Distal radius fracture

桡骨远端骨折
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由于骨折对齐的实时反馈,超声引导下桡骨远端骨折(DRF)的操作和复位(M&R)被认为可以改善影像学指标。这项试验的目的是比较掌侧倾斜,径向倾角,超声引导和常规(地标引导)M&R之间的X射线照片上的径向高度。
    共有79例成人桡骨远端关节外骨折被随机分为超声引导和常规(界标引导)M&R。比较两组在M&R之前和之后的上述X线照片参数。
    除了掌侧倾斜(P=0.05差异),两组的X线摄影参数即径向倾角和径向高度没有差异.我们估计,通过USG指导的减少,减少不良的发生率降低了49%(风险比0.51),绝对风险降低了22%。我们评估了通过USG指导的DRFM&R治疗4所需的数量,以防止一种不可接受的减少。在USG指导和地标指导的M&R中,有9(22%)和18(46%)(P=0.70)个不可接受的减少。
    在常规的基于界标的闭合复位方法中添加USG指导对于Colle\的骨折复位的准确性没有好处。然而,超声引导的M&R中改善的掌侧倾斜需要进一步研究以确定其临床意义。
    UNASSIGNED: Ultrasound-guided manipulation and reduction (M&R) of the distal radius fractures (DRF) is believed to improve radiographic indices due to real-time feedback of fracture alignment. The objective of this trial was to compare volar tilt, radial inclination, and radial height on radiographs between Ultrasound guided and conventional (landmark-guided) M&R.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 79 distal radius extraarticular fractures in adults were randomised to Ultrasound guided and conventional (landmark-guided) M&R. The radiograph parameters described above were compared before and after M&R in both groups.
    UNASSIGNED: Except for volar tilt (P=0.05 difference in difference), there was no difference in both the groups on radiograph parameters i.e. radial inclination and radial height. We estimated a reduction in the incidence of malreduction by 49% (Risk ratio 0.51) and an absolute risk reduction of 22% through USG-guided reduction. We evaluated a number needed to treat 4 through USG-directed M&R of DRF to prevent one unacceptable reduction. There were 9 (22%) and 18 (46%) (P=0.70) unacceptable reductions in USG-guided and landmark-guided M&R.
    UNASSIGNED: Adding USG guidance to conventional landmark-based closed reduction methods is not beneficial for the accuracy of fracture reduction in Colle\'s fracture. However, improved volar tilt in sonographic-directed M&R needs further studies to determine the clinical significance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:这项解剖学研究的目的是评估长伸肌(EPL)肌腱的过程,它与相邻结构的位置关系,以及在考虑各种功能位置时产生的临床相关性。
    方法:本研究包括使用Thiel方法进行防腐处理的10名成人尸体的20个上肢。EPL肌腱的最大可能的移动/滑动,肌腱缠绕李斯特结节的角度,并在所有功能位置记录并定义了其穿过radial腕长和短伸肌的过程(ECRL和ECRB)。
    结果:我们的发现表明,与临床相关结构相关的肌腱有很大的运动范围。
    结论:了解EPL肌腱的解剖过程,其潜在的运动范围,其导致的位置变化对于背背腕部有主诉或损伤的患者的诊断和手术治疗至关重要。
    BACKGROUND: The aim of this anatomical study was to evaluate the course of the extensor pollicis longus (EPL) tendon, its positional relationship to adjacent structures, and the resulting clinical relevance under consideration of various functional positions.
    METHODS: Twenty upper extremities from ten adult human cadavers embalmed using Thiel\'s method were included in this study. The greatest possible movement/slippage of the EPL tendon, the angle at which the tendon wraps around Lister\'s tubercle, and its course across the extensor carpi radialis longus and brevis (ECRL and ECRB) were recorded and defined in all functional positions.
    RESULTS: Our findings demonstrate a high range of motion of the tendon in relation to clinically relevant structures.
    CONCLUSIONS: Understanding the anatomical course of the EPL tendon, its potential extent of movement, and its resulting positional changes is essential for the diagnosis and surgical treatment of patients with complaints or injuries in the dorsoradial wrist region.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:与其他更常用的方式相比,周围神经阻滞可以为桡骨远端骨折的闭合复位提供更好的条件。在这次系统审查中,我们评估了现有的关于周围神经阻滞对成人桡骨远端骨折闭合复位的影响和危害的证据。
    方法:我们进行了一项系统评价,包括荟萃分析和试验序贯分析,包括研究使用周围神经阻滞闭合复位桡骨远端骨折的试验。共同的主要结果是(1)闭合复位的质量,以随后需要手术的参与者的比例衡量,以及(2)闭合复位期间的疼痛。
    结果:6项试验(n=312)符合纳入标准。一项试验报告需要手术,25名参与者中有4名接受神经阻滞,25名接受血肿阻滞的参与者中有7名需要手术(RR0.57,96.7%CI[0.19;1.71],p=.50)。四项试验报告了闭合复位过程中的疼痛。在荟萃分析中,神经阻滞的疼痛没有统计学上的显着减轻(-2.1数字评定量表(NRS)分(0-10),96.7%CI[-4.4;0.2],p=.07,tau2=5.4,I2=97%,运输安全管理局调整。95%CI[-11.5;7.3])。没有跨越试验顺序界限,并且未满足所需的信息大小。对评估超声引导的周围神经阻滞(患者=110)的试验进行的预先计划的亚组分析显示,减少过程中的疼痛显着减少(-4.1NRS,96.7%CI[-5.5;-2.6],p<.01,tau2=0.9,I2=80%)。所有试验结果都存在高偏倚风险,证据的确定性非常低。
    结论:关于周围神经阻滞闭合复位桡骨远端骨折效果的证据的确定性目前非常低。在超声引导下进行的周围神经阻滞可能潜在地减轻闭合复位期间的疼痛。高质量的临床试验是必要的。
    BACKGROUND: Peripheral nerve blocks may provide better conditions for closed reduction of distal radius fractures as compared to other more frequently used modalities. In this systematic review, we evaluate existing evidence on the effect and harm of peripheral nerve blocks for closed reduction of distal radius fractures in adults.
    METHODS: We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis including trials investigating the use of peripheral nerve blocks for closed reduction of distal radius fractures. Co-primary outcomes were (1) the quality of the closed reduction measured as the proportion of participants needing surgery afterwards and (2) pain during closed reduction.
    RESULTS: Six trials (n = 312) met the inclusion criteria. One trial reported on the need for surgery with 4 of 25 participants receiving nerve block compared to 7 of 25 receiving haematoma block needing surgery (RR 0.57, 96.7% CI [0.19; 1.71], p = .50). Four trials reported pain during closed reduction. In a meta-analysis, pain was not statistically significantly reduced with a nerve block (-2.1 Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) points (0-10), 96.7% CI [-4.4; 0.2], p = .07, tau2 = 5.4, I2 = 97%, TSA-adj. 95% CI [-11.5; 7.3]). No trial sequential boundaries were crossed, and the required information size was not met. Pre-planned subgroup analysis on trials evaluating ultrasound guided peripheral nerve blocks (patients = 110) showed a significant decrease in \'pain during reduction\' (-4.1 NRS, 96.7% CI [-5.5; -2.6], p < .01, tau2 = 0.9, I2 = 80%). All trial results were at high risk of bias and the certainty of the evidence was very low.
    CONCLUSIONS: The certainty of evidence on the effect of peripheral nerve blocks for closed reduction of distal radius fractures is currently very low. Peripheral nerve blocks performed with ultrasound guidance may potentially reduce pain during closed reduction. High-quality clinical trials are warranted.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:长期确定在桡骨远端骨折(DRF)患者的功能改善和疼痛缓解方面,监督物理治疗是否比家庭锻炼计划更有效。
    方法:随机对照试验。
    方法:康复医院。
    方法:将74例年龄超过60岁的关节外DRF患者随机分为两组。
    方法:实验组接受6周的有监督的物理治疗(n=37),对照组接受6周的家庭锻炼计划(n=37)。
    方法:主要结局是使用患者腕部评估(PRWE)问卷评估腕部/手功能;次要结局是疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS),握力和手腕屈伸活动范围。
    结果:所有患者均完成试验。对于主要结果,在6周和1年的随访中,PRWE问卷显示,两组之间的平均差异分别为18.6分(95%CI12.8至24.3)和18.5分(95%CI12.7至24.2),这些差异在临床上很重要。相反,在2年的随访中,该效应降低至3.3个百分点(95%CI-2.4~9.0).对于次要结果,在6周和1年的随访中,在所有测量中,效应大小范围从中等到大。相反,在2年的随访中,只有握力显示出有利于监督物理治疗的大效应大小,其余结局在组间无差异.
    结论:在6周和1年的随访中,在60岁以上的关节外DRF患者中,与家庭锻炼计划相比,有监督的物理治疗对功能改善和疼痛缓解更有效。然而,这种影响随着时间的推移而减少,在2年的随访中,只有握力显示出有利于监督物理治疗的差异。
    背景:巴西临床试验注册UTN号。U1111-1249-2492。2020年3月17日注册。论文的贡献。
    To determine in the long term whether supervised physiotherapy is more effective than a home exercise program for functional improvement and pain relief in patients with distal radius fracture (DRF).
    Randomized controlled trial.
    Rehabilitation hospital.
    A total of 74 patients older than 60 years with extra-articular DRF were randomly allocated into two groups.
    The experimental group received 6 weeks of supervised physiotherapy (n = 37) and the control group received 6 weeks of home exercise program (n = 37).
    The primary outcome was wrist/hand function assessed using the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) questionnaire; secondary outcomes were the pain visual analogue scale (VAS), grip strength and wrist flexion-extension active range of motion.
    All patients completed the trial. For the primary outcome, at 6-weeks and 1-year follow-up, the PRWE questionnaire showed a mean difference between groups of 18.6 (95% CI 12.8 to 24.3) and 18.5 points (95% CI 12.7 to 24.2) respectively, these differences are clinically important. Conversely, at 2-year follow-up this effect decreases to 3.3 points (95% CI -2.4 to 9.0). For secondary outcomes, at 6-weeks and 1-year follow-up, in all measurements the effect size range from medium to large. Conversely, at 2-year follow-up only grip strength showed large effect size in favor of supervised physiotherapy, the rest of outcomes did not show difference between groups.
    At the 6-week and 1-year follow-up, supervised physiotherapy was more effective for functional improvement and pain relief compared with a home exercise program in patients older than 60 years with extra-articular DRF. However, this effect decreases over time, at the 2-year follow-up, only grip strength showed a difference in favor of supervised physiotherapy.
    Brazilian registry of clinical trials UTN no. U1111- 1249-2492. Registered 17 March 2020. CONTRIBUTION OF THE PAPER.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:桡骨远端骨折(DRF)是人体三种最常见的骨折之一,在所有年龄段的发病率都在增加。发病率增加的已知原因,例如人口老龄化或肥胖增加,已经被描述和讨论。到目前为止,文献报道了体重指数(BMI)对骨生理学的矛盾影响。值得更详细地研究BMI对骨折结局的影响。本研究旨在探讨BMI异常对骨折严重程度和治疗的影响。以及临床,放射学,和功能结果,以改善临床决策。
    方法:对患者的数据进行了回顾性观察研究,2018年5月至2021年10月在当地一级创伤中心接受了DRF切开复位内固定术(ORIF)。手术骨折治疗后约1年进行随访检查,在此期间,各种问卷和功能测量(CMS,DASH,NRS,ROM)已应用。此外,记录术后并发症,并对患手进行放射学检查.排除不完整数据集并应用集排除标准后,对105例患者的完整资料进行分析.
    结果:74例患者为女性,31例男性,平均BMI差异显着[p=0.002;女性:23.8(SD±3.3),男性:26.2(SD±3.9)]。BMI较高的患者骨折明显更严重(p=0.042)。然而,骨折处理的手术时间没有显着差异。在后续行动中,BMI较低的患者在骨折和另一只手之间的手力量差异较小(p=0.017).BMI对临床和放射学结果无显著影响。
    结论:尽管BMI对骨骼系统有矛盾的影响,我们的研究结果表明,BMI越高,DRF越严重.因此,BMI与骨折治疗的手术时间无关。此外,未发现对临床和放射学结局有影响的证据.
    BACKGROUND: Distal radius fracture (DRF) is one of the three most common fractures of the human body with increasing incidences in all groups of age. Known causes of increasing incidence, such as ageing of the population or increased obesity, have been described and discussed. So far, literature reports ambivalent effects of body mass index (BMI) on bone physiology. It is worthwhile to examine the influence of BMI on the outcome of fractures more detailed. This study aims to investigate the influence of an abnormal BMI on fracture severity and treatment, as well as clinical, radiological, and functional outcome to improve clinical decision making.
    METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted on data obtained from patients, who underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of a DRF at a local Level 1 Trauma Center between May 2018 and October 2021. Follow-up examinations were performed approximately 1 year after surgical fracture treatment, during which various questionnaires and functional measurements (CMS, DASH, NRS, ROM) were applied. In addition, postoperative complications were recorded and radiological examinations of the affected hand were performed. After excluding incomplete data sets and applying set exclusion criteria, the complete data of 105 patients were analyzed.
    RESULTS: 74 patients were female and 31 male with significant difference in mean BMI [p = 0.002; female: 23.8 (SD ± 3.3), men: 26.2 (SD ± 3.9)]. Patients with higher BMI had significantly more severe fractures (p = 0.042). However, there was no significant difference in surgery time for fracture management. At follow-up, patients with lower BMI showed a smaller difference in hand strength between the fractured and the other hand (p = 0.017). The BMI had no significant effect on the clinical and radiological outcome.
    CONCLUSIONS: Despite the ambivalent effects of BMI on the skeletal system, our findings indicate that a higher BMI is associated with more severe DRF. Thereby BMI does not correlate with surgery time for fracture treatment. Furthermore, no evidence of an influence on the clinical and radiological outcome could be detected.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    随着人口的迅速老龄化,老年人桡骨远端骨折(DRF)的数量将急剧增加。这项回顾性注册研究的目的是检查80岁或以上的DRF患者的1年和5年死亡率,并将总生存率与与骨折本身无关的因素相关联。
    2010-2012年期间在瑞典隆德大学医院诊断为DRF的年龄≥80岁的患者从前瞻性隆德桡骨远端骨折记录中提取。使用瑞典标准人口作为参考,计算了1年和5年标准化死亡率(SMR)。在医疗记录中搜索非骨折相关因素,包括合并症,药物,认知障碍和生活类型。Cox比例风险回归模型用于确定全因死亡率的预后因素。
    该研究队列包括240名患者,平均年龄86岁.1年总死亡率为5%(n=11/240),5年死亡率为44%(n=105/240)。当间接调整年龄和性别并与瑞典标准人群相比时,1年SMR为.44(CI.18-.69,P<.01)。5年SMR为.96(CI.78-1.14)。患者在自己家中独立生活的能力对生存的影响最大。
    超老年DRF患者的1年死亡率仅为预期的44%。可能,这个年龄段的DRF可能是一个更健康,更活跃的患者的标志。
    与年龄和性别匹配的标准人群相比,年龄在80岁或以上的DRF患者骨折后1年的死亡率大大降低。独立生活在自己家中的患者的预期寿命最长。不应仅仅因为年老而限制治疗,但根据患者的能力和活动水平进行个性化。
    UNASSIGNED: With a rapidly ageing population, the number of distal radius fractures (DRFs) in the elderly will increase dramatically. The aim of this retrospective register study was to examine the 1- and 5-year mortality in DRF patients aged 80 years or more and correlate the overall survival to factors not related to the fracture itself.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients aged ≥80 diagnosed with DRFs in Lund University Hospital in Sweden in the period 2010-2012 were extracted from the prospective Lund Distal Radius Fracture register. One- and 5-year standardised mortality rates (SMRs) were calculated using the Swedish standard population as a reference. Medical records were searched for non-fracture-related factors including comorbidity, medications, cognitive impairment and type of living. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to identify prognostic factors for all-cause mortality.
    UNASSIGNED: The study cohort included 240 patients, with a mean age of 86. The overall 1-year mortality was 5% (n = 11/240) and the 5-year mortality was 44% (n = 105/240). The 1-year SMR was .44 (CI .18-.69, P < .01) when indirectly adjusted for age and gender and compared to the Swedish standard population. The 5-year SMR was .96 (CI .78-1.14). The patients\' ability to live independently in their own home had the highest impact on survival.
    UNASSIGNED: The 1-year mortality rate among the super-elderly DRF patients was only 44% of that expected. Possibly, a DRF at this age could be a sign of a healthier and more active patient.
    UNASSIGNED: The DRF patients aged 80 or more had a substantially lower mortality rate 1 year after fracture compared to the age- and gender-matched standard population. Patients living independently in their own homes had the longest life expectancy. Treatment should not be limited solely because of old age, but individualised according to the patient\'s ability and activity level.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:每年大约有45,000名成年患者,桡骨远端骨折是急诊科最常见的骨折之一。所有这些骨折中约有60%移位并需要手术。目前的指南建议对这些等待手术的骨折进行闭合复位,因为它可能导致减轻后疼痛和释放周围神经血管结构的张力。最近的研究表明,成功的复位不需要保守治疗,而患者会感到疼痛甚至创伤。这项研究的目的是确定这些患者是否可以安全地放弃闭合复位。
    方法:在这项多中心随机临床试验中,我们将在封闭还原之后的石膏铸造和仅石膏铸造之间进行随机化。18至75岁的患者,根据主治医生的说法,在急诊科出现移位的远端桡骨骨折,需要手术,有资格列入。主要结果是通过从急诊就诊直到手术的每日VAS评分来评估疼痛。次要结果是由PRWHE评估的功能,在急诊室的停留时间,手术长度,重返工作岗位,患者满意度,和并发症。总共134名患者将被纳入这项研究,随访1年。
    结论:如果我们的研究表明未接受闭合复位的患者没有明显的缺点,我们也许可以在急诊科重新组织桡骨远端骨折的初始治疗.如果手术是必要的,病人可以被送回家,等待入院的电话,大大减少在急诊室的时间。
    背景:该试验于2023年1月27日注册。
    BACKGROUND: With roughly 45,000 adult patients each year, distal radius fractures are one of the most common fractures in the emergency department. Approximately 60% of all these fractures are displaced and require surgery. The current guidelines advise to perform closed reduction of these fractures awaiting surgery, as it may lead to post-reduction pain relief and release tension of the surrounding neurovascular structures. Recent studies have shown that successful reduction does not warrant conservative treatment, while patients find it painful or even traumatizing. The aim of this study is to determine whether closed reduction can be safely abandoned in these patients.
    METHODS: In this multicenter randomized clinical trial, we will randomize between closed reduction followed by plaster casting and only plaster casting. Patients aged 18 to 75 years, presenting at the emergency department with a displaced distal radial fracture and requiring surgery according to the attending surgeon, are eligible for inclusion. Primary outcome is pain assessed with daily VAS scores from the visit to the emergency department until surgery. Secondary outcomes are function assessed by PRWHE, length of stay at the emergency department, length of surgery, return to work, patient satisfaction, and complications. A total of 134 patients will be included in this study with follow-up of 1 year.
    CONCLUSIONS: If our study shows that patients who did not receive closed reduction experience no significant drawbacks, we might be able to reorganize the initial care for distal radial fractures in the emergency department. If surgery is warranted, the patient can be sent home with a plaster cast to await the call for admission, decreasing the time spend in the emergency room drastically.
    BACKGROUND: This trial was registered on January 27, 2023.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:通过这项前瞻性随机对照试验(RCT),我们的目的是对老年人桡骨远端(DER)骨折治疗中三种最常用的治疗方式进行结果分析.
    方法:进行前瞻性随机对照试验。52例DER骨折患者(AOA2,A3,C1或C2)被随机分配到铸造(n=17),经皮钉扎(n=18),和掌侧电镀组(n=17)。测量的放射学测量是径向倾角(RI),径向高度(RH),掌侧倾斜(VT),和尺骨方差(UV)。结果是根据运动范围测量的,握力,患者相关腕部评估(PRWE)评分,和快速残疾的手臂肩手(QDASH)得分。
    结果:术后和1年随访的X射线检查显示两组之间的测量差异显着(p<0.05)。铸造和钉扎组(p<0.05)以及铸造和电镀组(p<0.05)的成对比较显示在1年的随访中存在显着差异。而不是钉扎和电镀组(p>0.05)。分析发现随访1个月后的临床结果存在显着差异,电镀组优于其他两组(p>0.05)。然而,经过一年的随访,所有组都有可比的结果;然而,平板治疗组改善掌屈(p<0.001),径向偏差(p<0.001),和较低的PRWE评分(p<0.05),表明更好的手腕功能。铸造组并发症较多。
    结论:该研究发现,在整个随访过程中,两组之间的放射学差异显着。但不影响功能结果。两组的临床结果相似,镀层表现出更好的手掌屈曲和径向偏差。镀层组的握力也较好,但统计上微不足道。研究表明,对于高需求患者,应选择电镀而不是其他治疗方法。
    OBJECTIVE: With this prospective randomized control trial (RCT), we aim to provide the outcome analyses of the three most used treatment modalities for distal end of radius (DER) fracture management in the elderly.
    METHODS: A prospective randomized control trial was performed. Fifty-two patients with DER fractures (AO A2, A3, C1, or C2) were randomized to the casting (n = 17), percutaneous pinning (n = 18), and the volar plating group (n = 17). Radiological measurements measured were radial inclination (RI), radial height (RH), volar tilt (VT), and ulnar variance (UV). The outcome was measured based on range-of-motion, grip strength, Patient-Related-Wrist-Evaluation (PRWE) score, and the Quick-Disabilities-of-the-Arm-Shoulder-Hand (QDASH) score.
    RESULTS: Immediate post-operative and 1-year-follow-up X-rays showed a significant difference measurement between the groups (p < 0.05). Pairwise comparisons of the casting and pinning groups (p < 0.05) and the casting and plating groups (p < 0.05) revealed significant differences at the 1-year follow-up, but not the pinning and plating groups (p > 0.05). The analysis found significant differences in clinical outcomes after 1 month of follow-up, with the plating group outperforming the other two (p > 0.05). However, after a year of follow-up, all groups had comparable outcomes; however, the plating group showed improved palmar flexion (p < 0.001), radial deviation (p < 0.001), and a lower PRWE score (p < 0.05), indicating better wrist function. Complications were more in casting group.
    CONCLUSIONS: The study found a radiologically significant difference between groups throughout the follow-up, but it did not affect functional results. Clinical outcomes were similar across the groups, with plating showing better palmar flexion and radial deviation. Grip strength was also better in the plating group, but statistically insignificant. The study suggests plating should be chosen over other treatments for high-demand patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们的研究目的是评估掌侧锁定钢板(VLP)治疗桡骨远端骨折(DRF)后的常规随访X线照片是否会影响工作年龄患者(18-65岁)的临床决策和治疗。我们评估了临床状况与随访X光片问题之间的可能相关性,并分析了总体再手术率。
    这项回顾性队列研究的研究人群包括2010年1月至2020年12月期间接受VLP治疗的工作年龄(18-65岁)的DRF患者。基线数据,后续访问,并收集了X光片。射线照片被分类为常规分配或根据临床发现。根据异常的影像学检查结果或导致再次手术的主要症状,将患者分为四组。患者还接受了患者评估的手腕评估(PRWE)问卷,进行了分析。
    本研究共纳入861例患者。844例(98%)患者可获得常规随访X光片。在7.0%的患者中,6周的X光片改变了标准治疗方案,最常见的额外成像和/或临床随访。九名(1.1%)病人接受了紧急再次手术,15例(1.8%)患者在随访期后期接受了再次手术。所有这些患者都异常疼痛/有症状。此外,33例(3.9%)患者在X线片异常后接受了额外的影像学检查和随访,但没有再次手术,无症状或仅遭受轻度疼痛。在随访期间,共有89名(10.5%)患者出于任何原因进行了再次手术。
    在工作年龄人群中,用VLP治疗DRF后的常规随访X光片很少导致无症状患者的治疗策略改变或再次手术,这表明减少常规随访X光片并将重点放在具有中度至重度症状的患者上是安全且经济有效的。
    UNASSIGNED: The purpose of our study was to evaluate whether routine follow-up radiographs after distal radius fracture (DRF) treated with volar locking plate (VLP) influenced clinical decision-making and treatment in working-aged patients (18-65 years). We evaluated the possible correlation between clinical status and problems with follow-up radiographs and analyzed the overall reoperation rate.
    UNASSIGNED: The study population of this retrospective cohort study consisted of working-aged (18-65 years) patients with DRF who were treated with VLP between January 2010 and December 2020. Baseline data, follow-up visits, and radiographs were collected. Radiographs were classified as either routinely assigned or according to clinical findings. Patients were divided into four groups based on abnormal radiographic findings or major symptoms leading to reoperation. Patients also received patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) questionnaire, which were analyzed.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 861 patients were included in this study. Routine follow-up radiographs were available for 844 (98%) patients. In 7.0% of patients, 6-week radiographs led to a change of standard treatment protocol, most commonly additional imaging and/or clinical follow-up. Nine (1.1%) patients underwent an urgent reoperation, and 15 (1.8%) patients underwent reoperation later in the follow-up period. All these patients were exceptionally painful/symptomatic. In addition, 33 (3.9%) patients who underwent additional imaging and follow-up after abnormal radiograph, but did not undergo reoperation, were asymptomatic or suffered only mild pain. A total of 89 (10.5%) patients had reoperation for any reason during the follow-up period.
    UNASSIGNED: Routine follow-up radiographs after the treatment of DRF with VLP in the working-aged population rarely leads to changes in treatment strategy or reoperation in asymptomatic patients suggesting that it would be safe and cost-effective to reduce routine follow-up radiographs and focus instead on those patients with moderate-to-severe symptoms.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:非手术治疗通常适用于桡骨远端关节外骨折。通常使用诸如糖钳夹板(STs)和明斯特夹板(MU)的保守治疗。然而,比较两种夹板类型的研究和结果数据有限。因此,本研究旨在调查和比较使用STs和MUs治疗的影像学结果和临床结果.
    方法:在这项回顾性比较研究中,我们旨在评估和比较STs和MU治疗桡骨远端骨折的影像学结果和临床结果.该研究包括64名在急诊室接受闭合复位(CR)并接受STs或MU夹板治疗的患者(STs组:n=38,MU组:n=26)。初始X射线,CR后X射线,并对最后一次门诊随访X线进行评估。径向高度(RH),尺骨方差(UV),径向倾角(RI),和掌侧倾斜(VT)由一名盲症研究者测量。QuickDASH表格用于测量患者治疗后的满意度。
    结果:基线特征无显著差异,初始射线照相测量,或在两组之间CR后立即进行射线照相测量。然而,与CR后图像相比,两组的总体放射学值都有一定程度的下降.此外,使用配对测试,STs组RH和RI差异显著,MUs组在末次随访和CR后图像之间的RH和UV显示显着差异。
    结论:该研究得出结论,两种夹板类型之间的临床结果没有差异。然而,ST和MU组均显示放射学参数降低,而MUs组在治疗桡骨远端骨折时RH和UV明显减少。
    方法:IV级;回顾性比较;治疗研究。
    BACKGROUND: Non-operative management is typically indicated for extra-articular distal radius fractures. Conservative treatments such as Sugar tong splints (STs) and Muenster splints (MUs) are commonly used. However, there is limited research and outcome data comparing the two splint types. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate and compare the radiographic and clinical outcomes of treatment using STs and MUs.
    METHODS: In this retrospective comparative study, we aimed to evaluate and compare the radiographic and clinical outcomes of STs and MUs for the treatment of distal radius fractures. The study included 64 patients who underwent closed reduction (CR) in the emergency room and were treated with either STs or MUs splints (STs group: n = 38, MUs group: n = 26). Initial X-rays, post-CR X-rays, and last outpatient follow-up X-rays were evaluated. Radial height (RH), ulnar variance (UV), radial inclination (RI), and volar tilt (VT) were measured by a blinded investigator. The Quick DASH form was applied to measure patients\' satisfaction after treatments.
    RESULTS: There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics, initial radiographic measurements, or radiographic measurements immediately after CR between the two groups. However, the overall radiological values deteriorated to some degree in both groups compared to the post-CR images. Furthermore, using a paired test, the STs group showed significant differences in RH and RI, and the MUs group showed significant differences in RH and UV between the last follow-up and post-CR images.
    CONCLUSIONS: The study concluded that there was no difference in clinical outcomes between the two splint types. However, both STs and MUs groups showed reduced radiographic parameters, and the MUs group showed a significant reduction of RH and UV in the treatment of distal radius fractures.
    METHODS: Level IV; Retrospective Comparison; Treatment Study.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号