背景:近年来,世界范围内出现了全球范围的大流行。为了应对广泛的生命损失和严重后果,研究人员开发疫苗接种在一个快速的步伐,以免疫的人口。虽然这些疫苗是通过广泛的人体试验开发和测试的,历史上,已知疫苗在通用人口统计学中引起混合情绪。在拟议的研究中,我们旨在揭示政治和社会经济因素对分布在六大洲的217个国家中观察到的SARS-Cov-2疫苗接种趋势的影响。
方法:该研究假设对政府信任度较低的公民不太倾向于接种疫苗。为了检验这个假设,将专制统治下国家的疫苗接种趋势与民主国家进行了比较。Further,这项研究是用Cov-2疫苗接种数据合成的,这些数据来自我们的世界数据库,在分布在六大洲的217个国家中进行了采样。该研究通过探索性数据分析进行了分析,并提出了与各国识字率相比,疫苗传播考虑的相关性和影响因素。该研究关注疫苗接种传播趋势的另一个影响因素是不同国家的医疗费用。这项研究综合了政治和社会经济因素,这些因素在回顾各种社会经济特征的过程中被认真研究,这些特征可能包括国家识字率,整体GDP率,我们进一步证实了解决政治因素的工作,这些因素被讨论为民主或具有其他地位的国家地位。
结果:趋势的比较表明,SARS-Cov-2疫苗的传播在两种相反的治理类型之间具有可比性。SARS-Cov-2疫苗被广泛接受的主要影响因素是一个国家在医疗保健方面的支出。这些国家使用了大量疫苗来管理其人口,并且趋势显示出积极的增长。从数量上讲,各国使用的疫苗的总体百分比是辉瑞/BioNTech(17.55%),人造卫星V(7.08%),Sinovac(6.98%),国药/北京(10.04%),牛津/阿斯利康(19.56%),Cansino(2.85%),现代(12.05%),Covaxin(3.28%),约翰逊(10.89%),人造卫星光(3.07%),诺瓦克斯(3.49%)。虽然医疗费用最低的国家未能满足需求,而是依靠其他国家捐赠的疫苗来保护其人口。
结论:分析显示,在医疗保健上花费更多的国家是SARS-Cov-2疫苗接种推广最好的国家。为了进一步支持未来的决策,各国应解决其公民对疫苗接种的信任和情绪。为此,需要支出来开发和推广疫苗,并将其作为积极的健康工具。
The world in recent years has seen a pandemic of global scale. To counter the widespread loss of life and severe repercussions, researchers developed vaccinations at a fast pace to immunize the population. While the vaccines were developed and tested through extensive human trials, historically vaccines have been known to evoke mixed sentiments among the generic demographics. In the proposed study, we aim to reveal the impact of political and socio-economic factors on SARS-Cov-2 vaccination trends observed in two hundred and seventeen countries spread across the six continents.
The study had hypothesized that the citizens who have lower trust in their government would be less inclined towards vaccination programs. To test this hypothesis, vaccination trends of nations under authoritarian rule were compared against democratic nations. Further, the study was synthesized with Cov-2 vaccination data which was sourced from Our World Data repository, which was sampled among 217 countries spread across the 6 continents. The study was analyzed with exploratory data analysis and proposed with relevance and impacting factor that was considered for vaccine dissemination in comparison with the literacy rate of the nations. Another impacting factor the study focused on for the vaccination dissemination trends was the health expenses of different nations. The study has been synthesized on political and socio-economic factors where the features were ardently study in retrospect of varied socio- economic features which may include country wise literacy rate, overall GDP rate, further we substantiated the work to address the political factors which are discussed as the country status of democratic or having other status.
The comparison of trends showed that dissemination of SARS-Cov-2 vaccines had been comparable between the two-opposing types of governance. The major impact factor behind the wide acceptance of the SARS-Cov-2 vaccine was the expenditure done by a country on healthcare. These nations used a large number of vaccines to administer to their population and the trends showed positive growth. The overall percentage of vaccine utilized by countries in quantitative terms are Pfizer/BioNTech (17.55%), Sputnik V (7.08%), Sinovac (6.98%), Sinopharm/Beijing (10.04%), Oxford/AstraZeneca (19.56%), CanSino (2.85%), Moderna (12.05%), Covaxin (3.28%), JohnsonandJohnson (10.89%), Sputnik Light (3.07%), Novavax (3.49%). While the nations with the lowest healthcare expenses failed to keep up with the demand and depended on vaccines donated by other countries to protect their population.
The analysis revealed strong indicators that the nations which spend more on healthcare were the ones that had the best SARS-Cov-2 vaccination rollout. To further support decision-making in the future, countries should address the trust and sentiment of their citizens towards vaccination. For this, expenses need to be made to develop and promote vaccines and project them as positive health tools.