Distal radius fractures

桡骨远端骨折
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景技术在桡骨远端骨折(DRF)手术中,经掌侧入路内固定后的旋前体方肌(PQ)修复的优势在文献中仍未得到证实。这项研究的目的是比较握力,患者报告的结果,PQ完整的患者和PQ破裂的患者在使用掌侧锁定钢板进行背侧移位的不稳定关节外DRF手术之前的功能结果。方法将120例55岁及以上的患者纳入一项随机对照试验,比较掌侧锁定钢板和背侧钉钢板。在随机分配到掌板组的60例患者中,在55例患者的手术过程中记录了PQ肌肉的完整性,谁被纳入这项研究。测量的结果是手臂的快速残疾,肩膀,和手结果测量(QuickDASH)得分,患者额定腕部评估(PRWE)评分,EQ-5D指数,视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分,握力,和运动范围(ROM)。结果中位年龄为67岁(55~88岁),一年的随访率为98%。手术释放前确定完整PQ(28/55)的患者在一年后的QuickDASH评分较好(2.5vs8.0,平均差5.5,95%CI:1.3至9.8,p=0.028)。完整组的患者在一年后也有更好的EQ-5D指数得分(0.94vs0.85,平均差0.089,95%CI:0.004至0.174,p=0.031),并在整个试验中表现出更好的握力;一年后:24kgvs20kg(平均差3.9;95%CI:0.3至7.6,p=0.016)。一年后,与未受伤侧相比,完整组恢复了96%的握力,非完整组恢复了93%的握力.观察到的差异可能具有可疑的临床重要性,因为它们低于先前提出的最小临床重要差异(MCID)。结论手术前患有DRF和PQ破裂的患者在一年后表现出更高的QuickDASH评分和更低的EQ-5D指数评分。PQ的完整性应在未来的研究中报告。
    Background The advantage of pronator quadratus (PQ) repair following internal fixation via the volar approach in distal radius fracture (DRF) surgery remains unconfirmed in the literature. The aim of this study was to compare grip strength, patient-reported outcomes, and functional results between patients with an intact PQ and those with a ruptured PQ before undergoing surgery with a volar locking plate for dorsally displaced unstable extra-articular DRFs. Methods A total of 120 patients aged 55 years and older were included in a randomized controlled trial comparing a volar locking plate with a dorsal nail plate. Of the 60 patients randomized to the volar plate group, the integrity of the PQ muscle was recorded during surgery for 55 patients, who were included in this study. The outcomes measured were the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Outcome Measure (QuickDASH) score, the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score, the EQ-5D index, the visual analog scale (VAS) score, grip strength, and range of motion (ROM). Results The median age was 67 years (range 55 to 88), and the one-year follow-up rate was 98%. Patients with an identified intact PQ (28/55) before surgical release had better QuickDASH scores after one year (2.5 vs 8.0, mean difference 5.5, 95% CI: 1.3 to 9.8, p=0.028). Patients in the intact group also had better EQ-5D Index scores after one year (0.94 vs 0.85, mean difference 0.089, 95% CI: 0.004 to 0.174, p=0.031), and demonstrated better grip strength throughout the trial; after one year: 24 kg vs 20 kg (mean difference 3.9; 95% CI: 0.3 to 7.6, p=0.016). After one year, the intact group had regained 96% of their grip strength and the nonintact group had regained 93% of their grip strength compared to the uninjured side. The observed differences may be of questionable clinical importance, as they were lower than those of previously proposed minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs). Conclusions Patients with a DRF and a ruptured PQ prior to surgery exhibited higher QuickDASH scores and lower EQ-5D index scores after one year. The integrity of the PQ should be reported in future studies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景:石膏在耐水性方面的缺点,透气性,皮肤舒适,固定的稳定性和穿着的重量仍然有待解决。3D打印铸件可以克服上述缺点。目前,关于3D打印铸件的临床应用数据相对缺乏,可能是由于它的复杂性,相对较长的运行时间,和高价格。我们旨在比较和评估短期有效性,3D打印腕管与聚合物矫形器治疗Colles骨折的安全性和优势。
    方法:选取2022年6月至12月我院收治的Colles骨折患者40例,分为观察组(20例,使用即时3D打印铸件治疗)和对照组(20例,用聚合物矫形器治疗)。两组均采用手法复位外固定治疗。视觉模拟量表(VAS)固定效果和满意度得分,手臂的残疾,肩和手(DASH)得分,收集并比较固定前和骨折后2,6和12周的并发症和影像学资料.
    结果:骨折后2周观察组VAS评分明显低于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组骨折后6周的固定效果和满意度评分均显著高于对照组(均P<0.05)。观察组骨折后2、6周的DASH评分均显著低于对照组(均P<0.05)。两组均未出现印模或矫形器破裂。对照组有2例皮肤刺激,观察组未出现皮肤刺激。观察组骨折后2周和12周的掌侧倾角和尺侧倾角均显著高于对照组(均P<0.05)。
    结论:即时3D打印铸模和聚合物矫形器均可有效治疗Colles骨折。但即时3D打印铸件在良好的临床和成像性能方面优于聚合物矫形器,和高患者满意度和舒适度。
    BACKGROUND: The shortcomings of plaster in water resistance, air permeability, skin comfort, fixed stability and weight of wearing are still to be solved. 3D printed cast can overcome the above shortcomings. At present, there is a relative lack of data on the clinical application of 3D printed cast, probably due to its complexity, relatively long operating time, and high price. We aimed to compare and evaluate the short-term effectiveness, safety and advantages of 3D printed wrist cast versus polymer orthosis in the treatment of Colles fracture.
    METHODS: Forty patients with Colles fracture in our hospital from June to December 2022 were selected and divided into an observation group (20 patients, treated with instant 3D printed cast) and a control group (20 cases, treated with polymer orthosis). Both groups treated with manual reduction and external fixation. The visual analogue scale (VAS), immobilization effectiveness and satisfaction scores, Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score, complications and imaging data were collected and compared before immobilization and at 2, 6 and 12 weeks after the fracture.
    RESULTS: VAS at 2 weeks after the fracture was significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group ( P < 0.05). The immobilization effectiveness and satisfaction scores at 6 weeks after the fracture were significantly higher in the observation group than in the control group (all P < 0.05). The DASH scores at 2 and 6 weeks after the fracture were significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group (all P < 0.05). There wasn\'t rupture of the printed cast or orthosis in both groups. There were 2 cases of skin irritation in the control group, and no skin irritation occurred in the observation group. The palmar tilt angle and ulnar inclination angle at 2 weeks and 12 weeks after the fracture were significantly higher in the observation group than in the control group (all P < 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: Both instant 3D printed cast and polymer orthosis are effective in the treatment of Colles fracture. But instant 3D printed cast is better than polymer orthosis in areas of good clinical and imaging performance, and high patient satisfaction and comfort.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:目前,缺乏前瞻性研究来统一桡骨远端骨折手术后固定的类型和时间标准。这项研究的目的是比较两组使用锁定钢板内固定治疗的桡骨远端骨折的功能和放射学结果。并用前臂夹板或加压绷带固定3周。
    方法:对两个平行组进行随机临床试验,随访3、6和12周。测量了主要和次要功能变量,如VAS量表上的疼痛,PRWE上的值,DASH和MRS量表,屈伸运动范围,并发症,等。此外,在手术前和手术后一周测量了一些放射学变量,比如工会时间,背侧位移,缩短,尺骨方差,等。结果:共评估了62例患者:27例用绷带固定,35例用夹板固定。对获得的结果的分析显示,从手术前到术后期间,两组的几乎所有放射学变量均存在显着差异。以及手术后3到12周的所有功能变量。在评估的任何放射学和功能变量中,两组之间均无显着差异(VAS3-12周:P=.584;PWRE3-12周:P=.248;屈曲运动范围3-12周:P=.959;延伸运动范围:P=.50;愈合时间:P=.89)。
    结论:我们没有发现前臂夹板固定或加压绷带固定在锁定钢板治疗桡骨远端骨折之间的临床或放射学差异。需要更多的患者和随访才能将结果推断到普通人群,并为这些骨折的良好术后管理建立标准。
    BACKGROUND: Currently, there is a lack of prospective studies to unify criteria about type and time for postoperative immobilisation in surgical distal radius fractures. The aim of this study is to compare functional and radiological results in two groups of distal radius fractures treated with internal fixation with locking plate, and immobilised with antebrachial splint or compression bandage for 3 weeks.
    METHODS: A randomised clinical trial was carried out with two parallel groups with 3, 6, and 12 weeks of follow-up. Main and secondary functional variables were measured, such as pain on VAS scale, values on PRWE, DASH and MRS scale, range of motion in flexion-extension, complications, etc. In addition, some radiological variables were measured at preoperative period and one week after surgery, such as union time, dorsal displacement, shortening, ulnar variance, etc. RESULTS: A total of 62 patients were evaluated: 27 immobilised with bandage and 35 with splint. Analysis of the results obtained showed significant differences in both groups for almost all radiological variables from pre to postoperative period, and for all functional variables from 3 to 12 weeks after surgery. No significant differences were found between the two groups for any of the radiological and functional variables evaluated (VAS 3-12 weeks: p=.584; PWRE 3-12 weeks: p=.248; flexion range of motion 3-12 weeks: p=.959; extension range of motion: p=.50; union time: p=.89).
    CONCLUSIONS: We do not find clinical or radiological differences between immobilisation with antebrachial splint or compression bandage for distal radius fractures operated with locking plate. A greater number of patients and follow-up are necessary to extrapolate the results to the general population and to establish criteria for good postoperative management of these fractures.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:闭合复位结合外固定是治疗成人桡骨远端骨折的常用方法。尽管如此,外固定后再次移位的可能性仍然存在。分析影响成人桡骨远端骨折非手术治疗后再移位的因素对于预防再移位和进行预后评估至关重要。
    方法:对天津医院中西医结合骨伤复位室接受非手术治疗的884例桡骨远端骨折患者进行回顾性分析,天津,中国,2019年7月至2022年12月。患者分为两组,即流离失所者和非流离失所者,基于射线照相结果。检查了影响骨折再移位的因素,包括性,年龄,侧面,AO/OTA类型,外固定,以及减少前和立即减少时的影像学结果。采用Logistic回归分析确定骨折再移位的危险因素,并构建ROC曲线。
    结果:在884名患者中,563(63.69%)在骨折复位后发生了再移位。两组在性别方面差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。外固定方法,和手掌倾斜角度在预减少和立即减少,虽然在年龄上观察到显著差异(p<0.05),侧面,AO/OTA类型,和径向倾角,径向长度,减少前和立即减少时尺骨变异的影像学结果。多因素Logistic回归分析显示,年龄(比值比[OR]=1.027,p<0.001),AO/OTA类型(OR=2.327,p=0.005),减少前的尺骨方差(OR=1.142,p=0.048),立即复位时的尺骨方差(OR=1.685,p<0.001)是与成人桡骨远端骨折非手术治疗后再移位相关的重要因素(p<0.05)。对于年龄≥60岁的患者,放射学结局缺失的数量与年龄呈正相关.受试者工作特性曲线表明年龄≥65.5岁,预复位时尺骨方差>3.26mm,即刻复位时尺骨方差>2.055mm是骨折再移位的高危因素。
    结论:非手术治疗桡骨远端骨折的再移位率较高。年龄,AO/OTA类型,预还原,即刻复位尺骨方差是预测骨折再移位的关键因素。
    OBJECTIVE: Closed reduction combined with external fixation is a frequently utilized approach for treating distal radial fractures in adults. Nonetheless, the potential for re-displacement following external fixation remains. Analyzing the factors influencing re-displacement after nonsurgical treatment of distal radial fractures in adults is vital for preventing re-displacement and making prognostic assessments.
    METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 884 patients who underwent nonsurgical treatment for distal radius fractures in the reduction room of the Orthopedics and Traumatology Department of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine at Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin, China, between July 2019 and December 2022. Patients were categorized into two groups, namely displaced and nondisplaced, based on radiographic outcomes. Factors affecting fracture re-displacement were examined, including sex, age, side, AO/OTA type, external fixation, and radiographic outcomes at pre-reduction and immediate reduction. Logistic regression analysis was employed to identify the risk factors for fracture re-displacement, and ROC curves were constructed.
    RESULTS: Among the 884 patients, 563 (63.69%) experienced re-displacement after fracture reduction. There were no statistically significant differences (p > 0.05) between the two groups in terms of gender, external fixation method, and palmar tilt angle at pre-reduction and immediate reduction, while significant differences (p < 0.05) were observed in age, side, AO/OTA type, and radial inclination, radial length, and radiographic outcomes of ulnar variance at pre-reduction and immediate reduction. Multifactorial logistic regression analysis revealed that age (odds ratio [OR] = 1.027, p < 0.001), AO/OTA type (OR = 2.327, p = 0.005), ulnar variance at pre-reduction (OR = 1.142, p = 0.048), and ulnar variance at immediate reduction (OR = 1.685, p < 0.001) were significant factors (p < 0.05) associated with re-displacement following nonoperative treatment of adult distal radius fractures. For patients aged ≥60 years, the amount of missing radiographic outcomes was positively correlated with age. The receiver operating characteristic curve demonstrated that age ≥65.5 years, ulnar variance >3.26 mm at pre-reduction, and ulnar variance >2.055 mm at immediate reduction were high-risk factors for fracture re-displacement.
    CONCLUSIONS: Nonsurgical treatment of distal radius fractures exhibits a higher rate of re-displacement. Age, AO/OTA type, pre-reduction, and immediate reduction ulnar variance are key factors predicting fracture re-displacement.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:目前,缺乏前瞻性研究来统一桡骨远端骨折手术后固定的类型和时间标准。这项研究的目的是比较两组使用锁定钢板内固定治疗的桡骨远端骨折的功能和放射学结果。并用前臂夹板或加压绷带固定3周。
    方法:对两个平行组进行随机临床试验,随访3、6和12周。测量了主要和次要功能变量,如VAS量表上的疼痛,PRWE上的值,DASH和MRS量表,活动范围在屈伸,并发症,等。此外,在手术前和手术后一周测量了一些放射学变量,比如工会时间,背侧位移,缩短,尺骨方差,等。结果:共评估62例患者,27用绷带固定,35用夹板固定。对获得的结果的分析显示,从手术前到术后期间,两组的几乎所有放射学变量均存在显着差异。以及手术后3到12周的所有功能变量。对于评估的任何放射学和功能变量,两组之间均无显着差异(VAS3-12周:p=0.584;PWRE3-12周:p=0.248;屈曲运动范围3-12周:p=0.959;延伸运动范围:p=0.50;联合时间:p=0.89)。
    结论:我们没有发现前臂夹板固定或加压绷带固定在锁定钢板治疗桡骨远端骨折之间的临床或放射学差异。需要更多的患者和随访才能将结果推断到普通人群,并为这些骨折的良好术后管理建立标准。
    BACKGROUND: Currently, there is a lack of prospective studies to unify criteria about type and time for postoperative immobilization in surgical distal radius fractures. The aim of this study is to compare functional and radiological results in two groups of distal radius fractures treated with internal fixation with locking plate, and immobilized with antebrachial splint or compression bandage for 3weeks.
    METHODS: A randomized clinical trial was carried out with two parallel groups with 3, 6, and 12weeks of follow-up. Main and secondary functional variables were measured, such as pain on VAS scale, values on PRWE, DASH and MRS scale, range of motion in flexion-extension, complications, etc. In addition, some radiological variables were measured at preoperative period and one week after surgery, such as union time, dorsal displacement, shortening, ulnar variance, etc. RESULTS: A total of 62 patients were evaluated: 27 immobilized with bandage and 35 with splint. Analysis of the results obtained showed significant differences in both groups for almost all radiological variables from pre to postoperative period, and for all functional variables from 3 to 12weeks after surgery. No significant differences were found between the two groups for any of the radiological and functional variables evaluated (VAS 3-12weeks: P=.584; PWRE 3-12weeks: P=.248; flexion range of motion 3-12weeks: P=.959; extension range of motion: P=.50; union time: P=.89).
    CONCLUSIONS: We do not find clinical or radiological differences between immobilization with antebrachial splint or compression bandage for distal radius fractures operated with locking plate. A greater number of patients and follow-up are necessary to extrapolate the results to the general population and to establish criteria for good postoperative management of these fractures.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    基于职业的干预(OBI)涉及日常和有意义的活动,以进行评估和干预。最近,开发了“手部职业选择决策辅助”(ADOC-H),以促进手部受伤患者的OBI。我们旨在使用ADOC-H结合基于身体功能的干预措施(PBI)检查OBI对桡骨远端骨折(DRF)患者的疗效。
    DRF患者被回顾性地分为两组,ADOC-H组(n=14)和PBI组(n=14),和比较。
    疼痛灾害性量表放大倍数和医院焦虑和抑郁量表的改善以及手臂的残疾,肩膀,ADOC-H组和手问卷得分明显高于PBI组(p<0.05)。两组在身体机能方面没有差异,如运动范围和握力。
    使用ADOC-H联合PBI的OBI对DRF患者在临床上很有用,因为它可以逐步促进受伤手的日常活动,改善使用手的心理困难。
    UNASSIGNED: Occupation-based intervention (OBI) involves daily and meaningful activities for evaluation and intervention. Recently, the \"aid for decision-making in occupation choice for hand\" (ADOC-H) was developed to facilitate OBI in patients with hand injuries. We aimed to examine the efficacy of OBI using the ADOC-H combined with physical function-based interventions (PBI) for patients with distal radius fractures (DRF).
    UNASSIGNED: Patients with DRF were retrospectively allocated to two groups, ADOC-H group (n = 14) and PBI group (n = 14), and compared.
    UNASSIGNED: Improvements in the Pain Catastrophizing Scale magnification and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire scores were significantly higher in the ADOC-H group than in the PBI group (p < .05). The groups showed no differences in measure of physical function, such as range of motion and grip strength.
    UNASSIGNED: OBI using the ADOC-H combined with PBI is clinically useful for patients with DRF as it promotes use of the injured hand for daily activities in a step-by-step approach, improving psychological difficulties in using the hand.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:为了应对COVID-19大流行给英国医院带来的压力,英国骨科协会,2021年5月,英国骨科协会制定了创伤和骨科标准(BOAST),用于早期治疗儿童前臂远端骨折。在此之后,我们的信托机构引入了一条本地途径,以在急诊室(ED)管理这些伤害。本次审核的目的是监测BOAST指南的遵守情况,并将这种做法与类似的COVID前队列进行比较。
    方法:进行了一项固定日期的回顾性队列研究,包括在6个月期间(2021年8月1日至2022年1月31日)向急诊科就诊的病例。分析数据的主要ED操作率,说明中的同意书和神经血管状况,正交X射线数据,直到临床随访,节省了剧院时间和并发症。还将ED骨折操作率与另一个类似的COVID前队列(2019年8月1日至2020年1月31日)进行了比较,以寻求实践中的任何改进。
    结果:根据BOAST建议引入Trust指南后,在ED中发现共有86.31%的病例进行了初次骨折操作。与COVID大流行前31.94%的骨折操作率相比,这是一个改进。
    结论:根据BOAST指南实施信托途径以及员工教育规范了我们信托的做法。在六个月的数据收集期间,它节省了大约63个小时的创伤手术室时间。我们的发现还表明,这对没有并发症的患者具有良好的预后。
    BACKGROUND: In response to the strain that the COVID-19 pandemic put on hospitals in the UK, the British Orthopaedic Association, in May 2021, set out British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma and Orthopaedics (BOAST) guidelines for the early management of distal forearm fractures in children. Following this, a local pathway was introduced at our Trust to manage these injuries in the Emergency Department (ED). The aim of this audit was to monitor compliance with the BOAST guidelines and compare the practice with a similar pre-COVID cohort.
    METHODS: A fixed-date retrospective cohort study was conducted that included cases that presented to the emergency department during a six-month period (August 1, 2021 to January 31, 2022). Data was analysed for rates of primary ED manipulation, documentation of consent and neurovascular status in the notes, orthogonal X-ray data, time till the clinic follow-up, theatre time saved and complications. The ED fracture manipulation rate was also compared with another similar pre-COVID cohort (August 1, 2019 to January 31, 2020) to look for any improvement in the practice.
    RESULTS: A total of 86.31% cases were found to have primary fracture manipulation in the ED following the introduction of Trust guidelines in accordance with the BOAST recommendations. This is an improvement in comparison to the 31.94% fracture manipulation rate before the COVID pandemic.
    CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the Trust pathway in accordance with the BOAST guidelines along with staff education has standardized the practice at our Trust. It saved approximately 63 hours of trauma theatre time for the six-month data collection period. Our findings also suggest that this has favourable outcomes for the patients with no complications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:桡骨远端骨折手术固定后,许多患者渴望重返驾驶。然而,协助外科医生的指南有限。这项研究的目的是确定患者在桡骨远端骨折固定后何时可以安全恢复驾驶,并确定患者在恢复安全驾驶之前需要达到的临床参数(运动范围和握力)。
    方法:进行了一项前瞻性资助的临床研究。21岁以上接受掌侧钢板手术固定的患者,拥有三级标准汽车牌照,从2017年到2019年,在一个机构中招募了正规司机。一名手部外科医生和一名职业治疗师,他看到了常规的手部治疗病例,术后2至12周定期评估患者。疼痛的临床参数,测量手腕的活动范围和握力。患者接受了越野和公路驾驶评估。
    结果:共招募了26名患者,21人成功完成驾驶评估。手术后通过驾驶考试的中位时间分别为6周和8周,用于越野和公路评估。观察到疼痛评分随着时间的推移而降低,从第2周到第4周显著减少。随着时间的推移,运动范围有所改善,术后2至4周之间最大改善。与未受影响的手腕相比,内旋的差异,术后4~6周,受累手的旋后和桡骨偏位在统计学上不再显著.
    结论:如果疼痛控制充分,可以建议手术治疗的桡骨远端骨折患者早在手术后4-6周进行驾驶评估。并满足内旋和外旋的临床参数。
    BACKGROUND: After surgical fixation of distal radius fractures, many patients are keen to return to driving. There are however limited guidelines assisting surgeons. The aims of this study were to determine when patients could return to driving safely after distal radius fracture fixation and determine the clinical parameters (range of motion and grip strength) that patients needed to achieve before return to safe driving could be advised.
    METHODS: A prospective grant-funded clinical study was conducted. Patients above the age of 21 years who underwent surgical fixation with a volar plate, possessed a class 3 standard motorcar license, and were regular drivers were recruited in a single institution from 2017 to 2019. A hand surgeon and an occupational therapist who sees routine hand therapy cases, assessed the patients at regular intervals from 2 to 12-weeks post-surgery. Clinical parameters of pain, wrist range of motion and grip strength were measured. Patients underwent off and on-road driving assessments.
    RESULTS: A total of 26 patients were recruited, with 21 successfully completing the driving assessment. Median time post-surgery to passing the driving test was 6 and 8-weeks for off and on-road assessments respectively. Pain score was observed to decrease over time, with a significant decrease from week 2 to week 4. Range of motion improved over time, with maximal improvement between 2 to 4-weeks post-surgery. When compared with the unaffected wrist, the difference in pronation, supination and radial deviation in the affected hand was consistently no longer statistically significant 4 to 6-weeks post-surgery.
    CONCLUSIONS: Patients with isolated surgically treated distal radius fractures can be recommended for a driving assessment as early as 4-6 weeks post-surgery if pain control is adequate, and clinical parameters for pronation and supination are met.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Background Distal end radius fractures (DRF), which account for 17.5% of all fractures, are the most frequent fracture seen in emergency rooms. In patients with DRFs, delayed carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) occurs in about 20% of cases. When patients are treated with DRFs using different modalities, CTS results in poor functional outcomes. Our study aims to identify the prevalence of CTS in DRF patients receiving treatment with various modalities. Materials and methods Two hundred twenty patients with a history of DRFs who were treated by a variety of modalities at R.L. Jalappa Hospital and Research Center between January 2013 and January 2018 are included in this retrospective analysis. The medical records from the department of the hospital\'s paperwork were used to gather the patient\'s information and radiographs. The information was gathered, tabulated, and examined. Results In our study, the incidence of CTS in DRF was calculated using a sample size of 220 and found to be 32.73%. The incidence of CTS was shown to be higher in groups with more comminution than less comminution when treatment modalities were analyzed. These groups included closed reduction and internal fixation (CRIF)/open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with K wire, external fixation, conservative with the cast, ORIF with variable angle volar locking plate (VAVLP), and ORIF with volar T locking plates (VTLP). Conclusions After DRFs, carpal tunnel syndrome is the most significant consequence limiting functional results, hence preventing it requires considerably more attention and care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的分析掌侧锁定钢板和背扣悬吊系统的微创固定技术在背侧粉碎的桡骨远端关节骨折中的临床和放射学结果。材料与方法6例桡骨远端骨折患者,年龄在19到68岁之间,包括在研究中。平均随访15周。屈曲运动范围(ROM),扩展,径向偏差,尺位偏差,内旋,仰卧起坐,以公斤为单位的强度,和视觉模拟比例(VAS)上的值,手臂的残疾,肩和手(DASH)在术后4、8和12周评估Mayo腕关节评分(MWS)量表。放射学评估了桡骨前后直径的校正以及术后前后直径与对侧腕部直径之间的一致性。结果术后12周获得以下平均值:屈曲ROM:40.5°,ROM扩展:49.5°,ROM径向偏差:24.5°,尺骨偏差ROM:15°,内旋ROM:87°,旋后ROM:89°,强度:37.5公斤,疼痛VAS评分:2分,DASH:54.5分,和MWS:67.5分。术后12周,前后径的平均校正为0.49mm.前后直径和对侧腕部的直径密切相关。结论掌侧锁定钢板和背侧悬吊按钮固定可替代背侧钢板固定治疗伴有粉碎或相关背侧冲模碎片的桡骨远端骨折。
    Objective  The objective of the study is to analyze the clinical and radiological results obtained using a minimally invasive fixation technique with a volar locking plate and a suspension system with a dorsal button in distal articular radius fractures with dorsal comminution. Materials and Methods  Six patients with distal radius fractures, between 19 and 68 years of age, were included in the study. Mean follow-up was of 15 weeks. Range of motion (ROM) in flexion, extension, radial deviation, ulnar deviation, pronation, supination, the strength in kilograms, and values on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), and Mayo Wrist Score (MWS) scales were evaluated at 4, 8, and 12 weeks postoperative. Correction of anteroposterior diameter of the radius and concordance between postoperative anteroposterior diameter and the contralateral wrist diameter were evaluated radiologically. Results  The following mean values were obtained at 12 weeks postoperative: ROM in flexion: 40.5°, ROM in extension: 49.5°, ROM in radial deviation: 24.5°, ROM in ulnar deviation: 15°, ROM in pronation: 87°, ROM in supination: 89°, strength: 37.5 kg, pain in VAS scale: 2 points, DASH: 54.5 points, and MWS: 67.5 points. At 12 weeks postoperative, the mean correction of anteroposterior diameter was 0.49 mm. The anteroposterior diameter and that of the contralateral wrist were strongly correlated. Conclusion  Fixation with the volar locking plate and dorsal suspension button could be considered an alternative to dorsal plate fixation for treatment of distal radius fractures with comminution or associated dorsal die punch fragments.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号