Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a pivotal intervention among HIV prevention strategies. We aimed to narratively revise the topic of HIV acute infection in the setting of PrEP exposure with a focus on diagnostic options, clinical features, and future PrEP perspectives, with a particular focus on users with high adherence to PrEP. We searched the main databases (PubMed, Embase, and Scopus) with the keywords \"PrEP\" or \"Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis\" and \"HIV\" or \"PLWH\" and \"breakthrough\" or \"acute infection\" or \"primary infection\". We included all randomized clinical trials and non-experimental studies (both case reports and observational studies) ever published. In the present narrative review, we revise the diagnostic challenges related to HIV diagnosis in the setting of PrEP and the clinical characteristics and symptoms of breakthrough infections. We discuss the management of acute HIV infection during PrEP and the new challenges that arise from the use of long-acting drugs for PrEP. Our review underlines that although extremely rare, HIV seroconversions are still possible during PrEP, even in a context of high adherence. Efforts to promptly identify these events must be included in the PrEP follow-up in order to minimize the chance of overlooked HIV breakthrough infections and thus exposure to suboptimal concentrations of antiretrovirals.

There is a vast amount of published literature concerning dental veneers; however, the effects of tooth preparation, aging, veneer type, and resin cement type on the failure of dental veneers in laboratory versus clinical scenarios are not clear. The purpose of the present narrative review was to determine the principal factors associated with failures of dental veneers in laboratory tests and to understand how these factors translate into clinical successes/failures. Articles were identified and screened by the lead author in January 2024 using the keywords \'\'dental veneer\", \"complication\", \"survival rate\", \"failure\", and \"success rate\" using PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Science Direct. The inclusion criteria included articles published between January 1999 and January 2024 on the topics of preparation of a tooth, aging processes of the resin cement and veneer, translucency, thickness, fabrication technique of the veneer; shade, and thickness of the resin cement. The exclusion criteria included articles that discussed marginal and internal fit, microhardness, water sorption, solubility, polishability, occlusal veneers, retention, surface treatments, and wear. The results of the present review indicated that dental veneers generally have a high survival rate (>90% for more than 10 years). The amount of preserved enamel layer plays a paramount role in the survival and success rates of veneers, and glass-ceramic veneers with minimal/no preparation showed the highest survival rates. Fracture was the primary failure mechanism associated with decreased survival rate, followed by debonding and color change. Fractures increased in the presence of parafunctional activities. Fewer endodontic complications were associated with veneer restorations. No difference was observed between the maxillary and mandibular teeth. Clinical significance: Fractures can be reduced by evaluation of occlusion immediately after cementation and through the use of high-strength veneer materials, resin cements with low moduli, and thin layers of highly polished veneers. Debonding failures can be reduced with minimal/no preparation, and immediate dentin sealing should be considered when dentin is exposed. Debonding can also be reduced by preventing contamination from blood, saliva, handpiece oil, or fluoride-containing polishing paste; through proper surface treatment (20 s of hydrofluoric acid etching for glass ceramic followed by silane for 60 s); and through use of light-cured polymerization for thin veneers. Long-term color stability may be maintained using resin cements with UDMA-based resin, glass ceramic materials, and light-cure polymerization with thin veneers.

Periprosthetic shoulder infection (PSI) remains a challenging complication after shoulder arthroplasty. Therapeutic options include one- or two-stage revision, irrigation and debridement, and resection arthroplasty. With our systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to compare one- and two-stage revisions for periprosthetic shoulder joint infections and determine the most appropriate therapeutic procedure. We performed an extensive literature search in PubMed, Ovid Medline, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CINAHL and filtered out all relevant studies. The meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects model, heterogeneity was analyzed using I2, and publication bias was assessed using the Egger\'s test. A total of 8 studies with one-stage revisions, 36 studies with two-stage revisions, and 12 studies with both one-stage and two-stage revisions were included. According to the random-effects model, the reinfection rate for the entirety of the studies was 12.3% (95% Cl: 9.6-15.3), with a low-to-moderate heterogeneity of I2 = 47.72%. The reinfection rate of the one-stage revisions was 10.9%, which was significantly lower than the reinfection rate of the two-stage revisions, which was 12.93% (p = 0.0062). The one-stage revision rate was significantly lower with 1.16 vs. 2.25 revisions in the two-stage revision group (p < 0.0001). The postoperative functional outcome in one-stage-revised patients was comparable but not statistically significant (p = 0.1523). In one- and two-stage revisions, most infections were caused by Cutibacterium acnes. In summary, our systematic review and meta-analysis show the superiority of single-stage revision regarding reinfection and revision rates in periprosthetic shoulder joint infection.

BACKGROUND: Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is an emerging effective treatment for achalasia. However, a significant proportion of patients do not respond well to the treatment. After over a decade of clinical practice, potential risk factors associated with POEM failure have been identified. This meta-analysis aimed to summarize the evidence of risk factors for POEM failure.
METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library from inception to June 10th, 2022. We included English studies that reported POEM outcomes in achalasia patients and identified risk factors for POEM failure. Relevant information was extracted and analyzed using fixed- or randomized-effect models to pool the effect size.
RESULTS: A total of 27 studies comprising 9371 patients with achalasia were included in this review. The pooled failure rate was 8% (90% CI 7%-10%). We identified sigmoid esophagus (OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.45-2.47), type I achalasia (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.04-1.63), and type III achalasia (OR 1.26, 95% CI 0.89-1.78) were associated with a worse clinical response. Conversely, type II achalasia was associated with a better response (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.47-0.75). Prior treatment with Heller myotomy (OR 5.75, 95% CI 3.97-8.34) and prior balloon dilation (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.07-1.29) were also associated with a higher risk of clinical failure.
CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis results demonstrated that sigmoid esophagus, manometric achalasia subtype, and prior treatment were associated with POEM failure. This information could be used to guide treatment decisions and improve the success rate of POEM in achalasia patients.

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic radiosurgery is the preferred option for treating brain arteriovenous malformation (AVM) when the risks associated with surgery outweigh the potential benefits. However, some patients require repeat radiosurgery due to residual AVM after the first procedure. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of repeated procedure of radiosurgery for AVM.
METHODS: A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guideline. The search was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science, using a pre-designed search string. Studies investigating the efficacy of repeat radiosurgery for residual AVM following initial single session radiosurgery were included. The risk of bias was assessed using the JBI tool. Meta-analysis and met-regression were performed to pool and inspect data.
RESULTS: Our meta-analysis, with a mean follow-up of 45.57 months, reveals repeat radiosurgery as a viable option for arteriovenous malformations (AVMs), achieving a 60.82% obliteration rate with a mean time to obliteration of 33.18 months. Meta-regression identifies AVM volume and Spetzler-Martin (SM) grade as factors influencing obliteration, with smaller volume and lower SM grades associated with higher rates. Complications include 10.33% radiation-induced changes, 5.26% post-radiosurgery hemorrhage, 2.56% neurologic deficits, and 0.67% cyst formation. Heterogeneity in complications is primarily attributed to male proportion and SM grade, while factors influencing post-radiosurgery hemorrhage remain unclear. The type of radiosurgery, whether Gamma Knife Radiosurgery (GKRS) or LINAC, does not significantly impact outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Repeat radiosurgery is a feasible, effective, and safe treatment for AVMs following failure of initial radiosurgery. When utilized in appropriate patient subgroups, it provides an acceptable risk-to-benefit profile. Feature studies are required to clarify its clear indications.

In this era of subspecialty care in orthopedics, iterations of implant design can occur in a silo which then precludes gaining knowledge from failures of implant design that may have occurred in different subspecialties. This literature review describes the history of failures in hip and shoulder arthroplasties with the purpose of identifying similar factors that led to previous implant failures. A review of the literature was performed by two reviewers assessing articles that described failed hip and shoulder arthroplasty systems over time. We identified and analyzed 53 implant failures-23 in hip arthroplasty and 30 in shoulder arthroplasty. These failures were categorized as material, mechanical, and technical. In hip arthroplasty, 48% were material, 39% mechanical, and 13% technical failures. In shoulder arthroplasty, the distribution was 10% material, 70% mechanical, and 20% technical failures. The distribution of these failures highlights similar and sometimes repeated failure mechanisms between subspecialties. This accentuates the importance of a collaborative approach to improve future arthroplasty designs.

The aim of the present systematic review was to investigate the clinical outcomes after the perforation of the maxillary sinus by dental implants, or after maxillary sinus membrane perforation during sinus lift procedure. Twenty-nine publications were included. Failure rates of implants in cases where perforation of sinus floor had happened (11 studies) was generally low, and only one case of transient sinusitis was reported. The estimated failure rate of these implants was 2.1% (SE 1.0%, p = 0.035). There were 1817 implants (73 failures) placed in augmented sinuses in which the sinus membrane was perforated and 5043 implants (274 failures) placed in sinuses with no perforated membrane, from 18 studies. The odds of implant failure difference between the groups were not significant (OR 1.347, p = 0.197). log OR of implant failure between perforated and non-perforated membrane groups did not significantly change with the follow-up time (-0.004/month; p = 0.500). In conclusion, implant failure rate is generally low either for implants penetrating in the floor of the maxillary sinus or implants placed in augmented sinuses in which the sinus membrane was perforated. The prevalence of postoperative infection/sinusitis is low, and it may depend either on the dimensions of the perforation or on the anatomical predisposition.

BACKGROUND: Distal humerus replacement (DHR) is a modular endoprosthesis mainly used for bone reconstruction after resection of primary or metastatic bone lesions. Studies on DHR failure rates and postoperative functional outcomes are scarce. We sought to assess implant survival, modes of failure, and functional outcomes in patients undergoing DHR for oncologic indications.
METHODS: A systematic review of the PubMed and Embase databases was performed. PRISMA guidelines were followed for this manuscript. Our study was registered on PROSPERO (457,260). Quality appraisal of included studies was conducted using the STROBE checklist. Prosthetic failure was assessed using the Henderson classification for megaprosthetic failures. We additionally performed a retrospective review of patients treated with a DHR for oncologic indications at a large tertiary care academic center. Weighted means were calculated to pool data.
RESULTS: Eleven studies with a total of 162 patients met the inclusion criteria. Mean follow-up was 3.7 years (range, 1.66-8 years). Henderson type 2 failures (aseptic loosening) were the most common mode of failure, occurring in 12% of cases (range, 0%-33%). Five-year implant survival was 72% (range, 49%-93.7%). Mean postoperative Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score was 81.1 (range, 74-84.3). In our institutional case series, 2 out of 5 patients had DHR revision for periprosthetic fracture and aseptic loosening at 16 and 27 months after surgery, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Distal humerus replacement is a successful reconstruction strategy for tumors of the distal humerus, with high implant survival and good to excellent functional outcomes.

Background: Aseptic loosening is one of the most common modes of failure of total ankle replacement (TAR). However, a precise definition of aseptic loosening is still lacking. This systematic review aimed to identify the variations of applied definitions and offer insights into the lack of consensus. Methods: Human studies reporting aseptic loosening of TAR published in peer-reviewed journals within the last decade were considered. The search strategy involved specific terms in Embase, MEDLINE ALL, and the Cochrane Library. Variations in aseptic loosening definitions were analysed. Results: Of 767 studies, 88 were included in this study. Only nine studies precisely defined aseptic loosening with significant variations. Twenty-two studies referenced the term and fifty-seven reported it as a complication but neither defined nor referenced it. Conclusions: Significant uncertainty exists regarding the universal definition of aseptic loosening of TAR, and many variations occur in terms of the assessment approach and criteria.

BACKGROUND: Although it is evident that a prior history of tunneled dialysis catheter (TDC) affects arteriovenous fistula (AVF) function, it is unclear whether its location (contralateral versus ipsilateral to AVF) has any effect on AVF maturation and failure rates. We aimed to document this possible effect.
METHODS: This systematic review and meta-analysis were performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies comparing outcomes between patients with contralateral TDC (CONTRA group) and those with ipsilateral one (IPSI group) were examined for inclusion. A random effects model meta-analysis of the odds ratio (OR) was conducted. Primary outcomes were AVF functional maturation, assisted maturation, and failure rates.
RESULTS: Four eligible studies comprising 763 patients were included in the meta-analysis. There were no significant differences in terms of AVF functional maturation (OR: 1.49; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.64-3.47; I2 = 83.4%), assisted maturation (OR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.29-1.19; I2 = 61.4%), and failure rates (OR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.29-1.58; I2 = 83.3%) between the 2 study groups.
CONCLUSIONS: TDC laterality seems not to affect fistula maturation rate in patients requiring TDC placement and concurrent AVF creation, but rather, vein- and patient-related characteristics might play a more important role in choosing TDC access site. Further studies are needed to validate these results.