Google Search and Google Scholar were used to identify \"grey literature\". All German and English language articles related to inpatient palliative and hospice care were included which were published between January 2020 and August 2021.
RESULTS: A total of 51 publications were included in the analysis. The identified measures can be clustered into 10 different categories: infection control measures, structural measures, visiting regulations, communication structures, education and training, psychosocial support measures, specific considerations for people with dementia, advance care planning, farewell and measures after death.
CONCLUSIONS: With respect to addressing the COVID-19 pandemic, the primary focus is on measures to enable communication between patients, staff and relatives, psychosocial support measures, structural measures and recommendations for training and education of all stakeholders. Measures for the palliative care of people with dementia in times of a pandemic as well as the farewell and grief management of bereaved families received less attention.
UNASSIGNED: HINTERGRUND: Palliativ- und Hospizeinrichtungen sind durch die COVID-19-Pandemie besonderen Herausforderungen ausgesetzt. Gründe dafür sind insbesondere das hohe Alter und bestehende Vorerkrankungen der Patienten sowie ein körperlich naher Kontakt zwischen Mitarbeitern und Patienten.
UNASSIGNED: Ziel der vorliegenden Studie ist es, bestehende Strategien, Richtlinien und Empfehlungen zum Umgang mit den Herausforderungen der COVID-19-Pandemie in der Palliativ- und Hospizversorgung zu ermitteln, die in Deutschland und anderen Ländern zum Einsatz kommen.
METHODS: Im Rahmen eines Scoping Reviews wurden die Datenbanken PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science und PsycInfo durchsucht. Zusätzlich wurde „graue Literatur“ über Google Search und Google Scholar recherchiert. Eingeschlossen wurden alle deutsch- und englischsprachigen Artikel im Zeitraum Januar 2020 bis August 2021, die sich auf die stationäre Palliativ- und Hospizversorgung beziehen.
UNASSIGNED: Insgesamt wurden 51 Veröffentlichungen in die Analyse aufgenommen. Die identifizierten Maßnahmen lassen sich 10 verschiedenen Kategorien zuordnen: Maßnahmen zur Infektionskontrolle, strukturelle Maßnahmen, Besuchsregelungen, Kommunikationsstrukturen, Schulung und Aufklärung, psychosoziale Unterstützungsmaßnahmen, spezifische Überlegungen für Menschen mit Demenz, vorausschauende Pflegeplanung, Abschiednahme sowie Maßnahmen nach dem Tod.
CONCLUSIONS: Bei der Bewältigung der COVID-19-Pandemie dominieren insbesondere Maßnahmen zur Ermöglichung der Kommunikation zwischen Patienten, Mitarbeitern und Angehörigen, psychosoziale Unterstützungsmaßnahmen, strukturelle Maßnahmen und Empfehlungen zur Schulung und Aufklärung aller Beteiligten. Strategien zur Palliativversorgung von Menschen mit Demenz in Pandemiezeiten sowie zu Abschiednahme und Trauerbewältigung von Hinterbliebenen finden weniger Beachtung.

The purpose of this consensus paper was to convene leaders and scholars from eight Expert Panels of the American Academy of Nursing and provide recommendations to advance nursing\'s roles and responsibility to ensure universal access to palliative care. Part I of this consensus paper herein provides the rationale and background to support the policy, education, research, and clinical practice recommendations put forward in Part II. On behalf of the Academy, the evidence-based recommendations will guide nurses, policy makers, government representatives, professional associations, and interdisciplinary and community partners to integrate palliative nursing services across health and social care settings. The consensus paper\'s 43 authors represent eight countries (Australia, Canada, England, Kenya, Lebanon, Liberia, South Africa, United States of America) and extensive international health experience, thus providing a global context for the subject matter. The authors recommend greater investments in palliative nursing education and nurse-led research, nurse engagement in policy making, enhanced intersectoral partnerships with nursing, and an increased profile and visibility of palliative nurses worldwide. By enacting these recommendations, nurses working in all settings can assume leading roles in delivering high-quality palliative care globally, particularly for minoritized, marginalized, and other at-risk populations.

The \'2021 AAFP Feline Senior Care Guidelines\' are authored by a Task Force of experts in feline clinical medicine and serve as an update and extension of those published in 2009. They emphasize the individual patient evaluation and the process of aging, with references to other feline practice guidelines for a more complete discussion of specific diseases. Focusing on each cat encourages and empowers the owner to become a part of the cat\'s care every step of the way. A comprehensive discussion during the physical examination and history taking allows for tailoring the approach to both the cat and the family involved in the care. Videos and analysis of serial historical measurements are brought into the assessment of each patient. These Guidelines introduce the emerging concept of frailty, with a description and methods of its incorporation into the senior cat assessment. Minimum database diagnostics are discussed, along with recommendations for additional investigative considerations. For example, blood pressure assessment is included as a minimum diagnostic procedure in both apparently healthy and ill cats. Cats age at a much faster rate than humans, so practical timelines for testing frequency are included and suggest an increased frequency of diagnostics with advancing age. The importance of nutrition, as well as senior cat nutritional needs and deficiencies, is considered. Pain is highlighted as its own syndrome, with an emphasis on consideration in every senior cat. The Task Force discusses anesthesia, along with strategies to allow aging cats to be safely anesthetized well into their senior years. The medical concept of quality of life is addressed with the latest information available in veterinary medicine. This includes end of life considerations like palliative and hospice care, as well as recommendations on the establishment of \'budgets of care\', which greatly influence what can be done for the individual cat. Acknowledgement is given that each cat owner will be different in this regard; and establishing what is reasonable and practical for the individual owner is important. A discussion on euthanasia offers some recommendations to help the owner make a decision that reflects the best interests of the individual cat.

End-of-life communication in acute care settings can be challenging and many patients and families have reported low satisfaction with those conversations.
To explore existing guidelines around palliative care to increase current understanding of end-of-life communication processes applicable to the acute care setting.
A scoping review following the method of Arksey and O\'Malley was undertaken to identify eligible documents and thematically summarize findings. Web sites of government authorities, departments, and ministries of health as well as palliative care organizations were searched as were MEDLINE, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Joanna Briggs Institute, and PsycINFO databases. Searches were limited to documents published between January 2009 and August 2019 that were nondisease specific and applicable to the acute care setting.
Thirteen guidelines from nine different countries were identified. Thematic analysis produced eight themes: 1) The purpose and process of end-of-life communications, 2) cognitive understanding and language in end-of-life communication, 3) legal aspects of end-of-life communication, 4) conflicts and barriers related to end-of-life care, 5) end-of-life communication related to medical record documentation, 6) healthcare professionals\' responsibilities and collaboration, 7) education and training, and 8) policies, guidelines, and tools for end-of-life communications.
Palliative and end-of-life guidelines applicable to acute care settings outline the purpose of end-of-life communication and address how, when, and by whom such conversations are best initiated and facilitated. How guidelines are developed and what aspects of communications are included and emphasized may differ across countries related to role differences of physicians and nurses and national laws and regulations.

Integration of specialist palliative care into routine oncologic care improves patients\' quality of life and survival. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) cancer treatment guidelines are instrumental in standardizing cancer care, yet it is unclear how palliative and hospice care are integrated in these guidelines. In this study, we examined the frequency of occurrence of \"palliative care\" and \"hospice care\" in NCCN guidelines and compared between solid tumor and hematologic malignancy guidelines.
We reviewed all 53 updated NCCN Guidelines for Treatment of Cancer. We documented the frequency of occurrence of \"palliative care\" and \"hospice care,\" the definitions for these terms if available, and the recommended timing for these services.
We identified a total of 37 solid tumor and 16 hematologic malignancy guidelines. Palliative care was mentioned in 30 (57%) guidelines (24 solid tumor, 6 hematologic). Palliative care was mentioned more frequently in solid tumor than hematologic guidelines (median, 2 vs. 0; p = .04). Among the guidelines that included palliative care in the treatment recommendation, 25 (83%) only referred to NCCN palliative care guideline. Specialist palliative care referral was specifically mentioned in 5 of 30 (17%) guidelines. Only 14 of 24 (58%) solid tumor guidelines and 2 of 6 (33%) hematologic guidelines recommended palliative care in the front line setting for advanced malignancy. Few guidelines (n = 3/53, 6%) mentioned hospice care.
\"Palliative care\" was absent in almost half of NCCN cancer treatment guidelines and was rarely discussed in guidelines for hematologic malignancies. Our findings underscored opportunities to standardize timely palliative care access across NCCN guidelines.
Integration of specialist palliative care into routine oncologic care is associated with improved patient outcomes. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology have an important role to standardize palliative care involvement for cancer patients. It is unclear how often palliative care referral is recommended in these guidelines. In this study involving 53 NCCN Guidelines for Treatment of Cancer, the researchers found that palliative care was not mentioned in over 40% of NCCN guidelines and was rarely discussed in guidelines for hematologic malignancies. These findings underscored opportunities to standardize timely palliative care access across NCCN guidelines.