Orbital radiotherapy for Graves\' ophthalmopathy is an example of non-oncological radiotherapy. First introduced in the 1930s, this treatment has become widely used since the 1980s with several studies showing proof of both effectiveness and safety: a decrease of soft tissue involvement in 70 to 80% of patients and an improvement of ocular mobility in 30 to 80% of patients. Nowadays, it\'s one of the second line treatment options recognized by the European Group on Graves\' orbitopathy in the management of a moderate to severe and active disease after failure of glucocorticoids. In that setting, orbital radiotherapy should be combined with glucocorticoids. To our knowledge, there are no practical recommendations on how orbital radiotherapy should be planned and conducted for Graves\' ophthalmopathy. Optimal dose is not defined however the most frequent regimen consists of 20Gy in ten fractions of 2Gy, though other options may yield better results. Lastly, the use of modern technique of radiotherapy such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy may allow a better sparing of organs at risk compared to three-dimensional radiotherapy using lateral opposing fields.

Spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) is a therapeutic approach with the potential to disrupt the classical paradigms of conventional radiation therapy. The high spatial dose modulation in SFRT activates distinct radiobiological mechanisms which lead to a remarkable increase in normal tissue tolerances. Several decades of clinical use and numerous preclinical experiments suggest that SFRT has the potential to increase the therapeutic index, especially in bulky and radioresistant tumors. To unleash the full potential of SFRT a deeper understanding of the underlying biology and its relationship with the complex dosimetry of SFRT is needed. This review provides a critical analysis of the field, discussing not only the main clinical and preclinical findings but also analyzing the main knowledge gaps in a holistic way.

The treatment of early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has improved enormously in the last two decades. Although surgery is not the only choice, lobectomy is still the gold standard treatment type for operable patients. For inoperable patients stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) should be offered, reaching very high local control and overall survival rates. With SBRT we can precisely irradiate small, well-defined lesions with high doses. To select the appropriate fractionation schedule it is important to determine the size, localization and extent of the lung tumor. The introduction of novel and further developed planning (contouring guidelines, diagnostic image application, planning systems) and delivery techniques (motion management, image guided radiotherapy) led to lower rates of side effects and more conformal target volume coverage. The purpose of this study is to summarize the current developments, randomised studies, guidelines about lung SBRT, with emphasis on the possibility of increasing local control and overall rates in \"fit,\" operable patients as well, so SBRT would be eligible in place of surgery.

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have demonstrated Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy\'s (FSRT) effectiveness in tumor control post-resection for craniopharyngiomas. Nevertheless, past literature has presented conflicting findings particularly regarding endocrine and visual function outcomes. This study aims to elucidate FSRT\'s efficacy and safety for this population.
METHODS: Adhering to PRISMA, a systematic review and meta-analyses was conducted. Included studies had to report the effects of FSRT for treating craniopharyngiomas in a sample greater than four patients, addressing at least one of the outcomes of interest: improvement in visual acuity or field, new-onset hypopituitarism, effectiveness, and tumor progression. Relative risk with 95% confidence intervals were used to assess the outcomes.
RESULTS: After retrieving a total of 1292 studies, 10 articles met the predefined criteria and thus were finally selected, amounting to a total of 256 patients. The improvement in visual acuity was estimated at 45% (95% CI: 6-83%), while the improvement in the visual field was 22% (95% CI: 0-51%). Regarding endocrine function, the new-onset hypopituitarism rate was found to be 5% (95% CI: 0-11%). Relative to FSRT effectiveness, the pooled estimate of the complete tumor response rate was 17% (95% CI: 4-30%), and the tumor progression rate was 7% (95% CI: 1-13%). Also, a 3-year progression-free survival rate of 98% (95% CI: 95-100%) was obtained.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite limitations and risks, FSRT shows promise as a viable therapeutic option for craniopharyngiomas, offering notable benefits for visual functions and tumor control. Further research is required to better understand the associated risks, benefits, and clinical utility.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the potential role of focused radiotherapy in managing the lymphocytic hypophysitis (LH) refractory to medical therapy and surgery.
METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines to identify the studies on radiation treatment for hypophysitis, along with the experience in our institution.
RESULTS: The study included eight patients, three from our institution and five from existing literature. The age at presentation ranged from 37 to 75 years old, with a median age of 58. The presenting symptoms involved headache in seven patients and diplopia in two patients. Pre-radiation visual field defects were noticed in four patients. All patients exhibited variable degrees of hypopituitarism before radiation, with oral corticosteroids being the initial medical treatment. Immunosuppressive therapy was attempted in two patients prior to radiation. Seven patients had a history of transsphenoidal surgery with a histologically confirmed LH. Three patients underwent stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), while the remaining received FSRT, with a mean irradiation volume of 2.2 cm3. A single-session total dose of 12 -15 Gy was administered in the SRS group. In the FSRT group, doses ranged from 24 to 30 Gy with a median dose of 25 Gy, delivered in 2 Gy fractions. Four patients achieved a resolution of visual field defects, while another two patients demonstrated improvement in their associated focal neurologic deficits. No change in pre-existing endocrine status was shown after radiation, except in one patient. Clinical response was achieved in seven patients after a single course of radiation, while one patient required the second course. Six patients remained stable on low-dose glucocorticoid during at least a 12-month follow-up period, and one discontinued it entirely without experiencing relapse. Three patients demonstrated a complete radiologic response, while the remaining showed a partial radiologic response.
CONCLUSIONS: Focused radiation, including FSRT, can play a role in symptomatic relief, effective mass shrinkage, and minimizing radiation exposure to critical surrounding structures in patients with refractory LH. However, further research efforts are necessary to better clarify its effects and optimal dose planning.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with primary genitourinary (GU), gynecologic (GYN) and gastrointestinal (GI) cancers can develop life-threatening or critical function-threatening symptoms that necessitate emergent intervention with palliative radiotherapy (RT). Unfortunately, research describing the use of RT in this critical setting is lacking. We aimed to review literature describing emergent palliative RT for primary pelvic malignancies and provide a narrative synthesis of relevant studies.
METHODS: A medical librarian searched Ovid MEDLINE, Embase Classic, and Embase databases for relevant English language references from 1946-2022. No restrictions were placed on study type, publication type or date. References for GU, GYN and GI cancers were grouped and synthesized separately.
UNASSIGNED: The treatment of bleeding from primary pelvic tumors was the only indication for emergent RT identified, however, no references reported dedicated cohorts of patients treated for bleeding in the emergent setting. Most references were retrospective single institution studies describing various dose fractionation schemes for non-emergent palliative RT. Outcome measures and response assessment times varied. The latency to hemostasis after RT commencement was not well described; most studies reported outcomes captured weeks or months following treatment. In general, high rates of hemostasis for GU, GYN and GI tumors have been reported following RT schedules ranging from a single fraction to many weeks of fractionated treatments. Bleeding seems to respond more favorably than other symptoms including pain and obstruction.
CONCLUSIONS: Managing bleeding was the only indication for emergent RT identified in our search. Scant data exist that describe the latency to a hemostatic response following RT. This is an important knowledge gap in the literature given how commonly patients are affected by this complication of primary pelvic malignancies.

OBJECTIVE: In the past decade, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have emerged as a treatment option for metastatic breast cancer (BC). More recently, ICIs have been approved in the perioperative setting. This has led to clinical scenarios where radiation therapy (RT) is given concurrently with ICIs. On the other hand, moderate and ultrahypofractionated schedules of RT are being widely adopted in the adjuvant setting, in addition to an increased use of metastasis-directed therapy. Furthermore, RT can modulate the tumor microenvironment and induce a systemic response at nonirradiated sites, an \"abscopal effect.\" The amplification of antitumor immune response is used as the rationale behind the concomitant use of ICIs and RT. To date, there is a lack of literature on the optimal sequence, timing, dose/fractionation schema, and treated RT volumes with ICIs in patients with BC, especially in the era of ultrahypofractionation.
METHODS: We conducted a systematic review to delineate the reported treatment details, safety, and efficacy of combining ICI and RT in patients with BC. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched between 2014 and 2023. Data were extracted to assess the details of ICIs/RT delivery, safety, and efficacy.
RESULTS: Of the 12 eligible studies, 9 involved patients with metastatic BC. Most studies were phase 1/2, had a small sample size (range, 8-28), and were heterogenous in patient population and reported outcomes. The combination was reported to be safe. We identified 1 study in the perioperative setting, which did a posthoc analysis of safety/efficacy of ICIs in the adjuvant setting with receipt and pattern of RT.
CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, there are limited data on the dose, timing, fractionation, and volumes of RT in both the adjuvant and metastatic setting in BC. Ongoing/future trials should collect and report such data on RT details, whenever RT is used in combination with ICIs.

Brain metastases (BMs) frequently occur in primary tumors such as lung cancer, breast cancer, and melanoma, and are associated with notably short natural survival. In addition to surgical interventions, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy, radiotherapy (RT) is a crucial treatment for BM and encompasses whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Validating the efficacy and safety of treatment regimens through preclinical models is imperative for successful translation to clinical application. This not only advances fundamental research but also forms the theoretical foundation for clinical study. This review, grounded in animal models of brain metastases (AM-BM), explores the theoretical underpinnings and practical applications of radiotherapy in combination with chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and emerging technologies such as nanomaterials and oxygen-containing microbubbles. Initially, we provided a concise overview of the establishment of AM-BMs. Subsequently, we summarize key RT parameters (RT mode, dose, fraction, dose rate) and their corresponding effects in AM-BMs. Finally, we present a comprehensive analysis of the current research status and future directions for combination therapy based on RT. In summary, there is presently no standardized regimen for AM-BM treatment involving RT. Further research is essential to deepen our understanding of the relationships between various parameters and their respective effects.

BACKGROUND: Radiation therapy is used to treat head and neck cancer (HNC) patients. Proton beam therapy (PBT) is one of the newer treatment options. This systematic review will describe the cost and cost-effectiveness of PBT compared with other first-line treatment options based on available literature and provide a better understanding of its usage in HNC in the future.
METHODS: This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Systematic searches were conducted in PUBMED, EMBASE and SCOPUS till February 2022. Original pharmacoeconomic articles written in English that considered PBT for HNC were included; the title, abstract and full text of the search items were screened. The included studies were critically appraised using the Drummond Checklist followed by data extraction.
RESULTS: Eight of the ten included studies were of good quality; most were cost-effectiveness or cost comparison studies and used the Markov model and lifetime horizon. The dominant comparator was intensity-modulated radiotherapy. The willingness to pay threshold ranged from $30,828 to $150,000 per QALY. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was between $4,436.1 and $695,000 per QALY. In HNC patients with human papillomavirus infection, the ICER was lower ($288,000/QALY) from the payer\'s perspective, but much higher ($390,000/QALY) from the societal perspective.
CONCLUSIONS: Our systematic review showed that appropriate patient selection can make PBT cost-effective. HPV-associated tumors can be cost-effectively treated with PBT. From the payer\'s perspective, PBT is a cost-effective treatment option. In younger patients, PBT can result in lesser incidence of adverse effects, and hence, can reduce the subsequent need for long-term supportive care. Lower fractionation schedules can also make PBT a cost-effective treatment.

OBJECTIVE: External beam radiation therapy to the prostate is typically delivered after verification of prostatic position with image guidance. Prostate motion can occur during the delivery of each radiation treatment between the time of localization imaging and completion of treatment. The objective of this work is to review the literature on intrafraction motion (IFM) of the prostate during radiation therapy and offer clinical recommendations on management.
METHODS: A comprehensive literature review was conducted on prostate motion during prostate cancer radiation therapy. Information was organized around 3 key clinical questions, followed by an evidence-based recommendation.
RESULTS: IFM of the prostate during radiation therapy is typically ≤3 mm and is unlikely to compromise prostate dosimetry to a clinically meaningful degree for men treated in a relatively short treatment duration with planning target volume (PTV) margins of ≥3 to 5 mm. IFM of 5 mm or more has been observed in up to ∼10% of treatment fractions, with limited dosimetric effect related to the infrequency of occurrence and longer fractionation of therapy. IFM can be monitored in continuous or discontinuous fashion with a variety of imaging platforms. Correction of IFM may have the greatest value when tighter PTV margins are desired (such as with stereotactic body radiation therapy or intraprostatic nodule boosting), ultrahypofractionated courses, or when treatment time exceeds several minutes.
CONCLUSIONS: This focused review summarizes literature and provides practical recommendations regarding IFM in the treatment of prostate cancer with external beam radiation therapy.