OBJECTIVE: To identify the association between the dietary carbohydrate indexes, such as dietary glycemic index (DGI) and load (DGL), dietary insulin index (DII) and load (DIL), with the possibility of cataract.
METHODS: This case-control study consisted of 101 new cases of cataract and 202 controls. DGI and DGL were computed through DGI values previously published. DII was also calculated based on dietary insulin index data published previously.
RESULTS: There was a significant positive association between the highest quartiles of DGI (OR = 6.56; 95% CI = 2.67-16.06; P < 0.001), DGL (OR = 6.17; 95% CI = 1.93-19.37; P = 0.002) and DIL (OR = 4.17; 95% CI = 1.41-12.27; P = 0.004) with risk of cataract, compared to those on the lowest quartile, but not for DII (OR = 0.85; 95% CI = 0.39-1.86; P = 0.82). Furthermore, after stratifying groups by BMI, a significant direct association between highest quartile of DGI (OR = 6.76; 95% CI = 2.49-18.38; P < 0.001) and DGL (OR = 3.45; 95% CI = 0.96-12.37; P = 0.05) with risk of cataract was evident in individuals with elevated BMI (BMI≥25).
CONCLUSIONS: We found a significant, direct, relationship between DGI, DGL and DIL with risk of cataract. However, the association between DII and the risk of cataract was not significant, even after adjusting for related confounders.

Background: In previous studies, diet has been shown to be associated with cataract. However, no study to date has focused on the association between inflammatory potential of diet and cataract.
OBJECTIVE: In this case-control study conducted in Iran, we examined the association of the dietary inflammatory index (DII®) and cataract.
METHODS: This case-control study included 97 cataract cases and 198 healthy controls hospitalized for acute non-neoplastic diseases with the control group matched according to age (with a five-year interval) and sex with the case group. The DII was computed based on dietary intake assessed by a previously validated food frequency questionnaire. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs), with the DII analyzed as both continuous and as tertiles. Energy was adjusted using the residual method.
RESULTS: Subjects with higher DII scores (i.e., with a more pro-inflammatory diet) had a higher odds of cataract, with the DII being used as both a continuous variable (ORcontinuous 1.51, 95% confidence interval, CI, 1.13 - 2.03; one unit increase corresponding to ≈18% of its range in the current study) and as tertiles (ORtertile3vs1 2.67, 95%CI 1.32 - 5.48, Ptrend = 0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that a pro-inflammatory diet is associated with increased risk of cataract. Additional studies should be conducted to further explore this association.

The putative relationship between diet, including its inflammatory potential, and breast cancer has been studied extensively, but results remain inconsistent. Using data from a large Italian case-control study conducted between 1991 and 1994, we examined the association between the dietary inflammatory index (DII) and odds of breast cancer.
DII scores were computed using a validated 78-item food frequency questionnaire. Subjects were 2569 women with incident, histologically confirmed breast cancer and 2588 controls admitted to hospital for acute, non-hormone-related diseases. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) based on continuous and quintiles of DII were estimated by multiple logistic regression adjusting for age, study center, education, BMI, parity, menopausal status, family history of hormone-related cancers, and total energy intake.
Women in quintiles 2, 3, 4 and 5 had ORs of breast cancer of 1.33 (95% CI: 1.11, 1.59), 1.37 (95% CI: 1.13, 1.66), 1.41 (95% CI: 1.15, 1.73), and 1.75 (95% CI: 1.39, 2.21), respectively, compared to women in quintile 1. One-unit increase in DII increased the odds of having breast cancer by 9% (95% CI: 1.05, 1.14).
A pro-inflammatory diet is associated to increased risk of breast cancer.