Family Separation

家庭分离
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:亲子分离对留守儿童(LBC)构成了重大挑战。然而,关于留守特征与LBC心理症状之间的相关性的经验证据有限。这项研究调查了LBC中的心理症状,并探讨了留守特征与这些症状之间的关联。
    方法:采用分层整群抽样,选择华东三个城市的1,832例13-18岁的LBC进行分析。参与者的抑郁和焦虑症状分别用患者健康问卷9和一般焦虑障碍7进行评估。采用卡方检验比较不同组LBC心理症状检出率的差异。二元logistic回归分析用于推断留守特征与心理症状之间的关联。
    结果:抑郁症和焦虑症状分别为32.86%和33.24%,分别,参与LBC。单因素分析显示,不同性别的抑郁症状检出率差异有统计学意义。grade,和亲子分离的时机。不同性别的焦虑症状发生率有统计学差异,grade,照顾者的类型,和母子分离的时机。多变量分析表明LBC的焦虑症状与小学后发生的母子分离之间存在正相关,和照顾者的类型(仅限父亲或仅限母亲)。我们的发现证实了LBC中留守特征与焦虑症状之间的正相关。
    结论:母子分离的时间和照顾者的类型是该人群焦虑症状发展的潜在危险因素。
    BACKGROUND: Parent-child separation poses a significant challenge for left-behind children (LBC). However, limited empirical evidence exists regarding the correlation between left-behind characteristics and the psychological symptoms of LBC. This study investigated psychological symptoms among LBC and explored associations between left-behind characteristics and those symptoms.
    METHODS: Using stratified cluster sampling, 1,832 LBC aged 13-18 years from three cities in East China were selected for analysis. Participants\' depression and anxiety symptoms were assessed with the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 and the General Anxiety Disorder 7, respectively. Chi-square tests were used to compare differences in detection rates of psychological symptoms among LBC in different groups. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to infer associations between left-behind characteristics and psychological symptoms.
    RESULTS: Depression and anxiety symptoms were detected in 32.86% and 33.24%, respectively, of participating LBC. Univariate analysis showed statistically significant differences in detection rates of depression symptoms by sex, grade, and timing of parent-child separation. Statistically significant differences were observed in anxiety symptom rates by sex, grade, type of caregiver, and timing of mother-child separation. Multivariate analysis indicated a positive association between LBC\'s anxiety symptoms and mother-child separation that occurred during post-primary school, and type of caregiver (father only or mother only). Our findings confirm a positive association between left-behind characteristics and anxiety symptoms among LBC.
    CONCLUSIONS: The timing of mother-child separation and type of caregiver are potential risk factors for the development of anxiety symptoms in this population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Comparative Study
    背景:儿童和青少年的意外伤害是全球范围内的主要公共卫生问题。这些伤害不仅对儿童的生理和心理产生负面影响,也给家庭和社会带来巨大的经济损失和社会负担。意外伤害是中国青少年致残和死亡的主要原因,留守儿童(LBC)更容易遭受意外伤害。本研究的目的是通过比较LBC与非留守儿童(NLBC)的差异,评估中国儿童和青少年意外伤害的类型和发生率,并探讨个人和环境因素的影响。
    方法:这项横断面研究于2019年1月和2月进行。此外,采用自填式问卷的形式,收集辽宁省10~19岁儿童青少年2786人,包括意外伤害调查,意外伤害感知问卷,青少年多维亚健康问卷(MSQA),负面生活事件,“我的班级”问卷和欺凌/受害者问卷。采用多因素logistic回归分析探讨儿童青少年意外伤害的相关因素。采用二元logistic回归分析探讨LBC与NLBC意外损伤的影响因素。
    结果:意外伤害前三名为坠落伤(29.7%),在我们的研究人群中扭伤(27.2%)和烧伤和烫伤(20.3%)。LBC的意外伤害发生率高于NLBC。烧伤和烫伤,LBC的割伤和动物咬伤高于NLBC。结果表明,初中生(比值比(OR)=1.296,CI=1.066-1.574)比小学生更容易报告多次意外伤害。女孩(OR=1.252,CI=1.042-1.504)报告多次意外伤害的几率更高。非故意伤害感知水平低的儿童青少年多发伤的几率高于非故意伤害感知水平高的儿童青少年(OR=1.321,C=1.013~1.568)。心理健康症状水平较高的儿童和青少年(OR=1.442,CI=1.193-1.744)报告多次意外伤害的几率较高。与从未经历过负面生活事件的青少年相比,经历过多次负性生活事件(OR=2.724,CI=2.121~3.499)的青少年更有可能多次遭受意外伤害.低水平的纪律和秩序(OR=1.277,CI=1.036-1.574)报告多次意外伤害的几率更高。与未被欺负的同龄人相比,被欺负的在校青少年更有可能多次受伤(OR=2.340,CI=1.925-2.845)。低水平的意外伤害感知,经历过负面生活事件和欺凌对LBC的影响大于对NLBC的影响。
    结论:调查发现,至少一次意外伤害的发生率为64.8%。学校层面,性别,意外伤害感知,亚健康,负面生活事件,纪律和秩序以及欺凌与意外伤害事件有关。与NLBC相比,LBC的意外伤害发生率较高,应该特别注意这个群体。
    Unintentional injuries among children and adolescents are a major public health problem worldwide. These injuries not only have negative effects on children\'s physiology and psychology, but also bring huge economic losses and social burdens to families and society. Unintentional injuries are the leading cause of disability and death among Chinese adolescents, and left-behind children (LBC) are more prone to experience unintentional injury. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the type and incidence of unintentional injury among Chinese children and adolescents and explore the influences of personal and environmental factors by comparing the differences between LBC and not left-behind children (NLBC).
    This cross-sectional study was conducted in January and February 2019. Additionally, 2786 children and adolescents from 10 to 19 years old in Liaoning Province in China were collected in the form of self-filled questionnaires, including Unintentional Injury Investigation, Unintentional Injury Perception Questionnaire, Multidimensional Subhealth Questionnaire of Adolescent (MSQA), Negative life events, \"My Class\" questionnaire and Bullying/victim Questionnaire. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to explore the factors associated with unintentional injury among children and adolescents. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to explore the factors affecting unintentional injuries between LBC and NLBC.
    The top three unintentional injuries were falling injuries (29.7%), sprains (27.2%) and burns and scalds (20.3%) in our study population. The incidence of unintentional injuries in LBC was higher than that in NLBC. Burn and scalds, cutting injury and animal bites in LBC were higher than those in NLBC. The results show that junior high school students (odds ratio (OR) = 1.296, CI = 1.066-1.574) were more likely to report multiple unintentional injuries than primary school students. Girls (OR = 1.252, CI = 1.042-1.504) had higher odds of reporting multiple unintentional injuries. The odds of multiple injuries in children and adolescents with low levels of unintentional injury perception were higher than those in children and adolescents with high levels of unintentional injury perception (OR = 1.321, C = 1.013-1.568). Children and adolescents with a higher levels of mental health symptoms (OR = 1.442, CI = 1.193-1.744) had higher odds of reporting multiple unintentional injuries. Compared with teenagers who had never experienced negative life events, teenagers who had experienced negative life events many times (OR = 2.724, CI = 2.121-3.499) were more likely to suffer unintentional injuries many times. Low-level discipline and order (OR = 1.277, CI = 1.036-1.574) had higher odds of reporting multiple unintentional injuries. In-school adolescents who were bullied were more likely to report being injured multiple times than their counterparts who were not bullied (OR = 2.340, CI = 1.925-2.845). Low levels of unintentional injury perception, experienced negative life events and bullying had greater impacts on LBC than on NLBC.
    The survey found that the incidence of at least one unintentional injury was 64.8%. School level, sex, unintentional injury perception, subhealth, negative life events, discipline and order and bullying were associated with incidents of unintentional injury. Compared with NLBC, LBC had a higher incidence of unintentional injury, and special attention should be given to this group.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    COVID-19大流行极大地影响了医疗保健系统。在儿科,压力,不确定性,许多父母经常遇到许多意想不到的挑战。研究表明,由于医院的限制,在大流行期间,父母与孩子的接触较少。然而,尚不清楚父母如何看待他们在儿科病房的经历。这项研究旨在描述大流行期间在儿科病房有孩子的父母的生活经历。使用定性描述性方法来调查父母在香港大流行期间将孩子送入儿科的经历。8位中国家长参加了面试。出现了三个主要主题:(1)父母在COVID-19期间的儿科病房经历是情感上孤立和压倒性的,(2)家庭和以家庭为中心的护理被打乱,和(3)与儿科提供者的互动加剧或减轻了情绪困扰。整合上述情绪困扰经历的主题是大流行期间父母经历的主要特征。因此,政策制定者应了解被诊断患有COVID-19的儿童的父母的生活经历,并应迅速做出决定,以处理父母的担忧和安全问题。
    The COVID-19 pandemic has greatly impacted the healthcare system. In the pediatric unit, stress, uncertainty, and many unexpected challenges for many parents were frequently reported. Research has shown that parents had less contact with their children during the pandemic due to hospital restrictions. However, it is unknown how parents perceived their experiences in a pediatric unit. This study aimed to describe the lived experiences of parents who had a child in the pediatric unit during the pandemic. A qualitative descriptive approach was used to investigate parents\' experiences of having children admitted to the pediatric unit during the pandemic in Hong Kong. Eight Chinese parents participated in the interview. Three major themes emerged: (1) parents\' pediatric ward experiences during COVID-19 were emotionally isolating and overwhelming, (2) the family and family-centered care were disrupted, and (3) interactions with pediatric providers intensified or alleviated emotional distress. Integrating the above themes of experiences of emotional distress was the main characteristic of the parents\' experiences during the pandemic. Therefore, policymakers should understand the lived experiences of parents of children diagnosed with COVID-19 and should make prompt decisions to deal with both parental concerns and safety issues.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:了解家庭分离对居住在澳大利亚的难民的影响。
    方法:13名具有难民背景并经历与家庭分离的参与者参加了半结构化的定性访谈。对访谈进行编码,并使用NVivo软件进行主题分析。
    结果:确定的主题分为四个领域。领域1侧重于家庭分离的个人影响。主题是对心理健康和功能的影响,在不断担心家庭安全和缺乏关键依恋人物的驱使下,失踪家庭的具体影响,自我认同和家庭动态的改变。领域2侧重于与寻找失踪家庭所采取的行动有关的主题,与分离的家庭联系或团聚。领域3强调了应对策略,参与者使用的支持机制和保护因素。领域4确定了关于家庭团结重要性的核心信念,专注于安全,定居和幸福的未来。
    结论:家庭分离对难民的福祉具有持久的影响,关键途径是持续的恐惧和不安全感,扰乱了与未来自我相关的社会依恋和身份转变。
    结论:与家庭分离或失踪的难民在持续的压力和适应问题上挣扎。
    OBJECTIVE: To understand the impact of family separation on refugees living in Australia.
    METHODS: Thirteen participants with a refugee background and experiencing separation from family participated in a semi-structured qualitative interview. Interviews were coded and a thematic analysis was conducted using NVivo software.
    RESULTS: Identified themes were organised under four domains. Domain 1 focused on the personal impact of family separation. Themes were the effects on mental health and functioning, driven by incessant worrying about the safety of family and the absence of key attachment figures, the specific effects of having missing family, alterations to self-identity and family dynamics. Domain 2 focused on themes relating to actions taken to find missing family, connect or reunite with separated family. Domain 3 highlighted the coping strategies, support mechanisms and protective factors used by participants. Domain 4 identified core beliefs about the importance of family unity, focusing on security, settlement and a happy future.
    CONCLUSIONS: Family separation has an enduring effect on the wellbeing of refugees, with key pathways being ongoing fear and insecurity, disrupted social attachments and identity shifts in relation to the future self.
    CONCLUSIONS: Refugees separated from or missing family struggle with ongoing stress and adjustment issues.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Little is known about social determinants among refugees resettled in Germany. This study aims to examine the impact of family separation on refugees\' subjective time pressure and mental health. Data come from the FlueGe Health Study (n = 208), a cross-sectional study administered by Bielefeld University. We used logistic regression analysis to investigate the effect of family separation on (i) being time-stressed and (ii) having a high risk for adverse mental health, considering sociodemographic and postmigration factors. As a result, more than 30% of participants with a spouse or partner and about 18% with a child or children reported separation. Multiple logistic regression showed that family separation was not associated with being time-stressed, but separation from at least one child was associated with adverse mental health (OR = 3.53, 95% CI = [1.23, 10.11]). In conclusion, family separation primarily contributes to adverse mental health among refugees from the Middle East and Africa resettled in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany. Therefore, policies and practices that facilitate family reunification can contribute significantly to the promotion of refugees\' mental health and well-being.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:网络成瘾已成为世界范围内日益关注的问题。本研究旨在比较留守儿童(LBC)和非留守儿童(非LBC)的网络成瘾患病率。并探讨父系和母系亲子沟通在LBC中的作用。方法:我们在安徽省农村地区进行了横断面调查,中国。完整数据可从699LBC和740非LBC获得。多变量logistic回归用于检查1)LBC是否更有可能发展为网络成瘾,2)LBC中亲子沟通与网络成瘾之间的关系。结果:与非LBC相比,LBC报告网络成瘾的可能性更高(OR=2.03,95CI=1.43-2.88,p<0.001)。在LBC中,亲子沟通(母子和父子)是儿童网络成瘾的保护因素。在男性LBC中,母婴沟通的作用很好。结论:父母监管缺失可能导致网络成瘾。强烈建议移民父母提高与孩子的沟通质量。此外,儿童行为与父母因素的关系应考虑性别匹配效应。
    Objective: Internet addiction has emerged as a growing concern worldwide. This study aimed to compare the prevalence of Internet addiction between left-behind children (LBC) and non-left-behind children (non-LBC), and explore the role of paternal and maternal parent-child communication on LBC. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey in rural areas in Anhui, China. The complete data were available from 699 LBC and 740 non-LBC. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine 1) whether LBC were more likely to develop Internet addiction, and 2) the association between parent-child communication and Internet addiction among LBC. Results: LBC had a higher likelihood to report Internet addiction when compared to non-LBC (OR = 2.03, 95%CI = 1.43-2.88, p < 0.001). Among LBC, parent-child communication (both mother-child and father-child) was protective factor for children\'s Internet addiction. The role of mother-child communication played well among male LBC. Conclusions: The lack of parental supervision may lead to Internet addiction. It is highly recommended for migrant parents to improve the quality of communication with their children. Also, gender-matching effects should be considered in the relationship between children\'s behavior and parental factors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: To examine whether family separation caused by prolonged waiting for family reunification is associated with the risk of mental disorders among refugee fathers.
    METHODS: Based on full-population Danish registry data covering 1995-2015, we mapped arrival patterns among nuclear refugee family members resettled in Denmark (n = 76,776) and established a cohort of refugee fathers (n = 6176) who all arrived alone and later obtained family reunification with their wife and children. The fathers were followed for up to 24 years, from the day their residence permit was issued until their first psychiatric diagnosis, emigration, death, or study end, whichever came first. Using Cox proportional hazard regression, we estimated hazard ratios (HRs) of being diagnosed with a mental disorder (i) for the period while the fathers were still separated from their family and (ii) across varying lengths of family separation.
    RESULTS: The HR of any mental disorder was 2.10 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.57-2.81) for fathers still separated from their family compared with those who had obtained family reunification. The HR increased with longer family separation. Compared with fathers separated for < 9 months, the HR of any mental disorder was 1.43 (95% CI 1.08-1.89) for 9-11 months\' separation, increasing to 2.02 (95% CI 1.52-2.68) for 18-23 months\' separation. Results were driven by post-traumatic stress disorder.
    CONCLUSIONS: Fathers waiting for their wives and children face an increased risk of mental disorders. Countries receiving refugees should be aware that delaying family reunification can lead to adverse mental health effects.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管治疗效果不佳,以家庭为导向的方法和获得居留权被认为对于从辞职综合症(RS)中恢复至关重要。在一项回顾性队列研究中,我们评估了一种涉及环境治疗的替代方法,患者与父母分离,同时积极放弃庇护过程中的治疗。我们检查了医疗记录,社会服务法案,2005年至2020年期间,在Solsidan养老院接受治疗的13名个人和养老院的行为。使用临床总体印象评估严重程度和结果,严重性和改进分量表。包括13名参与者,其中9名(69%)康复,即他们有很大或很大的改善。在分开的八个人中,全部恢复,还,一个未分离的恢复。受试者之间的结果差异不显著(p=0.007)。此外,在治疗期间获得居留许可的五个人中,一人康复,四人没有康复。获得居留权和非居留权的受试者之间的结果差异显着(p=0.007)。数据显示,有三例(23%)的模拟病例怀疑父母有煽动症状。我们的评估表明,在治疗RS时,与父母分离和放弃申请居留许可可能是必不可少的组成部分。依靠以家庭为导向,和居住权甚至可能不利于恢复。所检查的干预措施在可能通过代理人进行恶意攻击的情况下也是成功的。
    Despite poor treatment results, a family-oriented approach and the securing of residency have been deemed essential to recovery from resignation syndrome (RS). In a retrospective cohort study, we evaluated an alternative method involving environmental therapy, with patients separated from their parents, while actively abstaining from involving the asylum process in treatment. We examined medical records, social services acts, and residential care home acts from 13 individuals treated at Solsidan residential care home between 2005 and 2020. Severity and outcome were assessed with Clinical Global Impression, Severity and Improvement subscales. Thirteen participants were included and out of these nine (69%) recovered, i.e. they very much or much improved. Out of the eight that were separated, all recovered, also, one non-separated recovered. The difference in outcome between subjects separated and not was significant (p = 0.007). Moreover, out of the five which received a residency permit during treatment, one recovered whereas four did not. The difference in outcome between subjects granted residency and not was significant (p = 0.007). The data revealed three (23%) cases of simulation where parents were suspected to have instigated symptoms. Our evaluation suggests that separation from parents and abstaining from invoking residency permit could be essential components when treating RS. Relying on a family-oriented approach, and residency could even be detrimental to recovery. The examined intervention was successful also in cases of probable malingering by proxy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Live-in child domestic work is a mostly exploitative informal labour sector that involves child migration and long-term, most often forced separation from family and extended family network. This is the first empirical exploration of children\'s lived experiences of ongoing family-child separation in the context of child domestic work.
    While numerous studies conducted on childhood, child development and child health in the context of child labour argue that family separation is detrimental to children\'s psychosocial health, little is known about how this separation is understood by children living through ongoing separation while being employed in child domestic work. This study aimed at an empirical exploration of how child domestic workers experience the impact, meaning of, and coping with family separation in the context of child domestic work.
    10 children (10-14 years old) working as live-in domestic help in Karnataka, India.
    Data collection for this small-scale, exploratory qualitative study consisted of the administration of consecutive (2-3) task-based narrative interviews, involving graphic elicitation and doll-play techniques, with live-in child domestic workers.
    Findings from children\'s narrative accounts indicate how they relate ongoing family separation to cultural meaning systems regarding filial duty, family cohesion, and the role of the extended family network as a way of understanding, living and coping with family-child separation in the face of the stressors of live-in child domestic work.
    This paper generates an explorative understanding of how children make meaning of family separation, and their perspectives on re-uniting with their families. It also aims to aid organizations in designing family re-integration protocols based on perspectives gleaned from the children.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Children who are left behind when their parents migrate for work have a high prevalence of emotional and behavioral problems, which affect social function and increase family burden. To date, no national survey has been conducted on the emotional and behavioral problems of left-behind children (LBC) in China. This study aimed to investigate the emotional and behavioral outcomes of primary school LBC in the fourth grade in impoverished rural China and the possible influences of family environment and parenting practices.
    A cross-sectional study was carried out in 27 rural counties in the central and western parts of China from November 2016 to January 2017. The method of quota sampling was adopted to achieve a representative sample using postweighting adjustment. The survey sample was distributed proportionately across each county. LBC were defined as children aged <16 years who had two parents leave home to work or one parent leave home while the other lost the capacity to rear their children. The term \"non-left-behind children\" (NLBC) refers to children who have at least one parent who has not migrated for work. The Strengths and Difficulty Questionnaire (SDQ) was applied to measure children\'s emotional and behavioral problems.
    After the weighted calculations were performed, there were 1,147 LBC and 3,953 NLBC. The proportion of abnormal SDQ total scores (>17) was significantly higher in the LBC group than in the NLBC group (15.6% vs. 11.6%; p < .01). Binary regression analysis showed that high levels of insomnia (odds ratio [OR] 1.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-2.27), loneliness (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.13-2.43), and self-harm (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.17-3.16) may increase the risk of abnormal SDQ total scores in LBC.
    LBC showed a higher prevalence of abnormal SDQ total scores than NLBC. Insomnia, loneliness, and self-harm behavior were associated with abnormal SDQ total scores in LBC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号