Heart rate

心率
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:三尖瓣反流(TR)是全球常见的瓣膜性心脏病,目前的TR治疗指南相对保守,以及有害的结果。据报道,窦性心律的恢复可改善房颤(AF)TR患者的TR严重程度。然而,相关研究有限。本荟萃分析的目的是评估房颤患者窦性心律恢复的临床结果。
    方法:在本研究中,PubMed,WebofScience,和Scopus数据库被搜索到2023年7月之前的研究登记。本研究是在系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目的指导下设计的。这些包含患者基线特征的研究,外科手术,纳入了至少一项临床结局.主要终点是窦性心律恢复后随访期间的TR等级。
    结果:在1074条记录中,6人报名。窦性心律的恢复与TR严重程度的降低相关(TR等级,比值比0.11,95%置信区间(CI):0.01至1.28,P=0.08,I2=83%;TR面积,平均差(MD)-2.19cm2,95%CI:-4.17至-0.21cm2,P=0.03,I2=96%)。此外,右心脏重塑,三尖瓣环直径显着减小(MD-0.36cm,95CI:-0.47至-0.26厘米,P<0.00001,I2=29%)和右心房体积指数(MD-11.10mL/m2,95CI:-16.81至-5.39mL/m2,P=0.0001,I2=79%)。
    结论:结论:心律控制治疗可降低房颤患者的TR严重程度,并与右心重构相关。
    BACKGROUND: Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a common valvular heart disease worldwide, and current guidelines for TR treatment are relatively conservative, as well as with detrimental outcomes. Restoration of sinus rhythm was reported to improve the TR severity in those TR patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, relevant research was limited. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of restoration of sinus rhythm in TR patients with AF.
    METHODS: In this study, PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were searched for study enrollment until July 2023. This study was designed under the guidance of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. These studies containing the patient\'s baseline characteristics, surgical procedure, and at least one of the clinical outcomes were included. The primary endpoint was TR grade during follow-up after restoration of sinus rhythm.
    RESULTS: Out of 1074 records, 6 were enrolled. Restoration of sinus rhythm is associated with a reduction of TR severity (TR grade, odds ratio 0.11, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.01 to 1.28, P = 0.08, I2 = 83%; TR area, mean difference (MD) -2.19 cm2, 95% CI: -4.17 to -0.21 cm2, P = 0.03, I2 = 96%). Additionally, remolding of right heart with a significant reduction of tricuspid valve annulus diameter (MD -0.36 cm, 95%CI: -0.47 to -0.26 cm, P < 0.00001, I2 = 29%) and right atrium volume index (MD -11.10 mL/m2, 95%CI: -16.81 to -5.39 mL/m2, P = 0.0001, I2 = 79%) was observed during follow-up.
    CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, rhythm-control therapy could reduce TR severity in AF patients with TR and is associated with right heart remodeling.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    在过去的十年中,足球和手球等流行运动的海滩变体在参与中有所增加。然而,与室内运动相比,沙滩运动的工作量需求特征仍然有限。本系统综述旨在:(1)表征海滩入侵体育比赛期间的内部和外部负荷;(2)确定用于监测的技术和指标;(3)比较室内运动的需求;(4)探索竞争水平的差异,年龄,性别,海滩运动15项研究最终符合纳入标准。机车的平均容量为929±269m(平均)和16.5±3.3km/h(峰值),每节加速度为368±103,跳跃为8±4。每届会议的影响接近700。心率达到每分钟166-192次(最大),强度为60-95%。玩家的负载为12.5±2.9至125±30个单位。男性的外部负荷比女性高10-15%,但内部负荷相等。早期的研究仅仅依赖于时间-运动分析,虽然最近的作品集成了电子性能和跟踪系统,实现更全面的量化。然而,大量的公制强度区变异性仍然存在。海滩运动需要间歇性的高强度活动和较低强度的恢复。尽管跑步量比室内运动稍低,但不稳定的表面可能解释了内部应变的增加。需要继续将技术与工作量强度区的标准化相结合,以提供针对海滩的培训处方。
    Beach variants of popular sports like soccer and handball have grown in participation over the last decade. However, the characterization of the workload demands in beach sports remains limited compared to their indoor equivalents. This systematic review aimed to: (1) characterize internal and external loads during beach invasion sports match-play; (2) identify technologies and metrics used for monitoring; (3) compare the demands of indoor sports; and (4) explore differences by competition level, age, sex, and beach sport. Fifteen studies ultimately met the inclusion criteria. The locomotive volumes averaged 929 ± 269 m (average) and 16.5 ± 3.3 km/h (peak) alongside 368 ± 103 accelerations and 8 ± 4 jumps per session. The impacts approached 700 per session. The heart rates reached 166-192 beats per minute (maximal) eliciting 60-95% intensity. The player load was 12.5 ± 2.9 to 125 ± 30 units. Males showed 10-15% higher external but equivalent internal loads versus females. Earlier studies relied solely on a time-motion analysis, while recent works integrate electronic performance and tracking systems, enabling a more holistic quantification. However, substantial metric intensity zone variability persists. Beach sports entail intermittent high-intensity activity with a lower-intensity recovery. Unstable surface likely explains the heightened internal strain despite moderately lower running volumes than indoor sports. The continued integration of technology together with the standardization of workload intensity zones is needed to inform a beach-specific training prescription.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    测量飞行员的心理工作量(MWL)对于提高航空安全至关重要。然而,MWL是一种多维结构,可能受到多种因素的影响。特别是,在更自动化的驾驶舱设置的背景下,传统的评估试点MWL的方法可能面临挑战。心率变异性(HRV)已成为在真实飞行操作中检测飞行员MWL的潜在工具。这篇综述旨在研究HRV与飞行员MWL之间的关系,并使用HRV参数评估基于机器学习的MWL检测系统的性能。根据严格的资格标准,从三个数据库中提取了29篇相关论文进行审查。我们在审查的研究中观察到显著的变异性,包括研究设计和测量方法,以及机器学习技术。在不同MWL水平下,飞行员之间的HRV测量差异观察到不一致的结果。此外,对于开发基于HRV的MWL检测系统的研究,我们检查了不同的模型设置,发现可以使用几种先进的技术来应对特定的挑战。这篇评论为有兴趣采用HRV指标评估MWL并希望将尖端技术纳入MWL测量方法的研究人员和从业人员提供了实用指南。
    Measuring pilot mental workload (MWL) is crucial for enhancing aviation safety. However, MWL is a multi-dimensional construct that could be affected by multiple factors. Particularly, in the context of a more automated cockpit setting, the traditional methods of assessing pilot MWL may face challenges. Heart rate variability (HRV) has emerged as a potential tool for detecting pilot MWL during real-flight operations. This review aims to investigate the relationship between HRV and pilot MWL and to assess the performance of machine-learning-based MWL detection systems using HRV parameters. A total of 29 relevant papers were extracted from three databases for review based on rigorous eligibility criteria. We observed significant variability across the reviewed studies, including study designs and measurement methods, as well as machine-learning techniques. Inconsistent results were observed regarding the differences in HRV measures between pilots under varying levels of MWL. Furthermore, for studies that developed HRV-based MWL detection systems, we examined the diverse model settings and discovered that several advanced techniques could be used to address specific challenges. This review serves as a practical guide for researchers and practitioners who are interested in employing HRV indicators for evaluating MWL and wish to incorporate cutting-edge techniques into their MWL measurement approaches.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:导管消融和抗心律失常药物治疗用于心房颤动(AF)的心律控制,但是它们的相对有效性,尤其是当代的治疗方式,仍然未定义。我们进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,对比了目前的消融技术和抗心律失常药物治疗房颤。
    方法:我们搜索了PubMed,Scopus,科克伦中部,和WebofScience直到2023年11月进行比较房颤导管消融与抗心律失常药物的随机试验,对抗单独的抗心律失常药物治疗,报告>6个月的结果。四名调查人员提取数据并用ROB2工具评估偏倚风险(ROB)。荟萃分析使用R软件估计合并的疗效和安全性结果。
    结果:12项试验(n=3977)符合纳入标准。导管消融术与较低的房颤复发相关(相对危险度(RR)=0.44,95CI(0.33,0.59),P<0.0001)和住院(RR=0.44,95CI(0.23,0.82),P=0.009)比抗心律失常药物。导管消融术还使身体生活质量部分评分(通过36项简短表格调查评估)提高了7.61分(95CI-0.70-15.92,P=0.07);但是,由于高度异质性,没有统计学意义。消融与更高的手术相关并发症显著相关[RR=15.70,95CI(4.53,54.38),P<0.0001]和心脏压塞[RR=9.22,95CI(2.16,39.40),P=0.0027]。两组的全因死亡率相似。
    结论:对于有症状的房颤,前期导管消融术比单纯继续药物治疗更能减少心律失常和住院,尽管有中度更多的不良事件。关于消融术的时机,需要谨慎的患者选择和风险收益评估。
    BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation and antiarrhythmic drug therapy are utilized for rhythm control in atrial fibrillation (AF), but their comparative effectiveness, especially with contemporary treatment modalities, remains undefined. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis contrasting current ablation techniques against antiarrhythmic medications for AF.
    METHODS: We searched PubMed, SCOPUS, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Web of Science until November 2023 for randomized trials comparing AF catheter ablation with antiarrhythmics, against antiarrhythmic drug therapy alone, reporting outcomes for > 6 months. Four investigators extracted data and appraised risk of bias (ROB) with ROB 2 tool. Meta-analyses estimated pooled efficacy and safety outcomes using R software.
    RESULTS: Twelve trials (n = 3977) met the inclusion criteria. Catheter ablation was associated with lower AF recurrence (relative risk (RR) = 0.44, 95%CI (0.33, 0.59), P ˂ 0.0001) and hospitalizations (RR = 0.44, 95%CI (0.23, 0.82), P = 0.009) than antiarrhythmic medications. Catheter ablation also improved the physical quality of life component score (assessed by a 36-item Short Form survey) by 7.61 points (95%CI -0.70-15.92, P = 0.07); but, due to high heterogeneity, it was not statistically significant. Ablation was significantly associated with higher procedural-related complications [RR = 15.70, 95%CI (4.53, 54.38), P < 0.0001] and cardiac tamponade [RR = 9.22, 95%CI (2.16, 39.40), P = 0.0027]. All-cause mortality was similar between the two groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: For symptomatic AF, upfront catheter ablation reduces arrhythmia and hospitalizations better than continued medical therapy alone, albeit with moderately more adverse events. Careful patient selection and risk-benefit assessment are warranted regarding the timing of ablation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    通过出生时采用的各种评估方法检查新生儿心率测量的速度和准确性。
    搜索Medline,Scopus,CINAHL和Cochrane于1946年1月1日至2023年8月16日进行。(CRD42021283364)研究选择基于预定标准。审稿人独立提取数据,评估偏倚风险并评估证据的确定性。
    在心率评估方面,脉搏血氧定量比ECG慢且精确度低。听诊和触诊对于心率评估都不精确。其他设备,如数字听诊器,多普勒超声,一种心电图装置,其使用的干电极结合在皮带上,在少数新生儿中研究了光电体积描记术和肌电图,并且没有接受复苏的极早产或心动过缓新生儿的数据。数字听诊器是快速和准确的。皮带中的多普勒超声和干电极心电图速度快,准确和精确相比,传统的心电图与凝胶粘合电极。
    对于大多数比较,证据的确定性很低或很低。
    如果资源允许,应在出生时使用ECG进行快速准确的心率评估。脉搏血氧饱和度和听诊可能是合理的选择,但有局限性。数字听诊器,多普勒超声和干电极心电图显示出希望,但需要进一步研究。
    UNASSIGNED: To examine speed and accuracy of newborn heart rate measurement by various assessment methods employed at birth.
    UNASSIGNED: A search of Medline, SCOPUS, CINAHL and Cochrane was conducted between January 1, 1946, to until August 16, 2023. (CRD 42021283364) Study selection was based on predetermined criteria. Reviewers independently extracted data, appraised risk of bias and assessed certainty of evidence.
    UNASSIGNED: Pulse oximetry is slower and less precise than ECG for heart rate assessment. Both auscultation and palpation are imprecise for heart rate assessment. Other devices such as digital stethoscope, Doppler ultrasound, an ECG device using dry electrodes incorporated in a belt, photoplethysmography and electromyography are studied in small numbers of newborns and data are not available for extremely preterm or bradycardic newborns receiving resuscitation. Digital stethoscope is fast and accurate. Doppler ultrasound and dry electrode ECG in a belt are fast, accurate and precise when compared to conventional ECG with gel adhesive electrodes.
    UNASSIGNED: Certainty of evidence was low or very low for most comparisons.
    UNASSIGNED: If resources permit, ECG should be used for fast and accurate heart rate assessment at birth. Pulse oximetry and auscultation may be reasonable alternatives but have limitations. Digital stethoscope, doppler ultrasound and dry electrode ECG show promise but need further study.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    非临床方法,如冥想,瑜伽,正念是许多教育机构采用的流行的传统治疗干预措施,以改善学习者的身心健康。这项研究旨在评估瑜伽干预在改善心肺参数如血压方面的有效性。心率,肺功能检查和心身症状,如抑郁症,医学和牙科学生的焦虑和压力。使用PRISMA协议,从PubMed等数据库中搜索,Scopus,Embase产生了304篇相关文章。筛选标题和摘要后,对47篇论文进行了全面分析,并纳入定性分析。纳入了18篇关于生理和心理参数统计数据一致的文章进行荟萃分析。与对照组相比,该研究表明收缩压显着降低(SBP:6.82mmHg,z=-3.06,p=0.002),舒张压(DBP:2.92mmHg,z=-2.22,p=0.03),和心率(HR:2.55次/分,z=-2.77,p=0.006)。此外,来自4项研究的数据显示,由于瑜伽干预,在标准化评估中,压力降低为0.77的显著总体效果(z=5.29,p<0.0001).最后,结果还显示,与对照组相比,干预组的标准化焦虑测试显着降低了1.2(z=-2.52,p=0.01)。这些发现为全球医学教育工作者提供了有希望的前景,鼓励他们考虑在医学课程中进行改革和决策,以提高学业上的成功并改善全球医学生的整体生活质量。
    Non-clinical approaches such as meditation, yoga, and mindfulness are popular traditional therapeutical interventions adopted by many educational institutions to improve the physical and mental well-being of learners. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of yoga intervention in improving cardiopulmonary parameters such as blood pressure, heart rate, pulmonary function tests and psychosomatic symptoms such as depression, anxiety and stress in medical and dental students. Using the PRISMA protocol, a search from databases such as PubMed, Scopus, and Embase resulted in 304 relevant articles. After screening the title and abstracts, 47 papers were analyzed thoroughly and included in the qualitative analysis. 18 articles with homogenous statistical data on physiology and psychological parameters were included for meta-analysis. In comparison to the control group, the study showed a significant reduction of systolic blood pressure (SBP: 6.82 mmHg, z = -3.06, p = 0.002), diastolic blood pressure (DBP: 2.92 mmHg, z = -2.22, p = 0.03), and heart rate (HR: 2.55 beats/min, z = -2.77, p = 0.006). Additionally, data from 4 studies yielded a significant overall effect of a stress reduction of 0.77 on standardized assessments due to the yoga intervention (z = 5.29, p < 0.0001). Lastly, the results also showed a significant (z = -2.52, p = 0.01) reduction of 1.2 in standardized anxiety tests in intervention group compared to the control. The findings offer promising prospects for medical educators globally, encouraging them to consider reformation and policymaking in medical curricula to enhance academic success and improve the overall quality of life for medical students worldwide.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在现代足球中,健身和疲劳监测工具往往侧重于非侵入性,时间效率和球员友好的措施。心率变异性(HRV)已被建议作为监测训练反应和准备执行的有效方法。然而,在足球方面,关于HRV监测仍然缺乏共识。因此,这项范围审查旨在绘制职业和半职业足球环境中HRV的现有证据,并确定知识差距,为未来的研究方向提供信息。数据库搜索(PubMed,Scopus,WebofScience,谷歌学者)根据PRISMA-ScR声明被采用。根据纳入标准筛选了研究的资格:(1)HRV是本文讨论的主题之一;(2)成年职业或半职业足球运动员参与了研究;(3)男性和女性参与者;(4)没有地理区域排除;(5)以英语发表的文章;(6)文章全文可用。对所选数据库的搜索显示了8456条记录。检索所有文章的标题和摘要,用于筛选资格,留下30篇文章供进一步审议。根据设定的标准进行筛查后,本综述共纳入25项研究,样本量为6~124名参与者.纳入研究的参与者是职业和半职业足球运动员,采访了俱乐部的工作人员,和实践者。与其他监测策略一起,通过(超)短期体位测量进行的早晨迷走神经介导的HRV分析可能是评估职业和半职业足球运动员的训练适应性和准备程度的有效方法。需要进一步研究以提出明确的建议。
    In modern soccer, fitness and fatigue monitoring tools tend to be focused on noninvasive, time-efficient and player-friendly measures. Heart rate variability (HRV) has been suggested as an effective method for monitoring training response and readiness to perform. However, there is still a lack of consensus on HRV monitoring when it comes to soccer. Thus, this scoping review aims to map existing evidence on HRV in professional and semiprofessional soccer settings, and to identify knowledge gaps to inform future research directions. A search of databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar) according to the PRISMA-ScR statement was employed. Studies were screened for eligibility on inclusion criteria: (1) HRV was among the topics discussed in the article; (2) adult professional or semiprofessional soccer players were involved in the study; (3) both male and female participants; (4) no geographical area exclusion; (5) articles published in English; and (6) article full text available. The search of the selected databases revealed 8456 records. The titles and abstracts of all articles were retrieved for screening of eligibility, leaving 30 articles for further consideration. Following screening against set criteria, a total of 25 studies were included in this review, the sample size of which ranged from 6 to 124 participants. The participants in the included studies were professional and semiprofessional soccer players, interviewed clubs staff, and practitioners. Along with other monitoring strategies, morning vagally mediated HRV analysis via (ultra)short-term orthostatic measurements may be an efficient way to assess training adaptations and readiness to perform in professional and semiprofessional soccer players. Further research is required to make definitive recommendations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目的:分析听觉刺激对听力正常和听力损失健康个体心率变异性(HRV)指数的影响,无论类型和/或等级,通过系统审查。
    方法:这是一项具有荟萃分析的系统评价,旨在解决以下问题:在听力正常和/或听力损失的健康个体中,与沉默相比,听觉刺激对HRV指数的影响是什么?我们咨询了Cochrane图书馆,Embase,LILACS,PubMed,WebofScience,和Scopus数据库和灰色文献(谷歌学者,OpenGrey,和ProQuest)。
    方法:对于发表的时间或语言没有限制。
    方法:我们确定了451条记录,灰色文献中的另外261个,以及通过参考文献搜索的五项研究,共产生717条记录,有171条重复的记录。在筛选了546项研究的标题和摘要后,我们排除了490项研究,并对56项研究进行了全面评估.
    结果:其中9项研究纳入了系统评价,其中8个适用于荟萃分析。
    结论:建议听觉刺激可能会影响RMSSD,pNN50,SDNN,听力正常的健康成人HRV的RRTri和SD2指数。
    OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effects of auditory stimulation on heart rate variability (HRV) indices in healthy individuals with normal hearing and with hearing loss, regardless of type and/or grade, by means of a systematic review.
    METHODS: This is a systematic review with a meta-analysis that addresses the following question: in healthy individuals with normal hearing and/or with hearing loss, what are the effects of auditory stimulation on HRV indices in comparison to silence? We consulted the Cochrane Library, Embase, LILACS, PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases and the gray literature (Google Scholar, OpenGrey, and ProQuest).
    METHODS: There were no restrictions as to period or language of publication.
    METHODS: We identified 451 records, an additional 261 in the gray literature, and five studies in a search through the references, resulting in a total of 717 records, with 171 duplicate records. After screening the titles and abstracts of 546 studies, we excluded 490 and considered 56 studies in full to assess their eligibility.
    RESULTS: Nine of these studies were included in the systematic review, eight of which were suitable for the meta-analysis.
    CONCLUSIONS: It is suggested that auditory stimulation may influence the RMSSD, pNN50, SDNN, RRTri and SD2 indices of HRV in healthy adults with normal hearing.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:鼻部手术,解决形式和功能的解剖学变化,需要仔细的麻醉管理,包括右美托咪定和瑞芬太尼。这项荟萃分析评估了它们在鼻手术中的安全性和有效性变化,强调患者的舒适度和最佳结果。
    方法:四个电子数据库(PubMed,Scopus,WebofScience,和CINAHLComplete)搜索英文记录。包括测量右美托咪定与瑞芬太尼对鼻腔手术患者的影响的研究。Cochrane协作工具用于评估纳入研究的质量。优选随机效应模型,并通过Stata软件版本17进行统计分析。
    结果:在最初的63篇文章中,本分析选择了5项研究.所有这些选择的研究都是随机对照试验(RCTs)。荟萃分析共涉及302名参与者,瑞芬太尼组152例,右美托咪定组150例。比较右美托咪定和瑞芬太尼对术中心率(HR)和平均动脉压(MAP)的影响。两组均表现出相似的MAP和HR,瑞芬太尼组在手术第15分钟时的HR略低(标准化平均差:-0.24[-0.83,0.34])。此外,在评估这些药物对术后结果的影响时,包括疼痛程度,使用止痛药,患者-外科医生满意度,躁动分数,和恢复时间,两种药物在这些方面均无显著差异.
    结论:总之,本研究比较了右美托咪定和瑞芬太尼在鼻部手术麻醉中的应用。在心率方面没有发现显著差异,血压,满意,疼痛,激动,或恢复时间。这项研究有局限性,未来的研究应该建立标准化的方案,并考虑各种手术因素。
    BACKGROUND: Nasal surgeries, addressing anatomical variations for form and function, require careful anesthesia administration, including dexmedetomidine and remifentanil. This meta-analysis evaluates their safety and efficacy variations in nasal surgeries, emphasizing patient comfort and optimal outcomes.
    METHODS: Four electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and CINAHL Complete) were searched for records in English. Studies that measure the effect of dexmedetomidine versus remifentanil on patients underwent nasal surgery were included. The Cochrane Collaboration\'s tool was used to assess the quality of the included studies. A random-effect model was preferred and statistical analysis was performed by Stata software version 17.
    RESULTS: Out of an initial pool of 63 articles, five studies were selected for this analysis. All of these chosen studies were Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs). The meta-analysis involved a total of 302 participants, with 152 in the remifentanil group and 150 in the dexmedetomidine group. The analysis aimed to compare the effects of Dexmedetomidine and Remifentanil on heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) during surgery. Both groups exhibited similar MAP and HR, with the exception of a slightly lower HR in the remifentanil group at the 15th minute of surgery (Standardized Mean Difference: -0.24 [-0.83, 0.34]). Furthermore, when evaluating the impact of these medications on post-surgery outcomes, including pain levels, the use of pain relief medications, patient-surgeon satisfaction, agitation scores, and recovery time, no significant differences were observed between the two medications in any of these aspects.
    CONCLUSIONS: In summary, the study compared Dexmedetomidine and Remifentanil in nasal surgeries anesthesia. No significant differences were found in heart rate, blood pressure, satisfaction, pain, agitation, or recovery time. The study had limitations, and future research should establish standardized protocols and consider various surgical factors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    脓毒性休克与全身炎症反应有关,血流动力学不稳定,受损的交感神经控制,以及需要血管加压药或正性肌力支持的多器官功能障碍的发展。脓毒症中免疫功能的调节是复杂的并且随时间变化。然而,激活β-2受体和阻断β-1受体通过影响细胞因子的产生来减少促炎反应。支持在脓毒性休克患者中同时使用超短β受体阻滞剂与促效药和血管加压药的证据仍然有限。本研究旨在评估超短β受体阻滞剂的使用及其对ICU相关结局如死亡率的影响。逗留时间,心率控制,冲击分辨率,和血管加压药/抗张剂要求。
    一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析,包括接受促效药和血管加压药的感染性休克危重患者。将接受肾上腺素或去甲肾上腺素而不使用β受体阻滞剂的患者“对照组”与接受超短β受体阻滞剂同时使用肾上腺素或去甲肾上腺素的患者“干预组”进行比较。MEDLINE和Embase数据库用于系统地搜索从开始到2023年10月10日在肾上腺素或去甲肾上腺素的危重病患者中使用超短β受体阻滞剂的研究。主要结果是28天死亡率。同时,逗留时间,心率控制,和肌力强剂/血管加压药要求被认为是次要结局.
    在47项潜在相关研究中,9人被纳入分析。与对照组相比,使用超短β受体阻滞剂并伴有肾上腺素或去甲肾上腺素的感染性休克患者的28天死亡风险较低(RR(95CI):0.69(0.53,0.89),I2=26%;P=0.24)。此外,β受体阻滞剂组的心率在统计学上显著低于对照组,标准化平均差(SMD)为-22.39(95%CI:-24.71,-20.06).住院时间的SMD和肌力要求在两组之间没有统计学差异(SMD(95CI):-0.57(-2.77,1.64),和SMD(95CI):0.08(-0.02,0.19),分别)。
    在感染性休克的危重患者中,与肾上腺素或去甲肾上腺素同时使用超短β受体阻滞剂与更好的心率控制和生存获益相关,而不增加强迫剂和血管加压药的需求。
    UNASSIGNED: Septic shock is associated with systemic inflammatory response, hemodynamic instability, impaired sympathetic control, and the development of multiorgan dysfunction that requires vasopressor or inotropic support. The regulation of immune function in sepsis is complex and varies over time. However, activating Beta-2 receptors and blocking Beta-1 receptors reduces the proinflammatory response by influencing cytokine production. Evidence that supports the concomitant use of ultra short beta-blockers with inotropes and vasopressors in patients with septic shock is still limited. This study aimed to evaluate the use of ultra short beta-blockers and its impact on the ICU related outcomes such as mortality, length of stay, heart rate control, shock resolution, and vasopressors/inotropes requirements.
    UNASSIGNED: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials including critically ill patients with septic shock who received inotropes and vasopressors. Patients who received either epinephrine or norepinephrine without beta-blockers \"control group\" were compared to patients who received ultra short beta-blockers concomitantly with either epinephrine or norepinephrine \"Intervention group\". MEDLINE and Embase databases were utilized to systematically search for studies investigating the use of ultra short beta-blockers in critically ill patients on either epinephrine or norepinephrine from inception to October 10, 2023. The primary outcome was the 28-day mortality. While, length of stay, heart rate control, and inotropes/ vasopressors requirements were considered secondary outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: Among 47 potentially relevant studies, nine were included in the analysis. The 28-day mortality risk was lower in patients with septic shock who used ultra short beta-blockers concomitantly with either epinephrine or norepinephrine compared with the control group (RR (95%CI): 0.69 (0.53, 0.89), I2=26%; P=0.24). In addition, heart rate was statistically significantly lower with a standardized mean difference (SMD) of -22.39 (95% CI: -24.71, -20.06) among the beta-blockers group than the control group. The SMD for hospital length of stay and the inotropes requirement were not statistically different between the two groups (SMD (95%CI): -0.57 (-2.77, 1.64), and SMD (95%CI): 0.08 (-0.02, 0.19), respectively).
    UNASSIGNED: The use of ultra short beta-blockers concomitantly with either epinephrine or norepinephrine in critically ill patients with septic shock was associated with better heart rate control and survival benefits without increment in the inotropes and vasopressors requirement.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号