■意大利最高法院2019年6月20日第38485号裁决,第三刑事部分,从法律的角度解决了远程医疗的非常敏感和新的问题。
■本评论涉及卫生当局授权远程医疗活动的问题,从意大利刑事最高法院开始,第三节,第38485/2019号决定。判例法探讨了健康点的授权,开展远程医疗服务。
■从意大利卫生法规讨论的角度出发,这篇论文探讨了如何定义健康法案,随着电信提供的可能性,以及它现在如何在法律上与它发生的物理位置相关。
■即使远程医疗为健康实践的虚拟空间开辟了道路,卫生部意大利指南提出了功能和后勤问题,以保证用户的安全和医疗保健系统的问责制。然后,健康合法实践的功能要求,以及他们的持续监控,连同服务中心的职责,卫生专业人员和卫生机构,正在讨论。
■对国家卫生法的质疑,在像欧洲这样广泛的卫生系统中,以自主健康法规为特征,对于远程医疗的跨境卫生政策极为重要,由于医疗保健的总体监管合规性是风险预防和患者安全的基本标准,以得到适当的验证。
UNASSIGNED: The ruling n. 38485, 20 June 2019, of the Italian Supreme Court, III criminal section, addressed by the perspective of the law the very sensitive and new issue of telemedicine.
UNASSIGNED: This commentary deals with the issue of authorization of telemedicine activities by the health authority, starting from the Italian Court of Criminal Cassation, III section, decision n. 38485/2019. The case law explored the authorization of a health point, which carries out telemedicine services.
UNASSIGNED: Starting from the perspective discussed by Italian health regulations, the paper examines how the health act could be defined, with the possibilities offered by telecommunications, and how it now relates legally to the physical place where it takes place.
UNASSIGNED: Even if telemedicine opens the way to virtual spaces of health practice, the Ministry of Health Italian Guidelines pose functional and logistical issues to guarantee users\' safety and health care system accountability. Then, functional requirements for health legitimate practice, and their continuous monitoring, together with the responsibilities of the service centers, health professionals and health facilities, are discussed.
UNASSIGNED: The questioning of States\' health law, in a broad health system such as that of the Europe, characterized by autonomous health regulations, is extremely important for cross-border health policy with telemedicine, as overall regulatory compliance in health care is the ground criterion for risk prevention and patient safety, to be properly verified.