OBJECTIVE: Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are recommendations developed for broad application to optimize high-quality care and decision-making. The composition of patients and outcome measures used in studies informing CPGs; however, has not been rigorously evaluated. With growing evidence that outcomes in musculoskeletal surgery vary by sociocultural factors, we aimed to: (1) review the linguistic, racial, and ethnic representation of the patients in the studies informing CPGs for distal radius fractures and (2) assess their use of linguistically and culturally adapted patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).
METHODS: The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons website was used to identify relevant studies. Key variables were extracted, including inclusion and exclusion criteria, language of study, patient language and proficiency, patient race and ethnicity, and use of translated or culturally adapted PROMs. If provided, the clinical trial registration page for the study was evaluated. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the frequency of each variable.
RESULTS: Fifty-four published texts were evaluated. Participant language was reported in four (7%) of the published texts and six (11%) when including the clinical trial registration information. Of the published texts, one (2%) reported ethnic group/race data and 40 (74%) used PROMs. Of those using PROMs, eight (20%) of 40 reported the use of translated PROMs, and three (8%) of 40 reported the use of culturally adapted PROMs.
CONCLUSIONS: There is a lack of reporting of linguistic, racial, and ethnic data and inconsistent use of PROMs, particularly those that are translated and culturally adapted, in studies included in the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons CPG for distal radius fractures. As sociocultural characteristics and PROMs are associated with outcomes, ensuring they are broadly represented in studies, may improve equity and shared decision-making.
CONCLUSIONS: Greater inclusion and reporting of demographic data and PROMs are required in musculoskeletal studies to ensure broad applicability and advance health equity.

BACKGROUND: In response to the strain that the COVID-19 pandemic put on hospitals in the UK, the British Orthopaedic Association, in May 2021, set out British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma and Orthopaedics (BOAST) guidelines for the early management of distal forearm fractures in children. Following this, a local pathway was introduced at our Trust to manage these injuries in the Emergency Department (ED). The aim of this audit was to monitor compliance with the BOAST guidelines and compare the practice with a similar pre-COVID cohort.
METHODS: A fixed-date retrospective cohort study was conducted that included cases that presented to the emergency department during a six-month period (August 1, 2021 to January 31, 2022). Data was analysed for rates of primary ED manipulation, documentation of consent and neurovascular status in the notes, orthogonal X-ray data, time till the clinic follow-up, theatre time saved and complications. The ED fracture manipulation rate was also compared with another similar pre-COVID cohort (August 1, 2019 to January 31, 2020) to look for any improvement in the practice.
RESULTS: A total of 86.31% cases were found to have primary fracture manipulation in the ED following the introduction of Trust guidelines in accordance with the BOAST recommendations. This is an improvement in comparison to the 31.94% fracture manipulation rate before the COVID pandemic.
CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the Trust pathway in accordance with the BOAST guidelines along with staff education has standardized the practice at our Trust. It saved approximately 63 hours of trauma theatre time for the six-month data collection period. Our findings also suggest that this has favourable outcomes for the patients with no complications.