BACKGROUND: In patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty (TJA), the administration of dexamethasone may contribute to perioperative blood glucose (BG) disturbances, potentially resulting in complications, even in patients without diabetes. This study aimed to demonstrate the impact of different administration regimens of dexamethasone in postoperative BG levels.
METHODS: In this randomized, controlled, double-blind trial, 136 patients without diabetes scheduled for TJA were randomly assigned to three groups: two perioperative saline injections (Group A, placebo); a single preoperative injection of 20 mg dexamethasone and a postoperative saline injection (Group B), and two perioperative injections of 10 mg dexamethasone (Group C). Primary outcomes were the postoperative fasting blood glucose (FBG) levels. Secondary outcome parameters were the postoperative postprandial blood glucose (PBG) levels. Postoperative complications within 90 days were also recorded. Risk factors for FBG ≥ 140 mg/dl and PBG ≥ 180 mg/dl were investigated.
RESULTS: Compared to Group A, there were transient increases in FBG and PBG on postoperative days (PODs) 0 and 1 in Groups B and C. Statistical differences in FBG and PBG among the three groups were nearly absent from POD 1 onward. Both dexamethasone regimens did not increase the risk for postoperative FBG ≥ 140 mg/dl or PBG ≥ 180 mg/dl. Elevated preoperative HbA1c levels may increase the risk of postoperative FBG ≥ 140 mg/dl or PBG ≥ 180 mg/dl, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative intravenous high-dose dexamethasone to patients without diabetes has transient effects on increasing BG levels after TJA. However, no differences were found between the split-dose and single high-dose regimens. The elevated preoperative HbA1c, but not the dexamethasone regimens were the risk factor for FBG ≥ 140 mg/dl and PBG ≥ 180 mg/dl.
BACKGROUND: Chinese Clinical Trail Registry, ChiCTR2300069473. Registered 17 March 2023, https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=186760 .

UNASSIGNED: Immune-related adverse events (IRAEs) during therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are common, and their management sometimes requires glucocorticoids (GCs). Predictors for development of IRAEs and data about the impact of GCs on clinical outcome are missing. We evaluated the impact of GCs to treat IRAEs on clinical outcome, and plasmatic inflammatory proteins as predictors for IRAEs.
UNASSIGNED: Patients with melanoma (n = 98) treated with ICIs at Karolinska University Hospital were included. Clinical information and data regarding prescription of systemic GCs were collected. Baseline plasma samples (n = 57) were analyzed for expression of 92 inflammatory proteins.
UNASSIGNED: Forty-four patients developed at least one IRAE requiring systemic GCs and the most common was hypocortisolemia (n = 11). A median overall survival of 72.8 months for patients developing IRAEs requiring GCs, 17.7 months for those who did not, and 1.4 months for individuals receiving GCs at baseline was observed in Kaplan-Meier curves (P = 0.001). In immortal time bias adjusted analysis, patients receiving steroids to treat IRAE survived slightly longer, even though this time trend was not statistically significant. The median overall survival was 29 months for those treated with GCs within 60 days after ICIs start and was not reached for patients receiving GCs later. The number of ICI cycles was higher in subjects receiving GCs after 60 days (P = 0.0053). Hypocortisolemia occurred mainly in males (10/11) and correlated with favorable outcome. Male patients with hypocortisolemia had lower expression of interleukin 8, transforming growth factor-α, and fibroblast growth factor 5 and higher expression of Delta/Notch-like epidermal growth factor-related receptor.
UNASSIGNED: GCs may be used to treat IRAEs without major concern. GCs early during ICIs may, however, impact clinical outcome negatively. The prognostic value of hypocortisolemia and inflammation proteins as biomarkers should be further investigated.

暂无摘要。

暂无摘要。

Medical treatment of coronavirus 19 disease (COVID-19) is a therapeutic challenge. The available data strongly suggest that calcifediol treatment may reduce the severity of COVID-19, and corticosteroids are the treatment of choice worldwide for severe COVID-19. Both have a very similar action profile, and their combined use in patients may modify the contribution of each administered compound.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate how treatment with calcifediol and/or corticosteroids in medical practice modified the need for ICU admission, death, or poor prognosis of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 during the first outbreaks.
METHODS: A retrospective observational cohort study of patients admitted for COVID-19 to the Pneumology Unit of the Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía (Córdoba, Spain).
METHODS: Patients were treated with calcifediol or/and corticosteroids with the best available therapy and standard care, according to clinical practice guidelines.
METHODS: Admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) or death during hospitalization and poor prognosis.
RESULTS: Seven hundred and twenty-eight patients were included. According to the treatment received, they were included in four groups: calcifediol (n = 68), glucocorticoids (n = 112), both (n = 510), or neither (n = 38). Of the 578 patients treated with calcifediol, 88 were admitted to the ICU (15%), while of the 150 not treated with calcifediol, 39 required ICU admission (26%) (p < 0.01). Among the patients taking calcifediol without glucocorticoids, only 4 of 68 (5.8%) required ICU admission, compared to 84 of 510 (16.5%) treated with both (p = 0.022). Of the 595 patients who had a good prognosis, 568 (82.01%) had received treatment with calcifediol versus the 133 patients with a poor prognosis, of whom 90 (67.66%) had received calcifediol (p < 0.001). This difference was not found for corticosteroids.
CONCLUSIONS: The treatment of choice for hospitalized patients with moderate or mild COVID-19 could be calcifediol, not administering corticosteroids, until the natural history of the disease reaches a stage of hyperinflammation.

BACKGROUND: Glucocorticoids (GCs) play a crucial role in the treatment of many rheumatic diseases regarding their anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effects. Inappropriate use of GCs can exacerbate GC-related problems besides complex treatment regimens and miscellaneous well-established adverse events. Although several guidelines exist for managing these problems, there is lack of real-life studies evaluating the problems at the patient level. This study aims to identify GC-related problems among patients with rheumatic diseases and address how they have been solved.
METHODS: This prospective follow-up study was conducted between January 2021 and June 2022 at a university rheumatology outpatient clinic and included patients using GCs. A clinical pharmacist assessed patients for possible GC-related problems at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. Identified problems, their causes, interventions to address these problems, and their outcomes were categorized using the Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe (PCNE v9.1) classification system. The resolution of the problems was evaluated at the patient\'s next follow-up visit.
RESULTS: A total of 156 patients were included, and 236 GC-related problems were identified in 66% of the patients. Adverse drug events (possible) accounted for the highest proportion of GC-related problems (94.1%), and the most common causes were lack of laboratory monitoring of GC-related adverse events (41.5%) and lack of drug treatment despite existing indications (39.8%). The median cumulative prednisolone dose was higher in patients with GC-related problems (3115 vs. 5455 mg, p = 0.007). The clinical pharmacist suggested 381 interventions: 47.7% (n = 182) at the \'prescriber level\', 31.8% (n = 121) at the \'patient level\', and 20.5% (n = 78) at the \'drug level\'. Of those interventions, 98% were accepted, and 80.1% of the problems were solved.
CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that the prevalence of GC-related problems is high in patients with rheumatic diseases. Integrating clinical pharmacists into the multidisciplinary rheumatology team provides an advantage in effectively identifying and managing GC-related problems at an early stage.

BACKGROUND: Macular edema (ME) is a common complication following branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) and is also the main reason for visual impairment. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) or dexamethasone implant (IDI) monotherapy, as well as the combination of IVR and IDI injections, in patients with ME secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).
METHODS: This multicenter, prospective, and comparative study included 292 patients with unilateral ME involvement (total of 292 eyes) secondary to BRVO. The patients were randomly assigned to three groups and followed up for 12 months. Patients in group 1 (n = 96) were treated with 3-dose loading IVR injections followed by a pro re nata (PRN) regimen. Patients in group 2 (n = 98) received IVR combined with IDI injection, followed by IVR PRN regimen. Patients in group 3 (n = 98) were treated with IDI injection, followed by repeated IDI injection based on clinical necessity. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), complications, and frequency of injections were recorded and compared between the three groups.
RESULTS: At baseline, the three groups did not differ in age, gender, duration of ME, BCVA, IOP, and CRT (P > 0.05). Mean number of total injections per eye within 12 months were 7.1 ± 2.3 (range 4-9) in group 1, 3.7 ± 1.5 (range 2-6) in group 2, and 1.8 ± 0.4 (range 1-3) in group 3. There was a statistical difference in the number of injections between group 1 and group 2 (P = 0.037). Eyes in group 3 received fewer injections than those in group 2, but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.052). BCVA improvement and CRT reduction were achieved in all groups and there was no significant difference between the three groups at the end of the 12th month. However, IOP elevation and cataract progression were more frequent in group 3, especially in those patients who received repeated IDI injections.
CONCLUSIONS: Three therapeutic regimens had comparable efficacy in treating ME secondary to BRVO. Combination therapy had an advantage in maintaining good effect with fewer re-injections and complications.
UNASSIGNED: The study complied with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by Xi\'an Aier Ancient City Eye Hospital, Xi\'an Aier Eye Hospital, and Xianyang Aier Eye Hospital ethics committees (2022SF-367).

BACKGROUND: Benign tracheal stenosis is relatively rare but remains a significant chronic disease due to its drastic symptoms including dyspnoea and inspiratory stridor, and consequent negative effect on quality of life. Traditionally, the surgical approach by resection of the stenotic tracheal segment has been the therapy of choice. However, endoscopic techniques have arisen and may offer a safe and less invasive alternative.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the retrospective study was to evaluate procedure-related safety and outcome of endoscopic treatment of benign tracheal stenosis at a single centre.
METHODS: The study included all patients at our institution who between 2013 and 2022 had received endoscopic treatment of benign tracheal stenosis by rigid tracheoscopy, radial incision by electric papillotomy needle and dilation (endoscopic tracheoplasty) followed by triamcinolone acetonide as a local submucosal injection and additionally, from 2020, budesonide inhalation.
RESULTS: A total of 22 patients were treated in a total of 38 interventions, each resulting in immediate improvement of symptoms. There were no peri-interventional complications or mortality. Of the 38 interventions, 11 received no triamcinolone acetonide administration, resulting in a 54.5% recurrence rate after an average of 21.1 (±18.0) months, while 27 had local triamcinolone acetonide, with a 37% recurrence rate. Since 2020, we additionally initiated post-interventional budesonide inhalation as recurrence prophylaxis for newly admitted patients and patients with recurrences(n = 8), of whom only one (12.5%) has to date experienced a recurrence.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that endoscopic tracheoplasty offers a safe and successful, minimally invasive alternative to open surgery for patients with benign tracheal stenosis. We recommend local administration of triamcinolone into the mucosa as an additional treatment to decrease the risk of recurrence. However, given the uncontrolled study design and low sample size, safety and effectiveness cannot be conclusively demonstrated. Nonetheless, our findings suggest promising avenues for further investigation. Further studies on the additional benefit of inhaled corticosteroids are warranted.

BACKGROUND: The modified Ponticelli regimen (mPR) is a first-line therapy in patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN); however, it has a less favorable safety profile. Though mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) + steroid (S) is not recommended by Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes guidelines, it can be used as an alternative to mPR due to higher tolerability and steroid-sparing effect. Thus, we compared the safety and effectiveness of MMF + S and mPR regimens in patients with IMN.
METHODS: This randomized, open-label study enrolled patients with adult-onset nephrotic syndrome (NS) and biopsy-proven IMN. Forty-two patients were allocated to MMF + S group (MMF 1 gm twice daily + oral prednisolone 0.5 mg/kg/day; n = 21) and mPR group [methylprednisolone (1 gm intravenous) for 3 days followed by alternating monthly cycles of oral prednisolone (0.5 mg/kg/day) for the next 27 days and cyclophosphamide (2 mg/kg/day) for 6 months; n = 21]. The primary outcome measure was change in urinary protein creatinine ratio (UPCR).
RESULTS: At 6 months, both groups demonstrated a significant increase in serum albumin levels and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (both p-values <0.0001) as well as a decrease in 24-hour proteinuria (MMF + S group: p-value = 0.003, and mPR group: p-value <0.0001) and UPCR (both p-values <0.0001). However, the groups did not differ in any of these parameters at any of the monthly follow-up visits. Moreover, the groups did not differ significantly in terms of the composite remission rates (61.91% for MMF + S group and 71.43% for mPR group).
CONCLUSIONS: MMF + S and mPR had comparable tolerability and effectiveness, with MMF-associated advantage of reduced steroid exposure.

BACKGROUND: Prenatal exposure to supraphysiological glucocorticoid (GC) levels may lead to long-lasting developmental changes in numerous biological systems. Our prior study identified an association between prenatal GC prophylaxis and reduced cognitive performance, electrocortical changes, and altered autonomic nervous system (ANS) activity in children aged 8-9 years. This follow-up study aimed to examine whether these findings persisted into adolescence.
METHODS: Prospective observational follow-up study involving twenty-one 14- to 15-year-old adolescents born to mothers who received betamethasone for induction of fetal lung maturation in threatened preterm birth, but who were born with a normal weight appropriate for their gestational age (median 37+4 gestational weeks). Thirty-five children not exposed to betamethasone served as the reference group (median 37+6 gestational weeks). The primary endpoint was cognitive performance, measured by intelligence quotient (IQ). Key secondary endpoints included symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and metabolic markers. Additionally, we determined electrocortical (electroencephalogram), hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis (HPAA), and ANS activity in response to a standardized stress paradigm.
RESULTS: No statistically significant group difference was observed in global IQ (adjusted mean: betamethasone 103.9 versus references 105.9, mean difference -2.0, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -7.12 to 3.12, p = 0.44). Similarly, ADHD symptoms, metabolic markers, the overall and stress-induced activity of the HPAA and the ANS did not differ significantly between groups. However, the betamethasone group exhibited reduced electrocortical activity in the frontal brain region (spectral edge frequency-adjusted means: 16.0 Hz versus 17.8 Hz, mean difference -1.83 Hz, 95% CI: -3.21 to -0.45, p = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: In 14- to 15-year-old adolescents, prenatal GC exposure was not associated with differences in IQ scores or ANS activity compared to unexposed controls. However, decelerated electrocortical activity in the frontal region potentially reflects disturbances in the maturation of cortical and/or subcortical brain structures. The clinical significance of these changes remains unknown. Given the small sample size, selective participation/loss of follow-up and potential residual confounding, these findings should be interpreted cautiously. Further research is required to replicate these results in larger cohorts before drawing firm clinical conclusions.