Essential medicines

基本药物
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:药品在医疗机构的医疗支出中占很大比例。他们的有效库存管理需要使库存成本与客户需求相匹配,并避免任何医疗机构的供应短缺。本研究旨在使用ABC-VEN分析来分析药品库存管理。
    方法:这项研究是在卢旺达医疗供应(RMS)有限公司进行的,Nyamagabe分支机构,从2017-2018财政年度到2019-2020财政年度,向Nyamagabe区集水区的医疗机构分发产品。它由457个项目的描述性回顾性研究组成。后者是在研究期间分发给公共卫生设施的通用基本药物。产品按照重要性的降序排列,我们根据帕累托原则对产品进行了细分。在对向医疗机构收费的此类药物的分布数据进行ABC分析之后,进行了VEN分析,以确定需要更多关注的高价值重要产品.
    结果:在ABC分析期间,将76种产品归入A组,占所有产品总成本的19.84%,价值为74.91%。B组包括116种产品,占30.29%,占总成本的20%,而C组有191种产品,占49.87%,价值仅占总成本的5.09%。在VEN分析期间,202种产品(44.20%)被归类为生命,231(50.54%)是必需的,24种产品(75.26%)为非生命产品。ABC-VEN分析得出的第一类药物占所有药物的55.80%,占所有总成本的87.88%,II类占40.70%,总成本为11.82%,和III类占3.50%,成本为0.3%。
    结论:这项研究结果表明,重要和昂贵产品的库存管理,比如抗生素,抗高血压药物,耗材,和大规模的解决方案将被仔细监测,以防止此类产品在医疗机构的水平短缺。ABC-VEN分析是实现其优化供应链的实用且负担得起的方法之一。
    BACKGROUND: Pharmaceuticals account for a large portion of healthcare spending in healthcare organizations. Their effective inventory management is required to match the cost of stocks with the customer demand and avoid shortage of supplies at any health facility level. This study aimed to analyze pharmaceuticals\' inventory management using ABC-VEN analysis.
    METHODS: The study was conducted at Rwanda Medical Supply (RMS) Ltd, Nyamagabe Branch for products distributed to health facilities in Nyamagabe District catchment area from the financial years 2017-2018 to 2019-2020. It consisted of a descriptive retrospective study of 457 items. The latter are generic essential medicines distributed to public health facilities during the study period. Products were arranged according to a descending order of importance, and we performed a breakdown of products according to the Pareto Principle. Following an ABC analysis of distribution data for such drugs billed to healthcare facilities, a VEN analysis was performed to identify high-value vital products that require more attention.
    RESULTS: During the ABC analysis, 76 products were classified in group A. These accounted for 19.84% and had a value of 74.91% of the total cost of all products. Group B included 116 products, representing 30.29% with a value of 20% of the total cost, while Group C had 191 products, representing 49.87% with a value of only 5.09% of the total cost. During the VEN analysis, 202 products (44.20%) were classified as vital, 231 (50.54%) as essential, and 24 products (75.26%) as non-vital. The analysis with ABC-VEN resulted in Class I representing 55.80% of all medicines that cost 87.88% of all total cost, Class II representing 40.70% with a total cost of 11.82%, and Class III representing 3.50% with a cost of 0.3%.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study results show that inventory management of vital and expensive products, such as antibiotics, antihypertensive pharmaceuticals, consumables, and massive solutions would be carefully monitored to prevent a shortage of such products at health facility levels. The ABC-VEN analysis is one of the practical and affordable method to achieve their optimized supply chain.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Evaluation Study
    自1996年以来,南非(SA)卫生系统已采用基本药物清单(EML)和标准治疗指南(STG)。迄今为止,尚无研究报告SASTG/EML的变化。这项研究描述了这些随时间(1996-2013年)的变化,并将最新的SASTG/EML与最新的世界卫生组织(WHO)模型EML进行比较,以评估这些列表的一致性。
    在2个医疗保健水平下对SASTGs/EML进行定量评估,以评估分子数量和比例的变化,剂型,以及药品的添加和删除。最新的世卫组织EML(第18个名单,第四儿童清单)和2012年妇女和儿童优先救生药物(PMWC)清单与最新可用的SASTG/EML(初级卫生保健(PHC2008),成人医院2012年和儿科医院2013年)。
    多年来,PHCSTG/EML的分子数量增加,但成人和儿科医院STG/EML的分子数量略有减少。随着时间的推移,增加和删除最多的是成人医院级STG/EML(2006年为27个,2012年为44个)。最新的SASTG/EML与WHO模型EML(第18个列表)之间的比较显示,所有SASTG/EML中总共没有112种药物。2013年SA儿科医院级STG/EML和PMWC之间的儿童药物比较表明,这些清单在大多数情况下有些一致,因为SASTG/EML中没有14种药物中的3种和20种疫苗中的11种。
    这是SA的第一项研究,以调查国家EMLs随时间的变化与分子有关,剂型和治疗类。这也是第一个将最新的SASTG/EML与WHO模型列表进行比较的公司。因此,结果提供了对趋势和SASTG/EML过程随时间的了解。
    The South African (SA) health system has employed an Essential Medicines List (EML) with Standard Treatment Guidelines (STGs) since 1996. To date no studies have reported the changes in SA STG/EMLs. This study describes these changes over time (1996-2013) and compares latest SA STG/EMLs with the latest World Health Organization (WHO) Model EMLs to assess alignment of these lists.
    A quantitative evaluation of SA STGs/EMLs at 2 levels of healthcare was performed to assess changes in the number and ratio of molecules, dosage forms, and additions and deletions of medicines. The most recent WHO EMLs (18th list, 4th list for children) and 2012 priority life-saving medicines for women and children (PMWC) list were compared to the most recent available SA STG/EMLs (Primary Health Care (PHC 2008), Adult Hospital 2012, and Paediatric Hospital 2013) at the time of the research.
    The number of molecules over the years increased for PHC STG/EMLs but decreased slightly for Adult and Paediatric hospital STG/EMLs. The most additions and deletions over time occurred in the Adult hospital level STG/EML (27 in 2006 and 44 in 2012). A comparison between the most recent SA STG/EMLs and WHO Model EML (18th list) showed that a total of 112 medicines were absent on all SA STG/EMLs. A comparison of medicines for children between the 2013 SA Paediatric Hospital level STG/EML and PMWC indicated that these lists were somewhat aligned for most conditions as only 3 of 14 medicines and 11 of 20 vaccines were absent from SA STG/EMLs.
    This is the first study in SA to investigate changes in National EMLs over time in relation to molecules, dosage forms and therapeutic classes. It is also the first to compare the latest SA STG/EMLs to the WHO Model lists. The results therefore provide insight into the trends and SA STG/EML processes over time.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    The WHO Essential Medicines List (EML) was established to help countries prioritise medicines according to their health care needs. Selection for the List is based on rigorous scrutiny of public health relevance, evidence on efficacy and safety, and comparative cost effectiveness. The WHO ideal is that a medicine and its efficacy are based on science, but in reality a medicine has a social life and the acceptance of a pharmaceutical intervention involves the interaction of a wide array of governmental and civil society organisations, and industry. Misoprostol is a medicine widely used for both abortion and prevention of postpartum haemorrhage in low income countries. Although the evidence for the latter is highly contested it was nevertheless added to the WHO EML in 2011. We use social network analysis to examine the social, political and economic field surrounding the WHO EML applications and health policy. We describe a chronology of the drug\'s use and of the applications to the WHO EML and carry out a social network analysis of the organisations and individuals involved in the applications, research and dissemination. The research identified a network of 238 organisations and individuals involved in the promotion of misoprostol for postpartum haemorrhage and present at the time of the WHO EML applications. There is a strong interdependency between the funding bodies, civil society organisations, researchers and clinician organisations. The research was part of an EU FP7 funded project on Accessing Medicines in Africa and South Asia (2010-2013).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号