BACKGROUND: DNA methylation may have a regulatory role in monogenic sensorineural hearing loss and complex, polygenic phenotypic forms of hearing loss, including age-related hearing impairment or Meniere disease. The purpose of this systematic review is to critically assess the evidence supporting a functional role of DNA methylation in phenotypes associated with hearing loss.
RESULTS: The search strategy yielded a total of 661 articles. After quality assessment, 25 records were selected (12 human DNA methylation studies, 5 experimental animal studies and 8 studies reporting mutations in the DNMT1 gene). Although some methylation studies reported significant differences in CpG methylation in diverse gene promoters associated with complex hearing loss phenotypes (ARHI, otosclerosis, MD), only one study included a replication cohort that supported a regulatory role for CpG methylation in the genes TCF25 and POLE in ARHI. Conversely, several studies have independently confirmed pathogenic mutations within exon 21 of the DNMT1 gene, which encodes the DNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 1 enzyme. This methylation enzyme is strongly associated with a rare disease defined by autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia, deafness and narcolepsy (ADCA-DN). Of note, rare variants in DNMT1 and DNMT3A genes have also been reported in noise-induced hearing loss.
CONCLUSIONS: Evidence supporting a functional role for DNA methylation in hearing loss is limited to few genes in complex disorders such as ARHI. Mutations in the DNMT1 gene are associated with ADCA-DN, suggesting the CpG methylation in hearing loss genes deserves further attention in hearing research.

The abnormal expression of human DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) is closely related with the occurrence and development of a wide range of human cancers. DNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase-1 (DNMT1) is the most abundant human DNA methyltransferase and is mainly responsible for genomic DNA methylation patterns. Abnormal expression of DNMT1 has been found in many kinds of tumors, and DNMT1 has become a valuable target for the diagnosis and drug therapy of diseases. Nowadays, DNMT1 has been found to be involved in multiple cancers such as pancreatic cancer, breast cancer, bladder cancer, lung cancer, gastric cancer and other cancers. In order to achieve early diagnosis and for scientific research, various analytical methods have been developed for qualitative or quantitative detection of low-abundance DNMT1 in biological samples and human tumor cells. Herein, we provide a brief explication of the research progress of DNMT1 involved in various cancer types. In addition, this review focuses on the types, principles, and applications of DNMT1 detection methods, and discusses the challenges and potential future directions of DNMT1 detection.

Hereditary sensory neuropathy (HSN) 1E is a neurodegenerative disorder caused by pathogenic variants in DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1). It is characterised by sensorineural deafness, sensory neuropathy and cognitive decline. Variants in DNMT1 are also associated with autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia, deafness and narcolepsy.
A 42-year-old man presented with imbalance, lancinating pain, numerous paucisymptomatic injuries, progressive deafness since his mid-20s, mild cognitive decline and apathy. Examination revealed abnormalities of eye movements, distal sensory loss to all modalities, areflexia without weakness and lower limb ataxia. MRI brain and FDG-PET scan demonstrated biparietal and cerebellar atrophy/hypometabolism. Whole exome sequencing detected a heterozygous likely pathogenic missense variant in DNMT1, c.1289G > A, p.Cys430Tyr. Cochlear implant was performed at 44 years for the bilateral high frequency sensorineural hearing loss with improvement in hearing and day-to-day function.
We describe a novel variant in DNMT1 and confirm that an overlapping HSN1E-cerebellar phenotype can occur. Only one prior case of cochlear implant in HSN1E has been reported to date but this case adds to that literature, suggesting that cochlear implant can be successful in such patients. We further explore the clinical and radiological signature of the cognitive syndrome associated with this disorder.

We aimed to systematically evaluate the regulatory effect of arsenic on DNMTs and its downstream molecules in tumor cells and to provide a theoretical framework revealing the specific mechanism of arsenic in the treatment of tumors.
Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 and Stata 12.0, and differences between groups were described as standardized mean difference.
We found out that compared with the control group, the expression of DNMT1, DNMT3a, DNMT3b, MMP-9 & β-catenin decreased and the expression of RECK and E-cadherin increased in the arsenic-treated group. Subgroup analysis showed that high-dose arsenic exposure (> 2 μmol/L) reduced the expression of DNMT1, DNMT3b, MMP-9, and β-catenin and promoted the expression of E-cadherin. Arsenic could decrease the level of DNMT1, MMP-9 & β-catenin and increase the level of E-cadherin with short-time arsenic intervention (≤ 48 h). Arsenic could reduce DNMT1, DNMT3a, DNMT3b & β-catenin in hematological tumor cells; under the effect of arsenic, the expression of DNMT1, DNMT3b, MMP-9 & β-catenin decreased in solid tumor cells. In addition, the regulation of arsenic on DNMT3a was dose-dependent in the range of arsenic concentration from 0 to 5.0 μmol/L. The dose, time, and cell types of arsenic intervention were the variables of heterogeneity.
Arsenic could inhibit the proliferation and viability of tumor cells, and its mechanism may be related to the reduction of DNMTs and regulation of the expression of its downstream molecules. Overall, arsenic may be a promising candidate for the treatment of tumors.

Background: Approximately, one-third of adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are refractory to initial induction chemotherapy and relapse occurs in most patients who achieve remission. This study evaluates the efficacy of decitabine in the management of refractory or relapsed AML. Methods: After literature search in electronic databases (Google Scholar, Embase, Ovid, and PubMed) studies were selected by following pre-determined eligibility criteria. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to achieve effect sizes of complete remission (CR) rate, response rate (RR), and median survival after therapy. Subgroup analyses were performed with regards to use of decitabine with either epigenetics-based therapy, molecular therapy or chemotherapy. Results: Twenty studies were included (310 patients; age 55.1 years [95% confidence interval (CI): 43.8, 66.4]; 57% [52%, 63%] males). Overall RR was 46.1% [95% CI: 36.1%, 56.1%]. Overall CR rate was 23.5% [95% CI: 22.1%, 24.9%] but was 14.85% [95% CI: 3.8%, 25.9%] for decitabine with epigenetics-based therapies, 15.4% [95% CI: 6.7%, 24.0%] for decitabine with immunotherapy or molecular therapy, 34.8% [95% CI: 18.7%, 50.9%] for decitabine with chemotherapy, and 37.5% [36.4%, 38.7%] for decitabine with chemotherapy and molecular therapy. Median survival was 7.2 months [95% CI: 5.17, 9.3]. Major adverse events were neutropenia, nausea/vomiting, infections, fatigue, febrile neutropenia, diarrhea, thrombocytopenia, anemia, anorexia, leukopenia, hemorrhage, and hyperglycemia. Conclusion: Decitabine in combination with chemotherapy or molecular therapy has shown efficacious properties in refractory or relapsed AML patients.

DNA methylation plays a pivotal role in the etiology of cancer by mediating epigenetic silencing of cancer-related genes. Since the relationship between aberrant DNA methylation and cancer has been understood, there has been an explosion of research at developing anti-cancer therapies that work by inhibiting DNA methylation. From the discovery of first DNA hypomethylating drugs in the 1980s to recently discovered second generation pro-drugs, exceedingly large number of studies have been published that describe the DNA hypomethylation-based anti-neoplastic action of these drugs in various stages of the pre-clinical investigation and advanced stages of clinical development. This review is a comprehensive report of the literature published in past 40 years, on so far discovered nucleosidic DNA methylation inhibitors in chronological order. The review will provide a complete insight to the readers about the mechanisms of action, efficacy to demethylate and re-express various cancer-related genes, anti-tumor activity, cytotoxicity profile, stability, and bioavailability of these drugs. The review further presents the far known mechanisms of primary and secondary resistance to azanucleoside drugs. Finally, the review highlights the ubiquitous role of DNA hypomethylating epi-drugs as chemosensitizers and/or priming agents, and recapitulate the combinatorial cancer preventive effects of these drugs with other epigenetic agents, conventional chemo-drugs, or immunotherapies. This comprehensive review analyzes the beneficial characteristics and drawbacks of nucleosidic DNA methylation inhibitors, which will assist the pre-clinical and clinical researchers in the design of future experiments to improve the therapeutic efficacy of these drugs and circumvent the challenges in the path of successful epigenetic therapy.

BACKGROUND: Increasing studies showed that abnormal changes in single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of DNMTs (DNMT1, DNMT3A and DNMT3B) were associated with occurrence or decrease of various tumors. However, the associations between DNMTs variations and gastric cancer (GC) risk were still conflicting. We aimed to assess the effect of DNMTs polymorphisms on the susceptibility to GC.
METHODS: Firstly, we did a meta-analysis for 7 SNPs (rs16999593, rs2228611, rs8101866 in DNMT1, rs1550117, rs13420827 in DNMT3A, rs1569686, rs2424913 in DNMT3B). Four genetic models (homozygote, heterozygote, dominant and recessive model) were used. Moreover, a meta-sensitivity and subgroup analysis was performed to clarify heterogeneity source. Lastly, 17 SNPs that couldn\'t be meta-analyzed were presented in a systematic review.
RESULTS: 20 studies were included, 13 studies could be meta-analyzed and 7 ones could not. Firstly, a meta-analysis on 13 studies (3959 GC cases and 5992 controls) for 7 SNPs showed that GC risk increased in rs16999593 (heterozygote model: OR 1.36, 95%CI 1.14-1.61; dominant model: OR 1.36, 95%CI 1.15-1.60) and rs1550117 (homozygote model: OR 2.03, 95%CI 1.38-3.00; dominant model: OR 1.20, 95%CI 1.01-1.42; recessive model: OR 1.96, 95%CI 1.33-2.89) but decreased in rs1569686 (dominant model: OR 0.74, 95%CI 0.61-0.90). The remaining SNPs were not found associated with GC risk. Furthermore, the subgroup analysis indicated that for rs1550117 and rs1569686, the significant associations were particularly found in people from Chinese Jiangsu province (rs1550117, OR 1.77, 95%CI 1.25-2.51; rs1569686, OR 0.48, 95%CI 0.36-0.64) and that PCR-RFLP was a sensitive method to discover significant associations (rs1550117, OR 1.77, 95%CI 1.25-2.51; rs1569686, OR 0.49, 95%CI 0.37-0.65). Lastly, a systematic review on 7 studies for 17 SNPs suggested that rs36012910, rs7560488 and rs6087990 might have a potential effect on GC initiation.
CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis demonstrated that rs16999593 and rs1550117 could contribute to GC risk and that rs1569686 might be a protective factor against gastric carcinogenesis. By using these SNPs as biomarkers, it is feasible to estimate the risk of acquiring GC and thus formulate timely preventive strategy.

Epigenetics is heritable and reversible alterations of gene expression without direct alteration of DNA sequences. One example of epigenetic factors is DNA methylation, which prevents certain genes from being expressed. Another example is histone modifications. In addition, miRNAs can silence genes at transcriptional and posttranscriptional level. DNA methylation is regulated by DNA methyltransferases (DNMT1, DNMT3a, and DNMT3b). Aberrant DNMTs expression is the dominant mechanism for the genome instability which associates with a wide range of diseases such as a cancer, autoimmune diseases, mental disorders. In this article we reviewed the major mechanisms of changes of DNA methylation regulated by DNMTs and the role of this changes in pathogenesis of various diseases. In addition we briefly reviewed epigenetic agents, such as inhibitors of DNA methyltransferases or HDAC (histone deacetylase) targeting oncology, hematology, immunology, and neurologic disease indications, and which are in various phases of study or have been clinically tested and approved by FDA (Food and Drug Administration).