Frozen embryo transfer

冷冻胚胎移植
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在诊断为子宫腺肌病的女性中,功能失调的子宫蠕动似乎在阻碍胚胎植入中起关键作用。这项研究旨在调查在使用激素替代疗法(HRT)方案的冷冻胚胎移植(FET)周期中施用催产素受体拮抗剂是否可以增强受子宫腺肌病影响的不育妇女的体外受精(IVF)结局。
    方法:在2018年1月至2022年6月之间,我们的生殖中心对诊断为子宫腺肌病的不孕妇女进行了IVF-FETHRT周期。采用倾向评分匹配以1:1的比例在两组之间选择匹配的受试者。在此之后,168名妇女在FET期间接受了催产素受体拮抗剂,组成研究小组,而匹配的168名女性在没有这种拮抗剂的情况下接受了FET,形成对照组。我们对两组的基线和周期特征进行了比较分析,以及其他亚组分析。
    结果:研究组早期流产率明显低于对照组,尽管临床妊娠率没有显着差异,持续怀孕率,两组之间的活产率。多因素分析显示,子宫腺肌病妇女使用催产素受体拮抗剂与早期流产率呈负相关。亚组分析,按年龄分类,不孕症类型,胚胎移植日,在特定亚组中,早期流产率大幅下降:年龄≥37岁的女性,那些患有继发性不孕症的人,与对照组相比,研究组中进行第3天胚胎移植的个体。此外,基于子宫腺肌病类型的亚组分析表明,临床妊娠率明显更高,在弥漫性子宫腺肌病妇女中,研究组的持续妊娠率和活产率与对照组相比。
    结论:FET期间给予催产素受体拮抗剂可降低子宫腺肌病女性的早期流产率。
    BACKGROUND: Dysfunctional uterine peristalsis seems to play a pivotal role in hindering embryo implantation among women diagnosed with adenomyosis. This research aims to investigate whether administering an oxytocin receptor antagonist during a frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycle using a hormone replacement therapy (HRT) protocol can enhance in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes for infertile women affected by adenomyosis.
    METHODS: Between January 2018 and June 2022, our reproductive center conducted IVF-FET HRT cycles for infertile women diagnosed with adenomyosis. Propensity score matching was employed to select matched subjects between the two groups in a 1:1 ratio. Following this, 168 women received an oxytocin receptor antagonist during FET, constituting the study group, while the matched 168 women underwent FET without this antagonist, forming the control group. We conducted comparative analyses of baseline and cycle characteristics between the two groups, along with additional subgroup analyses.
    RESULTS: The study group exhibited notably lower rates of early miscarriage compared to the control group, although there were no significant differences in clinical pregnancy rates, ongoing pregnancy rates, and live birth rates between the two groups. Multivariate analysis revealed a negative correlation between the use of oxytocin receptor antagonists and early miscarriage rates in women with adenomyosis. Subgroup analyses, categorized by age, infertility types, and embryo transfer day, showed a substantial decrease in early miscarriage rates within specific subgroups: women aged ≥ 37 years, those with secondary infertility, and individuals undergoing day 3 embryo transfers in the study group compared to the control group. Furthermore, subgroup analysis based on adenomyosis types indicated significantly higher clinical pregnancy rates, ongoing pregnancy rates and live birth rates in the study group compared to the control group among women with diffuse adenomyosis.
    CONCLUSIONS: Administering an oxytocin receptor antagonist during FET may reduce the early miscarriage rates in women with adenomyosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:在单整倍体冷冻胚胎移植(FET)中,女性年龄是持续妊娠可能性的重要因素吗?
    方法:对1464名妇女的1923个单整倍体FET周期进行回顾性研究,无论是在自然周期或激素替代疗法周期。主要结果是持续妊娠率(OPR)。
    结果:在1923年中,有990(51.48%)正在进行的怀孕包括转移。OPR为51.4%,49.1%,53.3%和52.3%的女性年龄≤35岁,>35-≤37岁,>37-≤40岁和>40岁取卵(OCR),OPR下降趋势不显著(P=0.679)。两组之间在胚胎移植时的女性年龄(P=0.609)和OCR时的女性年龄(P=0.816)之间没有显着差异(持续怀孕与未怀孕或流产)。接受优质胚胎的女性(P<0.001),体重指数(BMI)较低(P<0.001),以前至少怀孕过一次(P<0.001),并且进行自然周期子宫内膜准备(P<0.001)更有可能实现持续妊娠。多变量回归分析(针对BMI进行调整,胚胎质量和子宫内膜准备)未显示OCR时女性年龄对实现持续妊娠的显着影响。与≤35岁的女性相比,没有一个年龄组的OPR显著升高或降低.多项回归分析表明,BMI,胚胎质量和子宫内膜准备与流产/未妊娠和持续妊娠相关(P分别为0.001,0.001和0.001).女性年龄与两种结果均无显著关联。
    结论:女性年龄本身对单个整倍体FET循环中的OPR没有实质性影响,但是OPR受胚胎质量的影响很大,BMI,先前的奇偶校验,和自然周期子宫内膜制备方案。
    OBJECTIVE: Is female age a significant factor in the likelihood of an ongoing pregnancy in single euploid frozen embryo transfers (FET)?
    METHODS: Retrospective study of 1923 single euploid FET cycles in 1464 women, either in a natural cycle or a hormone replacement therapy cycle. The primary outcome was the ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR).
    RESULTS: There were 990 (51.48%) ongoing pregnancies among 1923 included transfers. The OPR were 51.4%, 49.1%, 53.3% and 52.3% for women aged ≤35, >35-≤37, >37-≤40 and >40 years at oocyte retrieval (OCR), without a significant trend for decreasing OPR (P = 0.679). No significant differences in female age at embryo transfer (P = 0.609) and female age at OCR (P = 0.816) were found between the groups (ongoing pregnancy versus no pregnancy or miscarriage). Women who received good-quality embryos (P < 0.001), had a lower body mass index (BMI) (P < 0.001), had achieved at least one pregnancy previously (P < 0.001), and underwent natural cycle endometrial preparation (P < 0.001) were more likely to achieve an ongoing pregnancy. Multivariable regression analysis (adjusted for BMI, embryo quality and endometrial preparation) did not show a significant effect of female age at OCR on achieving an ongoing pregnancy. Compared with women aged ≤35 years, none of the age groups had significantly higher or lower OPR. A multinomial regression analysis showed that BMI, embryo quality and endometrial preparation were associated with miscarriage/no pregnancy versus ongoing pregnancy (P = 0.001, 0.001 and 0.001, respectively). Female age had no significant association with either outcome.
    CONCLUSIONS: Female age in itself does not have a substantial impact on the OPR in single euploid FET cycles, but the OPR is impacted significantly by embryo quality, BMI, previous parity, and a natural cycle endometrial preparation protocol.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究旨在确定与每日肌内孕酮(IM)相比,在程序化冷冻胚胎移植(FET)中每三天使用阴道Endometin加肌内孕酮(VIM)是否与较低的妊娠和活产率相关。单一项目的FET数据是在2018年11月至2021年12月之间收集的。总共分析了903个FET,包括IM组中的504个FET,VIM组中的399个FET。纳入标准是接受FET的女性,每天仅50mgIM孕酮(对照)或每天两次200mgEndometry,每三天一次加上50mgIM孕酮。与转移一个单一的一天5或6冷冻胚胎。在使用FET时,患者年龄没有显着差异,BMI,子宫内膜厚度,囊胚质量,或组间不孕症诊断。与IM相比,VIM的hCG阳性和临床妊娠率显着降低(60.2%vs72.0%和40.6%vs56.7%,分别,P=0.0002和P<0.0001)。VIM的活产率为36.1%,与IM的49.4%相比(P<0.0001)。当排除带有供体卵的FET时,这些发现也仍然显着(35.9%vs50.1%,P<0.0001)。这项研究表明,与IM相比,FET周期中的VIM产生的妊娠和活产率显着降低。在接受程序化冷冻胚胎移植的患者中,单独使用IM孕酮可能优于Endometin和IM孕酮的组合。
    This study aimed to determine whether the use of vaginal Endometrin plus intramuscular progesterone on every third day (VIM) in programmed frozen embryo transfer (FET) is associated with lower pregnancy and live birth rates compared to daily intramuscular progesterone (IM). FET data from a single program were collected between November 2018 and December 2021. A total of 903 FETs were analyzed, including 504 FETs in the IM group, and 399 FETs in the VIM group. Inclusion criteria were women undergoing FETs with either 50 mg daily IM progesterone only (control) or 200 mg Endometrin twice daily plus 50 mg IM progesterone on every third day, with the transfer of a single day 5 or 6 frozen embryo. There were no significant differences in patient age at time of FETs, BMI, endometrial thickness, blastocyst quality, or infertility diagnosis between the groups. The VIM had significantly lower positive hCG and clinical pregnancy rates compared to the IM (60.2% vs 72.0% and 40.6% vs 56.7%, respectively, P = 0.0002 and P < 0.0001). The live birth rate was 36.1% in the VIM, compared to 49.4% in the IM (P < 0.0001). These findings also remained significant when excluding FETs with donor egg (35.9% vs 50.1%, P < 0.0001). This study demonstrated that VIM in FET cycles yields significantly lower pregnancy and live birth rates compared to IM along. IM progesterone alone may be preferable to combined Endometrin and IM progesterone in patients undergoing programmed frozen embryo transfers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:主要目的是研究没有黄体的冷冻胚胎移植(FET)是否会增加妊娠高血压疾病(HDP)的风险。次要目的是调查其他不良的孕产妇和围产期结局。
    方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,在2012年至2020年期间,采用人工周期(AC-FET)(n=631)或自然/改良的自然/刺激周期(CL-FET)(n=537)进行FET后,对1168例单胎妊娠和活产进行了回顾性队列研究。数据收集自患者记录。主要结果是HDP。次要结果包括剖宫产,胎盘滞留问题,产后出血(PPH),怀孕的持续时间,出生体重,低出生体重,巨大儿,妊娠的长度,早产,小于胎龄,和大的胎龄。
    结果:在AC-FET组中,先兆子痫的发病率增加,妊娠期高血压,剖宫产,PPH超过500和1000毫升,保留胎盘组织,与CL-FET组相比。这些关联在具有临床相关调整的逻辑回归分析中仍然显著。
    结论:与CL-FET相比,AC-FET后发生HDP和其他一些母体并发症的风险似乎增加。我们的研究结果支持大多数早期关于HDP的研究,并增加了关于AC-FET涉及的其他孕产妇和围产期风险的知识,包括轻度胎盘滞留的风险增加。需要更多的研究来证实这些发现。
    OBJECTIVE: The primary aim was to investigate if frozen embryo transfer (FET) without a corpus luteum increases the risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP). The secondary aim was to investigate other adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes.
    METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of 1168 singleton pregnancies and live births following a FET with either an artificial cycle (AC-FET) (n = 631) or a natural/modified natural/stimulated cycle (CL-FET) (n = 537) between 2012 and 2020. The data were collected from patient records. The primary outcome was HDP. Secondary outcomes included cesarean sections, placental retention problems, postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), the duration of pregnancy, birth weight, low birth weight, macrosomia, length of gestation, preterm birth, small for gestational age, and large for gestational age.
    RESULTS: In the AC-FET group, there was an increased incidence of pre-eclampsia, gestational hypertension, cesarean sections, PPH over 500 and 1000 mL, and retained placental tissue, compared with the CL-FET group. These associations remained significant in logistic regression analyses with clinically relevant adjustments.
    CONCLUSIONS: The risk of HDP and several other maternal complications seems to be increased after AC-FET compared with CL-FET. Our findings support most earlier studies regarding HDP and add to the knowledge on other maternal and perinatal risks involved in AC-FET, including an increased risk of milder forms of placental retention. More studies are needed to confirm these findings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:人工周期(AC)冷冻胚胎移植(FET)中缺乏黄体可能会增加妊娠丢失的机会。在这项回顾性队列研究中,就持续妊娠而言,比较AC子宫内膜制备的疗效与自然周期(NC)子宫内膜制备的疗效.
    方法:包括在2021年12月至2022年11月之间进行的一千六百十八个连续的玻璃化温热胚泡FET,根据子宫内膜制备方法排除后与1023进行比较;293NC-FET,143修改的NC-FET,204未编程的AC-FET,和383口服避孕药(OCP)编程的AC-FET。在NC-(人绒毛膜促性腺激素和微粉化的阴道孕酮)中给予强化方法特异性黄体期支持(LPS),mNC-(微粉化阴道孕酮),和AC-FET(微粉化阴道孕酮,肌内孕酮,和口服地屈孕酮)。
    结果:临床医师对子宫内膜制备方法的选择导致NC-或AC-FET组有明显的差异,女性年龄,窦卵泡计数和体重指数以及DOR或PCOS诊断患者的百分比差异显著。NC-的未调整的持续妊娠和总妊娠损失率,mNC-,AC-,ocp-AC-FET为61.8%,55.2%,57.4%,和58.5%,和19.2%,24.0%,23.5%和23.8%,分别。在多变量逻辑回归中,预测持续妊娠和总妊娠丢失的依赖性结果,没有任何FET方法被选作独立预测因子.
    结论:接受NC-和AC-FET与方法特异性孕酮LPS的患者具有相当的持续妊娠率以及总妊娠损失率,NC-FET在回归分析中排名第一。
    OBJECTIVE: The absence of corpus lutea in artificial cycle (AC) frozen embryo transfers (FET) may increase the chances of pregnancy loss. In this retrospective cohort study, the efficacy of AC endometrial preparation was compared natural cycle (NC) endometrial preparation in terms of ongoing pregnancy.
    METHODS: One thousand six hundred and eighteen consecutive vitrified-warmed blastocyst FET performed between December 2021 and November 2022 were included, with 1023 compared after exclusions according to the endometrial preparation method; 293 NC-FET, 143 modified NC-FET, 204 unprogrammed AC-FET, and 383 oral contraceptive pill (OCP) programmed AC-FET. Intensive method-specific luteal phase support (LPS) was administered in NC- (human chorionic gonadotropin and micronized vaginal progesterone), mNC- (micronized vaginal progesterone), and in AC-FET (micronized vaginal progesterone, intramuscular progesterone, and oral dydrogesterone).
    RESULTS: Clinician choice of endometrial preparation method resulted in the NC- or AC-FET groups having distinct differences, with female age, antral follicle count and body mass index as well as the percentage of DOR or PCOS diagnosed patients significantly different. The unadjusted ongoing pregnancy and total pregnancy loss rates for NC-, mNC-, AC-, and ocp-AC-FET were 61.8 %, 55.2 %, 57.4 %, and 58.5 %, and 19.2 %, 24.0 %, 23.5 % and 23.8 %, respectively. In multivariate logistic regressions to predict the dependent outcomes of ongoing pregnancy and total pregnancy loss, none of the FET methods were selected as independent predictors.
    CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing NC- and AC-FET with method-specific progesterone LPS had comparable ongoing pregnancy rates as well as total pregnancy loss rates, with NC-FET ranked first in the regression analysis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:ART后出生的儿童患1型糖尿病(DM1)的风险是否高于未接受ART的儿童?
    结论:接受和未接受ART的儿童患DM1的风险相似,根据生育治疗方法,风险没有明显差异。
    背景:ART与不良围产期结局的高风险相关,风险取决于ART的方法。健康与疾病理论的发展起源提出,产前压力会引起内分泌过程的变化,从而影响以后的健康。
    进行了一项基于北欧注册的队列研究,包括在丹麦出生的所有儿童(1994-2014年出生),芬兰(1990-2014),挪威(1984-2015)。该研究包括在ART后出生的76.184例出生的单胎和在没有ART的情况下出生的4.403.419例。ART和非ART组的中位随访时间分别为8.3年和13.7年,分别。
    方法:队列,由北欧辅助生殖技术和安全委员会(CoNARTaS)发起,是通过将医疗出生登记处的国家登记数据和北欧国家的国家患者登记处联系起来建立的。我们对1984-1990年、1991-1995年、1996-2000年、2001-2005年、2006-2010年和2011-2015年的出生年份进行了多变量逻辑回归分析,同时调整了每个间隔内的出生年份,孩子的性别,奇偶校验,产妇年龄,母体糖尿病,和孕妇在怀孕期间吸烟是潜在的混杂因素。
    结果:随访期间,在ART后出生的259例(3.4‰)儿童被诊断为DM1,而没有ART出生的22.209例(5.0‰)就是这种情况,对应于0.98的调整后比值比(95%CI:0.861.11)。在不同的出生年份间隔内,两组的DM1风险没有显著差异,除了2011-2015年出生的最年轻儿童队列外,ART与DM1的高风险相关.当比较IVF与ICSI或新鲜与冷冻胚胎移植后出生的儿童时,我们发现DM1的风险没有显着差异。但每组病例很少。
    结论:该研究的主要局限性是随访时间相对较短。DM1的发病率在10-14岁期间达到峰值,因此,更长的随访将有利于所有分析,特别是,分组分析。
    结论:总体而言,我们的研究结果令人放心,特别是考虑到通过ART出生的儿童数量的增加以及全球DM1发病率的增加.
    背景:这项北欧注册研究得到了北欧试验联盟/NORDFORSK和Rigshospitalets研究基金会的支持。资金来源在研究设计中没有作用;在收集中,分析,和数据的解释;在撰写报告时;以及提交该文章发表的决定。没有任何作者对这项研究有任何利益冲突。
    背景:ISRCTN11780826。
    OBJECTIVE: Do children born after ART have a higher risk of developing Type 1 diabetes (DM1) than children conceived without ART?
    CONCLUSIONS: The risk of DM1 was similar for children conceived with and without ART, and there were no clear differences in risk according to method of fertility treatment.
    BACKGROUND: ART is associated with a higher risk of adverse perinatal outcomes, and the risk depends on the method of ART. The Developmental Origins of Health and Disease theory proposes that prenatal stress can provoke changes in endocrine processes which impact health later in life.
    UNASSIGNED: A Nordic register-based cohort study was carried out, including all children born in Denmark (birth years 1994-2014), Finland (1990-2014), and Norway (1984-2015). The study included 76 184 liveborn singletons born after ART and 4 403 419 born without ART. Median follow-up was 8.3 and 13.7 years in the ART and non-ART group, respectively.
    METHODS: The cohort, initiated by the Committee of Nordic Assisted Reproductive Technology and Safety (CoNARTaS), was established by linking national registry data from the medical birth registries and national patient registries available in the Nordic countries. We performed multivariable logistic regression analyses for the birth year intervals 1984-1990, 1991-1995, 1996-2000, 2001-2005, 2006-2010, and 2011-2015, while adjusting for year of birth within each interval, sex of the child, parity, maternal age, maternal diabetes, and maternal smoking during pregnancy as potential confounders.
    RESULTS: During follow-up, 259 (3.4‰) children born after ART were diagnosed with DM1, while this was the case for 22 209 (5.0‰) born without ART, corresponding to an adjusted odds ratio of 0.98 (95% CI: 0.861.11). Within the different birth year intervals, no significant difference in risk of DM1 between the two groups was found, except for the youngest cohort of children born 2011-2015 where ART was associated with a higher risk of DM1. We found no significant differences in risk of DM1 when comparing children born after IVF versus ICSI or fresh versus frozen embryo transfer, but with only few cases in each group.
    CONCLUSIONS: The main limitation of the study is the relatively short follow-up time. The incidence rate of DM1 peaks during ages 10-14 years, hence a longer follow-up would benefit all analyses and, in particular, the subgroup analyses.
    CONCLUSIONS: Overall, our findings are reassuring especially considering the concomitantly increasing number of children born from ART and the increasing incidence of DM1 globally.
    BACKGROUND: This Nordic registry study has been supported by the Nordic Trial Alliance/NORDFORSK and Rigshospitalets Research Foundation. The funding sources had no role in study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the article for publication. None of the authors has any conflicts of interest to declare regarding this study.
    BACKGROUND: ISRCTN11780826.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 在使用冷冻供体卵母细胞的患者中,接受新鲜胚胎移植的受者与使用同胞卵母细胞进行冷冻保存-解冻胚胎移植的受者相比,妊娠结局具有可比性.
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    在ART治疗中,卵巢刺激期间卵泡晚期孕酮升高(LFPE)对生殖结局的影响仍存在争议,但是最近的研究表明,孕酮水平升高,怀孕率降低。这项研究旨在调查晚期卵泡期孕酮升高(LFPE)的患病率,以及在一项随机对照试验的子研究中,新鲜或冷冻胚泡移植后对持续妊娠率的可能影响。共纳入288名女性(新鲜转移和冷冻-全部组n=137和n=151,分别)。在这11人(3.8%)中,孕酮水平≥1.5ng/ml,和20(6.9%)在触发日的孕酮水平≥1.2ng/ml。样条回归分析表明,晚期卵泡期孕酮水平对持续妊娠没有显着影响。在多元回归分析(n=312)中,只有年龄,但触发日的孕酮水平与持续妊娠无显著相关性.总之,在具有中度促性腺激素刺激和明确触发和新鲜转移取消标准的临床环境中,LFPE≥1.5ng/ml女性的患病率较低,且未显示卵泡晚期常规孕酮测定的临床价值.
    The effect of late-follicular phase progesterone elevation (LFPE) during ovarian stimulation on reproductive outcomes in ART treatment remains controversial, but recent studies indicate lower pregnancy rates with rising progesterone levels. This study aims to investigate the prevalence of late-follicular phase progesterone elevation (LFPE) and possible impact on ongoing pregnancy rate after fresh or frozen blastocyst transfer in a sub-study setting of a randomised controlled trial. A total of 288 women were included (n=137 and n=151 in the fresh transfer and freeze-all group, respectively). Among these 11(3.8%) had a progesterone level ≥1.5 ng/ml, and 20(6.9%) had a progesterone level ≥1.2 ng/ml on trigger day. Spline regression analysis showed no significant effect of late follicular phase progesterone levels on ongoing pregnancy. In the multivariate regression analysis (n = 312) only age, but not progesterone level on trigger day was significantly associated with ongoing pregnancy. In conclusion, in a clinical setting with moderate gonadotrophin stimulation and well-defined trigger and fresh transfer cancellation criteria, the prevalence of women with LFPE ≥1.5 ng/ml was low and did not indicate the clinical value of routine measurement of progesterone in the late follicular phase.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:研究黄体中期血清孕酮(P4)水平最佳的患者在激素替代疗法FET周期中,黄体中期血清雌二醇(E2)水平是否与活产率相关。
    方法:2020年1月至2022年11月对412名接受激素替代疗法FET单囊胚移植的女性进行观察性前瞻性队列研究。
    方法:激素替代疗法FET启动方案包括晚上口服雌二醇(6mg/24h),其次是阴道孕酮(400mg/12h)。以标准化方式测量血清E2和P4水平,在最近一次孕酮给药后2-4小时和在胚泡移植当天雌二醇给药后9-14小时,孕酮给药的第6天。血清P4<11ng/mL(35nmol/l)的患者在转移当天额外接收直肠孕酮(400mg/12h)。不给予额外的雌二醇。
    方法:主要结果是与胚泡移植日E2水平相关的活产率。
    结果:与持续妊娠相关的最佳血清E2范围为≥292pg/ml<409pg/ml(≥1070pmol/l和<1500pmol/l)。如果E2水平在此范围内,活产率为59%(60/102),而如果E2水平<292pg/ml(<1070pmol/l),则患者的活产率显着降低39%(101/260,p=0.001),如果E2水平≥409pg/ml(≥1500pg/mL),则为28%(14/50,p<0.001)。在逻辑回归分析中,在转移当天调整血清孕酮水平≥11ng/mL或<11ng/mL(≥35nmol或<35nmol/l),BMI,取卵年龄,第5天或第6天玻璃化囊胚和囊胚评分,当E2水平<292pg/mL(<1070pmol/l)时,活产的调整风险差(RD)为-0.21[-0.32;-0.10],如果E2水平≥409pg/ml(≥1500pmol/l),则为-0.31[-0.45;-0.18]。重要的是,只有25%的专利有最佳水平。
    结论:研究表明,在确保最佳血清孕酮水平的激素替代疗法FET队列中,血清E2水平与生殖结局之间存在显著关联。在激素替代疗法FET周期中,黄体中期血清E2水平与活产率相关,E2水平既不能太高也不能太低。
    OBJECTIVE: To study whether midluteal serum estradiol (E2) levels are associated with the live birth rate in hormone replacement therapy frozen embryo transfer (HRT-FET) cycles in patients with optimal midluteal serum progesterone (P4) levels.
    METHODS: Observational prospective cohort study.
    METHODS: Public fertility clinic.
    METHODS: A total of 412 women had an HRT-FET cycle single blastocyst transfer from January 2020 to November 2022.
    METHODS: The HRT-FET cycle priming regimen included oral E2 (6mg/24 h) administered in the evening, followed by vaginal P4 (400mg/12 h). Serum E2 and P4 levels were measured using a standardized method, 2-4 hours after the latest P4 administration and 9-14 hours after E4 administration on the day of blastocyst transfer, day 6 of P4 administration. Patients with serum P4 levels (<11 ng/mL [35 nmol/L]) on the day of transfer received additional rectal P4 (400mg/12 h). No additional E2 dose was administered.
    METHODS: The primary outcome was the live birth rate (LBR) in relation to E2 levels at blastocyst transfer day.
    RESULTS: The optimal serum E2 levels correlating with ongoing pregnancy were ≥292 pg/mL and <409 pg/mL (≥1,070 pmol/L and <1,500 pmol/L). The LBR was 59% (60/102) when E2 levels were within this range, whereas a significantly lower LBR of 39% (101/260) was seen in patients when E2 levels were <292 pg/mL (<1,070 pmol/L) and of 28% (14/50) when E2 levels were ≥409 pg/mL (≥1,500 pg/mL). In a logistic regression analysis, adjusting for serum P4 level ≥11 ng/mL or <11 ng/mL (≥35 nmol or <35 nmol/L) on the day of transfer, body mass index, age at oocyte retrieval, day 5 or 6 vitrified blastocysts, and blastocyst score, the adjusted risk difference of live birth was -0.21 (-0.32; -0.10) when the E2 level was <292 pg/mL (<1,070 pmol/L) and -0.31 (-0.45; -0.18) when the E2 level was ≥409 pg/mL (≥1,500 pmol/L) compared with E2 levels ≥292 pg/mL and <409 pg/mL (≥1,070 and <1,500 pmol/L). Importantly, only 25% of patents had optimal levels.
    CONCLUSIONS: The study shows a significant association between serum E2 levels and reproductive outcomes in an HRT-FET cohort in which optimal serum P4 levels were secured. Midluteal serum E2 levels are associated with the LBR in HRT-FET cycles, and E2 levels should neither be too high nor too low.
    BACKGROUND: EudraCT No.: 2019-001539-29.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:在冷冻胚胎移植(FET)后出生的婴儿中观察到与冷冻技术或子宫内膜准备方案相关的大胎龄(LGA)吗?
    结论:人工周期与较高的LGA风险相关,两种冷冻技术(玻璃化与缓慢冷冻)或胚胎阶段(分裂胚胎与胚泡)之间的速率没有差异。
    背景:一些研究比较了新鲜胚胎移植(ET)和FET后的新生儿结局,并表明FET与改善的新生儿结局有关,包括降低早产风险,低出生体重,小于胎龄(SGA),与新鲜ET相比。然而,这些研究还显示FET后LGA的风险增加.这种风险增加的潜在病理生理学仍不清楚;父母不孕症,实验室程序(包括胚胎培养条件和冻融过程),和子宫内膜准备治疗可能涉及。
    方法:通过回顾性分析2014年至2018年法国国家IVF注册的标准化个人临床记录,进行了多中心流行病学数据研究,包括在生育中心前瞻性收集的新鲜ET或FET导致的单次分娩。补充数据是从参与的生育中心收集的,包括玻璃化培养基和装置,和子宫内膜准备方案。
    方法:数据来自35个法国ART中心,导致总共包含72.789个新鲜ET,10.602慢速冻结FET,和39.062玻璃化FET。根据移植胚胎的来源(新鲜,缓慢冷冻,或玻璃化胚胎)和子宫内膜准备FET(排卵或人工周期),比较五个不同的组(新鲜,缓慢的冷冻-排卵周期,慢速冷冻-人工循环,玻璃化-排卵周期,和玻璃化-人工循环)。根据胎龄和特定性别的体重百分位数分布,在活产的单胎中定义胎儿生长障碍:如果<第10和≥第90百分位数,则为SGA和LGA。分别。使用ART中心作为随机效应的线性混合模型进行分析。
    结果:转移导致,分别,19.006、1798和9195交付,对应于每次转移的交付率为26.1%,17.0%,新鲜ET后23.5%,慢速冷冻FET,和玻璃化FET,分别。FET周期在排卵周期(n=21.704)或人工周期(n=34.237)中进行,导致5910和10.322怀孕,分别,每次转移的妊娠率为31.6%和33.3%。与排卵周期相比,在人工周期中观察到明显更高的自发性流产率(33.3%对21.4%,P<0.001,在缓慢冷冻组中,分别为31.6%和21.8%,玻璃化组P<0.001)。因此,与缓慢冷冻和玻璃化组的排卵周期相比,人工周期的每次转移的分娩率较低(15.5%对18.9%,P<0.001和22.8%对24.9%,分别为P<0.001)。在26.585名活出生的单身人士中,16.413婴儿从新鲜的ET出生,1644来自慢速冷冻FET,和8528来自玻璃化FET。FET组的出生体重明显高于新鲜ET组,两种冷冻技术没有区别。同样,无论使用何种方法冷冻胚胎,与新鲜ET组相比,FET组的LGA率更高,SGA率更低。在多变量分析中,与排卵周期相比,人工FET后LGA的风险显著增加.相比之下,LGA的风险与冷冻程序(玻璃化冷冻与缓慢冷冻)或冷冻时的胚胎阶段(切割胚胎与胚泡)无关.关于玻璃化方法,LGA的风险与所用的玻璃化培养基或胚胎阶段无关.
    结论:没有关于产妇背景的数据,比如奇偶校验,BMI,不孕的原因,或母体合并症,在法国国家数据库中。特别是,我们不能排除在FET人工循环后观察到的LGA风险增加可能,至少部分地,与一些母亲因素的混杂效应有关。没有关于胚胎培养和孵育条件的信息。大多数玻璃化技术是使用相同的设备和两种主要的玻璃化介质进行的。根据使用的设备或玻璃化介质限制LGA风险比较的有效性。
    结论:我们的结果似乎令人放心,因为与缓慢冷冻相比,胚胎玻璃化后没有观察到潜在的胎儿生长障碍。即使涉及其他因素,子宫内膜准备治疗似乎对FET后的LGA风险影响最大.排卵周期中的FET可以将胎儿生长障碍的风险降至最低。
    背景:这项工作已获得法国生物医学机构的资助(批准号:19AMP002)。没有任何作者有任何利益冲突声明。
    背景:不适用。
    OBJECTIVE: Is large for gestational age (LGA) observed in babies born after frozen embryo transfer (FET) associated with either the freezing technique or the endometrial preparation protocol?
    CONCLUSIONS: Artificial cycles are associated with a higher risk of LGA, with no difference in rate between the two freezing techniques (vitrification versus slow freezing) or embryo stage (cleaved embryo versus blastocyst).
    BACKGROUND: Several studies have compared neonatal outcomes after fresh embryo transfer (ET) and FET and shown that FET is associated with improved neonatal outcomes, including reduced risks of preterm birth, low birthweight, and small for gestational age (SGA), when compared with fresh ET. However, these studies also revealed an increased risk of LGA after FET. The underlying pathophysiology of this increased risk remains unclear; parental infertility, laboratory procedures (including embryo culture conditions and freezing-thawing processes), and endometrial preparation treatments might be involved.
    METHODS: A multicentre epidemiological data study was performed through a retrospective analysis of the standardized individual clinical records of the French national register of IVF from 2014 to 2018, including single deliveries resulting from fresh ET or FET that were prospectively collected in fertility centres. Complementary data were collected from the participating fertility centres and included the vitrification media and devices, and the endometrial preparation protocols.
    METHODS: Data were collected from 35 French ART centres, leading to the inclusion of a total of 72 789 fresh ET, 10 602 slow-freezing FET, and 39 062 vitrification FET. Main clinical outcomes were presented according to origin of the transferred embryos (fresh, slow frozen, or vitrified embryos) and endometrial preparations for FET (ovulatory or artificial cycles), comparing five different groups (fresh, slow freezing-ovulatory cycle, slow freezing-artificial cycle, vitrification-ovulatory cycle, and vitrification-artificial cycle). Foetal growth disorders were defined in live-born singletons according to gestational age and sex-specific weight percentile distribution: SGA and LGA if <10th and ≥90th percentiles, respectively. Analyses were performed using linear mixed models with the ART centres as random effect.
    RESULTS: Transfers led to, respectively, 19 006, 1798, and 9195 deliveries corresponding to delivery rates per transfer of 26.1%, 17.0%, and 23.5% after fresh ET, slow-freezing FET, and vitrification FET, respectively. FET cycles were performed in either ovulatory cycles (n = 21 704) or artificial cycles (n = 34 237), leading to 5910 and 10 322 pregnancies, respectively, and corresponding to pregnancy rates per transfer of 31.6% and 33.3%. A significantly higher rate of spontaneous miscarriage was observed in artificial cycles when compared with ovulatory cycles (33.3% versus 21.4%, P < 0.001, in slow freezing groups and 31.6% versus 21.8%, P < 0.001 in vitrification groups). Consequently, a lower delivery rate per transfer was observed in artificial cycles compared with ovulatory cycles both in slow freezing and vitrification groups (15.5% versus 18.9%, P < 0.001 and 22.8% versus 24.9%, P < 0.001, respectively). Among a total of 26 585 live-born singletons, 16 413 babies were born from fresh ET, 1644 from slow-freezing FET, and 8528 from vitrification FET. Birthweight was significantly higher in the FET groups than in the fresh ET group, with no difference between the two freezing techniques. Likewise, LGA rates were higher and SGA rates were lower in the FET groups compared with the fresh ET group whatever the method used for embryo freezing. In a multivariable analysis, the risk of LGA following FET was significantly increased in artificial compared with ovulatory cycles. In contrast, the risk of LGA was not associated with either the freezing procedure (vitrification versus slow freezing) or the embryo stage (cleaved embryo versus blastocyst) at freezing. Regarding the vitrification method, the risk of LGA was not associated with either the vitrification medium used or the embryo stage.
    CONCLUSIONS: No data were available on maternal context, such as parity, BMI, infertility cause, or maternal comorbidities, in the French national database. In particular, we cannot exclude that the increased risk of LGA observed following FET with artificial cycles may, at least partially, be associated with a confounding effect of some maternal factors. No information about embryo culture and incubation conditions was available. Most of the vitrification techniques were performed using the same device and with two main vitrification media, limiting the validity of a comparison of risk for LGA according to the device or vitrification media used.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our results seem reassuring, since no potential foetal growth disorders following embryo vitrification in comparison with slow freezing were observed. Even if other factors are involved, the endometrial preparation treatment seems to have the greatest impact on LGA risk following FET. FET during ovulatory cycles could minimize the risk for foetal growth disorders.
    BACKGROUND: This work has received funding from the French Biomedicine Agency (Grant number: 19AMP002). None of the authors has any conflict of interest to declare.
    BACKGROUND: N/A.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号