HIV/AIDS and other retroviruses

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    组织胞浆菌病是一种真菌病,与晚期HIV病患者的高死亡率有关。我们的系统评价综合了HIV感染者中由组织胞浆引起的抗原尿症的全球患病率数据。我们搜索了PubMed/Medline,Embase,和Scopus数据库于2023年1月3日进行,以确定横断面和队列研究,评估HIV感染成人中组织血浆抗原尿的患病率。我们计算了点估计和95%CI来总结患病率。在筛选的1294项研究中,我们包括15个。我们发现581/5,096(11%;95%CI11%-12%)HIV感染者和483/3,789名晚期HIV疾病患者(13%;95%CI12%-14%)中存在组织血浆抗原尿症。在患有HIV且症状与组织胞浆菌病一致的人中,组织血浆抗原尿症患病率为14%(95%CI13%-15%;502/3,631名参与者)。我们确定患有晚期艾滋病毒的人,住院病人,和有症状的人可能会受益于使用尿液抗原检测早期检测组织胞浆菌病的系统方法。
    Histoplasmosis is a fungal disease associated with substantial mortality rates among persons with advanced HIV disease. Our systematic review synthesized data on the global prevalence of Histoplasma--caused antigenuria in persons with HIV. We searched PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Scopus databases on January 3, 2023, to identify cross-sectional and cohort studies evaluating Histoplasma antigenuria prevalence among adults with HIV infection. We calculated point estimates and 95% CIs to summarize prevalence. Of 1,294 studies screened, we included 15. We found Histoplasma antigenuria among 581/5,096 (11%; 95% CI 11%-12%) persons with HIV and 483/3,789 persons with advanced HIV disease (13%; 95% CI 12%-14%). Among persons with HIV and symptoms consistent with histoplasmosis, Histoplasma antigenuria prevalence was 14% (95% CI 13%-15%; 502/3,631 participants). We determined that persons with advanced HIV disease, inpatients, and symptomatic persons might benefit from a systematic approach to early detection of histoplasmosis using urine antigen testing.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    传染病的爆发与严重的耻辱有关,这可能对受影响的人和社区以及疫情控制产生负面影响。因此,在疫情爆发早期以标准化和有效的方式衡量污名对疾病控制至关重要。我们回顾了用于评估疫情期间污名的现有量表。我们的研究结果表明,已经开发了许多不同的尺度,但是很少有人不止一次地使用过,已经得到充分验证,或者已经在不同的疾病和地理环境中进行了测试。我们发现,量表通常在爆发初期发展太慢,无法提供信息,并且在第一例爆发后的中位数为2年。一个严格开发的,需要可转移的污名量表来评估和指导传染病暴发期间对污名的反应。
    Infectious disease outbreaks are associated with substantial stigma, which can have negative effects on affected persons and communities and on outbreak control. Thus, measuring stigma in a standardized and validated manner early in an outbreak is critical to disease control. We reviewed existing scales used to assess stigma during outbreaks. Our findings show that many different scales have been developed, but few have been used more than once, have been adequately validated, or have been tested in different disease and geographic contexts. We found that scales were usually developed too slowly to be informative early during an outbreak and were published a median of 2 years after the first case of an outbreak. A rigorously developed, transferable stigma scale is needed to assess and direct responses to stigma during infectious disease outbreaks.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号