OBJECTIVE: Planovalgus foot deformity (PVFD) is common in children with neuromuscular conditions and severe deformity may require surgical correction. This study aims to assess clinical and radiological outcomes of PVFD secondary to neuromuscular disease managed by subtalar arthroeresis (SuAE), midfoot soft tissue release and talo-navicular arthrodesis (TNA).
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of children with neuromuscular disease and nonreducible PVFD who underwent SuAE, midfoot soft tissue release, and TNA and with a minimum follow-up of 5 years was performed. A total of 60 patients with neuromuscular disease (108 feet) including cerebral palsy were reviewed. Mean age at surgery was 12.7 ± 4.6 years (6-17). Mean follow-up was 7 ± 2.9 years (5-10). Clinical outcomes and radiologic correction at final follow-up were compared with preoperative values. Statistical analysis was performed and significance was set at P < 0.01.
RESULTS: Statistically significant radiological improvements between pre- and postoperative values were found for all angle values. At final follow-up, there was a significant improvement in VAS score (4.8 vs. 2; P < 0.01). There was also a positive trend in the improvement of walking ability. No cases of pseudoarthrosis were reported at final follow-up. Screw removal was required in 5 out of 108 feet (4.6%) and 2 feet (3.3%) had delayed medial wound healing.
CONCLUSIONS: SuAE combined with TNA and midfoot soft tissue is a safe and feasible procedure that can provide good clinical and radiologic results in patients with neuromuscular disease and nonreducible PVFD; the procedure can improve foot stability, and has a limited number of complications.
METHODS: IV.

BACKGROUND: Progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD), formally known as \"adult-acquired flatfoot deformity\" (AAFFD), is a complex foot deformity consisting of multiple components. If surgery is required, joint-preserving procedures, such as a medial displacement calcaneal osteotomy (MDCO), are frequently performed. The aim of this systematic review is to provide a summary of the evidence on the impact of MDCO on foot biomechanics.
METHODS: A systematic literature search across two major sources (PubMed and Scopus) without time limitation was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) criteria. Only original research studies reporting on biomechanical changes following a MDCO were included. Exclusion criteria consisted of review articles, case studies, and studies not written in English. 27 studies were included and the methodologic quality graded according to the QUACS scale and the modified Coleman score.
RESULTS: The 27 included studies consisted of 18 cadaveric, 7 studies based on biomechanical models, and 2 clinical studies. The impact of MDCO on the following five major parameters were assessed: plantar fascia (n = 6), medial longitudinal arch (n = 9), hind- and midfoot joint pressures (n = 10), Achilles tendon (n = 5), and gait pattern parameters (n = 3). The quality of the studies was moderate to good with a pooled mean QUACS score of 65% (range 46-92%) for in-vitro and a pooled mean Coleman score of 58 (range 56-65) points for clinical studies.
CONCLUSIONS: A thorough knowledge of how MDCO impacts foot function is key in properly understanding the postoperative effects of this commonly performed procedure. According to the evidence, MDCO impacts the function of the plantar fascia and Achilles tendon, the integrity of the medial longitudinal arch, hind- and midfoot joint pressures, and consequently specific gait pattern parameters.

The optimal extent of arthrodesis for severe and rigid progressive collapsing foot deformity is controversial. Traditionally, triple arthrodesis has been recommended; however, good results have been reported using subtalar arthrodesis only. We compared the results of triple arthrodesis and isolated subtalar repositional arthrodesis. A total of 22 symptomatic feet were evaluated retrospectively. Isolated subtalar repositional arthrodesis was performed in 13 cases (the subtalar group) and double or triple arthrodesis in 9 cases (the triple group). Various radiographic variables for assessing flatfoot and osteoarthritic changes in ankle and tarsal joints were measured and compared between the 2 groups at 3 time points: preoperatively, 3 months postoperatively, and 4 y postoperatively. Additionally, we analyzed various factors that affect postoperative valgus talar tilt in the ankle joint, which has been associated with poor prognosis. There were no differences in preoperative demographic data and the severity of the disease between the 2 groups; both groups showed improvement in radiographic parameters postoperatively compared with preoperative results. With the numbers available, no significant differences could be detected in postoperative radiographic measurements between the 2 groups. Of all the variables analyzed, postoperative hindfoot alignment angle was associated with postoperative talar tilt development. Additionally, postoperative talar tilt was observed more in triple group than in subtalar group. In conclusion, isolated subtalar repositional arthrodesis is an effective procedure to correct advanced progressive collapsing foot deformity. In addition, Chorpart joint arthrodesis with improper position can cause valgus talar tilt in the ankle joint.

Checkrein deformity is characterized by the dynamic status of the hallux, in which flexion deformity is aggravated by ankle dorsiflexion and relieved by ankle plantarflexion. In most cases, a checkrein deformity occurs secondary to trauma or following surgery. It has been suggested that the flexor hallucis longus tendon tethers or entraps scar tissue or fracture sites. Improvement with conservative treatment is difficult once the deformity has already become entrenched, and surgical management is usually required in severe cases. Various surgical options are available for the correction of checkrein deformities. It includes a simple release of adhesion at the fracture site; lengthening of the flexor hallucis longus by Z-plasty at the fracture site combined with the release of adhesion; lengthening of the flexor hallucis longus by Z-plasty at the midfoot, retromalleolar, or tarsal tunnel area; and flexor hallucis longus tenotomy with interphalangeal arthrodesis for recurrent cases. This review aimed to summarize the overall etiology, relevant anatomy, diagnosis, and treatment of checkrein deformities described in the literature.

This study evaluated a reverse V-shaped osteotomy for ankylosing rocker-bottom foot deformity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Three feet were presented in this study: rheumatoid rocker-bottom deformities with painful and/or infectious bony prominence towards the bottom of the foot, treated with a reverse V-shaped osteotomy in the mid-hindfoot. In all three cases, significant correction was achieved with restoration of the medial longitudinal arch, and improvement in clinical scores was confirmed. Reverse V-shaped osteotomy has the potential to be a useful and definitive procedure for ankylosing rocker-bottom deformity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in medial displacement calcaneus osteotomy (MDCO) has been proposed for surgical correction of adult-acquired flat foot deformity (AAFD) to reduce complications of open approaches. The aim of our study is to systematically analyze complications and the clinical and radiological results of MIS- MDCO.
METHODS: A systematic review of the English literature was performed on 30th October 2023. Randomized controlled trials and non-randomized trials, cohort studies, case-control studies and case series concerning surgical correction of AAFD with MIS-MDCO and with at least 15 patients were included. Case reports, technical notes, animal or cadaveric studies were excluded. The quality and risk of bias of the studies included were evaluated using GRADE and MINORS systems. Complications rate, clinical and radiological results were inferred from the studies included.
RESULTS: Nine articles were included. A total of 501 cases treated with MIS-MDCO were analysed with a mean follow-up of 11.9 ± 5.1 months. The reported wound infection rate was about 3% and sural neuropathy was rated about 1%. Only 4% of the cases required removal of the screw for pain. In the comparative studies (MIS versus Open MDCO), comparable clinical results but with significant differences (P < 0.001) in infection rates (1% versus 14%) and sural neuropathy (2% versus 1%) were observed.
CONCLUSIONS: AAFD correction performed with MIS-MDCO, with the limitation of a poor quality and high risk of bias of the included studies, seems to provide good clinical results and high subjective satisfaction with a lower complication rate compared to open approach. Further high-quality long-term comparative studies could better clarify complications and clinical and radiological outcomes of the MIS technique in the treatment of AAFD.
METHODS: Level IV.

The aim of this study is to analyze patient-reported outcomes following this procedure as well as any demographics that may confer prognostic capability. A retrospective analysis was conducted of patients who underwent Triple Arthrodesis at our facility from 2014-2021. Patients were selected if they underwent an isolated triple arthrodesis. All cases included either a gastrocnemius recession versus a percutaneous tendo-achilles lengthening depending on the patient\'s Silverskiold examination. The electronic medical record was utilized to collect basic patient demographics, previous foot and ankle surgeries, hardware failures, additional procedures, and surgical complications. To evaluate outcomes, we compared patient reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) survey scores with the general population and preoperative versus postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) scores. Foot function index (FFI) scores and scores were utilized as a validation tool for our results. A total of 132 patients met the criteria for our study with a total of 50 participants completing the PROMIS and FFI surveys. The average time point at which the outcomes were collected was 5.50 y postoperatively, ranging from 1.65 to 7.57 y. The average PROMIS physical function was 38.35, pain interference was 61.52, and depression was 49.82 for this population. The mean FFI scores were 58.56 for pain, 60.07 for disability, and 48.07 for activity limitation. There was a significant decrease in preoperative and postoperative VAS scores from 5.4 to 2.55 (p < .001). Three patients experienced wound complications related to decreased sensation. Our results indicated that only PROMIS depression scores were within one standard deviation of the population mean following a triple arthrodesis procedure. PROMIS physical function and pain interference were both outside of one standard deviation for the population.

There is growing interest in performing reconstruction of deformities associated with Charcot foot arthropathy. At least half of the patients undergoing this reconstruction will have chronic wounds and osteomyelitis overlying the deformity. It is important to provide orthopaedic surgeons with tools for making the diagnosis of osteomyelitis in this patient population and creating a strategy for treatment.

The foot resembles a tripod. The 3 legs consist of (1) the tip of the heel, (2) the first metatarsal, and (3) the fifth metatarsal. This concept is useful to explain cavus or flat feet. When the tips of the tripod move closer, the arch becomes higher. The leg of the tripod that moves the most will determine the type of cavus feet, which can be hindfoot cavus, forefoot cavus, or first metatarsal cavus. Cavovarus foot denotes the presence of a three-dimensional deformity of the foot, but it is much more a descriptive feature than a diagnosis.

In Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) cavovarus surgery, a regimented approach is critical to create a plantigrade foot, restore hindfoot stability, and generate active ankle dorsiflexion. The preoperative motor examination is fundamental to the algorithm, as it is not only guides the initial surgical planning but is key in the decision making that occurs throughout the operation. Surgeons need to be comfortable with multiple techniques to achieve each surgical goal. There is no one operation that works for all patients with CMT. A plantigrade foot is the most important of the surgical goals as hindfoot stability and ankle dorsiflexion can be augmented with bracing.