背景和目标:对女子足球运动员进行比赛状态分析的研究很少,并且以前仅研究过负荷监测,而其他标记,例如物理(即,力量,电源,和敏捷性),生理(即,最大摄氧量),和身体成分(即,身体脂肪量,无脂质量,体内水,和相位角)标记,需要进一步调查。因此,这项研究的目的是(A)比较身体,生理,身体成分,以及起跑者和非起跑者之间的负荷标记;(b)比较训练干预前和训练干预后(五周)的测量结果;(c)分析身体、生理,身体成分,在一支精英女子足球队中加载标记。材料与方法:14名一线队队员参加研究(年龄23.29±3.19岁,重量59.14±6.87kg,高度1.66±0.08m)。几个物理(n=15),生理(n=1),身体成分(n=11),并收集负荷标记(n=14)。此外,参与者被细分为首发者(n=7)和非首发者(n=7).结果:在任何检查变量中,起动器和非起动器之间均未发现差异。此外,在培训干预之后,发现总体水/无脂质量比的值明显较低(p=0.043;ES=0.582)。此外,在负荷和身体/生理标记(n=28);负荷和身体成分标记(n=6);身体/生理和身体成分标记(n=34);以及身体和生理标记(n=42)之间检测到了几种相关性。结论:总之,仅观察到起动机比非起动机更高的负荷值的轻微趋势。此外,身体上没有差异,生理,在初学者和非初学者之间发现了身体成分标记,可能表明五周不足以改善这些变量。最后,本研究结果提供了新颖的信息,评估了季前对葡萄牙优秀女子足球运动员的影响,并有助于更好地了解不同类型的测量之间的关联。
Background and Objectives: Research on female soccer players that analyzes playing status is scarce and has previously only examined load monitoring, while other markers, such as physical (i.e., strength, power, and agility), physiological (i.e., maximal oxygen uptake), and body composition (i.e., body fat mass, fat-free mass, body water, and phase angle) markers, warrant further investigation. Thus, the study aims were to (a) compare physical, physiological, body composition, and load markers between starters and non-starters; (b) compare measurements pre- and post-training intervention (five weeks); and (c) analyze any relationships between physical, physiological, body composition, and load markers in an elite female soccer team. Materials and Methods: Fourteen first-team players participated in the study (age 23.29 ± 3.19 years, weight 59.14 ± 6.87 kg, height 1.66 ± 0.08 m). Several physical (n = 15), physiological (n = 1), body composition (n = 11), and load markers (n = 14) were collected. In addition, participants were sub-divided into starters (n = 7) and non-starters (n = 7). Results: No differences were revealed between starters and non-starters in any of the examined variables. Moreover, following the training intervention, a significantly lower value was found for total body water/fat-free mass ratio (p = 0.043; ES = 0.582). In addition, there were several correlations detected between load and physical/physiological markers (n = 28); load and body composition markers (n = 6); physical/physiological and body composition markers (n = 34); and physical and physiological markers (n = 42). Conclusions: In conclusion, only a slight tendency of higher load values for starters than non-starters was observed. In addition, no differences in physical, physiological, and body composition markers were found between starters and non-starters, possibly suggesting that five weeks were not enough to improve such variables. Finally, the present results provide novel information assessing the effects of the pre-season in elite female Portuguese soccer players and contribute to a better understanding of the associations between different types of measurements.