BACKGROUND: To investigate the occurrence of previous cancer diagnoses in women suffering from premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) and compare it with the general population, shedding light on the association between cancer, cancer treatments, and POI.
METHODS: We conducted a nationwide case-control study based on registry data from various sources, including the Social Insurance Institution, Finnish Population Information System, and Finnish Cancer Registry spanning from 1953 to 2018. Our participants comprised all women in Finland who, between 1988 and 2017, received hormone replacement therapy reimbursement for ovarian insufficiency before the age of 40 years (n = 5221). Controls, matched in terms of age and municipality of residence, were selected from the Finnish Population Information System (n = 20 822). Our main exposure variable was a history of cancer diagnosis preceding the diagnosis of POI. We analyzed odds ratios (OR) to compare the prevalence of previous cancers in women with POI with that in controls, stratifying results based on cancer type, age at cancer diagnosis, and the time interval between cancer diagnosis and POI. We also assessed changes in OR for previous cancer diagnoses over the follow-up period.
RESULTS: Out of the women diagnosed with POI, 21.9% had previously been diagnosed with cancer, resulting in an elevated OR of 36.5 (95% confidence interval [CI] 30.9 to 43.3) compared with 0.8% of the controls. The risk of developing POI was most pronounced during the first 2 years following a cancer diagnosis, with an OR of 103 (95% CI 74.1 to 144). Importantly, this risk remained elevated even when the time interval between cancer and POI exceeded 10 years, with an OR of 5.40 (95% CI 3.54 to 8.23).
CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals that 21.9% of women with POI have a history of cancer, making the prevalence of cancer among these women 27.5 times higher than age-matched controls in the Finnish population. The risk of developing POI is most substantial in the first 2 years following a cancer diagnosis. These findings underscore the role of cancer treatments as an etiological factor for POI and emphasize the importance of recognizing the risk of POI in cancer survivors for early diagnosis and intervention.

BACKGROUND: Endometriosis is a common disabling pain condition in women of childbearing age, frequently showing familial clustering. Nevertheless, little is known about whether familial predispositions influence its severity or presentation. In this study, we investigate disease characteristics in endometriosis patients with a family history (FH) for endometriosis or the comorbidities migraine, depression and early menopause (EMP).
METHODS: We performed an observational case-control study enrolling women with histologically confirmed endometriosis in a tertiary center. Based on surgical findings, patient records and phone interviews, we examined the relations between a FH for endometriosis, migraine, depression or EMP and endometriotic signs and symptoms, such as response to combined hormonal contraceptives (CHC) and analgesics, disease localization, infiltration depth, Enzian- and rASRM-scores.
RESULTS: A positive FH for endometriosis, migraine, depression or EMP was reported by 10.2 %, 33.4 %, 32.6 % and 9.9 % of the 344 patients. A positive FH of endometriosis was associated with an increased risk for high rASRM-scores (rASRM 3 + 4: OR 2.74 (95 % CI 1.16-6.49), p = 0.017) and the presence of endometriomas (OR 2.70 (1.22-5.95), p = 0.011). A positive FH for migraine was associated with less response of endometriosis symptoms to CHC (OR 0.469 (0.27-0.82) p = 0.025). Depression in the family was linked to less severe rASRM-scores (rASRM 3 + 4: OR 0.63 (0.39-0.99), p = 0.046) and less endometriomas (OR 0.58 (0.67-0.92), p = 0.02), but increased the risk of both migraine (OR 1.66 (1.01-2.73), p = 0.043) and depression (OR 3.04 (1.89-4.89), p < 0.001) while showing a better response to CHC (OR 2.0 (1.15-3.48, p < 0.001). Patients with EMP in their family reported more current endometriosis symptoms at present (OR 3.72 (1.67-8.30), p = 0.001), more dysmenorrhea (OR 2.13 (1.04-4.35), p = 0.037), more frequent severe dysmenorrhea (OR 2.32 (1.14-4.74), p = 0.019) and suffered significantly more often > 5 days of non-cyclic pain (OR 3.58 (1.72-7.44), p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Around 30% reported a positive FH for migraine or depression. Patients with a positive FH for endometriosis, migraine, depression or EMP differ in symptoms and surgical findings when compared to controls. While a FH for endometriosis is associated with higher rASRM scores and more endometriomas, women with a FH for depression had lower rASRM scores and less endometriomas while responding better to CHC. In contrast, women with a FH for migraine showed less response to CHC.

This research aimed to retrospectively investigate the possible association between poor ovarian stimulation and selected thrombophilia markers in Iranian women with infertility. For this study 100 Iranian infertile women, with a history of at least three Assisted Reproduction Technology (ART) failures (50 with a poor ovarian response and 50 with a normal response), referred to Royan Institute were selected. Targeted genetic variation evaluation for Factor V G1691A, F II Prothrombin G20210A, MTHFR C677T, MTHFR A1298C was performed by PCR-RFLP followed by Sanger Sequencing. The association between these variants and the ovarian response was examined. The results showed an association between Factor V G1691A mutation and poor ovarian response. The heterozygosity rate of the FVL was significantly different between poor responders compared with the normal response group (p-value ≤ 0.05). In conclusion screening of this polymorphism can be used as a genetic determinant of ovarian response functioning through a vascular mechanism. A larger study with bigger sample size is recommended.Impact statementWhat is already known on this subject? Thrombophilia is a multi-genetic disease that is associated with changes in homeostatic mechanisms. Some studies have suggested that thrombophilia has no relationship with poor ovarian response and reduced ovarian reserve in general infertile population undergoing ART.What do the results of this study add? Our results showed a significant association between the FVL heterozygote mutation and poor ovarian response.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Screening of FVL polymorphism may be suggested as a predictive test for ovarian stimulation response in infertile women undergoing ART. Further prospective studies with bigger sample size evaluating other thrombophilia markers and ovarian response, as well as further in-vitro studies may help clarify the biological mechanisms behind the effect of the FVL polymorphism on ovarian response, oocyte quality and embryo quality.