UNASSIGNED: Assessment of ocular surface in patients using anti-glaucoma medications (AGM) is rarely a priority for clinicians since glaucoma management targets intraocular pressure and preserves vision. This review summarizes the various adverse effects of topical AGM on the ocular surface and highlights the importance of ocular surface assessment in these patients.
UNASSIGNED: A literature search of articles (English only) on the subject matter was conducted focusing on recent articles published in the past 5 years.
UNASSIGNED: The use of multiple anti-glaucoma medications in glaucoma patients increases patients\' exposure to the drug and the preservatives present in these medications. Long-term use of these medications has deleterious effects on the conjunctiva, cornea, eyelids, and periocular tissues like trichiasis, entropion, symblepharon, forniceal shortening, punctate keratopathy, non-healing epithelial defects, and pannus. Treatment requires drug withdrawal or substitution by oral or topical non-preserved and less toxic preparations of AGMs. The ocular surface and symptoms can improve if the condition is diagnosed early and after drug withdrawal in over 90% of eyes. However, stopping or changing AGMs can often present with its own unique set of challenges in intra-ocular pressure control which may often need glaucoma surgery in close to 20% of eyes for IOP control.
UNASSIGNED: Topical antiglaucoma medications (with their preservatives) can induce severe ocular surface and periorbital changes. Early identification and withdrawal of the offending drug/preservative can help to reverse the changes except in eyes with extensive cicatrization.

The European Association for the Study of the Liver has produced extensive guidelines for the investigation and management of drug-induced liver injury. Here, we provide a commentary and overview of some of the principle disease investigations and management that arise from these guideline recommendations.

BACKGROUND: Retinal toxicity is a rare adverse event related to the use of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ). To address this, in 2016, the American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO) issued guidelines recommending that HCQ not exceed 5 mg/kg/day. We analyzed HCQ prescribing habits at our institution, compared to these guidelines, and used surveys to determine the opinions on these guidelines. We then introduced, in a prospective and non-controlled study, a clinical decision support (CDS) tool into the electronic medical record (EMR) to study how this intervention might affect adherence with or opinions on these guidelines.
METHODS: Data were collected pre-intervention (June 2017-January 2019) and post-intervention (March 2019-April 2020). In January 2019 we released our CDS tool. Results were analyzed using descriptive statistics for demographic data and Fisher\'s exact tests for comparisons of proportions between groups.
RESULTS: Pre-intervention, we reviewed 1128 rheumatology charts and 282 dermatology charts. 31.0 and 39.7% respectively (32.8% combined) were prescribed HCQ > 5 .0 mg/kg/day. Post-intervention, we reviewed 1161 rheumatology charts and 110 dermatology charts. 23.0 and 25.5% respectively (23.2% combined) were prescribed HCQ > 5.0 mg/kg/day. Post-intervention, 9.6% fewer patients were prescribed HCQ > 5 mg/kg/day (P < .001). Pre-intervention, we compiled 18 rheumatology surveys and 12 dermatology surveys. Post-intervention, we compiled 16 rheumatology surveys and 12 dermatology surveys. Post-intervention, fewer rheumatologists incorrectly described the AAO weight-based guidelines. Combined, there was an overall reduction but not of statistical significance (P = .47). The majority of providers surveyed believed that the CDS tool was useful (72.2%).
CONCLUSIONS: At our academic institution, there remains unfamiliarity with and hesitation to comply with the 2016 AAO guidelines. Prescribed doses often exceed what is recommended in these guidelines. A CDS tool can improve adherence with these guidelines and might improve providers\' familiarity with these guidelines.

Current pediatric International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis guidelines for initial treatment of peritoneal dialysis (PD)-associated peritonitis suggest either monotherapy with cefepime or double therapy with first-generation cephalosporin or glycopeptide and ceftazidime or aminoglycoside. When using vancomycin, the intraperitoneal (IP) recommended pediatric loading dosage is 1000 mg/L of dialysate. This is based on adult pharmacokinetic (PK) studies and roughly translates to the adult recommendation where 30 mg/kg in 2 L is approximately 1000 mg/L. However, since the dialysate volume in pediatric patients is normalized to body surface area and not weight, the current recommended dosing can result in high vancomycin exposure in children. Vancomycin can potentially cause adverse effects. We aimed to determine if the IP vancomycin dosing of 1000 mg/L was causing elevated vancomycin levels and to offer possible dosing recommendations based on PK modeling and simulation.
Retrospective review of pediatric patients who had been treated with IP vancomycin for PD-associated peritonitis. Vancomycin levels obtained for clinical monitoring were analyzed using NONMEM to generate population and individual (empiric Bayesian) estimates of vancomycin PK parameters and estimated peak levels. Predicted vancomycin peaks were also simulated from virtual pediatrics patients 3-70 kg following various dosing strategies.
Six episodes of peritonitis in three patients were analyzed. In the two episodes treated with 1000 mg/L, the first vancomycin levels (h post) were 95.6 ug/mL (3) and 49 (33) and following 500 mg/L were 33.2 (11), 30.2 (11), 23.6 (24), and 22.1 (11). All patients were cured of their peritonitis without the need for catheter removal. Based on our population PK model, a 1000 mg/L IP vancomycin loading dose will typically result in peak > 50 mg/L in patients weighing <35 kg and >60 mg/L in patients <15 kg. Vancomycin levels will remain above 20 mg/L for over 2 days without additional vancomycin dosing.
The data suggest that a loading dose of vancomycin 1000 mg/L leads to higher than desired vancomycin levels and should be lowered. A 500 mg/L loading dosing appears more appropriate and needs further study.

暂无摘要。