Family Separation

家庭分离
  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    家庭分离作为一种压迫机制的做法在美国有着根深蒂固的历史,表现在不同的环境中,包括惩罚性移民政策。本系统综述旨在对移民政策导致的家庭分离及其对移民心理健康的影响进行严格和最新的综合研究,同时区分强迫家庭分离,家庭分离受到限制的选择,生活在家庭分离的恐惧中。我们使用与家庭分离相关的关键字系统地搜索了四个书目数据库,迁移,跨国家庭,以及1月1日或之前以英语发表的同行评审研究的心理健康,2022年。审查结果表明,家庭分离或恐惧可能会导致抑郁症,焦虑,行为和情绪问题,睡眠障碍,以及受影响儿童的压力或痛苦。同样,受影响的父母或照顾者可能会经历压力或痛苦,抑郁症,焦虑,和睡眠障碍。调查结果呼吁改变移民政策,优先考虑家庭团聚和全面的心理健康干预措施,以应对美国移民中家庭分离或恐惧的普遍后果
    The practice of family separation as a mechanism of oppression has a deep-rooted history in the U.S., manifesting in diverse contexts, including punitive migration policies. This systematic review aimed to provide a rigorous and updated synthesis of the research on family separation as a result of migration policies and its impacts on immigrants\' mental health while making a distinction between forced family separation, family separation by constrained choices, and living with the fear of family separation. We systematically searched four bibliographic databases using keywords related to family separation, migration, transnational families, and mental health for peer-reviewed studies published in English on or before January 1st, 2022. Results of the review indicate that family separation or fear of it may result in depression, anxiety, behavioral and emotional issues, sleep disturbances, and stress or distress in affected children. Similarly, impacted parents or caregivers might experience stress or distress, depression, anxiety, and sleep disturbances. Findings call for migration policy changes prioritizing family unity and comprehensive mental health interventions to respond to the pervasive consequences of family separation or fear thereof among immigrants in the U.S.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    难民危机迅速蔓延,这十年的全球难民人数比过去增加了一倍,导致对庇护政策及其心理影响的进一步关注。这项系统审查的目的是进一步强调家庭分离与难民心理健康障碍风险之间的相关性。这项特别的审查使用了来自不同国家的定量和定性数据,以比较大约8,737名15岁及以上难民的心理健康状况。这样做是为了确定家族分离是否可能影响他们的整体生活质量。因此,与家人的分离被发现与创伤后应激障碍的症状有关,抑郁症,焦虑,成人分离焦虑症,间歇性爆炸性疾病,还有更多.研究报告称,当模型针对家庭分离进行调整时,精神健康障碍的患病率差异很大。考虑了改善难民庇护程序和心理健康服务的方法。
    The refugee crisis is spreading rapidly, with the number of global refugees this decade doubling in comparison to the last, leading to further concern regarding asylum policies and their psychological impacts. The aim of this systematic review is to further emphasize the correlation between familial separation and the risk of mental health disorders in refugees. This particular review uses quantitative and qualitative data sourced from a variety of countries to comparatively view the mental health status of approximately 8,737 refugees ages 15 and older. This was done to determine if familial separation could potentially impact their overall quality of life. As a result, separation from one\'s family was found to be correlated with symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder, depression, anxiety, adult separation anxiety disorder, intermittent explosive disorder, and more. Studies reported a high variance in the prevalence of mental health disorders when models were adjusted for family separation. Methods to improve asylum procedure and mental health services for refugees is taken into consideration.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    虽然跨国社会联系和交流是移民研究的核心问题,健康研究人员经常忽视它们的重要性。在跨国网络内进行持续和循环的信息交流,也被定义为社会汇款,促进创新的传播,有可能推动当代社会和文化变革。对健康的影响,幸福,寻求护理很重要,但是研究不足,需要考虑的尺寸。我们进行了系统的叙述性证据综合,以描述该领域的知识现状,并确定卫生研究人员的差距和未来方向。在2017年4月至2019年5月之间,Medline进行了一系列迭代搜索,Embase,PsycINFO和PubMed,再加上反向和正向引文搜索,确定了1173篇潜在论文。筛选结果包括36篇论文,18个关注移民人口,18个关注落后的人。三大健康主题是寻求健康策略,性健康和生殖健康问题,和医疗保健支持。And,虽然并不总是明确地确定,心理健康和福祉进一步突出,交叉主题。关于移民人口的文章都是在全球北方发表的,18篇中有13篇使用了定性方法。确定了五个主要主题:持续社会关系的治疗效果,破坏了社会关系,医疗保健的混合,促进与医疗保健提供者的联系,以及鼓励或破坏跨国社会交流的因素。与落后的人有关的论文主要集中在全球南方,并采用了定性和定量方法。确定了四个主要主题:跨国转让与健康有关的建议,规范,移徙者与健康行为/结果之间的联系;健康知识的跨国集体转让;交流中的权力和阻力。调查结果表明,跨国社会交流既可以支持也可以损害移民和留守者的健康。这项审查证实,必须增加该领域研究的数量和质量,以便通过更好地了解这些对移民和留守者健康的重要影响,从而为卫生政策和实践提供信息。
    While transnational social ties and exchanges are a core concern within migration studies, health researchers have often overlooked their importance. Continuous and circular exchanges of information within transnational networks, also defined as social remittances, facilitate the diffusion of innovations, potentially driving contemporary social and cultural change. Influences on health, wellbeing, and care-seeking are important, but under-researched, dimensions for consideration. We undertook a systematic narrative evidence synthesis to describe the current state of knowledge in this area and to identify gaps and future directions for health researchers to take. Between April 2017 and May 2019, an iterative series of searches in Medline, Embase, PsycINFO and PubMed, plus backward and forward citation searches identified 1173 potential papers. Screening resulted in 36 included papers, eighteen focused on migrant populations and eighteen on those who remain behind. The top three health topics were health-seeking strategies, sexual and reproductive health issues, and healthcare support. And, while not always explicitly identified, mental health and wellbeing was a further prominent, cross-cutting theme. Articles on migrant populations were all conducted in the global North and 13 out of 18 used qualitative methods. Five main themes were identified: therapeutic effect of the continuing social relationships, disrupted social relationships, hybridisation of healthcare, facilitation of connections to healthcare providers, and factors encouraging or undermining transnational social exchanges. Papers concerned with those who remain behind were mainly focused on the global South and used a mix of qualitative and quantitative approaches. Four main themes were identified: transnational transfer of health-related advice, norms, and support; associations between migrant linkages and health behaviours/outcomes; transnational collective transfer of health knowledge; and power and resistance in exchanges. Findings suggest that transnational social exchanges can both support and undermine the health of migrants and those who remain behind. This review confirms that the volume and quality of research in this area must be increased so that health policy and practice can be informed by a better understanding of these important influences on the health of both migrants and those who remain behind.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    简介:尽管研究了留守儿童,对跨跨国空间的留守妇女知之甚少。这次范围审查的目的是评估范围,范围,以及现有关于其伴侣跨境移民的留守妇女文献的性质。方法:本范围审查以Arksey和O\'Malley的五步方法为指导。包括54篇文章,这些文章侧重于跨跨国空间的留守妇女。数据使用描述性统计和常规内容分析进行综合。结果:留守妇女主要来自墨西哥(n=13),移民目的地主要是美国(n=14)。我们确定了两个主要主题:(a)妇女的社会,经济和文化条件以及(B)妇女的福祉。讨论:我们发现了有关跨国移民背景下留守妇女的重大知识差距。讨论了对未来研究和实践的启示。
    Introduction: Despite the research on left-behind children, less is known about left-behind women across transnational spaces. The purpose of this scoping review was to assess the extent, range, and nature of the existing body of literature on left-behind women whose partners have migrated across borders. Method: This scoping review was guided by the five-step approach of Arksey and O\'Malley. Fifty-four articles that focused on left-behind women across transnational spaces were included. Data were synthesized using descriptive statistics and conventional content analysis. Results: Left-behind women were primarily from Mexico (n = 13) and the migrants\' place of destination was primarily the United States (n = 14). We identified two major themes: (a) women\'s social, economic and cultural conditions and (b) women\'s well-being. Discussion: We identified significant knowledge gaps regarding left-behind women in the context of transnational migration. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号