Emergency Medical Services

紧急医疗服务
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:院前急救护理面临的挑战是任何阻碍院前护理质量或影响社区院前利用的障碍或障碍。亚的斯亚贝巴火灾和灾害风险管理委员会(AAFDRMC)在亚的斯亚贝巴提供院前急救服务。埃塞俄比亚。这些服务在政府资助的组织下运作,提供免费的紧急服务,包括院外医疗和运输到最合适的医疗机构。本研究旨在评估亚的斯亚贝巴火灾和灾害风险管理委员会院前急救的挑战,埃塞俄比亚。
    方法:于2022年11月20日至12月4日进行了一项定性的描述性研究。通过深入收集数据,对院前急救领域21名经验丰富的个人进行半结构化访谈,谁是使用有目的的抽样选择。采用专题分析方法对数据进行分析。
    结果:这项研究包括在亚的斯亚贝巴火灾和灾害风险管理委员会工作的21名参与者。出现了三个主要主题。出现的主题是与会者对亚的斯亚贝巴院前急救挑战的看法,埃塞俄比亚。
    结论:火灾和灾害风险管理委员会在亚的斯亚贝巴提供优质院前急救护理方面面临诸多挑战。受访者表示,基础设施,通信,和资源是院前急诊护理挑战的主要原因。从基础设施改革的角度来看,必须更加关注应急管理,规划,员工培训,和教育,招募额外的专业力量,改善沟通,并使院前急救成为该市的独立组织。
    BACKGROUND: A challenge to pre-hospital emergency care is any barrier or obstacle that impedes quality pre-hospital care or impacts community pre-hospital utilization. The Addis Ababa Fire and Disaster Risk Management Commission (AAFDRMC) provides pre-hospital emergency services in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. These services operate under a government-funded organization that delivers free emergency services, including out-of-hospital medical care and transportation to the most appropriate health facility. This study aimed to assess the challenges of pre-hospital emergency care at the Addis Ababa Fire and Disaster Risk Management Commission in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
    METHODS: A qualitative descriptive study was conducted from November 20 to December 4, 2022. Data were collected through in-depth, semi-structured interviews with 21 experienced individuals in the field of pre-hospital emergency care, who were selected using purposeful sampling. A thematic analysis method was used to analyze the data.
    RESULTS: This study includes twenty-one participants working at the Addis Ababa Fire and Disaster Risk Management Commission. Three major themes emerged. The themes that arose were the participants\' perspectives on the challenges of pre-hospital emergency care in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
    CONCLUSIONS: The Fire and Disaster Risk Management Commission faces numerous challenges in providing quality pre-hospital emergency care in Addis Ababa. Respondents stated that infrastructure, communication, and resources were the main causes of pre-hospital emergency care challenges. There has to be more focus on emergency management in light of infrastructure reform, planning, staff training, and education, recruiting additional professional power, improving communication, and making pre-hospital emergency care an independent organization in the city.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:尽管参加了情景培训,许多医疗急救人员(MFR)认为自己准备不足,无法应对大规模伤亡事件(MCI)。这项研究的目的是对传统的MCI情景训练方法进行全面检查,关注其固有的优势和局限性。对参加过MCI情景培训的MFR的看法进行了调查,以确定潜在的改进领域,并为完善MCI培训方案提供建议。
    方法:使用2021年10月至2022年2月之间进行的半结构化访谈的定性归纳法。采用定性内容分析对数据进行分析。
    方法:MCI情景培训涉及四个组织(三个紧急医疗服务和一个搜救组织),负责响应MCI,代表四个欧盟国家。
    方法:招募了27名MFR(17名紧急医疗服务人员和10名搜救志愿者)参与研究。
    结果:确定了影响MFR学习成果的两个类别和七个相关子类别(括号中显示):在反映现实世界事件的背景下进行培训(进行事件现场风险评估,伤亡的现实表现,将场景多样性纳入课程,机构间合作,培训事件现场管理时的角色调整)和教学框架的使用(允许错误,培训后评估的重要性)。
    结论:这项研究重申了传统MCI情景训练的价值,并确定了需要增强的领域,倡导现实场景,机构间合作,改进事件现场管理技能和全面的培训后评估。这表明MCI培训的概念化和交付方式发生了转变。探索了虚拟现实技术作为培训方法的宝贵补充的潜力,并说明需要进一步研究以确定这些技术的长期有效性。然而,培训方法的选择应考虑计划目标,目标人口和资源。
    OBJECTIVE: Despite participating in scenario training, many medical first responders (MFRs) perceive themselves as inadequately prepared to respond to mass casualty incidents (MCIs). The objective of this study was to conduct a comprehensive examination of traditional MCI scenario training methods, focusing on their inherent strengths and limitations. An investigation into the perceptions of MFRs who had participated in MCI scenario training was carried out to identify potential areas for improvement and provide recommendations for refining MCI training protocols.
    METHODS: Qualitative inductive approach using semistructured interviews that took place between October 2021 and February 2022. Data were analysed with qualitative content analysis.
    METHODS: MCI scenario training involving four organisations (three emergency medical services and one search-and-rescue organisation) tasked with responding to MCIs, collectively representing four European Union countries.
    METHODS: 27 MFRs (17 emergency medical services personnel and 10 search-and-rescue volunteers) were recruited to participate in the study.
    RESULTS: Two categories and seven associated subcategories (shown in parentheses) were identified as influencing the learning outcomes for MFRs: Training in a context mirroring real-world incidents (conducting incident scene risk assessment, realistic representation in casualties, incorporating scenario variety into the curriculum, interagency collaboration, role alignment when training incident site management) and use of a pedagogical framework (allowing for mistakes, the importance of post-training evaluation).
    CONCLUSIONS: This study reaffirms the value of traditional MCI scenario training and identifies areas for enhancement, advocating for realistic scenarios, interagency collaboration, improved incident site management skills and thorough post-training evaluation. It suggests a shift in MCI training conceptualisation and delivery. The potential of virtual reality technologies as a valuable addition to training methods is explored, with a note on the need for further research to ascertain the long-term effectiveness of these technologies. However, the selection of a training method should consider programme goals, target population and resources.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:急诊科(ED)的过度拥挤是一个全球性问题。早期和准确地识别患者的性格可能会限制在ED上花费的时间,从而提高所提供护理的吞吐量和质量。这项研究旨在比较医疗保健提供者和院前改良预警评分(MEWS)在预测住院需求方面的准确性。
    方法:前瞻性,观察,我们进行了多中心研究,包括由救护车带到ED的成年患者.涉及紧急医疗服务(EMS)人员,要求ED护士和医生使用结构化问卷来预测入院的需求。主要终点是医疗服务提供者和院前MEWS预测患者入院需求的准确性之间的比较。
    结果:共纳入798例患者,其中393例(49.2%)入院。预测住院的敏感性从80.0到91.9%不等。与EMS和ED护士相比,医生预测住院的准确性明显更高(p<0.001)。特异性范围为56.4至67.0%。所有医疗保健提供者在预测住院方面均优于MEWS≥3分(敏感性为80.0-91.9%对44.0%;所有p<0.001)。特别是对病房入院的预测比MEWS更准确(特异性94.7-95.9%对60.6%,所有p<0.001)。
    结论:医疗保健提供者可以准确预测住院需求,并且所有提供者的表现都优于MEWS得分。
    BACKGROUND: Overcrowding in the emergency department (ED) is a global problem. Early and accurate recognition of a patient\'s disposition could limit time spend at the ED and thus improve throughput and quality of care provided. This study aims to compare the accuracy among healthcare providers and the prehospital Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) in predicting the requirement for hospital admission.
    METHODS: A prospective, observational, multi-centre study was performed including adult patients brought to the ED by ambulance. Involved Emergency Medical Service (EMS) personnel, ED nurses and physicians were asked to predict the need for hospital admission using a structured questionnaire. Primary endpoint was the comparison between the accuracy of healthcare providers and prehospital MEWS in predicting patients\' need for hospital admission.
    RESULTS: In total 798 patients were included of whom 393 (49.2%) were admitted to the hospital. Sensitivity of predicting hospital admission varied from 80.0 to 91.9%, with physicians predicting hospital admission significantly more accurately than EMS and ED nurses (p < 0.001). Specificity ranged from 56.4 to 67.0%. All healthcare providers outperformed MEWS ≥ 3 score on predicting hospital admission (sensitivity 80.0-91.9% versus 44.0%; all p < 0.001). Predictions for ward admissions specifically were significantly more accurate than MEWS (specificity 94.7-95.9% versus 60.6%, all p < 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare providers can accurately predict the need for hospital admission, and all providers outperformed the MEWS score.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:物质滥用构成了重大的公共卫生挑战,以过早的发病率和死亡率为特征,提高医疗保健利用率。虽然研究表明,以前的住院和急诊就诊与药物滥用患者的死亡率增加有关,在该人群中,先前使用急诊医疗服务(EMS)是否与不良结局类似相关尚不清楚.这项研究的目的是确定住院或急诊科就诊前30天内的EMS利用率与药物滥用患者的住院结局之间的关系。
    方法:我们在物质滥用数据共享范围内对2017年至2021年成人急诊科就诊和住院(称为医院遭遇)进行了回顾性分析。它保存了在威斯康星大学两家医院看到的药物滥用患者的电子健康记录,与国家机构有联系,索赔,和社会经济数据集。使用回归模型,我们检查了EMS使用与院内死亡结果之间的关系,住院时间,重症监护病房(ICU)入院,和危重疾病事件,定义为有创机械通气或血管活性药物给药。模型根据年龄进行了调整,合并症,最初的疾病严重程度,物质误用类型,和社会经济地位。
    结果:在19,402次相遇中,与之前未使用过EMS的患者相比,在医院治疗后30天内至少发生过一次EMS事件的患者发生院内死亡的可能性更高(OR1.52,95%CI[1.05-2.14]),在对混杂因素进行调整后。在相遇前30天使用EMS与住院时间略有增加有关,但与ICU入院或危重疾病事件无关。
    结论:在住院前一个月内使用过EMS的药物滥用者,其院内死亡风险增加。增强对该人群中EMS用户的监测可以改善总体患者预后。
    BACKGROUND: Substance misuse poses a significant public health challenge, characterized by premature morbidity and mortality, and heightened healthcare utilization. While studies have demonstrated that previous hospitalizations and emergency department visits are associated with increased mortality in patients with substance misuse, it is unknown whether prior utilization of emergency medical service (EMS) is similarly associated with poor outcomes among this population. The objective of this study is to determine the association between EMS utilization in the 30 days before a hospitalization or emergency department visit and in-hospital outcomes among patients with substance misuse.
    METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of adult emergency department visits and hospitalizations (referred to as a hospital encounter) between 2017 and 2021 within the Substance Misuse Data Commons, which maintains electronic health records from substance misuse patients seen at two University of Wisconsin hospitals, linked with state agency, claims, and socioeconomic datasets. Using regression models, we examined the association between EMS use and the outcomes of in-hospital death, hospital length of stay, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and critical illness events, defined by invasive mechanical ventilation or vasoactive drug administration. Models were adjusted for age, comorbidities, initial severity of illness, substance misuse type, and socioeconomic status.
    RESULTS: Among 19,402 encounters, individuals with substance misuse who had at least one EMS incident within 30 days of a hospital encounter experienced a higher likelihood of in-hospital mortality (OR 1.52, 95% CI [1.05 - 2.14]) compared to those without prior EMS use, after adjusting for confounders. Using EMS in the 30 days prior to an encounter was associated with a small increase in hospital length of stay but was not associated with ICU admission or critical illness events.
    CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with substance misuse who have used EMS in the month preceding a hospital encounter are at an increased risk of in-hospital mortality. Enhanced monitoring of EMS users in this population could improve overall patient outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:当疑似前大血管闭塞(aLVO)的中风患者碰巧生活在农村地区时,院前运输有两个主要选择:(I)滴灌和装运(DNS)策略,这确保了在最近的主要卒中中心快速获得静脉溶栓(IVT),但需要耗时的院间转院进行血管内血栓切除术(EVT),因为后者仅在综合卒中中心(CSC)可用;和(ii)母体(MS)策略,这需要直接运输到CSC,并允许更快地访问EVT,但存在IVT延迟甚至完全错过时间窗口的风险。使用直升机可能会缩短到农村地区CSC的运输时间。然而,如果aLVO中风仅由现场紧急服务人员识别,此外,必须要求直升机,这延长了院前时间,部分抵消了时间优势。我们假设,在调度员怀疑LVO的情况下,平行激活地面和直升机运输(LVO指导的调度策略)可以缩短农村地区的院前时间,并可以更快地使用IVT和EVT进行治疗。
    方法:作为概念证明,我们报告了LESTOR试验中的一例病例,其中调度员在紧急呼叫期间怀疑发生了aLVO卒中,并并行派遣了EMS和HEMS.基于这个案子,我们使用高度现实的建模方法,将提供的aLVO指导的调度策略与DnS和MS策略关于IVT和EVT的时间进行了比较。
    结果:使用aLVO指导的调度策略,与DnS或MS策略相比,患者接受IVT和EVT的速度更快.IVT比DnS策略快6分钟,比MS策略快22分钟,EVT比DnS策略早47分钟,比MS策略早22分钟。
    结论:在农村地区,在调度员识别出疑似aLVO的中风患者后,平行启动地面和直升机急救服务,可以快速进入IVT和EVT,从而克服了DnS和MS策略的局限性。
    BACKGROUND: When stroke patients with suspected anterior large vessel occlusion (aLVO) happen to live in rural areas, two main options exist for prehospital transport: (i) the drip-and-ship (DnS) strategy, which ensures rapid access to intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) at the nearest primary stroke center but requires time-consuming interhospital transfer for endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) because the latter is only available at comprehensive stroke centers (CSC); and (ii) the mothership (MS) strategy, which entails direct transport to a CSC and allows for faster access to EVT but carries the risk of IVT being delayed or even the time window being missed completely. The use of a helicopter might shorten the transport time to the CSC in rural areas. However, if the aLVO stroke is only recognized by the emergency service on site, the helicopter must be requested in addition, which extends the prehospital time and partially negates the time advantage. We hypothesized that parallel activation of ground and helicopter transportation in case of aLVO suspicion by the dispatcher (aLVO-guided dispatch strategy) could shorten the prehospital time in rural areas and enable faster treatment with IVT and EVT.
    METHODS: As a proof-of-concept, we report a case from the LESTOR trial where the dispatcher suspected an aLVO stroke during the emergency call and dispatched EMS and HEMS in parallel. Based on this case, we compare the provided aLVO-guided dispatch strategy to the DnS and MS strategies regarding the times to IVT and EVT using a highly realistic modeling approach.
    RESULTS: With the aLVO-guided dispatch strategy, the patient received IVT and EVT faster than with the DnS or MS strategies. IVT was administered 6 min faster than in the DnS strategy and 22 min faster than in the MS strategy, and EVT was started 47 min earlier than in the DnS strategy and 22 min earlier than in the MS strategy.
    CONCLUSIONS: In rural areas, parallel activation of ground and helicopter emergency services following dispatcher identification of stroke patients with suspected aLVO could provide rapid access to both IVT and EVT, thereby overcoming the limitations of the DnS and MS strategies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在英国,每年有超过30,000人经历院外心脏骤停,只有7-8%的患者存活。改善生存结果的最有效方法之一是以呼叫紧急服务和开始胸部按压的形式进行旁观者干预。此外,公众必须感到有权在紧急情况下采取行动和使用这些知识。这项研究旨在评估超简短的CPR熟悉视频,该视频使用授权的社交启动语言将CPR作为苏格兰的规范。
    方法:在一项随机对照试验中,参与者(n=86)被分配观看超简短CPR视频干预或传统的长格式CPR视频干预.完成干预前调查问卷后,检查人口统计学变量和先前的CPR知识,参与者使用测量复苏质量的CPR人体模型在便携式模拟套件中完成了紧急服务主导的复苏模拟.然后,参与者完成了问卷调查,以检查社会认同和对执行CPR的态度。
    结果:在模拟复苏期间,超简短干预组进行胸外按压的累积时间显著高于长式干预组.长型干预组的平均每分钟按压率明显高于超短干预组,然而,两项评分均在临床可接受范围内.在CPR质量方面没有观察到其他差异。关于社会认同措施,与长期干预参与者相比,处于超短暂状态的参与者对其他苏格兰人的预期紧急支持有更大的感觉.对执行CPR的态度没有显着差异。
    结论:社会准备,超简短的心肺复苏干预有望成为一种为公众提供基本复苏技能并授权观众在紧急情况下进行干预的方法。这些干预措施可能是为高危人群提供复苏技能和补充传统复苏培训的有效途径。
    BACKGROUND: Over 30,000 people experience out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in the United Kingdom annually, with only 7-8% of patients surviving. One of the most effective methods of improving survival outcomes is bystander intervention in the form of calling the emergency services and initiating chest compressions. Additionally, the public must feel empowered to act and use this knowledge in an emergency. This study aimed to evaluate an ultra-brief CPR familiarisation video that uses empowering social priming language to frame CPR as a norm in Scotland.
    METHODS: In a randomised control trial, participants (n = 86) were assigned to view an ultra-brief CPR video intervention or a traditional long-form CPR video intervention. Following completion of a pre-intervention questionnaire examining demographic variables and prior CPR knowledge, participants completed an emergency services-led resuscitation simulation in a portable simulation suite using a CPR manikin that measures resuscitation quality. Participants then completed questionnaires examining social identity and attitudes towards performing CPR.
    RESULTS: During the simulated resuscitation, the ultra-brief intervention group\'s cumulative time spent performing chest compressions was significantly higher than that observed in the long-form intervention group. The long-form intervention group\'s average compressions per minute rate was significantly higher than the ultra-brief intervention group, however both scores fell within a clinically acceptable range. No other differences were observed in CPR quality. Regarding the social identity measures, participants in the ultra-brief condition had greater feelings of expected emergency support from other Scottish people when compared to long-form intervention participants. There were no significant group differences in attitudes towards performing CPR.
    CONCLUSIONS: Socially primed, ultra-brief CPR interventions hold promise as a method of equipping the public with basic resuscitation skills and empowering the viewer to intervene in an emergency. These interventions may be an effective avenue for equipping at-risk groups with resuscitation skills and for supplementing traditional resuscitation training.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    虽然广泛测量,呼气末二氧化碳(EtCO2)和院外心脏骤停(OHCA)结局之间的时变关联尚不清楚.
    在实用气道复苏试验(PART)中评估EtCO2与自发循环恢复(ROSC)之间的时间关联。
    本研究是对复苏结果联盟多中心急诊医疗服务机构进行的整群随机试验的二次分析。PART从2015年12月1日至2017年11月4日纳入了3004名患有非创伤性OHCA的成年人(年龄≥18岁)。2023年6月进行的这项分析有1172例可用的EtCO2。
    PART评估了喉管与气管插管对72小时存活的影响。紧急医疗服务机构使用标准监测器收集连续的EtCO2记录,此二次分析确定了每次通气的最大EtCO2值,并使用先前验证的自动信号处理确定了1分钟时间内的平均EtCO2。包括所有可解释的EtCO2信号大于50%的晚期气道病例。计算EtCO2相对于复苏的变化斜率。
    主要结局是通过院前或急诊科可触及的脉搏确定的ROSC。使用Mann-Whitney检验比较离散时间点的EtCO2值,使用Cochran-Armitage趋势检验比较了EtCO2的时间趋势。进行多变量逻辑回归,根据Utstein标准和EtCO2坡度进行调整。
    在纳入研究的1113名患者中,694(62.4%)为男性;285(25.6%)为黑人或非裔美国人,592(53.2%)为白人,236人(21.2%)是另一个种族;中位年龄(IQR)为64岁(52-75岁).心搏骤停最常见的是没有目击(n=579[52.0%]),不可电击(n=941[84.6%]),和非公开(n=999[89.8%])。有198例(17.8%)有ROSC,915例(82.2%)无ROSC。ROSC和非ROSC病例的中间EtCO2值在10分钟时显著不同(39.8[IQR,27.1-56.4]mmHgvs26.1[IQR,14.9-39.0]mmHg;P<.001)和5分钟(43.0[IQR,28.1-55.8]mmHgvs25.0[IQR,13.3-37.4]mmHg;P<.001)复苏结束前。在ROSC病例中,二氧化碳中位数从30.5增加(IQR,22.4-54.2)mmHG至43.0(IQR,28.1-55.8)mmHg(趋势<.001的P)。在非ROSC案例中,EtCO2从30.8下降(IQR,18.2-43.8)mmHg至22.5(IQR,12.8-35.4)mmHg(趋势<.001的P)。使用具有EtCO2斜率的调整多变量逻辑回归,EtCO2的时间变化与ROSC相关(比值比,1.45[95%CI,1.31-1.61])。
    在对PART试验的二次分析中,EtCO2的时间增加与ROSC几率增加相关.这些结果表明在OHCA复苏期间利用连续波形二氧化碳图的价值。
    ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT02419573。
    UNASSIGNED: While widely measured, the time-varying association between exhaled end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2) and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) outcomes is unclear.
    UNASSIGNED: To evaluate temporal associations between EtCO2 and return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) in the Pragmatic Airway Resuscitation Trial (PART).
    UNASSIGNED: This study was a secondary analysis of a cluster randomized trial performed at multicenter emergency medical services agencies from the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium. PART enrolled 3004 adults (aged ≥18 years) with nontraumatic OHCA from December 1, 2015, to November 4, 2017. EtCO2 was available in 1172 cases for this analysis performed in June 2023.
    UNASSIGNED: PART evaluated the effect of laryngeal tube vs endotracheal intubation on 72-hour survival. Emergency medical services agencies collected continuous EtCO2 recordings using standard monitors, and this secondary analysis identified maximal EtCO2 values per ventilation and determined mean EtCO2 in 1-minute epochs using previously validated automated signal processing. All advanced airway cases with greater than 50% interpretable EtCO2 signal were included, and the slope of EtCO2 change over resuscitation was calculated.
    UNASSIGNED: The primary outcome was ROSC determined by prehospital or emergency department palpable pulses. EtCO2 values were compared at discrete time points using Mann-Whitney test, and temporal trends in EtCO2 were compared using Cochran-Armitage test of trend. Multivariable logistic regression was performed, adjusting for Utstein criteria and EtCO2 slope.
    UNASSIGNED: Among 1113 patients included in the study, 694 (62.4%) were male; 285 (25.6%) were Black or African American, 592 (53.2%) were White, and 236 (21.2%) were another race; and the median (IQR) age was 64 (52-75) years. Cardiac arrest was most commonly unwitnessed (n = 579 [52.0%]), nonshockable (n = 941 [84.6%]), and nonpublic (n = 999 [89.8%]). There were 198 patients (17.8%) with ROSC and 915 (82.2%) without ROSC. Median EtCO2 values between ROSC and non-ROSC cases were significantly different at 10 minutes (39.8 [IQR, 27.1-56.4] mm Hg vs 26.1 [IQR, 14.9-39.0] mm Hg; P < .001) and 5 minutes (43.0 [IQR, 28.1-55.8] mm Hg vs 25.0 [IQR, 13.3-37.4] mm Hg; P < .001) prior to end of resuscitation. In ROSC cases, median EtCO2 increased from 30.5 (IQR, 22.4-54.2) mm HG to 43.0 (IQR, 28.1-55.8) mm Hg (P for trend < .001). In non-ROSC cases, EtCO2 declined from 30.8 (IQR, 18.2-43.8) mm Hg to 22.5 (IQR, 12.8-35.4) mm Hg (P for trend < .001). Using adjusted multivariable logistic regression with slope of EtCO2, the temporal change in EtCO2 was associated with ROSC (odds ratio, 1.45 [95% CI, 1.31-1.61]).
    UNASSIGNED: In this secondary analysis of the PART trial, temporal increases in EtCO2 were associated with increased odds of ROSC. These results suggest value in leveraging continuous waveform capnography during OHCA resuscitation.
    UNASSIGNED: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02419573.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    每天有相当比例的紧急呼叫是针对疗养院居民的。随着整个欧洲人口的老龄化,预计疗养院(NH)的紧急呼叫和干预措施将增加。这些干预措施和医院转移的一部分可能是可以预防的,院前急救医务人员可能认为是不合适的。该研究旨在了解比利时急诊医师和急诊护士对NHs紧急呼叫和干预措施的看法,并调查导致他们对不当行为的看法的因素。
    在比利时急诊医师和急诊护士中进行了一项探索性非干预性前瞻性研究,目前在院前急救医学工作。电子问卷于九月发出,2023年10月和11月。描述性统计用于分析总体结果,以及比较急诊医生和急诊护士对某些主题的答案。
    共有114名急诊医生和78名护士对调查做出了回应。平均年龄为38岁,平均院前医疗保健工作经验为10年。疗养院工作人员被认为人手不足,缺乏能力,对病人护理的影响,尤其是在晚上和周末。全科医生被认为没有充分参与患者的护理,以及在需要的时候经常不可用,导致紧急医疗服务(EMS)的激活,并将疗养院居民转移到急诊科(ED)。在EMS干预中几乎从来没有预先指示,转移往往不符合患者的意愿。姑息治疗和疼痛治疗被认为是不够的。急诊医生和护士大多感到失望和沮丧。此外,急诊医师和护士在某些主题上的看法存在差异.急诊护士更加坚信,疗养院的医生应该全天候可用,如果疗养院的工作人员对医疗干预有更多的权力,则可以避免转移。急诊护士的印象也更多的是疼痛管理不足,急诊医生比急诊护士更害怕干预期间做得太少的医学影响。减少EMS干预次数的建议是更多的全科医生参与(82%),更好的疗养院员工教育/能力(77%),更多的养老院工作人员(67%),流动姑息治疗支持团队(65%)和流动老年护理干预团队(52%).
    护理院的EMS干预措施几乎从未被急诊医生和护士视为必要或指示,与适当的EMS水平几乎从未被激活。发现了以下关键问题:养老院工作人员的数量和能力不足,由于全科医生的缺乏以及缺乏对患者护理的参与,初级保健不足,缺乏现成的预先指令。全科医生应更多地参与致电紧急医疗服务(EMS)并将疗养院居民转移到急诊科的决定。医护人员应努力对患者的意愿保持警惕。决定可避免的养老院居民入院的情感负担,也许是出于对医疗法律后果的恐惧,如果做得太少,让急诊医生和护士感到沮丧和失望。疗养院人员配备的改善,更多的急性和慢性全科医生咨询,和移动老年和姑息治疗支持团队是潜在的解决方案。进一步的研究应着眼于上述缺陷的结构改进。
    UNASSIGNED: A considerable percentage of daily emergency calls are for nursing home residents. With the ageing of the overall European population, an increase in emergency calls and interventions in nursing homes (NH) is to be expected. A proportion of these interventions and hospital transfers may be preventable and could be considered as inappropriate by prehospital emergency medical personnel. The study aimed to understand Belgian emergency physicians\' and emergency nurses\' perspectives on emergency calls and interventions in NHs and investigate factors contributing to their perception of inappropriateness.
    UNASSIGNED: An exploratory non-interventional prospective study was conducted in Belgium among emergency physicians and emergency nurses, currently working in prehospital emergency medicine. Electronic questionnaires were sent out in September, October and November 2023. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the overall results, as well as to compare the answers between emergency physicians and emergency nurses about certain topics.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 114 emergency physicians and 78 nurses responded to the survey. The mean age was 38 years with a mean working experience of 10 years in prehospital healthcare. Nursing home staff were perceived as understaffed and lacking in competence, with an impact on patient care especially during nights and weekends. General practitioners were perceived as insufficiently involved in the patient\'s care, as well as often unavailable in times of need, leading to activation of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and transfers of nursing home residents to the Emergency Department (ED). Advance directives were almost never available at EMS interventions and transfers were often not in accordance with the patient\'s wishes. Palliative care and pain treatment were perceived as insufficient. Emergency physicians and nurses felt mostly disappointed and frustrated. Additionally, differences in perception were noted between emergency physicians and nurses regarding certain topics. Emergency nurses were more convinced that the nursing home physician should be available 24/7 and that transfers could be avoided if nursing home staff had more authority regarding medical interventions. Emergency nurses were also more under the impression that pain management was inadequate, and emergency physicians were more afraid of the medical implications of doing too little during interventions than emergency nurses. Suggestions to reduce the number of EMS interventions were more general practitioner involvement (82%), better nursing home staff education/competences (77%), more nursing home staff (67%), mobile palliative care support teams (65%) and mobile geriatric nursing intervention teams (52%).
    UNASSIGNED: EMS interventions in nursing homes were almost never seen as necessary or indicated by emergency physicians and nurses, with the appropriate EMS level almost never being activated. The following key issues were found: shortages in numbers and competence of nursing home staff, insufficient primary care due to the unavailability of the general practitioner as well as a lack of involvement in patient care, and an absence of readily available advance directives. General practitioners should be more involved in the decision to call the Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and to transfer nursing home residents to the Emergency Department. Healthcare workers should strive for vigilance regarding the patients\' wishes. The emotional burden of deciding on an avoidable hospital admission of nursing home residents, perhaps out of fear for medico-legal consequences if doing too little, leaves the emergency physicians and nurses frustrated and disappointed. Improvements in nursing home staffing, more acute and chronic general practitioner consultations, and mobile geriatric and palliative care support teams are potential solutions. Further research should focus on the structural improvement of the above-mentioned shortcomings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    虽然2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)可能会增加镰状细胞病(SCD)患者的急性发作,这也可能改变了他们对急诊科(ED)服务的依赖。我们评估了COVID-19大流行和封锁对法国五个参考中心随访的成年SCD患者的ED就诊的影响,特别关注“高用户”(2019年访问量≥10次)。我们使用自控病例系列分析了2015年1月1日至2021年12月31日的ED访视率。在1530人中(17829次ED访问),我们观察到,在封锁期间和之后,急诊就诊人数显著减少,但效果随着时间的推移消失了.与大流行前相比,第一次封锁时,ED就诊的发生率为0.59[95%CI0.52-0.67],第二次为0.66[95%CI0.58-0.75],第三次为0.85[95%CI0.73-0.99]。高用户(4%的人,但33.7%的访问量)主要推动了第一次封锁后的减少。COVID-19封锁与急诊就诊减少有关。虽然大多数人在2021年4月之前恢复了基线利用率,但高用户的ED访问量却持续下降。了解导致高用户ED利用率下降的因素可能会为临床实践和卫生政策提供信息。
    While the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) might have increased acute episodes in people living with sickle cell disease (SCD), it may also have changed their reliance on emergency department (ED) services. We assessed the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and lockdowns on ED visits in adult SCD people followed in five French reference centres, with a special focus on \'high users\' (≥10 visits in 2019). We analysed the rate of ED visits from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2021, using a self-controlled case series. Among 1530 people (17 829 ED visits), we observed a significant reduction in ED visits during and after lockdowns, but the effect vanished over time. Compared to pre-pandemic, incidence rate ratios for ED visits were 0.59 [95% CI 0.52-0.67] for the first lockdown, 0.66 [95% CI 0.58-0.75] for the second and 0.85 [95% CI 0.73-0.99] for the third. High users (4% of people but 33.7% of visits) mainly drove the reductions after the first lockdown. COVID-19 lockdowns were associated with reduced ED visits. While most people returned to their baseline utilization by April 2021, high users had a lasting decrease in ED visits. Understanding the factors driving the drop in ED utilization among high users might inform clinical practice and health policy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:救护车服务背景下的团队合作表现出独特的特征,因为这种环境涉及一个小的核心团队,必须适应一个动态的团队结构,包括医疗保健专业人员和紧急服务。必须更深入地了解救护车团队的运作方式。因此,这项研究旨在探讨救护车专业人员团队合作的经验,以及团队培训计划的实施对他们的影响。
    方法:进行了一项定性的描述性研究,其中包括参加焦点小组访谈的救护车专业人员,他们在挪威一家医院信托基金的7个救护车站实施团队培训计划之前和之后进行。使用基于演绎归纳法的反身主题分析对数据进行了分析。
    结果:我们的分析揭示了15个子主题,这些主题是救护车专业人员在团队合作和团队培训计划方面的经验,根据团队结构的五个主要主题组织,通信,领导力,形势监测,和相互支持。救护车专业人员的经验范围从团队组成,人际关系和专业关系的重要性到他们对不同沟通方式的偏好以及救护车服务中团队领导的必要性。团队培训计划提高了团队合作意识,而团队合作工具的采用受到个人和环境因素的影响。简介/身份,Situation,背景,评估和建议(ISBAR)通信工具由于其易用性而被认为是该计划最有益的方面,这导致协商和信息移交的结构和质量得到改善。
    结论:这项研究记录了救护车专业人员团队合作的不同特征和偏好,强调在这方面熟练的伙伴关系的特别重要性。参加团队培训计划被认为是对团队合作重要性的宝贵提醒,从而为提高沟通技能提供了基础。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.gov-ID:NCT05244928。
    BACKGROUND: Teamwork in the context of ambulance services exhibits unique characteristics, as this environment involves a small core team that must adapt to a dynamic team structure that involves health care professionals and emergency services. It is essential to acquire a deeper understanding of how ambulance teams operate. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the experiences of ambulance professionals with teamwork and how they were influenced by the implementation of a team training programme.
    METHODS: A qualitative descriptive study was conducted involving ambulance professionals who took part in focus group interviews carried out both before and after the implementation of a team training program across seven ambulance stations within a Norwegian hospital trust. The data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis based on a deductive-inductive approach.
    RESULTS: Our analysis revealed 15 subthemes that characterised ambulance professionals\' experiences with teamwork and a team training programme, which were organised according to the five main themes of team structure, communication, leadership, situation monitoring, and mutual support. Ambulance professionals\' experiences ranged from the significance of team composition and interpersonal and professional relationships to their preferences regarding different communication styles and the necessity of team leaders within the ambulance service. The team training programme raised awareness of teamwork, while the adoption of teamwork tools was influenced by both individual and contextual factors. The Introduction/Identity, Situation, Background, Assessment and Recommendation (ISBAR) communication tool was identified as the most beneficial aspect of the programme due to its ease of use, which led to improvements in the structure and quality of consultations and information handover.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study documented the diverse characteristics and preferences associated with teamwork among ambulance professionals, emphasising the particular importance of proficient partnerships in this context. Participation in a team training programme was perceived as a valuable reminder of the significance of teamwork, thus providing a foundation for the enhancement of communication skills.
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov-ID: NCT05244928.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号