Landfilling is the least preferred method in the hierarchy of solid waste management options, but it is the most widely practiced option. Thus, identification of environmentally and economically suitable landfill sites should be of prime importance. The main objective of this study is to identify environmentally and economically suitable landfill sites using fuzzy analytical hierarchy process-based weighted linear combination model within a GIS environment. This study also used the DRASTIC-based groundwater vulnerability index and distance of landfills from densely populated areas to protect groundwater and reduce cost of transportation of solid waste which were not considered by the previous studies. Using the previously reported methods, a total of 132 landfill sites were found environmentally suitable in the study area. But, after applying DRASTIC-based groundwater vulnerability index, the number of environmentally suitable sites reduced to 95. When the proximity of the 95 sites to densely populated areas was considered to reduce waste transportation cost, the number of selected sites further reduced to 21 site and they can be considered the most environmentally and economically suitable landfill sites. This study will help the policy makers and the concerned SWM authorities to construct the engineered landfills at environmentally and economically suitable landfill sites in the study area and in other similar areas.

Groundwater vulnerability assessment has nowadays evolved into an essential tool towards proper groundwater protection and management, while the DRASTIC method is included among the most widely applied vulnerability assessment methods. However, the high uncertainty of the DRASTIC method mainly associated with the subjectivity in assigning parameters ratings and weights has driven many researchers to apply various methods for improving its efficiency. In this context, in the present study, different techniques were implemented with the aim of modifying the DRASTIC framework and thus enhancing its performance for groundwater vulnerability assessment in the Bouficha aquifer, Tunisia. In a first stage, the land use type (L) was incorporated as an additional parameter in the typical DRASTIC framework, thus taking into consideration the impact of anthropogenic activities on groundwater vulnerability. Subsequently, the rating and weighting systems of the developed DRASTIC-L framework were modified through the application of statistical methods (DRASTIC-L-SA) and genetic algorithms (GA) (DRASTIC-L-GA) in an attempt to investigate and compare both linear and nonlinear modifications. To evaluate the various vulnerability frameworks, correlation between vulnerability values and nitrate concentrations, expressed as Spearman\'s rank correlation coefficient (ρ) and Correlation Index (CI), was examined. The results revealed that the DRASTIC-L-GA framework developed by applying a fully GA-based optimization procedure provided the highest values in terms of the performance metrics used, making it the most suitable for the study area. In addition, the aquifer under study was found to be less vulnerable to pollution when employing the typical DRASTIC framework instead of the modified ones, leading to the conclusion that the former substantially underestimates pollution potential in the study area.

Groundwater is the main source of production and living in most arid and semi-arid areas, and it plays an increasingly critical role in achieving local urban development. There is a serious issue regarding the contradiction between urban development and groundwater protection. In this study, we used three different models to assess the groundwater vulnerability of Guyuan City, including DRASTIC model, analytical hierarchy process-DRASTIC model (AHP-DRASTIC) and variable weight theory-DRASTIC model (VW-DRASTIC). The groundwater vulnerability index (GVI) of the study area was calculated in ArcGIS. Based on the magnitude of GVI, the groundwater vulnerability was classified into five classes: very high, high, medium, low, and very low using the natural breakpoint method, and the groundwater vulnerability map (GVM) of the study area was drawn. In order to validate the accuracy of groundwater vulnerability, the Spearman correlation coefficient was used, and the results showed that the VW-DRASTIC model performed best among the three models (ρ=0.83). The improved VW-DRASTIC model shows that the variable weight model effectively improves the accuracy of the DRASTIC model, which is more suitable for the study area. Finally, based on the results of GVM combined with the distribution of F- and urban development planning, suggestions were proposed for further sustainable groundwater management. This study provides a scientific basis for groundwater management in Guyuan City, which can be an example for similar areas, particularly in arid and semi-arid areas.

A vulnerability assessment of the aquifers in the agricultural area of Zacharo in SW, Peloponnese, Greece, was conducted using the DRASTIC index and the susceptibility index (SI). Sensitivity analysis was conducted and thematic maps for each parameter were generated to analyse the impact of individual parameter on the collective groundwater vulnerability. Results derived from the DRASTIC and SI maps revealed that the extremely highly vulnerable zones are concentrated at three coastal sites in the western part of the study area. Data from these maps also indicate low vulnerability areas throughout the eastern part of the region. The distribution of nitrate concentrations in groundwater is better correlated with the DRASTIC (79.2%) compared to SI (60.2%). Neither method takes into consideration the impact of dilution and nitrate to ammonium reduction, on the nitrate content of groundwater, thus overestimating the vulnerability index. Moreover, the SI method overestimates the impact of olive groves\' land use type on the susceptibility index, thus resulting to a lower correlation with the observed nitrate concentrations.

An assessment of the intrinsic aquifer vulnerability of South America is presented. The outcomes represent the potential sensitivity of natural aquifers to leaching of dissolved compounds from the land surface. The study, developed at continental scale but retaining regionally a high resolution, is based on a critical application of the DRASTIC method. The biggest challenge in performing such a study in South America was the scattered and irregular nature of environmental datasets. Accordingly, the most updated information on soil, land use, geology, hydrogeology, and climate at continental, national, and regional scale were selected from international and local databases. To avoid spatial discrepancy and inconsistency, data were integrated, harmonized, and accurately cross-checked, using local professional knowledge where information was missing. The method was applied in a GIS environment to allow spatial analysis of raw data along with the overlaying and rating of maps. The application of the DRASTIC method allows to classify South America into five vulnerability classes, from very low to very high, and shows an overall medium to low vulnerability at continental scale. The Amazon region, coastal aquifers, colluvial Andean valleys, and alluvial aquifers of main rivers were the areas classified as highly vulnerable. Moreover, countries with the largest areas with high aquifer vulnerability were those characterized by extended regions of rainforest. In addition, a single parameter sensitivity analysis showed depth to water table to be the most significant factor, while a cross-validation using existing vulnerability assessments and observed concentrations of compounds in groundwater confirmed the reliability of the proposed assessment, even at regional scale. Overall, although additional field surveys and detailed works at local level are needed to develop effective water management plans, the present DRASTIC map represents an essential common ground towards a more sustainable land-use and water management in the whole territory of South America.