Early Childhood Education

幼儿教育
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:早年环境中的教育者通过其教学选择和行为影响儿童的身体活动(PA)水平。迄今为止,对教育者行为与儿童PA水平之间的关系进行了最少的研究。这项系统审查的目的是了解早期环境中哪些教育者的行为和行动已被证明可以使儿童参与PA。
    方法:五个在线数据库(完成学术搜索,ERIC,SPORTDiscus,CINAHLComplete和PubMed)搜索了显示教育者行为与零至八岁儿童的PA水平之间存在关联的文章。
    结果:11项研究符合所有纳入标准,但在设计和数据收集方法上表现出很大的可变性。偏倚的风险评估使用以前发表的标准,适用于本研究并符合CONSORT声明。对数据进行的二项检验显示,与影响儿童PA的教育者行为有关,与机会期望(p<.001)存在统计学上的显着偏差。十项研究集中在教育家PA,四项研究强调了提示和鼓励的使用,三项研究分析了成人互动的广泛陈述,两项研究呼吁规划活动会议和讨论,两项研究鼓励角色建模。纳入审查的研究数量少,偏倚风险高,这表明需要谨慎对待这些结果。
    结论:虽然这篇综述强调了教育者PA(和其他有积极关联的行为)对儿童PA水平的重要性,它强调需要高质量的研究来检查教育者行为与儿童PA之间的关系。(PROSPERO注册:CRD42022338819)。
    BACKGROUND: Educators in early years settings influence children\'s physical activity (PA) levels through their pedagogical choices and behaviours. To date, minimal research has been conducted on the relationship between educator action and children\'s PA levels. The purpose of this systematic review was to understand which educator behaviours and actions in early years settings have been shown to engage children in PA.
    METHODS: Five online databases (Academic Search Complete, ERIC, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL Complete and PubMed) were searched for articles that showed an association between educator behaviour and the PA level of children between the ages of zero and eight.
    RESULTS: Eleven studies met all inclusion criteria, yet showed great variability in design and data collection methods. The risk of bias was assessed using previously published criteria adapted to this study and inline with the CONSORT statement. A binomial test on the data revealed a statistically significant deviation from chance expectation (p < .001) in relation to educator action influencing child PA. Ten of the studies focussed on educator PA, four studies highlighted the use of prompting and encouragement, three studies analysed broad statements of adult interaction, two studies called for planning activity sessions and discussions and two studies encouraged role modelling. The low number of studies included in the review and the high risk of bias indicates that caution with these results is needed.
    CONCLUSIONS: While this review highlights the importance of educator PA (and other behaviours that had a positive association) on child PA level, it underscores the need for high-quality research to examine the relationship between educator actions and child PA. (PROSPERO registration: CRD42022338819).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目的:儿童早期教育和护理(ECEC)是提供“大规模”健康饮食干预措施(即大量儿童保育服务)以改善儿童公共卫生营养的推荐环境。建议评估干预措施的“可扩展性”(大规模交付的适用性),以指导公共卫生决策。这项研究描述了在基于ECEC的健康饮食干预措施中报告评估可扩展性所需的因素的程度。
    方法:包括来自最近的Cochrane系统评价的研究,该研究评估了ECEC提供的健康饮食干预措施对改善儿童饮食摄入量的有效性。根据干预可扩展性评估工具(ISAT)中概述的领域评估了可扩展性因素的报告。该工具建议决策者考虑这个问题,干预,战略和政治背景,有效性,成本,保真度和适应性,达到和可接受性,交付设置和劳动力,实施基础设施,和可持续性。数据由一名审阅者提取,并由另一名审阅者检查。
    方法:ECEC。
    方法:6个月至6岁的儿童。
    结果:在38项纳入研究中,没有人报告ISAT中的所有因素。所有研究都报告了这个问题,干预,有效性,以及交付人员和设置。报道的最低领域是干预成本(13%的研究)和可持续性(16%的研究)。
    结论:研究结果表明,缺乏关于基于ECEC的健康饮食干预措施可扩展性的一些关键因素的报告。未来的试验应测量和报告这些因素,以提供重要信息,以支持政策和实践决策者选择要扩大的干预措施。
    OBJECTIVE: Early childhood education and care (ECEC) is a recommended setting for the delivery of health eating interventions \'at scale\' (i.e. to large numbers of childcare services) to improve child public health nutrition. Appraisal of the \'scalability\' (suitability for delivery at scale) of interventions is recommended to guide public health decision-making. This study describes the extent to which factors required to assess scalability are reported among ECEC-based healthy eating interventions.
    METHODS: Studies from a recent Cochrane systematic review assessing the effectiveness of healthy eating interventions delivered in ECEC for improving child dietary intake were included. The reporting of factors of scalability was assessed against domains outlined within the Intervention Scalability Assessment Tool (ISAT). The tool recommends decision makers consider the problem, the intervention, strategic and political context, effectiveness, costs, fidelity and adaptation, reach and acceptability, delivery setting and workforce, implementation infrastructure and sustainability. Data were extracted by one reviewer and checked by a second reviewer.
    METHODS: ECEC.
    METHODS: Children 6 months to 6 years.
    RESULTS: Of thirty-eight included studies, none reported all factors within the ISAT. All studies reported the problem, the intervention, effectiveness and the delivery workforce and setting. The lowest reported domains were intervention costs (13 % of studies) and sustainability (16 % of studies).
    CONCLUSIONS: Findings indicate there is a lack of reporting of some key factors of scalability for ECEC-based healthy eating interventions. Future studies should measure and report such factors to support policy and practice decision makers when selecting interventions to be scaled-up.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    政策,系统,和环境(PSE)方法可以促进优先人群的身体活动(例如,种族和少数族裔,低财富群体)在幼儿教育(ECE)环境中。这项审查的目的是1)描述将优先人群纳入包含PSE方法的ECE身体活动干预措施中的特征,以及2)确定和描述这些人群中的干预措施。系统地搜索了七个数据库(2000年1月至2022年2月),以获得基于欧洲经委会的干预措施,重点是使用至少一种PSE方法的儿童(0-6岁)。符合条件的研究包括儿童身体活动或身体活动环境结果以及儿童或中心水平的人群特征。44项研究,代表42项干预措施被确定。对于目标1,一半的干预措施包括一种PSE方法(21/42),只有11/42包括三个或更多的方法。物理环境变化[例如,添加游戏设备,修改空间(25/42)]是最常用的PSE方法,其次是系统[例如,将活动整合到例程中,(21/42)]和政策[例如,室外时间(20/42)]接近。近一半的干预措施主要在优先人群中进行(18/42)。使用Downs和Black检查表,研究主要被评为良好(51%)或一般(38%)的方法学质量。在目标2中,在评估优先人群儿童体力活动的12项干预措施中,9/12报告了至少一个预期方向的身体活动结果。在评估身体活动环境的11项干预措施中,9/11报告了预期方向的影响。调查结果表明,通过将PSE方法纳入欧洲经委会的身体活动干预措施,存在针对优先人群的明确机会。
    Policy, systems, and environmental (PSE) approaches can facilitate physical activity in priority populations (e.g., racial and ethnic minority, low wealth groups) within early childhood education (ECE) settings. The purpose of this review was to 1) characterize the inclusion of priority populations within ECE physical activity interventions containing PSE approaches and 2) identify and describe interventions within these populations. Seven databases were systematically searched (January 2000-Febrary 2022) for ECE-based interventions focusing on children (0-6 years) that utilized at least one PSE approach. Eligible studies included a child physical activity or physical activity environment outcome and child or center-level population characteristics. Forty-four studies, representing 42 interventions were identified. For Aim 1, half of interventions included one PSE approach (21/42), with only 11/42 including three or more approaches. Physical environment changes [e.g., adding play equipment, modifying space (25/42)] were the most used PSE approaches followed by system [e.g., integrating activity into routines, (21/42)] and policy [e.g., outdoor time (20/42)] approaches. Nearly half of interventions were conducted in predominantly priority populations (18/42). Studies were primarily rated as good (51%) or fair (38%) methodological quality using the Downs and Black checklist. In Aim 2, of the 12 interventions assessing child physical activity in priority populations, 9/12 reported at least one physical activity outcome in the expected direction. Of the 11 interventions assessing the physical activity environment, 9/11 reported an effect in the expected direction. Findings indicate clear opportunities exist to target priority populations by incorporating PSE approaches in ECE physical activity interventions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED:早期干预计划已被证明可以提高幼儿和教育环境中儿童的整体社会情感和身体健康。这篇叙述性综述的目的是探索描述这些系统实施的最新文献,并强调早期儿童干预领域的创新做法。
    未经批准:包括23篇文章,我们在这次审查中确定了三个主题。文献讨论了与儿童残疾干预措施有关的创新技术的概念;促进儿童,家庭,和从业者的福祉;并关注创伤知情护理在教育中对面临种族主义和殖民等社会边缘化影响的儿童和家庭的重要性。
    UNASISIGNED:当前早期干预范式的显著转变是通过交叉和批判理论来理解残疾的方法,以及系统层面的思维,超越了通过影响政策来推进该部门的创新实践的个人干预。
    UNASSIGNED: Early intervention programs have been shown to increase the overall socio-emotional and physical wellbeing of children in early childhood and educational settings. The goal of this narrative review is to explore recent literature that describes implementation of these systems and highlights innovative practices in the early childhood intervention sector.
    UNASSIGNED: Twenty-three articles were included, and we identified three themes in this review. The literature addressed concepts of innovative techniques in relation to childhood disability interventions; policy practices that promote child, family, and practitioner wellbeing; and attention to the importance of trauma-informed care in education for children and families who face the impacts of social marginalization such as racism and colonization.
    UNASSIGNED: Notable shifts in the current early intervention paradigms are approaches to understanding disability informed by intersectional and critical theories, as well as systems level thinking that goes beyond focusing on individual intervention by influencing policy to advance innovative practice in the sector.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED:本评论的目的是描述在幼儿环境中使用的教学技术的多样性和有效性。
    UNASSIGNED:完成了对三个数据库的系统审查,和研究由两名独立编码员审查,以确定它们是否符合纳入标准.如果(a)该技术用于培训教师,而不是直接用于幼儿学生,(b)参加者均注册于二年级或更高年级,(c)该设置不是幼儿教育设置,或(D)研究本质上是描述性的或利用了调查方法。从每篇文章中提取与参与者特征相关的数据,设置特性,研究设计,技术类型,和因变量。
    UNASSIGNED:本综述纳入了35项符合标准的研究。广泛的技术被用来提供或促进对(a)学者的指导,(b)社交和沟通技巧,和(c)认知技能。针对HeadStart学前教育的学术成果是研究中最常见的。结果从无效到高度有效。
    UNASSIGNED:纳入研究的结果差异很大,从报告传统教学和技术辅助教学之间没有差异到报告群体之间的显著差异或报告基于技术的干预和目标行为或技能之间的功能关系。包括患有神经发育障碍的学生在内的研究表明,对经历包括技术辅助教学在内的干预措施的学生的结果产生了积极影响。需要进行未来的研究,以确定幼儿教育环境中基于技术的有效干预措施的关键组成部分。
    UNASSIGNED: The purpose of this review is to describe the variety and effectiveness of instructional technologies used in the early childhood setting.
    UNASSIGNED: A systematic review of three databases was completed, and studies were reviewed by two independent coders to determine if they met inclusion criteria. Studies were excluded from this review if (a) the technology was used to train teachers and was not directly used with early childhood students, (b) participants were all enrolled in 2nd grade or higher, (c) the setting was not an early childhood education setting, or (d) studies were descriptive in nature or utilized a survey methodology. Data were extracted from each article related to participant characteristics, setting characteristics, research design, technology type, and dependent variables.
    UNASSIGNED: Thirty-five studies met criteria were included in this review. A wide range of technologies were used to provide or facilitate instruction on (a) academics, (b) social and communication skills, and (c) cognitive skills. Academic outcomes targeted in Head Start preschools were the most common across studies. The results ranged from no effect to highly effective.
    UNASSIGNED: The findings from the included studies varied widely in their outcomes from reporting no difference between traditional instruction and technology-aided instruction to reporting significant difference between groups or reporting a functional relation between the technology-based intervention and the target behavior or skill. Studies that included students identified with neurodevelopmental disorders demonstrated a positive impact in the outcomes of students who experience an intervention that included technology-aided instruction. Future research is needed to identify critical components of effective technology-based interventions in early childhood educational settings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:女同性恋的经历,同性恋,双性恋,变性人,在健康和早期学习系统中,发育障碍(DD)儿童的酷儿(LGBTQ)父母在很大程度上被研究不足。包容性,确认服务对于及时识别和干预DDs至关重要。这篇文献综述旨在确定LGBTQ父母在健康和早期学习系统中为孩子提供护理时是否会遇到结构性偏见和歧视。
    方法:PubMed,ERIC,和Scopus从1990年到2020年进行了实证研究:LGBTQ;父母,孩子们,家庭;偏见,差距,歧视;以及健康和早期学习服务。主题通过概念模型偏差水平进行分析,参与者类型,和设置。
    结果:搜索产生了1,872条未重复的记录(通过手工搜索)。代表八个国家的26项健康和早期学习研究的29篇文章符合纳入标准。各个部门普遍存在的偏见包括围绕LGBTQ状态披露的挑战;缺乏对非亲生父母的认可;和异质形式。在一些专业人士和学生中发现了对LGBTQ家庭的知识差距和消极态度。
    结论:一些LGBTQ父母在健康和早期学习系统中为孩子提供护理时,经历了偏见和歧视。建议实施和监测LGBTQ包容性健康教育和评估实践变化的政策和计划,以提高专业人员的知识。态度,和行为。多层次劳动力发展(例如,认证标准,组织审计,和培训)需要创建和维持LGBTQ肯定的健康和教育环境。尊重LGBTQ家庭多样性和减少健康和早期学习不平等对于改善儿童的健康和教育成果至关重要。
    BACKGROUND: The experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) parents of children with developmental disabilities (DDs) in health and early learning systems are largely understudied. Inclusive, affirming services are critical to timely identification and intervention for DDs. This literature review aimed to establish whether LGBTQ parents experience structural bias and discrimination when accessing care for their children in health and early learning systems.
    METHODS: PubMed, ERIC, and Scopus were searched for empirical research from 1990 to 2020 on: LGBTQ; parents, children, families; bias, disparities, discrimination; and health and early learning services. Themes were analyzed by conceptual model bias levels, participant type, and setting.
    RESULTS: The search yielded 1,872 unduplicated records (three through hand search). Twenty-nine articles representing 26 studies in health and early learning in eight countries met the inclusion criteria. Biases common across sectors included challenges surrounding LGBTQ status disclosures; lack of acknowledgment of non-biological parents; and heterosexist forms. Knowledge gaps and negative attitudes about LGBTQ families were found among some professionals and students.
    CONCLUSIONS: Some LGBTQ parents experienced bias and discrimination while accessing care for their children in health and early learning systems. Policies and programs to implement and monitor LGBTQ-inclusive health education and evaluate practice changes are recommended to improve professionals\' knowledge, attitudes, and behavior. Multilevel workforce development (e.g., accreditation standards, organizational audits, and training) is needed to create and sustain LGBTQ-affirming health and education environments. Honoring LGBTQ family diversity and reducing health and early learning inequities are critical for improving children\'s health and education outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:语言病理学家(SLP)可以提供间接服务,重点是促进幼儿教育中心丰富的交流环境。在幼儿教育中心以SLP为主导的专业发展之后,评估儿童的结果具有挑战性。这项范围界定审查的目的是确定如何在探索儿童早期教育中SLP专业发展的研究中测量儿童结果。
    方法:对七个数据库进行了系统搜索,以确定包括提供间接SLP服务和测量儿童结局的研究。确定了12项研究符合范围审查的所有纳入标准。有关研究设计的信息,提供专业发展培训,收集的儿童结局指标均从已确定的研究中提取。
    结果:一半确定的研究依赖于对儿童语言的直接评估,七项研究利用了教育者与儿童/人之间互动的视频记录。
    结论:评估儿童早期教育中心SLP职业发展后的儿童结果不仅具有挑战性,而且成本也很高。讨论了分配适当资源以评估间接服务的考虑因素。什么?:SLP可能需要通过评估儿童结局来证明间接服务对健康促进的影响。这项调查的结果概述了确定捕获儿童成果的适当工具所面临的挑战。本文受版权保护。保留所有权利。
    OBJECTIVE: Speech-language pathologists (SLPs) may provide indirect services focusing on the promotion of rich communication environments in early childhood education centres. Evaluating children\'s outcomes following SLP-led professional development in early childhood education centres is challenging. The aim of this scoping review was to identify how child outcomes were measured in studies exploring SLP professional development in early childhood education.
    METHODS: A systematic search of seven databases was conducted to identify studies that included the provision of an indirect SLP service and measurement of child outcomes. Twelve studies were identified that met all inclusion criteria for the scoping review. Information about the research design, professional development training provided and child outcome measures collected were all extracted from the identified studies.
    RESULTS: Half of the identified studies relied on the direct assessment of child language and seven studies utilised video-recording of interactions between educators and child/ren in their care.
    CONCLUSIONS: Evaluating child outcomes following SLP professional development in early childhood education centres is not only challenging but also expensive. Considerations for the allocation of suitable resources to evaluate indirect services are discussed. SO WHAT?: SLPs may need to demonstrate the impact of indirect services focusing on health promotion through the evaluation of child outcomes. The findings of this investigation outline the challenges identifying appropriate tools to capture the outcomes of children.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    预计幼儿教育者将为其中心的孩子提供高质量的护理,并为以后的学校成功做好准备。同时,近三分之一的儿童进入早期护理和教育环境,表现出具有挑战性的行为,这反过来又会影响教育工作者的压力水平和幸福感。因此,毫不奇怪,课堂管理和提供行为支持一直被确定为教育工作者在进入劳动力队伍时需要进一步培训的领域。这项研究的目的是对针对这些领域的幼儿专业人员的专业发展(PD)方法的经验文献进行系统回顾。42项研究被确定为符合纳入标准,并被编码为有针对性的策略,PD系列的背景和特点,以及利用的研究设计和成果。研究结果表明,研究在针对性策略方面存在很大差异,管理格式,训练剂量,研究设计,教育者和儿童样本,和报告实践。大多数研究是与来自HeadStart和公共幼儿园的教育工作者一起进行的,并在PD方法的管理中利用了研究人员。这表明需要更多关于PD方法的高质量经验证据,以满足更大的幼儿劳动力和中心需求。讨论了对研究人员和幼儿心理健康专业人员和管理人员的影响。
    UNASSIGNED:在线版本包含补充材料,可在10.1007/s12310-022-09562-x获得。
    Early childhood educators are expected to provide the children in their centers high-quality care and preparation for later school success. At the same time, nearly a third of children enter early care and education settings displaying challenging behaviors, which in turn impacts educators\' stress levels and wellbeing. It is then unsurprising that classroom management and providing behavioral supports are consistently identified as areas where educators require further training upon entering the workforce. The purpose of this study is to conduct a systematic review of the empirical literature on professional development (PD) approaches targeting these areas for early childhood professionals. Forty-two studies were identified as meeting inclusion criteria and were coded for strategies targeted, the context and characteristics of the PD series, and the research design and outcomes utilized. Findings revealed that studies were highly variable in terms of targeted strategies, format of administration, training dose, research design, educator and child samples, and reporting practices. The majority of studies were conducted with educators from Head Start and public preschools and utilized research staff in the administration of the PD approaches. This indicates a need for more high-quality empirical evidence on PD approaches that cater to the larger early childhood workforce and centers\' needs. Implications for researchers and early childhood mental health professionals and administrators are discussed.
    UNASSIGNED: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12310-022-09562-x.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    最近在教育环境中实施的以身体为导向的干预措施有所增加。以身体为导向的干预措施是以身心关系为基础的,涉及身体和运动的意识和表达。在这篇关于在学前教育环境中实施的以身体为导向的干预措施的文献的系统综述中,我们回顾了关于社会情绪能力的每种类型的以身体为导向的干预措施的定量证据的范围和质量.在七个数据库中搜索随机对照试验(RCTs)和准RCTs。发现了七个核心的以身体为导向的干预计划(例如,玩,放松,和精神运动性)。游戏程序是研究最多的,并且似乎是提高社交情感能力的最有效方法。然而,科学证据水平因缺乏方法学质量高的研究而受到影响.
    There has been a recent increase in body-oriented interventions implemented in educational contexts. Body-oriented interventions are grounded on the body-mind relationship, involving body and movement awareness and expression. In this systematic review of the literature on body-oriented interventions implemented in preschool contexts, we review the scope and quality of the quantitative evidence of each type of body-oriented intervention regarding social-emotional competence. Seven databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs. Seven core body-oriented intervention programs were found (e.g., play, relaxation, and psychomotricity). Play programs were the most studied and appear to be the most effective to improve social-emotional competence. Nevertheless, the level of scientific evidence was compromised by the lack of studies with high methodological quality.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    在儿童教育中基于自然的环境中玩耍对儿童发展具有积极的好处。尽管以前的评论显示了在基于自然的环境中玩耍对儿童发展的好处,但他们并没有试图理解基于自然的环境如何以及为什么有助于玩耍质量。这篇综述旨在探讨与非自然环境相比,自然环境中的游戏对幼儿(2-8岁)发育结果的价值。我们在PsycINFO数据库上搜索了调查游戏与基于自然的环境之间关系的研究,ERIC,和WebofScience。纳入/排除标准是:(1)研究侧重于在自然环境中/在自然环境中玩耍,(2)研究对象为2-8岁,(3)是一项实证研究,(4)这项研究是在幼儿教育(ECE)的背景下进行的,(5)该研究包括没有特殊需要或残疾的参与者。使用这些标准,我们选择了28项定性研究,总体样本量为N=998名2-8岁儿童。这些研究是使用Nablet和Hare的元人种学方法进行综合的。发现了三个总体主题:(1)与自然环境相关的游戏质量方面,(2)支持游戏的自然环境方面,(3)有助于自然游戏质量的师生互动方面。元主题与游戏理论和自然修复价值理论产生共鸣。我们利用定性数据来完善和扩展这些理论,并提出了“自然游戏”概念的定义。“这项系统评价也为未来在自然环境中进行游戏干预的研究奠定了基础。我们认为(1)研究将受益于彻底概念化游戏在幼儿发展中的作用,(2)使用能力理论研究将受益于超越个人游戏行为作为分析单位,(3)从教育的角度来看,重要的是将自然游戏的重点转移到对儿童认知发展的好处上。
    Play in nature-based environments in childhood education has positive benefits for child development. Although previous reviews showed the benefits of play in nature-based environments for child development they did not attempt to understand how and why nature-based environments contribute to play quality. This review aims to explore the value of play in nature-based environments compared to non-nature-based environments for developmental outcomes of young children (2-8 year). We searched for studies that investigated the relation between play and nature-based environments on the databases PsycINFO, ERIC, and Web of Science. Inclusion/exclusion criteria were: (1) the study focused on play in/on a nature based environment, (2) the study included participants between the age of 2-8 years, (3) it was an empirical study, (4) the study was conducted in the context of early childhood education (ECE), and (5) the study included participants without special needs or disabilities. Using these criteria we selected 28 qualitative studies with an overall sample size of N = 998 children aged 2-8 years. The studies were synthesized using an adaptation of Noblit and Hare\'s meta-ethnographic approach. Three overarching themes were found: (1) the aspects of play quality that are related to nature-based environments, (2) the aspects of nature-based environments that support play, and (3) the aspects of teacher-child interactions that contribute to nature play quality. The meta themes resonate with play theories and theories of the restorative value of nature. We draw on the qualitative data to refine and extend these theories, and to come up with a definition of the concept \"nature play.\" This systematic review also sets a base for future research on play interventions in nature-based environments. We argue that (1) research will benefit from thoroughly conceptualizing the role of play in the development of young children, (2) using the affordances theory research will benefit from moving beyond the individual play actions as a unit of analysis, and (3) from an educational perspective it is important to shift the focus of nature play to its benefits for children\'s cognitive development.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号