Detection

检测
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:声乐生物标志物,从声音特征的声学分析中得出,提供非侵入性的医疗筛查途径,诊断,和监测。先前的研究证明了通过智能手机记录语音的声学分析来预测2型糖尿病的可行性。在这项工作的基础上,这项研究探讨了音频数据压缩对声学声乐生物标志物开发的影响,这对于在医疗保健中更广泛的适用性至关重要。
    目的:本研究的目的是分析常见的音频压缩算法(MP3,M4A,和WMA)由3种不同的转换工具以2种比特率应用,影响对声音生物标志物检测至关重要的特征。
    方法:使用转换为MP3,M4A的未压缩语音样本,研究了音频数据压缩对声学声乐生物标志物开发的影响。和WMA格式在2比特率(320和128kbps)与MediaHuman(MH)音频转换器,WonderShare(WS)UniConverter,和快进运动图像专家组(FFmpeg)。数据集包括来自505名参与者的记录,总共17298个音频文件,使用智能手机收集。参与者每天记录一个固定的英语句子,最多6次,最长14天。特征提取,包括音高,抖动,强度,和梅尔频率倒谱系数(MFCC),是使用Python和Parselmouth进行的。使用Wilcoxon符号秩检验和Bonferroni校正进行多重比较用于统计分析。
    结果:在这项研究中,最初从505名参与者那里录制了36,970个音频文件,筛选后,有17298张录音符合固定的句子标准。音频转换软件之间的差异,MH,WS,和FFmpeg,值得注意的是,影响压缩结果,如恒定或可变比特率。分析包括不同的数据压缩格式和广泛的语音特征和MFCC。Wilcoxon符号秩检验得出P值,低于Bonferroni校正的显著性水平的那些表明由于压缩引起的显著改变。结果表明了跨格式和比特率的压缩的特定特征影响。与WS转换的文件相比,MH转换的文件表现出更大的弹性。比特率也影响了功能稳定性,38例唯一受单一比特率影响。值得注意的是,语音特征在各种转换方法中显示出比MFCC更高的稳定性。
    结论:发现压缩效果具有特定特征,MH和FFmpeg表现出更大的弹性。某些功能一直受到影响,强调理解特征弹性对诊断应用的重要性。考虑到声乐生物标志物在医疗保健中的实施,为数据存储或传输目的找到通过压缩保持一致的功能是很有价值的。专注于特定的功能和格式,未来的研究可以拓宽范围,包括不同的特征,实时压缩算法,和各种记录方法。这项研究增强了我们对音频压缩对语音特征和MFCC的影响的理解,为跨领域开发应用程序提供见解。该研究强调了特征稳定性在处理压缩音频数据中的重要性,为在不断发展的技术环境中使用明智的语音数据奠定基础。
    BACKGROUND: Vocal biomarkers, derived from acoustic analysis of vocal characteristics, offer noninvasive avenues for medical screening, diagnostics, and monitoring. Previous research demonstrated the feasibility of predicting type 2 diabetes mellitus through acoustic analysis of smartphone-recorded speech. Building upon this work, this study explores the impact of audio data compression on acoustic vocal biomarker development, which is critical for broader applicability in health care.
    OBJECTIVE: The objective of this research is to analyze how common audio compression algorithms (MP3, M4A, and WMA) applied by 3 different conversion tools at 2 bitrates affect features crucial for vocal biomarker detection.
    METHODS: The impact of audio data compression on acoustic vocal biomarker development was investigated using uncompressed voice samples converted into MP3, M4A, and WMA formats at 2 bitrates (320 and 128 kbps) with MediaHuman (MH) Audio Converter, WonderShare (WS) UniConverter, and Fast Forward Moving Picture Experts Group (FFmpeg). The data set comprised recordings from 505 participants, totaling 17,298 audio files, collected using a smartphone. Participants recorded a fixed English sentence up to 6 times daily for up to 14 days. Feature extraction, including pitch, jitter, intensity, and Mel-frequency cepstral coefficients (MFCCs), was conducted using Python and Parselmouth. The Wilcoxon signed rank test and the Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons were used for statistical analysis.
    RESULTS: In this study, 36,970 audio files were initially recorded from 505 participants, with 17,298 recordings meeting the fixed sentence criteria after screening. Differences between the audio conversion software, MH, WS, and FFmpeg, were notable, impacting compression outcomes such as constant or variable bitrates. Analysis encompassed diverse data compression formats and a wide array of voice features and MFCCs. Wilcoxon signed rank tests yielded P values, with those below the Bonferroni-corrected significance level indicating significant alterations due to compression. The results indicated feature-specific impacts of compression across formats and bitrates. MH-converted files exhibited greater resilience compared to WS-converted files. Bitrate also influenced feature stability, with 38 cases affected uniquely by a single bitrate. Notably, voice features showed greater stability than MFCCs across conversion methods.
    CONCLUSIONS: Compression effects were found to be feature specific, with MH and FFmpeg showing greater resilience. Some features were consistently affected, emphasizing the importance of understanding feature resilience for diagnostic applications. Considering the implementation of vocal biomarkers in health care, finding features that remain consistent through compression for data storage or transmission purposes is valuable. Focused on specific features and formats, future research could broaden the scope to include diverse features, real-time compression algorithms, and various recording methods. This study enhances our understanding of audio compression\'s influence on voice features and MFCCs, providing insights for developing applications across fields. The research underscores the significance of feature stability in working with compressed audio data, laying a foundation for informed voice data use in evolving technological landscapes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:人工智能(AI)的使用可以彻底改变医疗保健,但这引发了风险担忧。因此,了解临床医生如何信任和接受AI技术至关重要。胃肠病学,由于其性质是基于图像和干预重的专业,是人工智能辅助诊断和管理可以广泛应用的领域。
    目的:本研究旨在研究胃肠病学家或胃肠外科医生如何接受和信任AI在计算机辅助检测(CADe)中的使用,计算机辅助表征(CADx),和计算机辅助干预(CADi)在结肠镜检查中结直肠息肉。
    方法:我们于2022年11月至2023年1月进行了基于网络的问卷调查,涉及亚太地区的5个国家或地区。问卷包括用户背景和人口统计等变量;使用人工智能的意图,感知风险;接受;以及对人工智能辅助检测的信任,表征,和干预。我们为参与者提供了与结肠镜检查和结直肠息肉管理相关的3种AI方案。这些场景反映了结肠镜检查中现有的AI应用,即息肉的检测(CADe),息肉(CADx)的表征,和AI辅助息肉切除术(CADi)。
    结果:总计,165胃肠病学家和胃肠外科医师使用医学交流专家设计的结构化问卷对基于网络的调查做出了回应。参与者的平均年龄为44岁(SD9.65),大部分为男性(n=116,70.3%),大多在公立医院工作(n=110,66.67%)。参与者报告了相对较高的AI暴露,111人(67.27%)报告使用人工智能进行消化系统疾病的临床诊断或治疗。胃肠病学家对在诊断中使用AI非常感兴趣,但在风险预测和接受AI方面表现出不同程度的保留。大多数参与者(n=112,72.72%)也表示有兴趣在未来的实践中使用AI。CADe被83.03%(n=137)的受访者接受,CADx被78.79%(n=130)接受,CADi的接受率为72.12%(n=119)。85.45%(n=141)的受访者信任CADe和CADx,72.12%(n=119)的受访者信任CADi。在风险认知方面没有特定应用的差异,但更有经验的临床医生给出了较低的风险评级.
    结论:胃肠病学家报告了在大肠息肉治疗中使用AI辅助结肠镜检查的总体接受度和信任度较高。然而,此信任级别取决于应用场景。此外,风险感知之间的关系,接受,信任在胃肠病学实践中使用人工智能并不简单。
    BACKGROUND: The use of artificial intelligence (AI) can revolutionize health care, but this raises risk concerns. It is therefore crucial to understand how clinicians trust and accept AI technology. Gastroenterology, by its nature of being an image-based and intervention-heavy specialty, is an area where AI-assisted diagnosis and management can be applied extensively.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to study how gastroenterologists or gastrointestinal surgeons accept and trust the use of AI in computer-aided detection (CADe), computer-aided characterization (CADx), and computer-aided intervention (CADi) of colorectal polyps in colonoscopy.
    METHODS: We conducted a web-based questionnaire from November 2022 to January 2023, involving 5 countries or areas in the Asia-Pacific region. The questionnaire included variables such as background and demography of users; intention to use AI, perceived risk; acceptance; and trust in AI-assisted detection, characterization, and intervention. We presented participants with 3 AI scenarios related to colonoscopy and the management of colorectal polyps. These scenarios reflect existing AI applications in colonoscopy, namely the detection of polyps (CADe), characterization of polyps (CADx), and AI-assisted polypectomy (CADi).
    RESULTS: In total, 165 gastroenterologists and gastrointestinal surgeons responded to a web-based survey using the structured questionnaire designed by experts in medical communications. Participants had a mean age of 44 (SD 9.65) years, were mostly male (n=116, 70.3%), and mostly worked in publicly funded hospitals (n=110, 66.67%). Participants reported relatively high exposure to AI, with 111 (67.27%) reporting having used AI for clinical diagnosis or treatment of digestive diseases. Gastroenterologists are highly interested to use AI in diagnosis but show different levels of reservations in risk prediction and acceptance of AI. Most participants (n=112, 72.72%) also expressed interest to use AI in their future practice. CADe was accepted by 83.03% (n=137) of respondents, CADx was accepted by 78.79% (n=130), and CADi was accepted by 72.12% (n=119). CADe and CADx were trusted by 85.45% (n=141) of respondents and CADi was trusted by 72.12% (n=119). There were no application-specific differences in risk perceptions, but more experienced clinicians gave lesser risk ratings.
    CONCLUSIONS: Gastroenterologists reported overall high acceptance and trust levels of using AI-assisted colonoscopy in the management of colorectal polyps. However, this level of trust depends on the application scenario. Moreover, the relationship among risk perception, acceptance, and trust in using AI in gastroenterology practice is not straightforward.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:很少有研究通过纹理和彩色增强成像(TXI)评估结肠镜检查的腺瘤检出率(ADR),一种新颖的图像增强技术。这项研究比较了使用TXI和使用白光成像(WLI)检测结直肠息肉。
    方法:此单中心回顾性研究使用基于患者基线特征的倾向匹配评分(年龄,性别,指示,肠道准备,内窥镜医师,结肠镜类型,和停药时间),以比较在丰岛内窥镜检查诊所使用WLI或TXI进行色素内窥镜检查的患者的结果。确定TXI组和WLI组之间的息肉检出率和每次结肠镜检查检测到的息肉平均数量的差异。
    结果:在倾向得分匹配后,1970例患者被纳入每个成像模式组。患者平均年龄为57.2±12.5岁,其中44.5%为男性.TXI组的ADR高于WLI组(55.0%vs49.4%,赔率比:1.25)。TXI组比WLI组更常见高危ADR(17.6%vs12.8%;OR:1.45)。TXI组每次结肠镜检查(APC)的平均腺瘤数量高于WLI组(1.187vs0.943,OR:1.12)。与WLI组相比,TXI组形态平坦的APC(1.093vs0.848,OR:1.14)和<6mm的APC(0.992vs0.757,OR:1.16)较高。
    结论:与WLI相比,根据实际临床数据,TXI改善了行色素内镜检查的患者的ADR。
    OBJECTIVE: Few studies have evaluated the adenoma detection rate (ADR) of colonoscopy with texture and color enhancement imaging (TXI), a novel image-enhancing technology. This study compares the detection of colorectal polyps using TXI to that using white light imaging (WLI).
    METHODS: This single-center retrospective study used propensity-matched scoring based on the patients\' baseline characteristics (age, sex, indication, bowel preparation, endoscopist, colonoscope type, and withdrawal time) to compare the results of patients who underwent chromoendoscopy using WLI or TXI at the Toyoshima Endoscopy Clinic. The differences in polyp detection rates and the mean number of detected polyps per colonoscopy were determined between the TXI and WLI groups.
    RESULTS: After propensity score matching, 1970 patients were enrolled into each imaging modality group. The mean patient age was 57.2 ± 12.5 years, and 44.5% of the cohort were men. The ADR was higher in the TXI group than in the WLI group (55.0% vs 49.4%, odds ratio: 1.25). High-risk ADR were more common in the TXI group than in the WLI group (17.6% vs 12.8%; OR: 1.45). The mean number of adenomas per colonoscopy (APC) was higher in the TXI group than in the WLI group (1.187 vs 0.943, OR: 1.12). APC with a flat morphology (1.093 vs 0.848, OR: 1.14) and APC of <6 mm (0.992 vs 0.757, OR: 1.16) were higher in the TXI group than in the WLI group.
    CONCLUSIONS: Compared to WLI, TXI improved the ADR in patients who underwent chromoendoscopy based on actual clinical data.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:SARS-CoV-2的检测对于为重症高危人群提供早期COVID-19治疗和限制感染在社会中的传播至关重要。正确收集上呼吸道标本是在公共场所诊断SARS-CoV-2病毒的最关键步骤,在COVID-19大流行期间,在许多国家/地区,咽拭子是用于大规模检测的首选标本。然而,关于咽喉拭子是否对SARS-CoV-2诊断测试具有足够高的灵敏度仍然存在讨论,正如以前的研究报道的那样,灵敏度从52%到100%存在很大的差异。许多以前探索咽拭子诊断准确性的研究缺乏对采样技术的详细描述,这使得很难比较不同的诊断准确性结果。一些研究仅通过从口咽后壁收集标本来进行咽喉拭子,而其他人还包括用于SARS-CoV-2测试的pat扁桃体拭子。然而,研究表明,扁桃体可能对SARS-CoV-2具有组织嗜性,这可能会改善采样过程中SARS-CoV-2的检测。这可以解释报告的灵敏度变化,但是还没有临床研究探讨在咽喉拭子期间是否包括腭扁桃体的敏感性和患者不适的差异。
    目的:本研究的目的是检查包括腭扁桃体在内的咽喉拭子的敏感性和患者不适,而在SARS-CoV-2的分子测试中,仅擦拭后口咽壁。
    方法:我们将进行一项随机对照研究,比较从口咽后壁和腭扁桃体(干预组)或仅在口咽后壁(对照组)进行的咽拭子对SARS-CoV-2的分子检出率。参与者将以1:1的比例随机分配。所有参与者在参加试验时填写基线问卷,检查他们被测试的原因,症状,和以前的扁桃体切除术。随访问卷将发送给参与者,以探索测试后症状的发展。
    结果:在2022年11月10日至2022年12月22日期间,共有2315名参与者参加了这项研究。后续问卷的结果预计将于2024年初完成。
    结论:这项随机临床试验将为我们提供关于咽喉拭子(包括腭扁桃体标本)是否会提高SARS-CoV-2分子检测的诊断敏感性的信息。这些结果可以,因此,用于改进未来的测试建议,并提供有关SARS-CoV-2的组织嗜性的其他信息。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.govNCT05611203;https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05611203。
    DERR1-10.2196/47446。
    BACKGROUND: Testing for SARS-CoV-2 is essential to provide early COVID-19 treatment for people at high risk of severe illness and to limit the spread of infection in society. Proper upper respiratory specimen collection is the most critical step in the diagnosis of the SARS-CoV-2 virus in public settings, and throat swabs were the preferred specimens used for mass testing in many countries during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, there is still a discussion about whether throat swabs have a high enough sensitivity for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic testing, as previous studies have reported a large variability in the sensitivity from 52% to 100%. Many previous studies exploring the diagnostic accuracy of throat swabs lack a detailed description of the sampling technique, which makes it difficult to compare the different diagnostic accuracy results. Some studies perform a throat swab by only collecting specimens from the posterior oropharyngeal wall, while others also include a swab of the palatine tonsils for SARS-CoV-2 testing. However, studies suggest that the palatine tonsils could have a tissue tropism for SARS-CoV-2 that may improve the SARS-CoV-2 detection during sampling. This may explain the variation of sensitivity reported, but no clinical studies have yet explored the differences in sensitivity and patient discomfort whether the palatine tonsils are included during the throat swab or not.
    OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to examine the sensitivity and patient discomfort of a throat swab including the palatine tonsils compared to only swabbing the posterior oropharyngeal wall in molecular testing for SARS-CoV-2.
    METHODS: We will conduct a randomized controlled study to compare the molecular detection rate of SARS-CoV-2 by a throat swab performed from the posterior oropharyngeal wall and the palatine tonsils (intervention group) or the posterior oropharyngeal wall only (control group). Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio. All participants fill out a baseline questionnaire upon enrollment in the trial, examining their reason for being tested, symptoms, and previous tonsillectomy. A follow-up questionnaire will be sent to participants to explore the development of symptoms after testing.
    RESULTS: A total of 2315 participants were enrolled in this study between November 10, 2022, and December 22, 2022. The results from the follow-up questionnaire are expected to be completed at the beginning of 2024.
    CONCLUSIONS: This randomized clinical trial will provide us with information about whether throat swabs including specimens from the palatine tonsils will improve the diagnostic sensitivity for SARS-CoV-2 molecular detection. These results can, therefore, be used to improve future testing recommendations and provide additional information about tissue tropism for SARS-CoV-2.
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05611203; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05611203.
    UNASSIGNED: DERR1-10.2196/47446.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:这个多中心,双盲,随机对照试验(RCT)旨在评估基于人工智能(AI)的模型对CT血管造影(CTA)中颅内动脉瘤检测效果的影响及其对患者短期和长期结局的影响.
    方法:研究设计:前瞻性,多中心,双盲RCT。
    方法:该模型设计用于从原始CTA图像自动检测颅内动脉瘤。
    方法:安排头部CTA扫描的成人住院患者和门诊患者。随机分组:(1)实验组:放射科医师在True-AI整合颅内动脉瘤诊断策略(True-AIarm)的协助下解释头部CTA。(2)对照组:由放射科医师在Sham-AI整合的颅内动脉瘤诊断策略(Sham-AIarm)的协助下解释的头部CTA。
    方法:区组随机化,按中心分层,性别,和年龄组。
    方法:在颅内动脉瘤中,True-AI臂在患者水平的敏感性和特异性方面的非劣效性优于Sham-AI臂。
    结果:其他颅内病变的诊断表现,检测率,CTA解释的工作量,资源利用率,治疗相关临床事件,动脉瘤相关事件,生活质量,和成本效益分析。
    方法:研究参与者和参与的放射科医生将对干预措施视而不见。
    方法:根据我们的试点研究,假定Sham-AI臂的患者水平灵敏度为0.65,True-AI臂的患者水平灵敏度为0.75,特异性分别为0.90和0.88。在医院接受头部CTA的患者颅内动脉瘤的患病率约为12%。使用单侧α=0.025来确定敏感性和特异性的非劣效性的优势,以5%的边缘,以确保联合主要终点测试的功效达到0.80和5%的流失率,在True-AI或Sham-AI组的1:1分配中,样本量确定为6450.
    结论:该研究将确定AI系统对双盲设计中颅内动脉瘤检测性能的确切影响,并遵循对患者短期和长期结果的实际影响。
    背景:该试验已在NIH注册,美国国家医学图书馆ClinicalTrials.gov,ID:NCT06118840。2023年11月11日注册。
    BACKGROUND: This multicenter, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial (RCT) aims to assess the impact of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based model on the efficacy of intracranial aneurysm detection in CT angiography (CTA) and its influence on patients\' short-term and long-term outcomes.
    METHODS: Study design: Prospective, multicenter, double-blinded RCT.
    METHODS: The model was designed for the automatic detection of intracranial aneurysms from original CTA images.
    METHODS: Adult inpatients and outpatients who are scheduled for head CTA scanning. Randomization groups: (1) Experimental Group: Head CTA interpreted by radiologists with the assistance of the True-AI-integrated intracranial aneurysm diagnosis strategy (True-AI arm). (2) Control Group: Head CTA interpreted by radiologists with the assistance of the Sham-AI-integrated intracranial aneurysm diagnosis strategy (Sham-AI arm).
    METHODS: Block randomization, stratified by center, gender, and age group.
    METHODS: Coprimary outcomes of superiority in patient-level sensitivity and noninferiority in specificity for the True-AI arm to the Sham-AI arm in intracranial aneurysms.
    RESULTS: Diagnostic performance for other intracranial lesions, detection rates, workload of CTA interpretation, resource utilization, treatment-related clinical events, aneurysm-related events, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness analysis.
    METHODS: Study participants and participating radiologists will be blinded to the intervention.
    METHODS: Based on our pilot study, the patient-level sensitivity is assumed to be 0.65 for the Sham-AI arm and 0.75 for the True-AI arm, with specificities of 0.90 and 0.88, respectively. The prevalence of intracranial aneurysms for patients undergoing head CTA in the hospital is approximately 12%. To establish superiority in sensitivity and noninferiority in specificity with a margin of 5% using a one-sided α = 0.025 to ensure that the power of coprimary endpoint testing reached 0.80 and a 5% attrition rate, the sample size was determined to be 6450 in a 1:1 allocation to True-AI or Sham-AI arm.
    CONCLUSIONS: The study will determine the precise impact of the AI system on the detection performance for intracranial aneurysms in a double-blinded design and following the real-world effects on patients\' short-term and long-term outcomes.
    BACKGROUND: This trial has been registered with the NIH, U.S. National Library of Medicine at ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT06118840 . Registered 11 November 2023.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    蚜虫侵染是小麦和高粱田大面积破坏的主要原因之一,也是植物病毒最常见的传播媒介之一,造成了巨大的农业产量损失。为了解决这个问题,农民经常使用低效的有害化学农药,对健康和环境有负面影响。因此,大量农药被浪费在没有严重虫害的地区。这引起了对智能自主系统的迫切需要,该系统可以在复杂的作物冠层内选择性地定位和喷洒足够大的侵扰。我们开发了一个用于蚜虫簇检测和分割的大型多尺度数据集,从实际的高粱田收集,并精心注释,包括蚜虫簇。我们的数据集包含总共54,742个图像块,展示各种观点,不同的照明条件,和多个尺度,强调其在实际应用中的有效性。在这项研究中,我们训练并评估了四个实时语义分割模型和三个专门用于蚜虫簇分割和检测的对象检测模型。考虑到准确性和效率之间的平衡,Fast-SCNN提供了最有效的分割结果,达到80.46%的平均精度,81.21%平均召回,和91.66帧每秒(FPS)。对于对象检测,RT-DETR表现出最佳的整体性能,平均精度为61.63%(mAP),92.6%平均召回,和72.55在NVIDIAV100GPU上。我们的实验进一步表明,蚜虫簇分割比使用检测模型更适合评估蚜虫的侵染情况。
    Aphid infestations are one of the primary causes of extensive damage to wheat and sorghum fields and are one of the most common vectors for plant viruses, resulting in significant agricultural yield losses. To address this problem, farmers often employ the inefficient use of harmful chemical pesticides that have negative health and environmental impacts. As a result, a large amount of pesticide is wasted on areas without significant pest infestation. This brings to attention the urgent need for an intelligent autonomous system that can locate and spray sufficiently large infestations selectively within the complex crop canopies. We have developed a large multi-scale dataset for aphid cluster detection and segmentation, collected from actual sorghum fields and meticulously annotated to include clusters of aphids. Our dataset comprises a total of 54,742 image patches, showcasing a variety of viewpoints, diverse lighting conditions, and multiple scales, highlighting its effectiveness for real-world applications. In this study, we trained and evaluated four real-time semantic segmentation models and three object detection models specifically for aphid cluster segmentation and detection. Considering the balance between accuracy and efficiency, Fast-SCNN delivered the most effective segmentation results, achieving 80.46% mean precision, 81.21% mean recall, and 91.66 frames per second (FPS). For object detection, RT-DETR exhibited the best overall performance with a 61.63% mean average precision (mAP), 92.6% mean recall, and 72.55 on an NVIDIA V100 GPU. Our experiments further indicate that aphid cluster segmentation is more suitable for assessing aphid infestations than using detection models.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    谵妄是一种严重的神经精神综合征,具有不良后果,这在绝症患者中很常见,但通常无法诊断。4\'A\'s测试或4AT(www.the4AT.com),一个简短的谵妄检测工具,广泛用于一般设置,但是缺乏对绝症患者的验证研究。
    为了确定4AT在检测绝症患者谵妄中的诊断准确性,谁是临终关怀患者。
    一项诊断测试准确性研究,其中参与者接受了4AT和基于《精神障碍诊断和统计手册》第五版的参考标准。参考标准由谵妄评分量表修订版-98和评估唤醒和注意力的测试告知。评估由成对的独立评估者按随机顺序进行,对其他评估的结果视而不见。
    苏格兰的两个临终关怀医院,英国。参与者是148名18岁的临终关怀住院患者。
    共有137名参与者完成了两项评估。三名参与者的参考标准诊断不确定,被排除在外。最终得到134个样本。平均年龄为70.3(SD=10.6)岁。约33%(44/134)有参考标准谵妄。4AT的敏感性为89%(95%CI79%-98%),特异性为94%(95%CI90%-99%)。受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.97(95%CI0.94-1)。
    本验证研究的结果支持将4AT用作临终关怀患者的谵妄检测工具,并增加了姑息治疗中谵妄检测方法的文献评价。
    ISRTN97417474。
    UNASSIGNED: Delirium is a serious neuropsychiatric syndrome with adverse outcomes, which is common but often undiagnosed in terminally ill people. The 4 \'A\'s test or 4AT (www.the4AT.com), a brief delirium detection tool, is widely used in general settings, but validation studies in terminally ill people are lacking.
    UNASSIGNED: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of the 4AT in detecting delirium in terminally ill people, who are hospice inpatients.
    UNASSIGNED: A diagnostic test accuracy study in which participants underwent the 4AT and a reference standard based on the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. The reference standard was informed by Delirium Rating Scale Revised-98 and tests assessing arousal and attention. Assessments were conducted in random order by pairs of independent raters, blinded to the results of the other assessment.
    UNASSIGNED: Two hospice inpatient units in Scotland, UK. Participants were 148 hospice inpatients aged ⩾18 years.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 137 participants completed both assessments. Three participants had an indeterminate reference standard diagnosis and were excluded, yielding a final sample of 134. Mean age was 70.3 (SD = 10.6) years. About 33% (44/134) had reference standard delirium. The 4AT had a sensitivity of 89% (95% CI 79%-98%) and a specificity of 94% (95% CI 90%-99%). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.97 (95% CI 0.94-1).
    UNASSIGNED: The results of this validation study support use of the 4AT as a delirium detection tool in hospice inpatients, and add to the literature evaluating methods of delirium detection in palliative care settings.
    UNASSIGNED: ISCRTN 97417474.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    腹膜炎是腹膜透析(PD)的主要并发症。指示患者迅速寻求护理的迹象(浑浊的流出物)或症状(腹痛),和早期治疗改善结果。CloudCath腹膜透析引流集监测(CloudCath)系统监测透析流出物中的浊度,并发送可能的腹膜炎信号的变化通知。
    我们进行了这种单臂,开放标签,PD期间CloudCath系统使用的多中心研究。我们停用了对参与者和调查人员的系统通知,遵循腹膜炎体征和症状的标准护理。使用国际腹膜透析协会(ISPD)标准测量CloudCath系统通知与腹膜炎事件之间的有效终点时间。
    二百四十三名参与者使用CloudCath系统178.8患者年。在71个潜在的腹膜炎事件中,51个事件(0.29/患者-年)符合ISPD白细胞(WBC)计数标准。系统触发了51个事件中的41个事件的通知(80.4%),中位提前期为2.6天(10%-90%范围,-1.0至15.7;P<0.0001)。不包括系统不使用时发生的6例腹膜炎事件,系统触发了45个事件中的41个事件的通知(91.1%),中位提前期为3.0天(10%-90%范围,-0.5至18.8;P<0.0001)。在每病人年0.78份通知中,大多数为腹膜炎事件或非腹膜炎事件,如出口部位和隧道感染或导管/循环仪问题.
    CloudCath系统在PD期间检测到腹膜炎事件的时间比当前的护理标准早几天,并且有能力发送可以加快腹膜炎诊断和治疗的通知。
    UNASSIGNED: Peritonitis is the leading complication of peritoneal dialysis (PD). Patients are instructed to seek care promptly for signs (cloudy effluent) or symptoms (abdominal pain), and earlier treatment improves outcomes. The CloudCath Peritoneal Dialysis Drain Set Monitoring (CloudCath) system monitors turbidity in dialysis effluent and sends notifications of changes signaling possible peritonitis.
    UNASSIGNED: We conducted this single-arm, open-label, multicenter study of CloudCath system use during PD. We deactivated system notifications to participants and investigators, who followed standard-of-care for peritonitis signs and symptoms. Effectiveness endpoints measured time between CloudCath system notifications and peritonitis events using International Society of Peritoneal Dialysis (ISPD) criteria.
    UNASSIGNED: Two hundred forty-three participants used the CloudCath system for 178.8 patient-years. Of 71 potential peritonitis events, 51 events (0.29 per patient-year) met ISPD white blood cell (WBC) count criteria. The system triggered notifications for 41 of 51 events (80.4%), with a median lead time of 2.6 days (10%-90% range, -1.0 to 15.7; P < 0.0001). Excluding 6 peritonitis events that occurred when the system was not in use, the system triggered notifications for 41 of 45 events (91.1%), with a median lead time of 3.0 days (10%-90% range, -0.5 to 18.8; P < 0.0001). Of the 0.78 notifications per patient-year, the majority were peritonitis events or nonperitonitis events such as exit site and tunnel infections or catheter/cycler issues.
    UNASSIGNED: The CloudCath system detected peritonitis events during PD several days earlier than the current standard-of-care and has the capacity to send notifications that could expedite peritonitis diagnosis and treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:息肉检出率低的内镜医师结肠镜检查后结直肠癌的发病率和死亡率较高。使用英国的国家内窥镜数据库(NED),自动捕获实时数据,我们评估是否提供病例混合调整的息肉平均数(aMNP)的反馈,作为关键绩效指标,改善内窥镜医师的表现。反馈是通过基于理论的循证审计和反馈干预来提供的。
    方法:这个多中心,prospective,NED自动绩效报告以提高质量结果试验(NED-APRIQOT)随机NHS内窥镜检查中心进行干预或控制。在NED中自动生成的干预手臂内窥镜医师通过电子邮件发送定制的月度报告,由定性访谈和行为改变理论提供信息。主要结果是9个月干预期间的内窥镜医师aMNP。
    结果:从2020年11月至2021年7月,来自36个中心(19个干预;17个对照)的541个内窥镜医师在干预期间执行了54,770个程序,以及干预后3个月内的15,960个程序。在干预期间,将干预臂与控制臂内窥镜医师进行比较:aMNP没有显着升高(7%,95%置信区间(CI)-1%至14%;p=0·08)。未调整的MNP(10%,95CI1-20%)和息肉检出率(PDR)(10%,95CI4-16%)显著较高。干预后的差异没有维持。在干预臂中,访问NED-APRIQOT网页的内窥镜医师的aMNP高于未访问者(118vs102aMNP,p=0.03)。
    结论:尽管我们的自动反馈干预在干预期间并未显着增加aMNP,但MNP和PDR确实显着改善。参与的内窥镜医师受益最大,干预后未保持改善;未来的工作应解决反馈的参与问题,并考虑持续反馈的有效性。www.isrctn.orgISRCTN11126923。
    OBJECTIVE: Postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer incidence and mortality rates are higher for endoscopists with low polyp detection rates. Using the UK\'s National Endoscopy Database (NED), which automatically captures real-time data, we assessed if providing feedback of case-mix-adjusted mean number of polyps (aMNP), as a key performance indicator, improved endoscopists\' performance. Feedback was delivered via a theory-informed, evidence-based audit and feedback intervention.
    METHODS: This multicenter, prospective, NED Automated Performance Reports to Improve Quality Outcomes Trial randomized National Health Service endoscopy centers to intervention or control. Intervention-arm endoscopists were e-mailed tailored monthly reports automatically generated within NED, informed by qualitative interviews and behavior change theory. The primary outcome was endoscopists\' aMNP during the 9-month intervention.
    RESULTS: From November 2020 to July 2021, 541 endoscopists across 36 centers (19 intervention; 17 control) performed 54,770 procedures during the intervention, and 15,960 procedures during the 3-month postintervention period. Comparing the intervention arm with the control arm, endoscopists during the intervention period: aMNP was nonsignificantly higher (7%; 95% CI, -1% to 14%; P = .08). The unadjusted MNP (10%; 95% CI, 1%-20%) and polyp detection rate (10%; 95% CI, 4%-16%) were significantly higher. Differences were not maintained in the postintervention period. In the intervention arm, endoscopists accessing NED Automated Performance Reports to Improve Quality Outcomes Trial webpages had a higher aMNP than those who did not (aMNP, 118 vs 102; P = .03).
    CONCLUSIONS: Although our automated feedback intervention did not increase aMNP significantly in the intervention period, MNP and polyp detection rate did improve significantly. Engaged endoscopists benefited most and improvements were not maintained postintervention; future work should address engagement in feedback and consider the effectiveness of continuous feedback.
    BACKGROUND:  www.isrctn.org ISRCTN11126923 .
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:现在比以往任何时候都更强调眼科的早期疾病检测,结果,临床医生和创新者转向深度学习以加快准确诊断并减轻治疗延迟。努力集中在创建深度学习系统,该系统分析临床图像数据,以最大的灵敏度检测疾病特异性特征。此外,这些系统有望对常见进行性疾病的患者进行早期准确诊断和治疗。DenseNet,ResNet,和VGG-16是一些深度学习卷积神经网络(CNN)算法之一,这些算法已经被引入并正在研究在眼科中的潜在应用。
    方法:在本研究中,作者试图创建和评估一种新颖的集成深度学习CNN模型,该模型分析了来自具有各种眼部疾病特征(白内障,青光眼,糖尿病视网膜病变)。我们的目标是确定(1)我们最终模型在根据疾病对RCFIs进行分类方面的相对性能,以及(2)最终模型作为特定疾病(白内障,青光眼,糖尿病性视网膜病变)在出现具有多种疾病表现的RCFIs时。
    结果:我们发现将卷积层添加到现有的VGG-16模型中,在本文中被命名为一个拟议的模型,显著提高了性能,准确率为98%(p<0.05),包括在白内障中检测二元疾病的良好诊断潜力,青光眼,糖尿病视网膜病变。
    结论:发现所提出的模型适用于眼科临床框架中的决策支持系统。
    BACKGROUND: Early disease detection is emphasized within ophthalmology now more than ever, and as a result, clinicians and innovators turn to deep learning to expedite accurate diagnosis and mitigate treatment delay. Efforts concentrate on the creation of deep learning systems that analyze clinical image data to detect disease-specific features with maximum sensitivity. Moreover, these systems hold promise of early accurate diagnosis and treatment of patients with common progressive diseases. DenseNet, ResNet, and VGG-16 are among a few of the deep learning Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) algorithms that have been introduced and are being investigated for potential application within ophthalmology.
    METHODS: In this study, the authors sought to create and evaluate a novel ensembled deep learning CNN model that analyzes a dataset of shuffled retinal color fundus images (RCFIs) from eyes with various ocular disease features (cataract, glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy). Our aim was to determine (1) the relative performance of our finalized model in classifying RCFIs according to disease and (2) the diagnostic potential of the finalized model to serve as a screening test for specific diseases (cataract, glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy) upon presentation of RCFIs with diverse disease manifestations.
    RESULTS: We found adding convolutional layers to an existing VGG-16 model, which was named as a proposed model in this article that, resulted in significantly increased performance with 98% accuracy (p<0.05), including good diagnostic potential for binary disease detection in cataract, glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy.
    CONCLUSIONS: The proposed model was found to be suitable and accurate for a decision support system in Ophthalmology Clinical Framework.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号