Volar locking plate fixation of distal radius fractures is a common orthopedic procedure and should be mastered by graduating orthopedic residents. Surgical education is transitioning from a traditional time-based approach to competency-based medical education. Valid and objective assessment is essential for successful transition. The purpose of this study was to develop a comprehensive, procedure-specific assessment tool to evaluate technical competence in volar locking plate osteosynthesis of a distal radius fracture.
International orthopedic/trauma experts involved in resident education participated as panelists in a four-round online Delphi process to reach consensus on the content of the assessment tool. Round 1 was an item-generating round, in which the panelists identified potential assessment parameters. In round 2, the panelists rated the importance of each suggested assessment parameter and reached consensus on which to include in the assessment tool. Round 3 yielded specific assessment score intervals for specific bone and fracture models and is not reported in this study. In round 4, the panelists assigned weights to the assessment parameters on a 1-10 scale to determine how each parameter should have an impact on the overall results.
Eighty-seven surgeons, representing 42 countries, participated in the study. Round 1 resulted in 45 assessment parameters, grouped into five procedural steps. After round 2, the number of parameters was reduced to 39. After the final round, an additional parameter was removed and weights were assigned to the remaining parameters.
Using a systematic methodology, a preliminary assessment tool to evaluate technical competence in distal radius fracture fixation was developed. A consensus of international experts supports the content validity of the assessment tool.
This assessment tool represents the first step in the evidence-based assessment essential for competency-based medical education. Before implementation, further studies exploring validity of variations of the assessment tool in different educational contexts are required.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to measure the harms-related reporting among randomized controlled trials (RCTs) cited as supporting evidence for the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons clinical practice guidelines regarding the management of distal radius fractures.
METHODS: We adhered to the guidance for reporting metaresearch and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines throughout the course of this investigation. We used the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons clinical practice guidelines for distal radius fractures available on Orthoguidelines.org. A linear regression analysis was conducted to model the relationship between the year of publication and the total Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials percentage adherence over time.
RESULTS: Thirty-five RCTs were included in the final sample. The average number of Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials Extension for Harms items adequately reported across all included RCTs was 9.2 (9.2/18, 50.9%). None of the included trials adequately reported all 18 items. Ten items had a compliance of more than 50% (10/18, 55.6%), 4 items had a compliance of 20%-50% (4/18, 22.2%), and 4 items had a compliance of less than 20% (4/18, 22.2%). The results of the linear regression model showed no significant improvement in Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials Harms reporting over time.
CONCLUSIONS: Adverse events are incompletely reported among RCTs cited as supporting evidence for American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons clinical practice guidelines for the management of distal radius fractures.
CONCLUSIONS: Given our findings, specific attention should be paid to improving the standardization of the classification of adverse events to facilitate ease in the reporting process.

The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and the American Society for Surgery of the Hand released updated Clinical Practice Guidelines in 2020 on the evaluation and treatment of acute distal radius fractures. Following a rigorous methodology designed and implemented through the AAOS, 7 guidelines based upon the best available evidence were released to assist surgeons and physicians managing distal radius fractures. These guidelines can serve as a reference for surgeons when managing patients with distal radius fractures. We review the evidence behind each guideline and highlight the practical implications of each guideline on care.

BACKGROUND: Last decades there is an increased tendency of performing surgery on displaced distal radius fractures. However, it is unclear whether this affects the development of osteoarthritis. This study aims to determine the relation between anatomical position, radiological osteoarthritis and functional outcome of the elderly wrist, 10-15 years after a distal radius fracture.
METHODS: 173 patients between the age of 50 and 70 at time of trauma were included in this retrospective cohort study with a 10-15-year follow-up. Based on the reassessed initial X-rays, the patients were placed into 4 groups (1: anatomical, 2a: acceptable, 2b: current operative indication but treated conservative, 2c: operative indication and operated). Functional outcome was measured, questionnaires were answered, and new bilateral X-rays of the wrist were obtained. Factors influencing osteoarthritis, the difference in osteoarthritis between the groups and the difference between the fractured and non-fractured wrists were studied.
RESULTS: Group 2b showed a significantly higher degree of osteoarthritis in comparison with the contralateral wrist. In the other groups, this difference was not observed. We found no significant difference in OA and functional outcomes between the groups. The degree of osteoarthritis of the non-fractured wrist appeared to be highly associated with osteoarthritis of the fractured wrist.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study showed that the degree of radiocarpal osteoarthritis is higher in conservatively treated patients that should have been operated on according to current guidelines in comparison with patients without an indication for surgery. This might suggest that our current guidelines can be effective in prevention of posttraumatic osteoarthritis. However, the effect on the functional outcome is very limited. Since the degree of radiocarpal osteoarthritis of the non-fractured wrist appeared to be highly associated with the degree of osteoarthritis of the fractured wrist, future studies should always assess osteoarthritis of both wrists in order to study the real posttraumatic effect of a fracture.

The American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS) has provided Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG) and Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) regarding management of distal radius fractures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate current practices in management of distal radius fractures among orthopedic trauma surgeons and to examine adherence to the AAOS criteria.
An online survey was posted and distributed via the Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) website. Information collected included demographics, injury management, and case based questions. For all cases, surgeons were asked to select their treatment of choice given the same fracture in a 25-year-old patient and a 65-year-old patient. Results were compared between surgeons with < 10 years of practice experience and those with > 10 years of experience.
There was a total of 51 survey respondents. 45% had <10 years in practice, while 55% had > 10 years in practice. All respondents reported routine use of preoperative radiographs, while 26% reported routine use of preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans. 73% of respondents reported that they perform operative adjunct fixation of associated ligamentous injuries at the time of distal radius fracture fixation. No one used wrist arthroscopy or fixed associated ulnar styloid fractures. 69% did not allow any range of motion in the immediate postoperative period, while the remainder allowed active and/ or passive ROM. 20% routinely used Vitamin C for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) prophylaxis postoperatively. 59% routinely used physical and/ or occupational therapy postoperatively. For case-based scenarios, respondents generally tended towards operative fixation in younger patients compared to older patients with the same fracture type. Surgeons with < 10 years in practice and those with > 10 years in practice varied significantly in terms of preoperative imaging and operative fixation of associated ligamentous injuries at the time of fracture fixation.
When compared to the AAOS CPG and AUC, orthopedic trauma surgeons generally followed accepted treatment guidelines. Differing practices between surgeons with <10 years in practice compared to those with >10 years in practice may be reflective of what is taught in residency training programs.

OBJECTIVE: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are often used to evaluate the outcome of treatment in patients with distal radial fractures. Which PROM to select is often based on assessment of measurement properties, such as validity and reliability. Measurement properties are assessed in clinimetric studies, and results are often reviewed without considering the methodological quality of these studies. Our aim was to systematically review the methodological quality of clinimetric studies that evaluated measurement properties of PROMs used in patients with distal radial fractures, and to make recommendations for the selection of PROMs based on the level of evidence of each individual measurement property.
METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, EMbase, CINAHL and PsycINFO databases to identify relevant clinimetric studies. Two reviewers independently assessed the methodological quality of the studies on measurement properties, using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist. Level of evidence (strong / moderate / limited / lacking) for each measurement property per PROM was determined by combining the methodological quality and the results of the different clinimetric studies.
RESULTS: In all, 19 out of 1508 identified unique studies were included, in which 12 PROMs were rated. The Patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) and the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (DASH) were evaluated on most measurement properties. The evidence for the PRWE is moderate that its reliability, validity (content and hypothesis testing), and responsiveness are good. The evidence is limited that its internal consistency and cross-cultural validity are good, and its measurement error is acceptable. There is no evidence for its structural and criterion validity. The evidence for the DASH is moderate that its responsiveness is good. The evidence is limited that its reliability and the validity on hypothesis testing are good. There is no evidence for the other measurement properties.
CONCLUSIONS: According to this systematic review, there is, at best, moderate evidence that the responsiveness of the PRWE and DASH are good, as are the reliability and validity of the PRWE. We recommend these PROMs in clinical studies in patients with distal radial fractures; however, more clinimetric studies of higher methodological quality are needed to adequately determine the other measurement properties.Cite this article: Dr Y. V. Kleinlugtenbelt. Are validated outcome measures used in distal radial fractures truly valid?: A critical assessment using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist. Bone Joint Res 2016;5:153-161. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.54.2000462.

BACKGROUND: Concomitant distal radius and distal ulna metaphysis or head fractures (DRUF) are uncommon and acceptable results have been reported from cast immobilisation and internal fixation.
METHODS: We reviewed the charts of 1094 patients treated for distal radius fracture at our institution in a two year period from 2009 to 2010. 24 patients with concomitant DRUF with were treated by cast immobilisation (group 1, n = 11), internal fixation of both bones (group 2, n = 7), internal fixation of radius alone (group 3, n = 2), and internal fixation of radius with distal ulna resection (group 4, n = 4). Patients treated by surgery underwent intraoperative assessment of distal ulna stability to determine the indication for ulna fixation. Post surgical range of motion, clinical parameters, and functional outcome scores (Gartland-Werley and modified Mayo) were measured.
RESULTS: Wrist motion was comparable in each group. Radiographic parameters were better in surgical groups. 23 of 24 patients achieved excellent/good outcomes based on Gartland-Werley scores, while 12 of 24 achieved good modified Mayo wrist score. There was a case of distal ulna non-union in group 1, and another case of delayed distal radius union in group 2.
CONCLUSIONS: By evaluating patients\' functional requirement, and dynamic fluoroscopy examination, satisfactory outcomes can be achieved for various presentations of DRUF.