在本文中,我们对使用眼动仪的任何研究的各个方面(如仪器,方法论,环境,参与者,等。)影响记录的眼动跟踪数据和获得的眼动和凝视测量的质量。我们通过这篇评论来代表报告任何涉及眼动仪的研究指南的经验基础。我们将此经验基础与五个现有的报告指南以及207个已发表的眼动追踪研究的数据库进行了比较。我们发现报告指南差异很大,与实际报告实践不符。我们最后得出一个最小值,基于实证研究的灵活报告准则(“基于经验的最低限度报告准则”部分)。
In this paper, we present a review of how the various aspects of any study using an eye tracker (such as the instrument, methodology, environment, participant, etc.) affect the quality of the recorded eye-tracking data and the obtained eye-movement and gaze measures. We take this review to represent the empirical foundation for reporting
guidelines of any study involving an eye tracker. We compare this empirical foundation to five existing reporting
guidelines and to a database of 207 published eye-tracking studies. We find that reporting
guidelines vary substantially and do not match with actual reporting practices. We end by deriving a minimal, flexible reporting
guideline based on empirical research (Section \"An empirically based minimal reporting
guideline\").