Dermatologic surgery

皮肤病外科
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:由于复杂的鼻几何形状和需要美学考虑,鼻缺损的重建是一项具有挑战性的任务。Bilobe皮瓣已成为鼻重建的可靠技术,特别是涉及鼻尖的缺陷,alae,和下背部。
    目的:本研究回顾了31例肿瘤切除后鼻部缺损行胆道皮瓣重建的患者。
    方法:手术技术,短期和长期的美学结果,患者满意度,并对并发症进行了评估。使用定性序数量表评估美学结果,患者的长期满意度是通过随访记录和电话访谈获得的.
    结果:Bilobe皮瓣重建在大多数情况下产生了良好的美学效果,患者满意度高。并发症很少,在少数病例中进行了翻修手术,以解决美学问题。
    结论:总体而言,Bilobe皮瓣技术被证明是鼻腔重建的有效和可靠的选择,提供稳定和持久的结果。
    BACKGROUND: Reconstruction of nasal defects is a challenging task due to the complex nasal geometry and the need for aesthetic considerations. The bilobe flap has emerged as a reliable technique for nasal reconstruction, particularly for defects involving the nasal tip, alae, and inferior dorsum.
    OBJECTIVE: This study presents a review of 31 patients who underwent bilobe flap reconstruction for nasal defects after tumor resection.
    METHODS: The surgical technique, short- and long-term aesthetic outcomes, patient satisfaction, and complications were evaluated. Aesthetic outcomes were assessed using a qualitative ordinal scale, and long-term patient satisfaction was obtained through follow-up notes and phone interviews.
    RESULTS: Bilobe flap reconstruction yielded good aesthetic outcomes in the majority of cases, with high patient satisfaction. Complications were minimal, and revision surgeries were performed in a small number of cases to address aesthetic concerns.
    CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the bilobe flap technique proved to be an effective and reliable option for nasal reconstruction, providing stable and long-lasting results.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    皮肤手术的并发症风险非常低。没有被广泛接受,基于证据的协议,并建议皮肤科手术后的伤口护理。在这篇叙述性评论中,我们将讨论手术伤口护理产品和程序的证据。总的来说,我们发现相对较少的研究,在许多情况下,缺乏统计学上的显著差异,可能是因为并发症发生率低。我们将讨论何时启动伤口护理程序及其频率的证据,应该使用的软膏和防腐剂的类型,以及应该使用的敷料类型。尽管很少有关于皮肤科手术后伤口护理的研究,有足够的证据表明不建议使用预防性局部抗生素。我们还分析了目前在特殊情况下手术伤口护理的现有证据,例如皮肤移植的管理,部分皮肤移植供体部位,异种移植物/生物膜,和腿部的手术伤口。
    Dermatologic surgery is associated with a very low risk of complications. There is no widely accepted, evidence-based protocol with recommendations for postoperative wound care after dermatologic surgery. In this narrative review, we will be discussing the evidence on surgical wound care products and procedures. Overall, we found relatively few studies and, in many cases, a lack of statistically significant differences, possibly because of the low rate of complications. We\'ll be discussing the evidence on when we should initiate wound care procedures and their frequency, the type of ointment and antiseptics that should be applied, and the type of dressings that should be used. Despite the very few studies available on postoperative wound care following dermatologic surgery, there is sufficient evidence as to not recommend the use of prophylactic topical antibiotics. We also analyze the currently available evidence on surgical wound care in special situations, such as management of skin grafts, partial skin graft donor sites, xenografts/biomembranes, and surgical wounds to the legs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本文探讨了远程皮肤病学(TD)在患者护理各个阶段在Mohs显微外科(MMS)中的作用。这项研究旨在评估收益,局限性,以及围绕TD集成到MMS实践的患者经验。我们使用与TD和MMS相关的关键字进行了PubMed搜索,将选定的文章分类为术前,术中,和MMS的术后阶段。TD减少了等待时间(TD为26.10天,面对面[FTF]为60.57天)和咨询失败率(TD为6%与17%为FTF)为MMS术前会诊。它还将治疗时间缩短了两周,并显著节省了旅行(162.7分钟,144.5英里,和每人$60.00)。心电病理学促进了彩信期间的沟通和决策,提高准确性和效率,特别是在具有挑战性的情况下,需要合作的另一个外科医生或病理学家的物理存在是不可行的。81.8%的病例(18/22)经心电病理学明确诊断为良性病变和恶性肿瘤。此外,在肿瘤的常规光学显微镜诊断和心程病理学之间有95%的一致性(19/20),以及所有20个Mohs冻结部分咨询的100%协议。对于术后随访,电话跟进(TFU)和短信被证明是有效的,具有高患者满意度(94%在新西兰和96%在英国)和早期并发症识别成本效益的替代方案。这项研究强调了TD在MMS中的多方面益处:术前增强患者体验,改善手术期间的沟通,和具有成本效益的术后随访。限制包括TD可能出现的财务费用和技术问题(连接问题,视频/音频传输中的延迟,等。).需要进一步的研究来探索术后患者管理中新兴的TD模式。将TD整合到MMS中标志着皮肤病学护理的进步,提供方便,成本效益高,以及更好的解决方案,有可能增强患者的体验和结果。
    This paper explores the role of teledermatology (TD) in Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) at various stages of patient care. The study aims to assess the benefits, limitations, and patient experiences surrounding TD integration into MMS practices. We conducted a PubMed search using keywords related to TD and MMS, categorizing selected articles into pre-operative, intra-operative, and post-operative stages of MMS. TD reduced waiting times (26.10 days for TD compared to 60.57 days for face-to-face [FTF]) and consultation failure rates (6% for TD vs. 17% for FTF) for MMS preoperative consultations. It also shortened time to treatment by two weeks and led to notable travel savings (162.7 min, 144.5 miles, and $60.00 per person). Telepathology facilitated communication and decision-making during MMS, improving accuracy and efficiency, especially in challenging cases requiring collaboration where physical presence of another surgeon or pathologist is not feasible. Telepathology definitively diagnosed benign lesions and malignant tumors in 81.8% of cases (18/22). Additionally, there was a 95% agreement between conventional light microscopy diagnosis and telepathology in tumors (19/20), and 100% agreement for all 20 Mohs frozen section consultations. For post-operative follow-up, telephone follow-up (TFU) and text messaging proved effective, cost-efficient alternatives with high patient satisfaction (94% in New Zealand and 96% in the U.K.) and early complication identification. This study underscores TD\'s multifaceted benefits in MMS: enhanced patient experience preoperatively, improved communication during surgery, and cost-effective postoperative follow-up. Limitations include the financial expense and technical issues that can arise with TD (connectivity problems, delays in video/audio transmission, etc.). Further studies are needed to explore emerging TD modalities in post-operative patient management. The integration of TD into MMS signifies a progressive step in dermatological care, offering convenient, cost-effective, and better solutions with the potential to enhance patient experiences and outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:虽然目前的指南建议采用5mm的手术切缘来切除原位黑色素瘤(MIS),越来越多的证据表明,这对于实现肿瘤清除可能是次优的。
    目的:评估头颈部MIS切除的最佳治愈率所需的切缘,并研究需要>5mm切缘才能获得肿瘤清除的肿瘤和/或患者因素。
    方法:对846(807主要,39例复发)在作者皮肤外科治疗的头颈部MIS病例超过126个月(10.5年)。
    结果:以5mm的边缘清除了百分之六十二。需要15mm的边缘才能达到97%的清除率。边缘阈值之间的清除率差异显着(p<0.001)。脸颊上的肿瘤位置和较大的术前尺寸与需要>5mm的边缘以实现肿瘤清除相关(分别为p=0.006和p=0.001)。
    结论:这是一项单中心回顾性研究,依赖于临床数据的准确记录。
    结论:这项研究表明,头颈部的MIS通常需要>5mm的边缘才能清除肿瘤。当MMS是不可能的,头颈部肿瘤可能需要切除≥10mm的切缘。
    BACKGROUND: Although current guidelines recommend a 5 mm surgical margin for the excision of melanoma in situ (MIS), increasing evidence has shown this may be suboptimal to achieve tumor clearance.
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate margins required for optimal cure rates with excision of MIS on the head and neck and investigate tumor and/or patient factors in those requiring >5 mm margins to achieve tumor clearance.
    METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on 846 (807 primary and 39 recurrent) MIS cases on the head and neck treated in the authors\' dermatologic surgery department over a 126-month (10.5 year) period.
    RESULTS: Sixty-two percent were cleared with 5 mm margins. A total of 15 mm margins were required to achieve a 97% clearance rate. Difference in clearance rate between margin thresholds was significant (P < .001). Tumor location on the cheek and larger preoperative size correlated with requiring >5 mm margins to achieve tumor clearance (P = .006 and P = .001, respectively).
    CONCLUSIONS: This is a single-center retrospective study which relies on accurate documentation of clinical data.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that MIS on the head and neck often requires margins >5 mm margins to achieve tumor clearance. When Mohs micrographic surgery is not possible, excision margins of ≥10 mm are likely necessary for head and neck tumors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    患者报告的结果(PRO)描述了患者报告的整个医疗护理过程中患者经历的衡量标准(Mercieca-Bebber等。在患者关系结果测量中,2018)。存在各种PRO工具。鉴于缺乏组织框架,选择合适的仪器是具有挑战性的,该组织框架描述了皮肤病外科中所有可测量的PRO,并代表了哪些仪器测量了哪些结果。我们的目标是系统地审查皮肤病外科中所有经过验证的PRO仪器,并使用定性分析来开发代表PRO措施和仪器的组织框架。PubMed/MEDLINE,Embase,CINAHL,PsycINFO,和Cochrane数据库被搜索以检索皮肤科手术人群中经过验证的PRO仪器.使用持续的定性分析比较方法来开发代表皮肤病外科所有PRO的组织框架。所有仪器都被分类到这个框架中。搜索确定了3195篇文章;提取并定性分析了35种经过验证的仪器。组织框架将所有仪器分类为与美国国立卫生研究院患者报告结果测量信息系统(GershonRC,RothrockN,HanrahanR,etal(2010)在临床研究中使用PROMIS和评估中心提供患者报告的结果测量)。措施分为四类(期望,满意,生活质量,需求)描述患者如何体验这些结果以及研究人员可以通过它们进行评估的镜片。总之,我们提出了一个组织框架,用于选择经过验证的工具来开发和回答PRO研究问题。
    Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) describe measures of a patient\'s experience throughout medical care as reported by the patient (Mercieca-Bebber et al. in Patient Relat Outcome Meas, 2018). Various PRO instruments exist. It is challenging to select appropriate instruments given the absence of an organizational framework which describes all measurable PROs in dermatologic surgery and represents which instruments measure which outcomes. Our objective was to systematically review all validated PRO instruments in dermatologic surgery and use qualitative analysis to develop an organizational framework representing PRO measures and instruments. PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Cochrane databases were searched to retrieve validated PRO instruments in the dermatologic surgery population. The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis was used to develop an organizational framework representing all PROs in dermatologic surgery. All instruments were sorted into this framework. The search identified 3195 articles; 35 validated instruments were extracted and qualitatively analyzed. The organizational framework sorted all instruments into 36 PRO measures aligned with the National Institutes of Health Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (Gershon RC, Rothrock N, Hanrahan R, et al (2010) The use of PROMIS and assessment center to deliver patient-reported outcome measures in clinical research). Measures were grouped into four categories (expectations, satisfaction, quality of life, needs) describing how patients experience these outcomes and lenses through which researchers can evaluate them. In conclusion, we have proposed an organizational framework for use in choosing validated instruments to develop and answer PRO research questions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:关于活动限制的围手术期咨询对于接受皮肤科手术的患者至关重要。当前关于活动限制的术后指导可能不足,但这不能在不知道患者期望的情况下确定。研究目的是阐明患者对术后活动限制咨询的期望,并确定增加咨询是否会影响患者术前或术后的计划。
    方法:颈部切除的患者,躯干,或同一外科医生在一个日历年内在一个机构的四肢参加了电话调查。解决先前存在的活动级别的问题,手术后活动变化,收到的咨询数量,和围手术期咨询期望。多变量逻辑回归用于确定与患者对咨询的看法相关的因素,活动限制,和手术结果。
    结果:接受术后活动限制咨询的患者报告说,如果他们接受了额外的咨询,他们不太可能对他们的手术/个人时间表做出进一步的安排。相反也是正确的。当患者接受他们预期的咨询量时,他们不太可能想要重新安排手术或调整个人计划。年轻的患者和下肢手术的患者更有可能在更长的时间内限制他们的活动。
    结论:随着有关活动限制的说明变得更加透明,患者可以就他们的手术和个人时间表做出明智的决定.这项研究可以指导皮肤科外科医生调整术后指导,以提高患者对活动限制的认识,合规,以及他们手术经验的整体质量。
    Perioperative counseling regarding activity limitations is critical for patients undergoing dermatologic surgery. Current postoperative instructions regarding activity limitations may be inadequate, but this cannot be determined without knowing patient expectations. The study objective was to elucidate patient expectations for counseling on postoperative activity limitations and to determine if increased counseling would impact patient planning pre or postoperatively.
    Patients who had excisions on the neck, torso, or extremities at one institution in one calendar year by the same surgeon participated in a phone survey. Questions addressed preexisting activity level, activity changes after surgery, amount of counseling received, and perioperative counseling expectations. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with patient perceptions about counseling, activity limitations, and surgical outcomes.
    Patients counseled on postoperative activity limitations reported they were unlikely to have made further arrangements to their surgical/personavl schedule had they been given additional counseling. The inverse was also true. When patients received the amount of counseling they expected, they were less likely to want to reschedule surgery or adjust personal plans. Younger patients and those with surgery on the lower extremities were more likely to limit their activity for longer periods of time.
    As instructions on activity limitations become more transparent, patients can make informed decisions regarding their surgical and personal schedules. This study can guide dermatologic surgeons in adjusting postoperative instructions to improve patient understanding of activity limitations, compliance, and the overall quality of their surgical experience.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    耳廓的重建由于其难以接近和有限的组织灵活性而带来了挑战;但是,文献中没有关于该解剖部位应采用哪种重建技术的建议。这篇系统的综述旨在描述和比较该地区皮肤肿瘤外科手术后在耳甲碗重建中使用的重建技术。关于他们的并发症和美学结果。在这样做的时候,我们的目标是确定最适合的重建程序(S)的conchal碗。搜索的六个数据库(PubMed,Scopus,WebofScience,奥维德,SciELO,和CENTRAL)产生了12项符合条件的研究,这些研究探索了旋转门瓣,分裂厚度皮肤移植物(STSG),全层皮肤移植物(FTSG),第二个意图愈合,耳前易位皮瓣,皮下椎弓根移植物,和其他局部皮瓣。结果的定性综合得出结论,旋转门瓣可能是耳廓外耳的首选重建程序,皮肤癌切除后.坏死的风险很低,感染,术后出血,以及出色的美学效果。STSG可以用作替代方案。尽管如此,由于一些研究的样本量小,偏倚风险高,必须对此进行进一步调查。
    Reconstruction of the auricular concha poses a challenge due to its difficult access and limited tissue flexibility; however, there are no recommendations in the literature on which reconstructive technique should be favored for this anatomical site. This systematic review intends to describe and compare the reconstructive techniques used in conchal bowl reconstruction following cutaneous oncologic surgery of this region, with regard to their complications and aesthetic results. In doing so, we aim to identify the best suited reconstructive procedure(s) for the conchal bowl. The six databases searched (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Ovid, SciELO, and CENTRAL) yielded twelve eligible studies that explored the revolving door flap, split-thickness skin grafts (STSG), full-thickness skin grafts (FTSG), second intention healing, the preauricular translocation flap, subcutaneous pedicle grafts, and other local flaps. Qualitative synthesis of the results concluded that the revolving door flap could be the reconstructive procedure of choice for the auricular concha, following skin cancer excision. It has a low risk of necrosis, infection, and postoperative hemorrhage, as well as excellent aesthetic outcomes. STSG may be used as an alternative. Nonetheless, due to the low sample size and the high risk of bias in some studies, further investigations must be conducted on this subject.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    去除手部和手指上的皮肤恶性肿瘤可能导致难以闭合的手术缺陷。皮肤科医生不仅要有很高的技术,但也要了解该区域的复杂解剖结构,以执行重建,提供最佳的功能和美容效果。这篇综述强调了在该地区手术时必须考虑的关键解剖因素。下文讨论的伤口管理选项包括次要意图,初级线性修复,局部皮瓣,插值襟翼,和植皮。外科医生的选择是基于缺陷的大小,相邻皮肤松弛的存在/不存在,以及其他可能影响愈合的患者特异性因素,如医疗合并症,使用抗凝药物,和吸烟状况。该手稿是对手术治疗手和手指皮肤恶性肿瘤的医生的闭合注意事项和技术的最新回顾。
    Removal of cutaneous malignancies on the hand and fingers can result in challenging surgical defects to close. The dermatologic surgeon must not only be highly skilled, but also be knowledgeable regarding the complex anatomy of this area to perform reconstruction that provides optimal functional and cosmetic results. This review highlights key anatomic factors that must be considered when operating in this region. Wound management options discussed below include secondary intention, primary linear repair, local skin flaps, interpolation flaps, and skin grafting. The surgeon\'s choice is based on defect size, the presence/absence of adjacent skin laxity, and other patient-specific factors that may impact healing such as medical comorbidities, utilization of anticoagulant medications, and smoking status. This manuscript serves as an up-to-date review of closure considerations and techniques for physicians who surgically treat cutaneous malignancies of the hand and fingers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号